Talk:Bio-based building materials: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:33, 12 July 2024

Review

The overall article is well written and structured. In the Further reading section if the links to the articles can be updated that would be of great help.

Thanks Muhammadrehan645 (talk) 12:42, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your comments and suggestions!

I've just updated the links on the "Further readings" section.

Many thanks! Camilla.vi (talk) 13:45, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review 2

The article sounds interesting, in particular the description of the different typologies of bio-based materials and the different fields of application. Use of references is also very good. My only suggestion is to provide, if available, more further readings in order to deepen the topic.

Thanks you. Ilmaggio98 (talk) 12:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks!

I'll think about more books on the topic to add there, thank you! Camilla.vi (talk) 13:46, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review 3

I am sorry for my late communication. Your use of English is good but I did a few (and small) corrections. However, I noticed you placed the reference numbers before puntuations and sometimes after it. To make it uniform I placed them after as usual.

At the end of the second paragraph of the section about embodied and operational carbon, it seams you repeat the same concept twice. I corrected it but please, check that I manteined the intended meaning.

I put brackets around "LVL" and "CLT" as they are acronyms you cited for the first time in your article

Anyway the topic is open and very interesting and the text is well structured. SergioCarlosMiguel (talk) 20:29, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 == Review 3 ==
-I am sorry for my late communication. Your use of English is good but I did a few (and small) corrections. However, I noticed you placed the reference numbers before puntuations but sometimes after it. To make it uniform I placed them after as usual.
+I am sorry for my late communication. Your use of English is good but I did a few (and small) corrections. However, I noticed you placed the reference numbers before puntuations and sometimes after it. To make it uniform I placed them after as usual.
 At the end of the second paragraph of the section about embodied and operational carbon, it seams you repeat the same concept twice. I corrected it but please, check that I manteined the intended meaning.