Jump to content

Extinction threshold: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ctwohig (talk | contribs)
Ctwohig (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:

{{copypaste}}
Contents:
1. Mathematical models
2. Other Factors


Extinction threshold is a term used in conservation biology to explain the point at which a species, population or metapopulation, experiences an abrupt change in density or number because of an important parameter, such as habitat loss. It is at this critical value below which a species, population, or metapopulation, will go extinct <sup>[1]</sup>.
Extinction threshold is a term used in conservation biology to explain the point at which a species, population or metapopulation, experiences an abrupt change in density or number because of an important parameter, such as habitat loss. It is at this critical value below which a species, population, or metapopulation, will go extinct <sup>[1]</sup>.

Revision as of 00:05, 24 May 2007


Extinction threshold is a term used in conservation biology to explain the point at which a species, population or metapopulation, experiences an abrupt change in density or number because of an important parameter, such as habitat loss. It is at this critical value below which a species, population, or metapopulation, will go extinct [1].

Extinction Thresholds are important to conservation biologists when studying a species in a population or metapopulation context because the colonization rate must be larger than then extinction rate, otherwise the entire entity will go extinct once it reaches the threshold [4].

Extinction thresholds are realized under a number of circumstances and the point in modeling them is to define the conditions that lead a population to extinction. Modeling extinction thresholds can explain the relationship between extinction threshold and habitat loss and fragmentation [2].

Mathematical Models

Metapopulation-type models are used to predict extinction thresholds. The classic metapopulation model is the Levins Model. Levins Model refers to the model of metapopulation dynamics established by Richard Levins in the 1960’s. It was used to evaluate patch occupancy in a large network of patches. This model was extended in the 1980’s by Russell Lande to include habitat occupancy [1]. This mathematical model is used to infer the extinction values and important population densities. These mathematical models are primarily used to study extinction threshold because of the difficulty in understanding extinction processes through empirical methods and the lack of research on this subject thus far[3]. In determining extinction threshold there are two types of models that can be used: deterministic and stochastic metapopulation models.

Deterministic

Deterministic metapopulation models assume that there are an infinite number habitat patches available and therefore predict that the metapopulation will go extinct only if the threshold is not met [1].

dp/dt = chp (1-p)-ep

Where p= occupied patches , e= extinction rate, c= colonization rate, and h= amount of habitat.

A species will persist only if h> δ

where δ=e/c

δ= species parameter, or how successful a species is in colonizing a patch.

Stochastic

Stochastic metapopulation models take into account stochasicity, which is the non-deterministic or random in nature. With this approach a metapopulation may be above the threshold if it is determined that it is unlikely it will go extinct within a certain time period [1].

The complex nature of these models can result in a small metapopulation that is considered to be above the deterministic extinction threshold in reality is in high extinction risk [1].

Other Factors

When using metapopulation-type models to predict extinction thresholds there are a number of factors that can affect the results of a model. First, including more complicated models, rather than relying solely on the Levins model produces different dynamics. For example, Otso Ovaskainen and Ilkka Hanski, in an article published in 2004, explained using an empirical example, that when factors such as Allee effect or rescue effect were included in modeling the extinction threshold, there were unexpected extinctions at high number of species. A more complex model came up with different results, and in practicing conservation biology this can add more confusion to efforts to save a species from the extinction threshold. Transient dynamics, which are effects on the extinction threshold because of instability in either the metapopulation or environmental conditions, is also a large player in modeling results. Landscapes that have recently endured habitat loss and fragmentation may be less able to sustain a metapopulation than previously understood without considering transient dynamics. Finally, environmental stochasticity, which may be spatially correlated, can lead to amplified regional stochastic fluctuations and therefore greatly affect the extinction risk [1].

Notes

1. Ovaskainen, O. and Hanski, I. 2003:Extinction Threshold in Metapopulation Models, Ann.Zool.Fennic.40:81-97.
2. With, K.A. and King, A.W. 1999:Extinction Thresholds For Species in Fractal Landscapes, Conservation Biology: Vol 13, No.2,pp.314-326.
3. Deredec, A. and Courchamp,F, 2003:Extinction Thresholds in Host-Parasite Dynamics, Ann. Zool. Fennic. 40:115-130.
4. Principles of Conservation Biology
5.Fahrig, Lenore. 2000:Effect of Habitat Fragmentation on the Extinction Threshold: A Synthesis, Ecological Applications: Vol.12, No.2, pp.346-353.