User:Fyyer/Sandbox: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Morphy began as an unknown in the European chess scene, with very few of his games being seen by top players of that time, and those that were seen were disregarded. Because of his age and strength of opposition in his own country, opinion on him in Europe wasn't that which it was in America. |
Morphy began as an unknown in the European chess scene, with very few of his games being seen by top players of that time, and those that were seen were disregarded. Because of his age and strength of opposition in his own country, opinion on him in Europe wasn't that which it was in America. |
||
:"It is quite possible that Mr. Morphy may become a second La Bourdonnais, but he cannot have the strength his admiring countrymen wish to believe. Chess requires many long years of attentive study, and frequent play with the best players, and neither of these your friend has had. Depend upon it he will find European amateurs very different opponents |
:"It is quite possible that Mr. Morphy may become a second La Bourdonnais, but he cannot have the strength his admiring countrymen wish to believe. Chess requires many long years of attentive study, and frequent play with the best players, and neither of these your friend has had. Depend upon it he will find European amateurs very different opponents from those he has hitherto encountered." |
||
from those he has hitherto encountered." |
|||
Due to his success in the American Chess Congress, many felt confident they had a player strong enough to challenge the best players abroad and that he should be supported by the American Chess Association to make those challenges. Initially, there were problems with travel. European opinion was that they should not have to make the journey to America to play a young upstart. |
|||
<blockquote> |
|||
<p>"The American Chess Association, it is reported, are about to challenge any player in Europe to contest a match with the young victor in the late passage at arms, for from $2,000 to $5,000 a side, the place of meeting being New York. If the battle-ground were to be London or Paris, there can be little doubt, we apprehend, that a European champion would be found ; but the best players in Europe are not chess professionals, but have other and more serious avocations, the interests of which forbid such an expenditure of time as is required for a voyage to the United Stats and back again."</p> |
|||
<p>—''[[Illustrated London News]]''</p> |
|||
</blockquote> |
|||
Due to his success in the American Chess Congress, America had felt confident they had a player strong enough to challenge the best European players. |
|||
Staunton was later criticised for avoiding a match with Morphy. Staunton is known to have been working on his edition of the complete works of [[William Shakespeare|Shakespeare]] at the time, but he also competed in a chess tournament during Morphy's visit. Staunton later blamed Morphy for the failure to have a match, suggesting among other things that Morphy lacked the funds required for match stakes—a most unlikely charge given Morphy's popularity. |
Staunton was later criticised for avoiding a match with Morphy. Staunton is known to have been working on his edition of the complete works of [[William Shakespeare|Shakespeare]] at the time, but he also competed in a chess tournament during Morphy's visit. Staunton later blamed Morphy for the failure to have a match, suggesting among other things that Morphy lacked the funds required for match stakes—a most unlikely charge given Morphy's popularity. |
Revision as of 01:48, 23 June 2011
Europe
Morphy began as an unknown in the European chess scene, with very few of his games being seen by top players of that time, and those that were seen were disregarded. Because of his age and strength of opposition in his own country, opinion on him in Europe wasn't that which it was in America.
- "It is quite possible that Mr. Morphy may become a second La Bourdonnais, but he cannot have the strength his admiring countrymen wish to believe. Chess requires many long years of attentive study, and frequent play with the best players, and neither of these your friend has had. Depend upon it he will find European amateurs very different opponents from those he has hitherto encountered."
Due to his success in the American Chess Congress, many felt confident they had a player strong enough to challenge the best players abroad and that he should be supported by the American Chess Association to make those challenges. Initially, there were problems with travel. European opinion was that they should not have to make the journey to America to play a young upstart.
"The American Chess Association, it is reported, are about to challenge any player in Europe to contest a match with the young victor in the late passage at arms, for from $2,000 to $5,000 a side, the place of meeting being New York. If the battle-ground were to be London or Paris, there can be little doubt, we apprehend, that a European champion would be found ; but the best players in Europe are not chess professionals, but have other and more serious avocations, the interests of which forbid such an expenditure of time as is required for a voyage to the United Stats and back again."
Staunton was later criticised for avoiding a match with Morphy. Staunton is known to have been working on his edition of the complete works of Shakespeare at the time, but he also competed in a chess tournament during Morphy's visit. Staunton later blamed Morphy for the failure to have a match, suggesting among other things that Morphy lacked the funds required for match stakes—a most unlikely charge given Morphy's popularity.
Seeking new opponents, Morphy crossed the English Channel to France. At the Café de la Régence in Paris, the center of chess in France, he played a match against Daniel Harrwitz, the resident chess professional, soundly defeating him.
In Paris, Morphy suffered from a bout of intestinal influenza. In accordance with the medical wisdom of the time, he was treated with leeches, resulting in his losing a significant amount of blood. Although too weak to stand up unaided, Morphy insisted on going ahead with a match against the visiting German master Adolf Anderssen, considered by many to be Europe's leading player. Despite his illness Morphy triumphed easily, winning seven while losing two, with two draws. When asked about his defeat, Anderssen claimed to be out of practice, but also admitted that Morphy was in any event the stronger player and that he was fairly beaten. Anderssen also attested that in his opinion, Morphy was the strongest player ever to play the game, even stronger than the famous French champion La Bourdonnais.
Both in England and France, Morphy gave numerous simultaneous exhibitions, including displays of blindfold chess in which he regularly played and defeated eight opponents at a time. Morphy played a well-known casual game against the Duke of Brunswick and Count Isouard at the Italian Opera House in Paris.