Template talk:Human rights: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Split template or collapse subsections: new section |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
This template is overwhelmingly large, it would probably be easier to use if split into several templates (e.g. Concepts & Philosophies; Organisations; Legal instruments; and Concepts that may be considered as human rights). Or at least make the major subsections individually collapsible (and start out collapsed, so can reveal as needed). [[User:Zodon|Zodon]] ([[User talk:Zodon|talk]]) 00:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC) |
This template is overwhelmingly large, it would probably be easier to use if split into several templates (e.g. Concepts & Philosophies; Organisations; Legal instruments; and Concepts that may be considered as human rights). Or at least make the major subsections individually collapsible (and start out collapsed, so can reveal as needed). [[User:Zodon|Zodon]] ([[User talk:Zodon|talk]]) 00:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
:Does it matter if the thing is always collapsed by default anyway? It's only large when opened... [[User:Tkn20|Tkn20]] ([[User talk:Tkn20|talk]]) 16:43, 27 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:43, 27 May 2008
Footer
Does anyone think we should do a section just on the UN, then break down into other international, regional, and multilateral bodies? The UN is the gold standard on human rights. I'm thinking it might help. Thoughts? Phyesalis (talk) 05:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Split template or collapse subsections
This template is overwhelmingly large, it would probably be easier to use if split into several templates (e.g. Concepts & Philosophies; Organisations; Legal instruments; and Concepts that may be considered as human rights). Or at least make the major subsections individually collapsible (and start out collapsed, so can reveal as needed). Zodon (talk) 00:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Does it matter if the thing is always collapsed by default anyway? It's only large when opened... Tkn20 (talk) 16:43, 27 May 2008 (UTC)