Jump to content

Talk:Stargate fandom: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 17: Line 17:
I noticed that Gateworld covers news on Battlestar Galactica even though it is not Stargate related. Why is that?--[[User:The Shadow Treasurer|The Shadow Treasurer]] ([[User talk:The Shadow Treasurer|talk]]) 06:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that Gateworld covers news on Battlestar Galactica even though it is not Stargate related. Why is that?--[[User:The Shadow Treasurer|The Shadow Treasurer]] ([[User talk:The Shadow Treasurer|talk]]) 06:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
:GateWorld has always covered other scifi shows. It was just in the early 2000s that the focus was changed to Stargate, but they are still reporting about the other shows on their respective subpages. &ndash; [[User:Sgeureka|sgeureka]] <sup>[[User_talk:Sgeureka|t]]•[[Special:Contributions/Sgeureka|c]]</sup> 11:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
:GateWorld has always covered other scifi shows. It was just in the early 2000s that the focus was changed to Stargate, but they are still reporting about the other shows on their respective subpages. &ndash; [[User:Sgeureka|sgeureka]] <sup>[[User_talk:Sgeureka|t]]•[[Special:Contributions/Sgeureka|c]]</sup> 11:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

== This article is an ad ==

Umm, this article is an advertisement for a website. Is this allowed these days? I'm confused since an article of the same nature I posted once was removed.

Revision as of 22:09, 25 April 2008

Template:Stargateproject

Timing

Does this mean 5:33am GMT? Simply south 17:10, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't put entire links on the page, it results in the page looking messy and cluttered, please use [] on the ends of links Disturbed_uk 16:54, 11 January 2007

It mentions 2,000,000 million posts. Surely this should be just '2,000,000'?

GateWorld Play

Is anyone going to write anything about this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.164.166.209 (talk) 18:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Battlestar Galactica

I noticed that Gateworld covers news on Battlestar Galactica even though it is not Stargate related. Why is that?--The Shadow Treasurer (talk) 06:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GateWorld has always covered other scifi shows. It was just in the early 2000s that the focus was changed to Stargate, but they are still reporting about the other shows on their respective subpages. – sgeureka tc 11:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article is an ad

Umm, this article is an advertisement for a website. Is this allowed these days? I'm confused since an article of the same nature I posted once was removed.