Wikipedia:Picture peer review/PanoramaOfDouglasBay: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
unsigned comment |
→Douglas Bay Panorama: comment on image |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
;Comments: |
;Comments: |
||
*Zoomed out, it looks amazing. When I look at it full size, it could be me, but it seems a tad grainy. I like the bird off to the left side of the picture, though. <small>Preceding unsigned comment by [[User:Elephantissimo|Elephantissimo]] 00:34, 10 April 2008</small> |
*Zoomed out, it looks amazing. When I look at it full size, it could be me, but it seems a tad grainy. I like the bird off to the left side of the picture, though. <small>Preceding unsigned comment by [[User:Elephantissimo|Elephantissimo]] 00:34, 10 April 2008</small> |
||
*Thanks for your nomination. This is a good photo and useful for Wikipedia, but even at image page size I can see some problems that would prevent it succeeding at FPC (I haven't opened it fullsize, so correct me if I'm wrong). Clear stitching joins are evident between images, mainly visible as the brightness changes from section to section across the image - this happens continually and is possibly due to using auto settings on the camera while you took the originals. I also think I see stitching errors in the clouds, particularly about 1/6 way in from the left. The horizon has a funny uneven look to it, and looks to tilt downwards to the right - again this could be due to stitching errors. I wonder if it would be worth trying to adjust the originals so brightness was more consistent and trying a restitch. --[[User:Jjron|jjron]] ([[User talk:Jjron|talk]]) 10:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
;Seconder: |
;Seconder: |
||
Revision as of 10:34, 10 April 2008
This is a photograph of the Douglas bay on a nice bright day. It is a very large photograph and clearly shows a number of buildings on the Harris Promenade and The Tower of Refuge.
- Nominated by
- Ganeshrg (talk) 14:24, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- Zoomed out, it looks amazing. When I look at it full size, it could be me, but it seems a tad grainy. I like the bird off to the left side of the picture, though. Preceding unsigned comment by Elephantissimo 00:34, 10 April 2008
- Thanks for your nomination. This is a good photo and useful for Wikipedia, but even at image page size I can see some problems that would prevent it succeeding at FPC (I haven't opened it fullsize, so correct me if I'm wrong). Clear stitching joins are evident between images, mainly visible as the brightness changes from section to section across the image - this happens continually and is possibly due to using auto settings on the camera while you took the originals. I also think I see stitching errors in the clouds, particularly about 1/6 way in from the left. The horizon has a funny uneven look to it, and looks to tilt downwards to the right - again this could be due to stitching errors. I wonder if it would be worth trying to adjust the originals so brightness was more consistent and trying a restitch. --jjron (talk) 10:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Seconder