Jump to content

Talk:Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Clarification
WikiProject Occult assessment template (Plugin) Tag Category:Occult. Added {{WPOccult}}. using AWB
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPOccult|class=|importance=}}



The previous categorization of Hermeticism did not exist until today. This is the only article that automatically popped up into the category. [[User:King Vegita|KV]] 05:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
The previous categorization of Hermeticism did not exist until today. This is the only article that automatically popped up into the category. [[User:King Vegita|KV]] 05:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:46, 3 July 2007

WikiProject iconOccult Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The previous categorization of Hermeticism did not exist until today. This is the only article that automatically popped up into the category. KV 05:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added the Golden Dawn page. M Alan Kazlev 07:59, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see that you made that new category! I thought I had done it when i made the HBoL page, but obviously I never got around to it. Good stuff! M Alan Kazlev 08:29, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrt. The reference to the only group teaching practical occultism prior to the Golden Dawn, is the Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia intentionally excluded from consideration?

sorry! Please correct accordingly! M Alan Kazlev 23:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

This article states that the connection between the HB of L and the one mentioned in certain early documents of the Theosophical Society is "unclear." However, the arguments which exist linking Blavatsky to the HB of L are spurious and circumstantial at best (Godwin, Chanel, Deveney pp.52 - 54) I think this article needs some revision in light of Godwin et al.'s academic work on the subject. Eyes down, human. 04:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)