User talk:Abd: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:03, 1 May 2011

indef blocked

So, you've been asking for it, I'll do you the favour. Block extended to indef for systematic block/ban evasion. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:07, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Will you please state which edits you are blocking me for. All of them? One of them? What?

By the way, does this fourth block protect the wiki? After all, I was already blocked. Seems to me that the goal here is "Do what I say, or else!" Sorry, but with your third block of me (one admin against the Powers of Evil!), you destroyed my will to cooperate, so, unless something changes, I'm not cooperating any more, period. Except, of course, in respecting the right of the community to ban, that's why the self-reversion, you have nothing to clean up, and if you want to waste time pushing a block button for the fifth time, with the IP, etc. that's your choice. I'm not making you do that.

The community can eliminate the cooperation part of this. Self-reversion is what I'll do until it is very substantially sanctioned. This was the first sanction from self-reversion (which includes self-identification for helping with ban enforcement). Natural consequences, FP. Reward good edits by at least ignoring them, when they are obviously harmless at worst (already reverted!), and very useful at best (archive fixed!), you'll get more good edits. Punish them with range blocks, even though the content is not disruptive, and even if it were, not harmful because self-reverted, which is just an efficient on-wiki substitute for making suggestions by email or on Wikipedia Review or whatever, then the cooperation will eventually stop and SPI and all that waste of time will start, and still be ineffective wheel-spinning. Do what you wish, and as long as the community permits it, the community is responsible. I'll be judged by what you have done, you by what you have done.

Fair? --Abd (talk) 21:25, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 22:03, 1 May 2011 view source Abd (talk \| contribs) 14,259 edits →indef blocked: add a little ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:03, 1 May 2011 view source Abd (talk \| contribs) 14,259 edits m →indef blocked: fmt Next edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:The community can eliminate the cooperation part of this. Self-reversion is what I'll do until it is very substantially sanctioned. This was the first sanction from self-reversion (which includes self-identification for helping with ban enforcement). Natural consequences, FP. Reward good edits by at least ignoring them, when they are obviously harmless at worst (already reverted!), and very useful at best (archive fixed!), you'll get more good edits. Punish them with range blocks, even though the content is not disruptive, and even if it were, not harmful because self-reverted, which is just an efficient on-wiki substitute for making suggestions by email or on Wikipedia Review or whatever, then the cooperation will eventually stop and SPI and all that waste of time will start, and still be ineffective wheel-spinning. Do what you wish, and as long as the community permits it, the community is responsible. I'll be judged by what you have done, you by what you have done.		:The community can eliminate the cooperation part of this. Self-reversion is what I'll do until it is very substantially sanctioned. This was the first sanction from self-reversion (which includes self-identification for helping with ban enforcement). Natural consequences, FP. Reward good edits by at least ignoring them, when they are obviously harmless at worst (already reverted!), and very useful at best (archive fixed!), you'll get more good edits. Punish them with range blocks, even though the content is not disruptive, and even if it were, not harmful because self-reverted, which is just an efficient on-wiki substitute for making suggestions by email or on Wikipedia Review or whatever, then the cooperation will eventually stop and SPI and all that waste of time will start, and still be ineffective wheel-spinning. Do what you wish, and as long as the community permits it, the community is responsible. I'll be judged by what you have done, you by what you have done.

	Fair? --[[User:Abd\|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd#top\|talk]]) 21:25, 1 May 2011 (UTC)		:Fair? --[[User:Abd\|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd#top\|talk]]) 21:25, 1 May 2011 (UTC)