User talk:Arrowe6365: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
AusLondonder (talk | contribs) Notification: listing of Southern Diocese at WP:Articles for deletion. |
Vanjagenije (talk | contribs) Adding sockpuppetry block notice per w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arrowe6365 (using spihelper.js) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:AusLondonder|AusLondonder]] ([[User talk:AusLondonder|talk]]) 15:13, 24 August 2024 (UTC) |
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:AusLondonder|AusLondonder]] ([[User talk:AusLondonder|talk]]) 15:13, 24 August 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Blocked for sockpuppetry == |
|||
<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing for [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|abusing multiple accounts]] per the evidence presented at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arrowe6365]]. Note that multiple accounts are [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but '''not for ''[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|illegitimate]]'' reasons''', and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Edits by and on behalf of banned editors|reverted]] or [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G5|deleted]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. '''[[User:Vanjagenije|<span style="color:#008B8B;">Vanjagenije</span>]] [[User talk:Vanjagenije|<span style="color: #F4A460;">(talk)</span>]]''' 21:28, 25 August 2024 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-sockblock --> |
|||
Latest revision as of 21:28, 25 August 2024
Confirmed sockpuppetry
[edit]Surprise, surprise. SJIvey was you attempting to deceive and subvert community consensus at the AfD. How stupid did you think we all were? AusLondonder (talk) 15:07, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Northern Diocese for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Diocese until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder (talk) 15:10, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Southern Diocese for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Diocese until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder (talk) 15:13, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arrowe6365. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:28, 25 August 2024 (UTC)