Jump to content

Freethought: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Deist (talk | contribs)
There is no debate over theism, there is one over deism.
weight of evidence
Line 2: Line 2:
[[fr:libre-pensée]]
[[fr:libre-pensée]]


'''Freethought''' is the view of a ''freethinker''. A ''freethinker'' is a person who forms opinions on the basis of [[reason]] independently of [[authority]], especially somebody who is skeptical about [[religion|religious]] [[dogma]].
'''Freethought''' is the view of a ''freethinker''. A ''freethinker'' is a person who forms opinions on the basis of [[reason]] independently of [[authority]], especially somebody who is skeptical about [[religion|religious]] [[dogma]]. Freethinkers believe that the weight of evidence for any form of religion is insufficient.


The definition by the [[Freedom From Religion Foundation]] (references) as
The definition by the [[Freedom From Religion Foundation]] (references) as


:'''free-think-er n. ''' ''a person who forms opinions about religions on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include [[atheist]]s, [[agnostic]]s, [[Rationalism|rationalists]], and [[Universism|universists]].''
:'''free-think-er n. ''' ''a person who forms opinions about religions on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include [[atheist]]s, [[agnostic]]s, [[Rationalism|rationalists]], and [[Universism|universists]].''


There are strong ties between the word ''freethought'' and the terms ''[[atheism]]'', ''[[heresy | heretic]]'', ''[[skepticism]]'', and both ''[[humanism]]'' and ''[[secular humanism]]'', but these terms are not synonymous. A precise definition is at best difficult, as ''freethought'' is defined differently by different persons. For example, in principle, one could be a freethinker and simultaneously believe in the existence of a [[God]], provided the basis for that belief was rational argument, rather than arguments from authority, tradition, or scripture. Some atheist freethinkers, however, believing that there are no rational arguments for [[deism]], are reluctant to accept the claims of deists to be freethinkers.
There are strong ties between the word ''freethought'' and the terms ''[[atheism]]'', ''[[heresy | heretic]]'', ''[[skepticism]]'', and both ''[[humanism]]'' and ''[[secular humanism]]'', but these terms are not synonymous. A precise definition is at best difficult, as ''freethought'' is defined differently by different persons. For example, in principle, one could be a freethinker and simultaneously believe in the existence of a [[God]], provided the basis for that belief was rational argument, rather than arguments from authority, tradition, or scripture. Some atheist freethinkers, however, believing that there are no rational arguments for [[deism]], are reluctant to accept the claims of deists to be freethinkers.

Revision as of 19:47, 5 June 2004


Freethought is the view of a freethinker. A freethinker is a person who forms opinions on the basis of reason independently of authority, especially somebody who is skeptical about religious dogma. Freethinkers believe that the weight of evidence for any form of religion is insufficient.

The definition by the Freedom From Religion Foundation (references) as

free-think-er n. a person who forms opinions about religions on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics, rationalists, and universists.

There are strong ties between the word freethought and the terms atheism, heretic, skepticism, and both humanism and secular humanism, but these terms are not synonymous. A precise definition is at best difficult, as freethought is defined differently by different persons. For example, in principle, one could be a freethinker and simultaneously believe in the existence of a God, provided the basis for that belief was rational argument, rather than arguments from authority, tradition, or scripture. Some atheist freethinkers, however, believing that there are no rational arguments for deism, are reluctant to accept the claims of deists to be freethinkers.

A related movement is that of the "Brights", a term coined in 2003 by Paul Geisert of Sacramento, California to refer to people who hold a naturalistic worldview, free of supernatural and mystical elements. A similar movement advocates the term Universist and notably includes deists.

See also: The Godless Americans PAC


Free thinker also describes an individual independent of established or dogmatic political/social/intellectual views.