User talk:Double sharp: Difference between revisions
Double sharp (talk | contribs) Tag: Reverted |
|||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Waiting for someone attempting any of these reactions, even if some products are neutron-poor. :) [[User:Nucleus hydro elemon|Nucleus hydro elemon]] ([[User talk:Nucleus hydro elemon|talk]]) 13:59, 12 October 2024 (UTC) |
Waiting for someone attempting any of these reactions, even if some products are neutron-poor. :) [[User:Nucleus hydro elemon|Nucleus hydro elemon]] ([[User talk:Nucleus hydro elemon|talk]]) 13:59, 12 October 2024 (UTC) |
||
:{{ping|Nucleus hydro elemon}} Very cool! [[User:Double sharp|Double sharp]] ([[User talk:Double sharp#top|talk]]) 14:21, 12 October 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:21, 12 October 2024
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Element infobox caption
At the GA review of Radium, it was brought up that the infobox image may not actually be radium. I have no way to confirm or deny this but assuming it is what it says it is (radium electroplated on copper foil) it may be of use to provide a caption. I can't see any way to do that in the article or on Template:Infobox radium. Can you point me in the right direction on this? I see it's done for Template:Infobox protactinium. Reconrabbit 15:39, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Reconrabbit: I added the caption from the file page (File:Radium226.jpg) to
{{Template:Infobox element/symbol-to-top-image/caption}}
, so it should show up now. Double sharp (talk) 18:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Superheavy element synthesis with extremely high cross sections
- Manjunatha, H. C; Sowmya, N.; Manjunatha, N.; Gupta, P. S. Damodara; Seenappa, L.; Sridhar, K. N.; T, Ganesh; Nandi, T. (2020-12-08). "Entrance channel dependent hot fusion reactions for superheavy element synthesis". Physical Review C. 102 (6). American Physical Society (APS). doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.064605. ISSN 2469-9985.
This predicted many reactions with cross sections >1 nb. After removing those which don't make sense (such as using 223At as target), here are the reactions:
- 251Cf(25Mg,4n)272Ds
- 250Cm(37Cl,4n)283Nh (if 250Cm is available...)
- 240Pu(43Ca,3n)280Fl
- 236U(51V,3n)284Mc
- 248Bk(48Ca,3n)293Ts (if 248Bk is available...)
- 244Pu(52Cr,3n)293Og
- 250Cm(50V,3n)297119 (if 250Cm is available...)
- 249Cf(47Ti,n)295120
- 249Cf(50Ti,n)298120 (the authors are probably too optimistic for this one.)
- 247Bk(60Ni,n)305125 (if 247Bk is available...)
- 232Th(82Kr,γ)314126
Waiting for someone attempting any of these reactions, even if some products are neutron-poor. :) Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 13:59, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Nucleus hydro elemon: Very cool! Double sharp (talk) 14:21, 12 October 2024 (UTC)