Template talk:Human rights: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Split template or collapse subsections: yes it matters, it is when try to use it it is overwhelming |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Does it matter if the thing is always collapsed by default anyway? It's only large when opened... [[User:Tkn20|Tkn20]] ([[User talk:Tkn20|talk]]) 16:43, 27 May 2008 (UTC) |
:Does it matter if the thing is always collapsed by default anyway? It's only large when opened... [[User:Tkn20|Tkn20]] ([[User talk:Tkn20|talk]]) 16:43, 27 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
::Yes it does matter, what good is something that is hard to use only when you try to use it? It is when it is expanded that it gets overwhelming. The purpose of navigational templates is to make it easy to get around, not cram in everything [[Wikipedia:Navigational_templates#Navigational templates provide navigation]]. This template has too much on it to be easily comprehended. Any one of the major sections is a bit on the large side for an easy to use navigational template, together it is just too much. |
|||
::The examples on the navigational templates page show ways of making collapsible sections. I think splitting it into a few templates (as listed above) with collapsible sections would make it manageable. (Even with judicious editing there is probably just too much here for one template.) [[User:Zodon|Zodon]] ([[User talk:Zodon|talk]]) 08:59, 29 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 08:59, 29 May 2008
Footer
Does anyone think we should do a section just on the UN, then break down into other international, regional, and multilateral bodies? The UN is the gold standard on human rights. I'm thinking it might help. Thoughts? Phyesalis (talk) 05:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Split template or collapse subsections
This template is overwhelmingly large, it would probably be easier to use if split into several templates (e.g. Concepts & Philosophies; Organisations; Legal instruments; and Concepts that may be considered as human rights). Or at least make the major subsections individually collapsible (and start out collapsed, so can reveal as needed). Zodon (talk) 00:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Does it matter if the thing is always collapsed by default anyway? It's only large when opened... Tkn20 (talk) 16:43, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yes it does matter, what good is something that is hard to use only when you try to use it? It is when it is expanded that it gets overwhelming. The purpose of navigational templates is to make it easy to get around, not cram in everything Wikipedia:Navigational_templates#Navigational templates provide navigation. This template has too much on it to be easily comprehended. Any one of the major sections is a bit on the large side for an easy to use navigational template, together it is just too much.
- The examples on the navigational templates page show ways of making collapsible sections. I think splitting it into a few templates (as listed above) with collapsible sections would make it manageable. (Even with judicious editing there is probably just too much here for one template.) Zodon (talk) 08:59, 29 May 2008 (UTC)