User talk:DARTH SIDIOUS 2

---

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Davina McCall, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gawaxay (talk • contribs • count) 19:07, 11 June 2010 (UTC) Incomplete rollback, not vandalism. Gawaxay (talk • contribs • count) 19:19, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Your comment on my talk page

I was going through the history trying to see why I reverted you, but my edits seem to have disappeared. I think you might have done an incomplete revert and changed the vandalism instead of removing it. Gawaxay (talk • contribs • count) 19:12, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

I see, this appeared to be vandalism. I think you did an incomplete revert. Gawaxay (talk • contribs • count) 19:14, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

If that's the case, you should think about getting a tool like Twinkle; it "rolls back" to the last revision by a different editor. Gawaxay (talk • contribs • count) 19:17, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Why edit conflict?

I gave a reason - it is unsourced trivia and overly detailed. I was trying to clean up this article. Why did you revert this material?--85.65.99.40 (talk) 09:11, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Why

Why is it you admins keep deleting my edits and dont email me or fix my page? donnylong at xxxfilmjobs.com thanks, donny long —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.154.230.125 (talk) 09:50, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

New section

my updates on jimi hendrix were properly cited and referenced with a page number as well. here is a direct link to a quote in the book. http://books.google.com/books?id=JB1W2dn31rwC&pg=PA468&lpg=PA468&dq=%22Mike+was+terribly+upset+at+the+thought+of+Jimi+not+being+able+to+get+through+to+him%22&source=bl&ots=zNfJfMrW4A&sig=a-IDGCA3M5AeucrTSooZa2m5zMo&hl=en&ei=J_E6TNj6DYOC8gbGh42mBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CBUQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22Mike%20was%20terribly%20upset%20at%20the%20thought%20of%20Jimi%20not%20being%20able%20to%20get%20through%20to%20him%22&f=false —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.144.10.191 (talk) 11:43, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

When warning

I have noticed that you tend to revert alot of IP vadalism, and you seem to be pretty fast at it too, but when you are giving an IP a first warning, remember to put the month and year as the header like this ==July 2010==. If you just forgot, disregard thiss message from me. Thanks. Mrlittleirish 08:04, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

It's all good, I didn't mean to sound patronising. Happy editing. :) Mrlittleirish 09:06, 15 July 2010 (UTC

Sorry to have used such a strategy (Carlo Cudicini) but as I stated I have done this several times properly over the last couple of years, I have noted it requires locking due to obtuse people who refuse to read the source but it's never listened to. What am I supposed to? Every time I do it properly it gets changed back to it's incorrect status! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.188.17.194 (talk • contribs)

To the unsigned poster above - firstly, you can register an account and leave comments so people know who to talk to. Secondly, you can read the talk page for the debated article you're talking about. Thirdly, you could at least sources provided by other people too. DS2 - keep up the good work!--Trhoult (talk) 09:40, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, thanks. :) DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 10:38, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Reverting anonymous users blanking their talk page

Per WP:USER, anonymous users have the same right to remove messages from their talk page as registered users. Please don't go around reverting them and telling them not to do it.--Atlan (talk) 13:07, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Yes, see WP:BLANKING for the part of the guideline that says that. Any information can be found in the page history so it's not lost anyway.--Atlan (talk) 10:51, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.-- œ^™ 05:23, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar awarded!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Keep up the good work :) œ™ 05:37, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Man, huge thanks! :) DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 08:27, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Matthew Koon

Hi, sorry about the vandalism to Matthew Koon. It is my nephew thinking he's being funny, so wanted to bring this to your attention as he's using my internet connection and I don't want to get blocked. Crazy-dancing (talk) 14:50, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

New Section

but man, fluminense is a brazillian team, rival of botafogo (my team), and they have edited botafogo's page too, check Current Squad http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botafogo_de_Futebol_e_Regatas — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.67.44.111 (talk • contribs)

Edit on Thornton Donovan page

You recently deleted the edit on Thornton Donovan School's page. While I understand it could be viewed as a joke, it is actually true. The school consists of grades K-12 and the individual I mentioned graduated from the 8th grade class in 2005, thus making her an alumni, albeit not a high school alumni. And a simple google search by yourself will reveal it to be true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.124.237.85 (talk) 18:40, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

HEY

start explaining why you keep deleting funny jokes and nice edits by funny users huh? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.163.18.131 (talk) 05:46, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Help

A parent notified us of a wikipedia page on Spencerport High School which has hundreds of mistakes and looks like a user was intentionally libeling us. I created an account and tried to delete at least some of the offending content, but keep getting a warning. Please advise.

14:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spencerport_High_School

I love you

thank you for showing me the error of my ways, i promise to stop vandalizing wikipedia in i will stop those criminals out there that do. so what are you doing later? asl? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.235.230.191 (talk) 18:58, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

ok i dont know what i am doin grant u that

i would like to to take out the study that talks about MCS that talks about MCS suferers not being able to tell ne smell from another. the group was only 44 people not enough people tobe talking about any thing!!!! If they tested 1000 people ok but 44 i dont think so. It offends me as a person with MCS. MCS is now recognized by the SSA, FHUD and the ADA. the CDC will take forever to classfi it, they cant get anything done down there. they havent come out about mold making so sick either. so can u take it off please??????????????? i have no study to ref..... so u wont let me do it. thanksNemo3333 (talk) 18:39, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

why did you revert me???

Neo-Nazi influence

The 82nd as a unit did not promote Neo-Nazi influence. This page is for what the unit did, not crimes individuals committed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony.spiers (talk • contribs)

Reverting

When I revert, can you not warn the user, I was just about to do that with the vandalism. As you can see in the page history. Thanks Látches ^{Lets talk!} 16:16, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Fine, don't worry about it Látches ^{Lets talk!} 18:49, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Geographic information system

I removed the references as they were merely science spam that we see more and more these days. some scientists just add their publication everywhere and the references were in no way core readings on semantics and gis. can we please remove them and ensure that wikipedia stays an encyclopedia and not just a good source for pagerank. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.72.197.212 (talk) 19:05, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Huggle

Hi, I see your are editing right now and so am I, there is so much vandalism on wikipedia. Why do you not see all this on Recent Changes. I was wondering if you can see any mistakes i'm making, i'm asking because im new to Huggle. Mr.Kennedy1 ^talk 14:49, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Your bot's edits to Above (artist)

Hi, you reverted my removal of some interwiki links that weren't correct. You left me a message saying to use a edit summary explaining the content removal. I definitely did provide a summary... I'm a long time contributor with about 10,000 edits. I am an admin on other Wikimedia sites such as Commons. I didn't realize I wasn't logged in, but I'm sadden to see how poorly we treat anons. Take a look at this and put yourself in my position. Imagine if this was my first time trying to help Wikipedia be better... 71.155.236.183 (talk) 18:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Unbelievable. You still haven't even looked at the edits... or the history. The edit summaries would tell you exactly why I removed content. I thought you were bot because it such mindless reverting. 71.155.236.183 (talk) 18:38, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

I replied on my page since another user has commented. 71.155.236.183 (talk) 18:58, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

... for reverting the vandalism on my user page this morning. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:32, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Always happy to undo some vandalism. :) DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 11:46, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

I want to work

In case there is any work for me ... do let me know. Is this a free service or there is a commercial benefit involved in this ?? pl suggest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.177.185.255 (talk) 14:44, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Re: The Libertine changes

The changes I made were quite obvious in the film. I can't help that others cannot intuit as I can. Since this is not a biographical entry, only a film synopsis/analysis, it is not libelous to anyone, merely the true conclusions that can be drawn from the innuendo in the film. You would be robbing the public of useful insights should you maintain the reversion of my edits. Please consider this duly. Follow up: I have made the changes again, yet with subtler language and less controversial assumption; I have also added a slight change in the Plot Synopsis section that acts as proof the some of the claims you had reversed for lack of evidence. This should help, though my above reasoning still applies.--Cory Parkinson, Composer (ASCAP)/Pianist/Vocalist (talk) 01:01, 30 August 2010 (UTC) (added after I logged in to my account, which admittedly, I do not use often to make my contributions. Forgive me.)

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.216.182.208 (talk) 00:44, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 

Thanks alot

Thanks for the barnstar, and np on the user page vandal revert, I'm sure you would have done the same. ;) I would have replied sooner but I was on the WP:ANI trying to sort out a questionable user that was persistently messing up (in good faith though) the John Cena article.  Fyyer  16:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

how is what i wrote on the demographics of virginia- considered vandilism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.110.209.189 (talk) 15:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

New Section

yes, I might have been to rude and angry... I'll think how to avoid such condemnation to hell in future... But anyway those links to celibacy must be there so people do not go to hell anyway... So I wonder... I was trying to prevent from sin, and others say that I am doing wrong... What is this???? Hare Krishna — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.132.83.216 (talk • contribs)

[1] Symptoms Strongly believes that all users are equal but admins are more equal than others Assumes bad faith frequently TLAitis (see WP:WOTTA) Stops editing articles, but continuously pontificates about "writing the encyclopedia" Impatience Exhibits immediatism Hangs out in project namespace Has no time for featured articles Frequently refreshes pages to catch the latest change that (of course) needs to be reverted Believes that he or she is always right (sorry, EVula...) Believes anyone who uses the word 'vote' for 'express a view in a straw poll' should be banned for life Originally hailed as the nicest person on the wiki, now reviled as the most hated troll Prevents pages from being edited in encyclopedic fashion for policy reasons Seems to enjoy biting new users General BOFHness Strict adherence to "Wikipedia policy" while not using common sense or conversely, Strict adherence to ignore all rules, as a strict rule... while not using common sense Self-denial. "This page cannot possibly apply to me" Humor breakdown. "This page is not funny" Sudden spike in use of specific admin tools, or use of admin tools in areas where he hadn't been using them before Requires less and less evidence to be convinced of sock puppetry until confidently asserting that all new users are the same person Spends hours writing sarcastic pages about admin behavior Believes he is the only real claimant to the "Defender of the Wiki" barnstar Exhibits signs of MPOV Thinks people are attacking them when they're only trying to be nice Has a habit of removing criticism while pretending it's a personal attack Indulges in biting delicious newcomers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.132.83.216 (talk) 17:05, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Just forget it... I might have also been wrong anyway... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.132.83.216 (talk) 17:08, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: Libertine

Thanks mate, I right appreciate it, I do. I have a bit of an informed perspective of bisexuality and other LGBT concepts, if you know what I mean. I take time to watch films many times and then add what insight I can, not unlike what Rochester accomplishes with Lizzy Barry in the film itself. I do not hold a grudge against you for doing your job, although I must say the bit about libel was a bit preposterous...anyway, just wanted to let you know I am here to do good and to serve the people of the world, and that it is not me you have to worry about. I promise you that. Fondly, CP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Corypark (talk • contribs) 22:32, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Re:

Thanks so much. I always endeavor to contribute as much as I can to the wikipedia community, and thus the world, correcting vandalism should I come across it, and to keep editing it till its done right. I'd love to be a moderator on here...I applied once but since I made all my edits anonymously, I had nothing to my name account here. Now that I use it exclusively, maybe I can apply again soon. I love doing the grunt work, don't get me wrong, I just am natural suited to be a leader...thanks again for your help, and happy surfing!--CP Cory Parkinson, Composer (ASCAP), Pianist/Vocalist (talk) 12:33, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Four (film)

Just to let you know I reverted the edit you made reverting the blanking of this page, since it was blanked by the only significant contributor to the article. I've marked it as g7 accordingly. I'm not sure if this is actually valid while the article is at AfD, but the CSD doesn't state that as an exception so it seems to be. If you something I don't, feel free to revert and let me know why. Thanks. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 14:27, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, DARTH SIDIOUS 2. You have new messages at Giftiger wunsch's talk page.
Message added 14:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, DARTH SIDIOUS 2. You have new messages at Alpha Quadrant's talk page.
Message added 16:22, 3 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

New Section

for cryin out loud, i'm trying to fix the foundation public school page, stop removing my edits.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.159.211.224 (talk) 17:07, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

CryoBurn

All the new information is from the CryoBurn book. I just wanted to enter it while it's still fresh in my mind from the ARC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.193.145.63 (talk • contribs)

Talk:Tegakkan_Bendera_Kita

Foreign-language comments on a talk page do not make the article or the talkpage elligible for speedy deletion. I have consequently declined your CSD tag. Regards Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 09:00, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Le Corbeau

Hi, I noticed you reverted an edit as vandalism, not doubt in good faith. I left a message at talk:Le Corbeau and would welcome your input. Superp (talk) 10:47, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Logical Disk Manager

Not a test, but to let the reader know what the article is aimed at. --222.35.83.115 (talk) 13:58, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Neeeeargh!

Who are you to go against WAAAArio? You probably from that stupid Mushroom Kingdom! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.84.185.61 (talk) 19:12, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

RE: RE: Neeeeargh!

Don't you play dumb with Waaaario! You make-a my page less glorious! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.84.185.61 (talk) 19:22, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Since when are the ladies tugging on my handsome mustache an opeenion? It says so in the Diamond City Times! You're just in league with that Mario! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.84.185.61 (talk) 19:33, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Revert on chickenhawk (politics)

I think you got this one wrong. Dick Cheney is normally known as Dick, not Richard. You might want to withdraw your warning on User talk:67.248.122.223. Grafen (talk) 08:44, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

G7

Hi Darth, when the sole author of an article blanks it then its best to give it a {{G7}}} tag. As the tag says "the author of the only substantial content has requested deletion in good faith, either explicitly or by blanking the page". ϢereSpielChequers 11:24, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

I know, and I have done like that many times. Only this time I first didn't notice that the one blanking it was the sole author, and after noticing it, I didn't want to go and revert my own edits anymore, just to put there g7. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 15:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

OK, easily missed and not a problem, but would you mind reverting the warning that you gave that editor? They've had a wall of warnings from various people but not all were warranted. ϢereSpielChequers 16:11, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Bah. I thought I had done that already. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:15, 5 September 2010 (UTC)