Okay answer me this...why is male circumcision found under Circumcision on Wikipedia, and female circumcision is called Female Genital Cutting. Well, some people (doctors) call those clitoradectomies and labieadectomies not Female Genital Cutting. Why aren't they calling circumcision..Male Genital Cutting, this is what some countries call it. My point is...it's biased and nobody on Wikipedia seems to care. There are benefits to female circumcision but a full two sentences are written on it on the Wikipedia page. The male circ page is ALL about the medical rationale to cut/mutilate a penis. The entire thing is an advertisement. And by the way, UNAIDS and the WHO is from the same organization, the United Nations. I don't know if you knew that or not. The UN could have 20 different organizations and they would all support the official UN line. Then there would be (according to you) 20 different "international" organizations. Well, here you go.. the European Journal of Medical, British Academy of Medicine both say Circumcision does NOT decrease HIV. Is that anywhere to be found? Nobody talks about that on Wikipedia. I'm not trying to change the Entire article, I am trying to add an ounce of balance and everyone (including you) don't think it's a good idea. Why? And why can't circumcision be called Male Genital Cutting, like female circumcision is labeled as? Or female circumcision actually called...FEMALE CIRCUMCISION.. WOW! What a radical idea!! I look forward to your response. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/70.114.38.167|70.114.38.167]] ([[User talk:70.114.38.167|talk]]) 20:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Okay answer me this...why is male circumcision found under Circumcision on Wikipedia, and female circumcision is called Female Genital Cutting. Well, some people (doctors) call those clitoradectomies and labieadectomies not Female Genital Cutting. Why aren't they calling circumcision..Male Genital Cutting, this is what some countries call it. My point is...it's biased and nobody on Wikipedia seems to care. There are benefits to female circumcision but a full two sentences are written on it on the Wikipedia page. The male circ page is ALL about the medical rationale to cut/mutilate a penis. The entire thing is an advertisement. And by the way, UNAIDS and the WHO is from the same organization, the United Nations. I don't know if you knew that or not. The UN could have 20 different organizations and they would all support the official UN line. Then there would be (according to you) 20 different "international" organizations. Well, here you go.. the European Journal of Medical, British Academy of Medicine both say Circumcision does NOT decrease HIV. Is that anywhere to be found? Nobody talks about that on Wikipedia. I'm not trying to change the Entire article, I am trying to add an ounce of balance and everyone (including you) don't think it's a good idea. Why? And why can't circumcision be called Male Genital Cutting, like female circumcision is labeled as? Or female circumcision actually called...FEMALE CIRCUMCISION.. WOW! What a radical idea!! I look forward to your response. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/70.114.38.167|70.114.38.167]] ([[User talk:70.114.38.167|talk]]) 20:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
and yes i agree. Some statements should be given more weight than others. Is my ONE sentence too much? I'm only trying to add one sentence. Why are people allowed to just keep deleting it and they're not called "aggressively edit warring." If they want to put my sentence somewhere else on the article, why don't they? Why delete a perfectly understandable, citied fact? [[Special:Contributions/70.114.38.167|70.114.38.167]] ([[User talk:70.114.38.167|talk]]) 20:46, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
The Status Bot has beenblocked. See my last edit here.
I am a bibliomaniac (figuratively, of course), and my lucky number is 15. As far as I know, only starry.dreams knows my true identity. User:Grammar-check is an alternate account I use for the most gnomish things; I have not used it much lately. Because I like to play video games, I have an account at StrategyWiki, Meta, Simple, Wookieepedia, and the Wikia Wiki on Harry Potter. My sister is User:XtraCredit, so contact me if she's riding up your rear. :)
If you'd like to ask me questions or request something, I am an administrator. I am usually online from 22-4 UTC, assuming it is Daylight Savings Time.
Welcoming newcomers.- go to for log of new users. I click on this link at least once a day and welcome whoever is on the top, even though they haven't made any edits yet.
[1] - The Wikback. A remarkable place for discussing Wikipedia. Almost always more on task than IRC. Good for people who like to argue policy.
Okay answer me this...why is male circumcision found under Circumcision on Wikipedia, and female circumcision is called Female Genital Cutting. Well, some people (doctors) call those clitoradectomies and labieadectomies not Female Genital Cutting. Why aren't they calling circumcision..Male Genital Cutting, this is what some countries call it. My point is...it's biased and nobody on Wikipedia seems to care. There are benefits to female circumcision but a full two sentences are written on it on the Wikipedia page. The male circ page is ALL about the medical rationale to cut/mutilate a penis. The entire thing is an advertisement. And by the way, UNAIDS and the WHO is from the same organization, the United Nations. I don't know if you knew that or not. The UN could have 20 different organizations and they would all support the official UN line. Then there would be (according to you) 20 different "international" organizations. Well, here you go.. the European Journal of Medical, British Academy of Medicine both say Circumcision does NOT decrease HIV. Is that anywhere to be found? Nobody talks about that on Wikipedia. I'm not trying to change the Entire article, I am trying to add an ounce of balance and everyone (including you) don't think it's a good idea. Why? And why can't circumcision be called Male Genital Cutting, like female circumcision is labeled as? Or female circumcision actually called...FEMALE CIRCUMCISION.. WOW! What a radical idea!! I look forward to your response. Thanks. 70.114.38.167 (talk) 20:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
and yes i agree. Some statements should be given more weight than others. Is my ONE sentence too much? I'm only trying to add one sentence. Why are people allowed to just keep deleting it and they're not called "aggressively edit warring." If they want to put my sentence somewhere else on the article, why don't they? Why delete a perfectly understandable, citied fact? 70.114.38.167 (talk) 20:46, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
