User talk:Filelakeshoe

edit count | edit summary usage

Deletion Review for Alkonost (band)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Alkonost (band). Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Óðinn (talk) 04:30, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

For the rollback. #include Green Lantern oath -- Zsero (talk) 17:15, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

No probs! - Zeibura ^{( talk )} 17:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

3RR on Rue

Care to comment/rule on this? Also see the discussion on the talk page regarding the issue. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 20:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Prominence

I have nominated Wikipedia:PROMINENCE for deletion because it is an underhanded way to twist policy to suit one's own interpretation. Feel free to comment. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 22:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Protection of lolcats

Hi, Zeibura. I appreciate the need to protect lolcats, as an edit war was currently ongoing. Would you consider, however, fully protecting the page? It seems unfair to semi-protect the article, as it excludes the anonymous editors, and lets the registered editors continue to edit (despite the fact that they were also engaging in edit warring).

Thanks for your consideration, Iamunknown 05:50, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks :) --Iamunknown 15:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Question

I wanted to ask, how did it feel fixing your nominator's statement? :) Acalamari 22:08, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh, it was no bother. :) I just found it funny, that's all. Acalamari 22:34, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Ultraexactzz is now an Administrator

My RfA was successful, and closed with 44 Supports, 6 Opposes, and 1 Neutral. For your support, you have my thanks - I fully intend to live up to the lofty yet not-a-big-deal responsibility you have granted me. For those who opposed my candidacy, I value your input and advice, and hope that I may prove worthy of your trust. Special thanks to both Rudget and bibliomaniac15 for their expert coaching and guidance. I look forward to serving the project, my fellow editors, the pursuit of higher knowledge, et cetera, et cetera. Again, you have my thanks. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 01:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

8th London WIkipedia Meetup: POSTPONED!

Hi! I've decided to postpone the meetup pending a new date, as too many regulars / people who signed up have said that they will not likely make it. Please go over to the talk page and let's discuss a new date! Poeloq (talk) 01:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Rollback request

Thank you! κaτaʟaveno^T_C 13:43, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks from Happy-melon

I just wanted to say thanks for your support for my RfA, which closed (74/2/0) this morning. Your comment and support was very much appreciated. Happy‑melon 14:58, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

ATT: ZEIBURA

vandalism again at neuro article. pls check recent history, my undo of some vandal talk.

best, rob.

Kridian —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kridian (talk • contribs) 20:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Techno

Template:Techno has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Stifle (talk) 13:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ferdinando Pisani

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ferdinando Pisani, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferdinando Pisani. Thank you. Edcolins (talk) 20:06, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Can a cool admin help a guy out? I want to add one sentence to the world of Wikipedia. But I can't. The sentence is factual, provable, reliable (I chose the New York Times version.)

Circumcision may decrease a man's risk of getting HIV but it may also INCREASE a man's risk of getting herpes and chlamydia. (and some doctors even say other STD's too but I won't get into that and I wouldn't put caps on INCREASE.)

The article on circumcision mentions the term HIV probably 100 times (I'm not joking) and mentions "herpes" or "chlamydia" not Once. Click on the article. You tell me if it's an article on the procedure or a pro-circumcision propaganda pamphlet.

Can a cool admin stop two guys named Avraham and Jakew (the site's dictators) from deleting my one sentence I want to add? Or possibly get new Admins to take over this article, which has fallen way below Wikipedia standards. And if people's edits are automatically deleted, people won't want to get a user name and contribute in the future.

here's the New York Times piece... http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9C07E4D91F3AF931A35757C0A961958260&fta=y

I used to love Wikipedia until I went to add a sentence, you know? Well, thanks. 70.114.38.167 (talk) 07:05, 17 February 2008 (UTC)