User talk:WebHamster/Archive 1

		The Original Barnstar
		For all the work you do on various music pages and for blitzing those reds. INXS-Girl 18:17, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Bulgarian Organised Crime

Just look at the articles I put in external links of Security Insurance Company.I'm going to put more if you want to understand that it really is one of the most powerfull crime organisations in South-Eastern Europe.And Mladen "Madzho" Mihalev is it's boss and a multimillionare look at the article in external links.

Mo Foster

I note you are webmaster for the above but please do not revert the recategorisation of the article. WP protocol is to categorize articles at the most accurate level. (see WP:MUSCAT).The other categories you undeleted are in any case subsumed in the categories that are left. The recategorisation does not cut Mr. Foster out from anything. All other entries in Category:English musicians are being recategorised in the same way.--Smerus 11:47, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Requesting your assistance

Hello. I've seen some of the good work you've done in cleaning "the lists" I have commmended INXS-Girl for all of her contributions and I apologise for not extending those kudos your way as well. INXS_Girl is taking a badly needed Wiki-break(this place gets to everyone). She told me she would be back in a couple of weeks. In the meantime I am requesting your assistance on a couple of other "lists" Both the List of banjo players and List of hammered dulcimer players articles were strewn with nn links and both were in poor shape and not a trustworthy resource. I had started, with INXS-Girl's help on cleaning up the banjo list. I had just moved on to the dulcimer list. But both were met with resistance from an editor who did not see how keeping the lists in bad shape was actually a "bad" thing and leaned toward being an "inclusionist". Many a bad quality article remains on WIki at the hands of inclusionists. This editor was simply editing from the heart and not the head... he is a very good editor he just disagreed with the process which is in place for most other musician lists. If you have the time could you add those 2 lists to your watchlist and help to keep things clean until INXS_Girl returns from her break and we can get back to making quality articles out of those currently "not very good" pages. Thanks. 156.34.209.136 10:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

If you have time comment there is more conversation about including non-articled players into the banjo list. Thanks. 156.34.142.110 17:31, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

A reminder about AfD tags

One thing to remember... just because you remove the AfD link... doesn't mean the AfD vote ends. The vote is still going on. And, with the link to find it gone... no regular editors will know about it and be able to respond to it. So the article could be deleted anyway simply because you removed the tag. Right now the vote is 3 - 3. Your choice. 142.167.83.144 16:54, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

PS The list of Rhythm guitarists is up for AfD to and needs vote in order to stick around. right now it's losing 2 - 3 in favour of delete. You may want to contact other regular guitar list editors. I cannot vote I am an anon. And if I create an account now just to vote... it will be a foul vote. Good luck. 142.167.83.144 16:59, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Bel Assis

A tag has been placed on Bel Assis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Metropolitan90 03:56, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Eureka Video

No it is not advertising, its explaining to the users what the company does and what material the company releases. You could throw your floppy point at anything; an article on a writer will mention his work, hence that too could be classified as advertising, is it? No. Its simply useful and relevant information, just like the Eureka article. Hence I will remove your pointless tagging.

What makes you are sure about the a Person's biography to be deleted ?

Is this is a random task on which you are working to assign the new articles, pages..etc to submit for Speedy deletion ? I myself donot understand, what boosted u to refer the page to speedy deletion. The Gundu Rajasekhar page is just under construction & its been already too late for me, which led me stopping it then & there. So the real content of the biography will be published on the next visits of mine other users who are well aware of him. --Raj808 23:36, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Michael Pelster

Hi! I noticed you put a speedy deletion tag on Michael Pelster. This article was previously listed for speedy, hangon'd by the creator, and deleted at 23:07 today by User:Kubigula log here. It was recreated 30 minutes later by the original author - I noticed because I was in a discussion on the talk page with him/her over non-notability. I think this may now need to go to WP:AFD? --kateshortforbob 23:44, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: Notibilty of Dean Sherr

Dear WebHamster. Dean Sherr is a published journalist in "The Age". he had his own coloumn next to Caroline Wilson. I believe this is notable enough. From, --Bangcow123 00:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: Jägermonsters

Put in the context. (: Octane ^{[improve me]} 09.08.07 2000 (UTC)

Deletion

The article I submitted for 4 Wheel Drive & Sport Utility Magazine has been deleted. The original inspiration was to link it to the Primedia article. Other magazines on that page have been linked, so I tried to match their styles as much as possible. Is there any chance I can submit it again and it won't be deleted? This is very time-consuming, so I'd like to avoid wasting my time. TrisM 21:42, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Eureka Video

Hi, I would just like to make sure you are aware that all information on the Eureka Video page is both accurate and relevant- hence shouldn’t be deleted. The page is a stub- hence it shouldn’t be deleted. Thanks.Edito*Magica 23:19, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Prints (band)

Hi there,

I'm in the process of compiling more information on the band and further updating the article. I believe they deserve a stub as they are relevant to todays music scene and are on a prominent indie rock label. Barleycorn 00:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
---
Please see the talk page and my revised article and inform me if it still is in danger of deletion. Barleycorn 01:27, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

db-club of Pomo Afro Homos

I tagged the brand-new article with {{underconstruction}} to indicate that the article was being updated. The original text came from an AFC request from last year, Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/2006-03-21. By convention, the first version of AFC articles should closely match the submission. This helps with GFDL compliance. Another editor has removed the {{db-club}} tag. Please don't be so hasty in adding this tag in the future. It's not unusual for an AFC submission to take a day or so to mature. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 01:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Henry Fonda

Hi, I feel that it is unfair to have the article deleted especially this early, perhaps, you (or someone else) could find someone else to expand the article. Let me know how you feel about that when you get a chance. --bobsmith319 02:06, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Kemlo

Im trying to add another new article for E. C. Eliot's character "Tas", the same as I have done for Kemlo. However I cant work out how to do this, as there are multiple TAS links. What do I do.

thanks

I'm not WebHamster, I'm just someone who happens to have this page on my watch list for some odd reason. Anyways, unless the book series itself is award-winning or otherwise notable, it's probably best to put it in the author's article. If the series is notable, create an article under the name of the most prominent book, the first book, or the common name of the series. If nothing else, call it Tas (books), Tas (book series), or Tas (E. C. Elliott) or something similar. Then add that to the disambiguation page Tas. For the character in the book, use Tas (character). Keep notability in mind here. Not every work or series by famous authors deserves its own article. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 20:21, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Eric Grossman

Thanks for notifying me about the {{db-bio}} tag on Eric Grossman, but can I please advise you that I just created the article within the last ten minutes??? Please give folks time to expand things before jumping on them, thanks. If you are doing New Page Patrol, I recommend working on articles that were created 48 hours ago. --Elonka 19:05, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

I do appreciate what you're doing with New Page Patrol. It's a useful function, I've done it myself, and I know we clean up a lot of garbage.  :) And I do agree that it's useful to scan "immediately-created" pages, because many of them do indeed need rapid deletion. In the case of Grossman though, I feel that a db-bio tag was not appropriate, since even with a stub, there was a clear case of notability (gold/platinum records), which to my knowledge clearly passes WP:MUSIC. Then again, I understand how a page-patroller can get into a delete-delete-delete mindset, and it's possible to accidentally stomp on good faith contributions. I guess all I'm saying is, please be a bit more careful in the future? Thanks, Elonka 19:22, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Gateway City Supporters

Really, five minutes after the article is created, you're tagging it for deletion? What is your hurry? Especially since I fully inted to expand and improve the article, I guess I didn't realize I was being timed though. These Ain't Loose Card in Ales ^Pitcher/_Catcher 21:49, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

This sort of bs is why I stopped contributing. These Ain't Loose Card in Ales ^Pitcher/_Catcher 21:50, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Rachael Cantu

I have just spent an hour creating a well-referenced article on a successful and well-respected independent singer songwriter and within five minutes of its publication you've whacked a proposed deletion tag on it with no explanation. You couldn't possibly have had time to read all the cited references. Behaviour like this is really little better than vandalism. This is the sort of thing that has discouraged me from contributing anything to Wikipedia. It is very difficult to see at this point why anyone should bother writing articles for Wikipedia when it is irresponsibly and destructively over-policed in this manner. Rubywine 21:53, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Had you actually read the cited press reports and reviews you would have seen that the artist's debut album was well received by a range of music critics, and was successful in the independent album charts. Rachael Cantu has also collaborated with Tegan Quin of Tegan and Sara - and she was referenced in the Tegan and Sara article. If their name means nothing to you, then you know nothing about indie music, and you are not qualified to judge notability. I can't believe I'm having to waste all this time explaining this after having written a perfectly clear and well-referenced article STUB!! If you still need to refer your completely outrageous "decision" to independent arbitration then yes, do so. Rubywine 22:18, 11 August 2007 (UTC)