Jump to content

User talk:Logan: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
On another note...: new section
Line 48: Line 48:
== On another note... ==
== On another note... ==


Do you/did you edit the [[lady gaga]] article? Maybe that's why I was confused, other than the fact Legolas and Logan begin with vowels. Ha [[User:Tommy2010|<font color="gray">Tom</font>]][[User talk:Tommy2010|my!]] 21:33, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Do you/did you edit the [[lady gaga]] article? Maybe that's why I was confused, other than the fact Legolas and Logan begin with L and vowels. Ha [[User:Tommy2010|<font color="gray">Tom</font>]][[User talk:Tommy2010|my!]] 21:33, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:34, 16 May 2011

1.75 RPM according to RedWarn. Bot is down.
Ampil (ΤαικCοnτribυτιοns) 08:58, 1 November 2024 (UTC) - update[reply]


The Signpost: 9 May 2011

Hello, Logan. You have new messages at Methecooldude's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Putting i . . .

Hello, Logan — you may have overlooked my post above, "Putting in a Link". Looking for your assistance. Thank you. Theherald1000 (talk) 22:55, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK Nom

Hi. I've nominated Music Beta by Google, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. Pesky (talkstalk!) 04:33, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much, Pesky! Logan Talk Contributions 01:02, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

sorry

I just wanted to say sorry for trying 2 help —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cornishgame (talkcontribs) 13:07, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion message

You recently posted this message on my talk page. I know the message was posted by a script, but I find the tone of it rather patronising (You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages), and I have suggested to the script's "owner" that it be revised. In addition, perhaps you should think twice before, in effect, templating an experienced user in good standing. – ukexpat (talk) 13:08, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I overturned your non-admin closure of this discussion and closed it as "delete" for the reason given there. Closers should weigh the arguments presented, and in this case, the only "weak keep" opinion did not provide a useful analysis of the notability of the article according to our guidelines. Regards,  Sandstein  07:34, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay - I personally didn't see consensus, especially with that loaded "Neutral" rationale, but that's fine with me. Logan Talk Contributions 11:38, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sandstein, I disagree. I think that Logan made the right call to close as No Consensus, and that the article, while in poor condition, should not have been deleted in it's final revision. Logan I would suggest you consider filing this article for Deletion Review, if you care to. Evilphoenix Talk 00:24, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On another note...

Do you/did you edit the lady gaga article? Maybe that's why I was confused, other than the fact Legolas and Logan begin with L and vowels. Ha Tommy! 21:33, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]