Jump to content

User talk:Skatewalk: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m spelling
Skatewalk (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 30: Line 30:


It doesn't appear [[user:neil]] is listening to us here. there is a process to ask for a review by another admin. If Skatewalk was really a proficient puppeteer, he wouldn't be posting here either. He would have got another IP and would have been back in circulation. Obviously, he's not. Oh that other user with two sockpuppets was blocked for a week. Or so I"ve read from wikireview.''Godspeed John Glenn!'' [[User:Will314159|Will]] 20:30, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
It doesn't appear [[user:neil]] is listening to us here. there is a process to ask for a review by another admin. If Skatewalk was really a proficient puppeteer, he wouldn't be posting here either. He would have got another IP and would have been back in circulation. Obviously, he's not. Oh that other user with two sockpuppets was blocked for a week. Or so I"ve read from wikireview.''Godspeed John Glenn!'' [[User:Will314159|Will]] 20:30, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Will, but the problem is that I can't post anywhere, except for this page, so I really can't ask for a review by another admin. The Arab wiki-project has one Admin and he was involved in a car accident one day before I was banned, talk about some coincidence!--[[User:Skatewalk|Skatewalk]] 22:12, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:12, 20 September 2007

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

It is abundantly clear this account is a sockpuppet of banned user Serenesoulnyc (see Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Serenesoulnyc). It has been indefinitely blocked. Neil  10:28, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Why I am blocked?

  • I am not related User: Serenesoulnyc sockpuppet in anyway, but there is no point of arguing with a ban-happy admin!
  • My IP address only belongs to me, I was blocked because Zerida claims my IP came from the same area another Arab user was blocked.
  • (Zerida blocked 20+ members using the same Serenesoulnyc excuse! simply because they corrected her fabricated articles!).
  • I hope Wikipedia has an impartial admin to examine Zerida false claims!

The Message?

Any Arab wikipedia-user who tries to correct a biased Anti-Arab article will not be tolerated! And he will be labeled as a sockpuppet.--Skatewalk 03:26, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is ridiculous, how can a personal skirmish between the two turn into Skatewalk being "indefinitely blocked"? There's no valid evidence for him being a "sock puppet". Is it really that hard to believe that two Arabs from within the same IP range could have the same urge to remove anti-Arab bias from Arab related pages? Heck, I could be his sock puppet too!Funkynusayri 05:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Compare this punishment to that of admitted user of sockpuppets user:Isarig. I got banned for 45 days for advising Isarig that it was not nice to call Juan Cole a "Jew Baiter." That if Wikipedia didn't take appropriate action I would contact Juan, who is a friend of mine. this was stretched and construed beyond imagination as "making a legal threat." That's why I don't archive my user page. I want the world to see what can go on in wikipedia. please re-instate Skatewalk or at least have a calibrated punishment. What have been his infractions as Skatewalk? He appears to have been an excellent editor. Given the tremendous alleged bias in the Wiki, banning Arab editors just reinforces it.Godspeed John Glenn! Will 13:02, 19 September 2007 (UTC) Addendum. I may have misspoke about Isarig admitting being a socket. His userpage shows no warnings and no punishment. but a google search shows confirmation for two puppets.ArchiveGodspeed John Glenn! Will 13:23, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you suspect Skatewalk to be a Sockpuppet because of his IP?, please keep in mind, if you use an internet cafe, every single pc are a part of a one network all share the same IP. It's nonsense to claim that this user is a sockpuppet using this source. Juju78 20:09, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Juju78, If it was the same IP, then it will make some sense, its not even the same IP address. He only claim is that:

  • My IP address is similar (but not the same ip-address!). to only one of the 20+ users-suspected sockpuppets that Zerida listed! all of them are Arabs/mideasterners? from the NYC area, most the IPs are actually from Europe and the Mideast, I don't now how this is allowed in Wikipedia?
  • Zerida beahvior evidence is that I disagreed with her/him!, but the truth is most mideasterners will disagree with Zerida outlandish claims he tries to post as facts i Wikipedia. (example Egyptian Arabic as a language!). So everybody who will disagree with Zerida will get listed as a sockpuppet!
When the truth is that:

It doesn't appear user:neil is listening to us here. there is a process to ask for a review by another admin. If Skatewalk was really a proficient puppeteer, he wouldn't be posting here either. He would have got another IP and would have been back in circulation. Obviously, he's not. Oh that other user with two sockpuppets was blocked for a week. Or so I"ve read from wikireview.Godspeed John Glenn! Will 20:30, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Will, but the problem is that I can't post anywhere, except for this page, so I really can't ask for a review by another admin. The Arab wiki-project has one Admin and he was involved in a car accident one day before I was banned, talk about some coincidence!--Skatewalk 22:12, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]