Jump to content

Talk:BMW R1200RT: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Jeff dean (talk | contribs)
Line 17: Line 17:
# As your changes are obviously contested, please at least provide arguments for them. As shown above, your personal preference is not an argument.
# As your changes are obviously contested, please at least provide arguments for them. As shown above, your personal preference is not an argument.
# Please don't make assumptions about me, in particular, don't accuse me of breaking WP's rules unless you have evidence. This is clearly a [[WP:PA|personal attack]]. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/87.189.126.6|87.189.126.6]] ([[User talk:87.189.126.6|talk]]) 21:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
# Please don't make assumptions about me, in particular, don't accuse me of breaking WP's rules unless you have evidence. This is clearly a [[WP:PA|personal attack]]. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/87.189.126.6|87.189.126.6]] ([[User talk:87.189.126.6|talk]]) 21:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->

:: Dear anonymous sock puppet, a.k.a., most likely, [[Anonymity|M-72]]. Thank you for your comments. It is not a personal attack. How can it be inasmuch as you are unsigned and anonymous? [[User:Jeff dean|Jeff dean]] 00:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:55, 4 May 2007

WikiProject iconMotorcycling Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Motorcycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorcycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:



Here are some tasks awaiting attention:


Best viewed at

I had added the tag, "Best viewed at 1280 x 1024." I had not written, "ONLY view at 1280 x 1024." It is best viewed at 1280 x 1024. Good grief! Jeff dean 15:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But the point is that an open project like Wikipedia should design pages that can be viewed on any machine with any browser at any resolution. If the page is best viewed at 1280x1024 then something is wrong with the design of the page and it needs to be fixed. I track browser resolution closely on websites that I own. What I see month-on-month is that proportion of browsers with a resolution of 1024x768 or less is around 50%[23]. --Cheesy Mike 15:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is true. To add: Wikipedia also includes cascading style sheets for viewing on devices like PDAs and devices for the visually impaired. So it is not necessary to recommend a viewing resolution. Malber (talk contribs game) 17:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Now that the infobox is added and it contains most of the key elements in the specifications section, is the specifications section now redundant and ready for removal? i.e. is there anything in the specifications that is not adequately covered in the infobox? --Cheesy Mike 19:51, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think See information box for other specifications is good, and I will remove redundancies in the specs section as I have done for other articles when adding the {{Infobox Motorcycle}}. -- Brianhe 22:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blanks

Dear Jeff dean,

  1. Please don't revert unless you assume vandalism. Please see WP:Revert for details.
  2. Please don't assume that any article on Wikipedia is yours. If you look at the bottom of the edit page, you will find the sentence "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it." Please read WP:OWN for details.
  3. As your changes are obviously contested, please at least provide arguments for them. As shown above, your personal preference is not an argument.
  4. Please don't make assumptions about me, in particular, don't accuse me of breaking WP's rules unless you have evidence. This is clearly a personal attack. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.189.126.6 (talk) 21:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Dear anonymous sock puppet, a.k.a., most likely, M-72. Thank you for your comments. It is not a personal attack. How can it be inasmuch as you are unsigned and anonymous? Jeff dean 00:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]