Jump to content

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-07-02 Royal Knights: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
P3net (talk | contribs)
update comments
P3net (talk | contribs)
Reformat page a bit
Line 13: Line 13:
<!-- Please be concise -->
<!-- Please be concise -->
==== Who are the involved parties? ====
==== Who are the involved parties? ====
[[User:KrytenKoro]] and [[User:156.110.42.10 ]]
[[User:KrytenKoro]] and [[User:156.110.42.10]]


==== What's going on? ====
==== What's going on? ====
===== Statement from [[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] =====
User [[156.110.42.10]] constantly reverts the page to a version he had made that is quite frankly, a disgrace to proper English, both grammar and spelling. I explained why I reverted each of the edits that I did, on his talk page (I even tried to assimilate his edits that were actually constructive), but he continuously performed full reverts to the previous page. To not get into a revert war, I withdrew from that dispute until other editors input their opinions and decided for themselves, and explained this to him. He continued to make continuous edits that made the grammar and spelling somewhat worse, and used as his reason that "I'm just improving grammar, so you can't argue with me" - something the other editors complained about. When other editors began to notice the faults in the page, and even reverted his edits on their own, I decided that since others supported my "side", I was allowed to go back to editing that overall version of the page without breaking my word. 156 resumed the full reverts, was asked to stop and even given a vandalism warning*, and continued with "all I'm doing is improving the grammer! TELL ME WHAT IS WRONG WITH THAT!" and "Hey, don't critize me, you were the one who reformated the whole thing, there was no reason to do that, it was good the way it was!" edit reasoning.[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] 17:18, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
User [[156.110.42.10]] constantly reverts the page to a version he had made that is quite frankly, a disgrace to proper English, both grammar and spelling. I explained why I reverted each of the edits that I did, on his talk page (I even tried to assimilate his edits that were actually constructive), but he continuously performed full reverts to the previous page. To not get into a revert war, I withdrew from that dispute until other editors input their opinions and decided for themselves, and explained this to him. He continued to make continuous edits that made the grammar and spelling somewhat worse, and used as his reason that "I'm just improving grammar, so you can't argue with me" - something the other editors complained about. When other editors began to notice the faults in the page, and even reverted his edits on their own, I decided that since others supported my "side", I was allowed to go back to editing that overall version of the page without breaking my word. 156 resumed the full reverts, was asked to stop and even given a vandalism warning*, and continued with "all I'm doing is improving the grammer! TELL ME WHAT IS WRONG WITH THAT!" and "Hey, don't critize me, you were the one who reformated the whole thing, there was no reason to do that, it was good the way it was!" edit reasoning.[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] 17:18, 2 July 2007 (UTC)


(*) I had previously explained that since he was not giving any specific reasoning for his reverts, and had been asked to stop, that I could no longer assume good faith, and would start giving him vandalism notices.
(*) I had previously explained that since he was not giving any specific reasoning for his reverts, and had been asked to stop, that I could no longer assume good faith, and would start giving him vandalism notices.

===== Statement from [[User:156.110.42.10|156.110.42.10]] =====
<!-- Please input your statement on the lines below this comment. -->


==== What would you like to change about that? ====
==== What would you like to change about that? ====
===== Statement from [[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] =====
I would like 156 to stop performing full reverts, and instead perform grammar "fixes" one at a time, with explanations for each, like I did for my edits. I would also like him to stop acting like we are attacking him, when we are merely trying to improve the article. In short, I would like him to act like an adult.[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] 17:18, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
I would like 156 to stop performing full reverts, and instead perform grammar "fixes" one at a time, with explanations for each, like I did for my edits. I would also like him to stop acting like we are attacking him, when we are merely trying to improve the article. In short, I would like him to act like an adult.[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] 17:18, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

===== Statement from [[User:156.110.42.10|156.110.42.10]] =====
<!-- Please input your statement on the lines below this comment. -->


=== Discussion between parties and mediator ===
=== Discussion between parties and mediator ===
Line 28: Line 36:
<!-- Please note your response here -->
<!-- Please note your response here -->
:: [[Royal Knights]] {{#if:P3net|<span style="background-color:;color:#006400;">P3net</span>|<span style="color:#006400;"></span>}} <sup>([[User_Talk:P3net|Talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/P3net|Contribs]])</sup> 02:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
:: [[Royal Knights]] {{#if:P3net|<span style="background-color:;color:#006400;">P3net</span>|<span style="color:#006400;"></span>}} <sup>([[User_Talk:P3net|Talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/P3net|Contribs]])</sup> 02:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
==== Compromises ====
=== Administrative notes ===
=== Administrative notes ===

Revision as of 18:14, 6 July 2007

Wikipedia Mediation Cabal
Statusopen
Request dateUnknown
Requesting partyUnknown
Mediator(s)P3net (Talk
CommentWaiting for comment from other party.

[[Category:Wikipedia Medcab active cases|]][[Category:Wikipedia medcab maintenance|]]

Request details

Who are the involved parties?

User:KrytenKoro and User:156.110.42.10

What's going on?

Statement from KrytenKoro

User 156.110.42.10 constantly reverts the page to a version he had made that is quite frankly, a disgrace to proper English, both grammar and spelling. I explained why I reverted each of the edits that I did, on his talk page (I even tried to assimilate his edits that were actually constructive), but he continuously performed full reverts to the previous page. To not get into a revert war, I withdrew from that dispute until other editors input their opinions and decided for themselves, and explained this to him. He continued to make continuous edits that made the grammar and spelling somewhat worse, and used as his reason that "I'm just improving grammar, so you can't argue with me" - something the other editors complained about. When other editors began to notice the faults in the page, and even reverted his edits on their own, I decided that since others supported my "side", I was allowed to go back to editing that overall version of the page without breaking my word. 156 resumed the full reverts, was asked to stop and even given a vandalism warning*, and continued with "all I'm doing is improving the grammer! TELL ME WHAT IS WRONG WITH THAT!" and "Hey, don't critize me, you were the one who reformated the whole thing, there was no reason to do that, it was good the way it was!" edit reasoning.KrytenKoro 17:18, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(*) I had previously explained that since he was not giving any specific reasoning for his reverts, and had been asked to stop, that I could no longer assume good faith, and would start giving him vandalism notices.

Statement from 156.110.42.10

What would you like to change about that?

Statement from KrytenKoro

I would like 156 to stop performing full reverts, and instead perform grammar "fixes" one at a time, with explanations for each, like I did for my edits. I would also like him to stop acting like we are attacking him, when we are merely trying to improve the article. In short, I would like him to act like an adult.KrytenKoro 17:18, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Statement from 156.110.42.10

Discussion between parties and mediator

Additional Details

1. What page are you referring to?
Royal Knights P3net (Talk|Contribs) 02:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Compromises

Administrative notes