User talk:Qaqwewew: Difference between revisions
Amorymeltzer (talk | contribs) |
m request |
||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
|text = '''It has been established that you engaged in [[Wikipedia:Sock puppet|sockpuppetry]]''' by evidence presented here:<br />[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Qaqwewew]], and you are therefore [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] {{#ifeq:1 month|indefinite|indefinitely.|for a period of 1 month. You're welcome to make ''useful'' contributions after the block expires.}}<br />If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. {{#if:yes|~ <font color="#FF0099">Amory</font><font color="#555555"><small> ''([[User:Amorymeltzer|u]] • [[User talk:Amorymeltzer|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Amorymeltzer|c]])''</small></font> 14:18, 4 March 2010 (UTC)}} <!-- Template:SockmasterProven --> |
|text = '''It has been established that you engaged in [[Wikipedia:Sock puppet|sockpuppetry]]''' by evidence presented here:<br />[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Qaqwewew]], and you are therefore [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] {{#ifeq:1 month|indefinite|indefinitely.|for a period of 1 month. You're welcome to make ''useful'' contributions after the block expires.}}<br />If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. {{#if:yes|~ <font color="#FF0099">Amory</font><font color="#555555"><small> ''([[User:Amorymeltzer|u]] • [[User talk:Amorymeltzer|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Amorymeltzer|c]])''</small></font> 14:18, 4 March 2010 (UTC)}} <!-- Template:SockmasterProven --> |
||
}}{{do not delete}} |
}}{{do not delete}} |
||
{{unblock|I was wondering if my block of one month could be reviewed because, I did not read Wikipedia policy which I know is wrong but I had no idea their was rules against more than one account. Also none of these accounts were use to move arguements in my favor. None of the accounts in question were ever used during the same time. After not being able to access and use a account I had made I went back and created another to continue my contribution to Wikipedia. I did not know how to delete previously created accounts so they where still there. I would like to have the block on my ability to edit restored because I have made alot of positive contributions to Wikipedia. I also think his block will greatly stop my ability to help on Wikipedia because if I cannot edit I cannot help improve Wikipedia articles. I hope you see this and I will make sure to read Wikipedia's policy and continue to positively contribute to Wikipedia.}} |
Revision as of 22:08, 6 March 2010
|
Blocked for one month - See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Qaqwewew
It has been established that you engaged in sockpuppetry by evidence presented here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Qaqwewew, and you are therefore blocked for a period of 1 month. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:18, 4 March 2010 (UTC) |
Qaqwewew (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was wondering if my block of one month could be reviewed because, I did not read Wikipedia policy which I know is wrong but I had no idea their was rules against more than one account. Also none of these accounts were use to move arguements in my favor. None of the accounts in question were ever used during the same time. After not being able to access and use a account I had made I went back and created another to continue my contribution to Wikipedia. I did not know how to delete previously created accounts so they where still there. I would like to have the block on my ability to edit restored because I have made alot of positive contributions to Wikipedia. I also think his block will greatly stop my ability to help on Wikipedia because if I cannot edit I cannot help improve Wikipedia articles. I hope you see this and I will make sure to read Wikipedia's policy and continue to positively contribute to Wikipedia. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I was wondering if my block of one month could be reviewed because, I did not read Wikipedia policy which I know is wrong but I had no idea their was rules against more than one account. Also none of these accounts were use to move arguements in my favor. None of the accounts in question were ever used during the same time. After not being able to access and use a account I had made I went back and created another to continue my contribution to Wikipedia. I did not know how to delete previously created accounts so they where still there. I would like to have the block on my ability to edit restored because I have made alot of positive contributions to Wikipedia. I also think his block will greatly stop my ability to help on Wikipedia because if I cannot edit I cannot help improve Wikipedia articles. I hope you see this and I will make sure to read Wikipedia's policy and continue to positively contribute to Wikipedia. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I was wondering if my block of one month could be reviewed because, I did not read Wikipedia policy which I know is wrong but I had no idea their was rules against more than one account. Also none of these accounts were use to move arguements in my favor. None of the accounts in question were ever used during the same time. After not being able to access and use a account I had made I went back and created another to continue my contribution to Wikipedia. I did not know how to delete previously created accounts so they where still there. I would like to have the block on my ability to edit restored because I have made alot of positive contributions to Wikipedia. I also think his block will greatly stop my ability to help on Wikipedia because if I cannot edit I cannot help improve Wikipedia articles. I hope you see this and I will make sure to read Wikipedia's policy and continue to positively contribute to Wikipedia. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}