Wikipedia:Picture peer review/WingsOfADragonfly: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
JJ Harrison (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*I would appreciate it if someone can critique this image and carry out any improvements, if necessary on this image. I am happy with the contrast and sharpness on this but if any of you think it can be improved, please go ahead and do it. I would be grateful. |
*I would appreciate it if someone can critique this image and carry out any improvements, if necessary on this image. I am happy with the contrast and sharpness on this but if any of you think it can be improved, please go ahead and do it. I would be grateful. |
||
** Whilst the image has some asthetic value it is not particularly sharp, there is some CA and the main subject is not entirely in focus. There are lots of images on the dragonfly page that show as much detail in the wings but also have the body visible. You also need to include the image in an article to be eligiable for featured picture status. [[User:Noodle snacks|Noodle snacks]] ([[User talk:Noodle snacks|talk]]) 05:42, 15 November 2008 (UTC) |
** Whilst the image has some asthetic value it is not particularly sharp, there is some CA and the main subject is not entirely in focus. There are lots of images on the dragonfly page that show as much detail in the wings but also have the body visible. You also need to include the image in an article to be eligiable for featured picture status. [[User:Noodle snacks|Noodle snacks]] ([[User talk:Noodle snacks|talk]]) 05:42, 15 November 2008 (UTC) |
||
***I've uploaded an alternative version of it. You can see it on the image page or here: [[Image:Wings of a dragonfly2.jpg]] |
|||
;Seconder: |
;Seconder: |
||
* |
* |
||
Revision as of 06:46, 15 November 2008
This macro shot clearly emphasises the intricate pattern on the wings of a dragonfly.
- Creator
- Ganeshrg
- Nominated by
- Ganeshrg (talk) 05:28, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- I would appreciate it if someone can critique this image and carry out any improvements, if necessary on this image. I am happy with the contrast and sharpness on this but if any of you think it can be improved, please go ahead and do it. I would be grateful.
- Whilst the image has some asthetic value it is not particularly sharp, there is some CA and the main subject is not entirely in focus. There are lots of images on the dragonfly page that show as much detail in the wings but also have the body visible. You also need to include the image in an article to be eligiable for featured picture status. Noodle snacks (talk) 05:42, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- I've uploaded an alternative version of it. You can see it on the image page or here:
- I've uploaded an alternative version of it. You can see it on the image page or here:
- Whilst the image has some asthetic value it is not particularly sharp, there is some CA and the main subject is not entirely in focus. There are lots of images on the dragonfly page that show as much detail in the wings but also have the body visible. You also need to include the image in an article to be eligiable for featured picture status. Noodle snacks (talk) 05:42, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Seconder