User talk:Kj650: Difference between revisions
→Reference desk: WP:BLP is still a problem, too, even with the changed version of the question. |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Also, in addition to the opinions problem, even if the question has any explicit reference to the survivor removed, any "yes" answers would still imply something major and negative about the survivor, resulting in a [[WP:BLP]] problem. It's just not an appropriate question. [[User:Red Act|Red Act]] ([[User talk:Red Act|talk]]) 17:46, 2 November 2010 (UTC) |
Also, in addition to the opinions problem, even if the question has any explicit reference to the survivor removed, any "yes" answers would still imply something major and negative about the survivor, resulting in a [[WP:BLP]] problem. It's just not an appropriate question. [[User:Red Act|Red Act]] ([[User talk:Red Act|talk]]) 17:46, 2 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
mind your own business. did your family kill themselves or something? |
|||
Revision as of 18:20, 2 November 2010
almost every answer on here is a "opinion"
Reference desk
Look, I've already explained to you why the question is no good. You've done 3 reverts today [1] [2] [3] , any more and you'll go over the 3 revert rule: see Wikipedia:3RR#The_three-revert_rule What I'm doing isn't vandalism, and if you're intellegent enough to speak english you will be intelligent enough to realise that too.Sf5xeplus (talk) 17:30, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Also, in addition to the opinions problem, even if the question has any explicit reference to the survivor removed, any "yes" answers would still imply something major and negative about the survivor, resulting in a WP:BLP problem. It's just not an appropriate question. Red Act (talk) 17:46, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
mind your own business. did your family kill themselves or something?