Wikipedia:Picture peer review/LonarMeteoriteCrater: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m Signing comment by 210.18.83.86 - "" |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* Interesting picture, but there are problems with technical quality and encyclopedic value. The two main problems with this picture are that it doesn't show the entire subject, and that it seems underexposed. If you shot in [[Raw image format|RAW]], you might be able to solve this second problem by increasing the exposure compensation. I'm afraid fixing the first problem would require you to stitch a multi-shot panorama to achieve the wider field of view. [[User:NotFromUtrecht|NotFromUtrecht]] ([[User talk:NotFromUtrecht|talk]]) 07:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC) |
* Interesting picture, but there are problems with technical quality and encyclopedic value. The two main problems with this picture are that it doesn't show the entire subject, and that it seems underexposed. If you shot in [[Raw image format|RAW]], you might be able to solve this second problem by increasing the exposure compensation. I'm afraid fixing the first problem would require you to stitch a multi-shot panorama to achieve the wider field of view. [[User:NotFromUtrecht|NotFromUtrecht]] ([[User talk:NotFromUtrecht|talk]]) 07:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
**I understand what you are talking about. The original picture was actually exposed slightly more but the sky was too bright which is why I edited the picture to underexpose it. Could you help me get the right exposure level for this? I have submitted this picture in Wikipedia Graphic Lab but I haven't seen any responses yet. |
**I understand what you are talking about. The original picture was actually exposed slightly more but the sky was too bright which is why I edited the picture to underexpose it. Could you help me get the right exposure level for this? I have submitted this picture in Wikipedia Graphic Lab but I haven't seen any responses yet. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/210.18.83.86|210.18.83.86]] ([[User talk:210.18.83.86|talk]]) 08:11, 7 April 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
;Seconder: |
;Seconder: |
||
Revision as of 08:11, 7 April 2010
This is a good picture of the meteorite crater at Lonar shot with a wide angle and it clearly shows the crater as well as the vegetation surrounding it.
- Articles this image appears in
- [Lonar]
- Creator
- ganeshrg
- Suggested by
- Ganeshrg (talk) 06:48, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comments
- Interesting picture, but there are problems with technical quality and encyclopedic value. The two main problems with this picture are that it doesn't show the entire subject, and that it seems underexposed. If you shot in RAW, you might be able to solve this second problem by increasing the exposure compensation. I'm afraid fixing the first problem would require you to stitch a multi-shot panorama to achieve the wider field of view. NotFromUtrecht (talk) 07:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
- I understand what you are talking about. The original picture was actually exposed slightly more but the sky was too bright which is why I edited the picture to underexpose it. Could you help me get the right exposure level for this? I have submitted this picture in Wikipedia Graphic Lab but I haven't seen any responses yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.18.83.86 (talk) 08:11, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
- Seconder