Jump to content

Curved structures: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 35: Line 35:
All the typologies of [[Arch|arches]], [[Vault (architecture)|vaults]] and [[Dome|domes]] come from the operations stated in the previous section. They are comprehensively collected and explained in each correspondant [[Wikipedia article]]. Curved shapes were used in the past for covering large rooms in buildings, as happened for example in the [[Domus Aurea]] of [[Emperor Nero]], the [[Basilica of Maxentius]], the [[Pantheon, Rome]], or [[Hagia Sophia]]. However, they could be used for infrastructures too. For instance, the [[Ancient Roman civilization]] exploited curved structures for [[Bridge|bridges]]<ref>{{Cite book |last=O'Connor |first=Colin |title=Roman bridges |date=1993 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-39326-3 |location=Cambridge ; New York}}</ref>, [[Aqueduct (water supply)|aqueducts]]<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://www.worldcat.org/title/326681108 |title=The Oxford encyclopedia of ancient Greece and Rome |date=2010 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-517072-6 |editor-last=Gagarin |editor-first=Michael |location=New York |oclc=326681108 |editor-last2=Fantham |editor-first2=Elaine}}</ref>, [[sewage]] ducts, and [[Arch dam|arch-dam]]<ref>{{Cite book |last=Smith |first=Norman Alfred Fisher |title=A history of dams |date=1971 |publisher=P. Davies |isbn=978-0-432-15090-0 |location=London}}</ref>. The main materials of such constructions were [[Masonry]] and [[Roman concrete]].
All the typologies of [[Arch|arches]], [[Vault (architecture)|vaults]] and [[Dome|domes]] come from the operations stated in the previous section. They are comprehensively collected and explained in each correspondant [[Wikipedia article]]. Curved shapes were used in the past for covering large rooms in buildings, as happened for example in the [[Domus Aurea]] of [[Emperor Nero]], the [[Basilica of Maxentius]], the [[Pantheon, Rome]], or [[Hagia Sophia]]. However, they could be used for infrastructures too. For instance, the [[Ancient Roman civilization]] exploited curved structures for [[Bridge|bridges]]<ref>{{Cite book |last=O'Connor |first=Colin |title=Roman bridges |date=1993 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-39326-3 |location=Cambridge ; New York}}</ref>, [[Aqueduct (water supply)|aqueducts]]<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://www.worldcat.org/title/326681108 |title=The Oxford encyclopedia of ancient Greece and Rome |date=2010 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-517072-6 |editor-last=Gagarin |editor-first=Michael |location=New York |oclc=326681108 |editor-last2=Fantham |editor-first2=Elaine}}</ref>, [[sewage]] ducts, and [[Arch dam|arch-dam]]<ref>{{Cite book |last=Smith |first=Norman Alfred Fisher |title=A history of dams |date=1971 |publisher=P. Davies |isbn=978-0-432-15090-0 |location=London}}</ref>. The main materials of such constructions were [[Masonry]] and [[Roman concrete]].


With the [[Industrial Revolution]], the material chosen were more likely [[Wrought iron|wrought]], [[cast iron]] or, later, [[reinforced concrete]]. In this way, also the shape of the infrastructures started to change. Some example of curved structures were the [[Palm House, Kew Gardens]] by Turner and Burton and the[[The Crystal Palace]] by Paxton, or on the infrastructures side, the [[Garabit viaduct]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Frampton |first=Kenneth |title=Storia dell'architettura moderna |date=2008-09-01 |publisher=Zanichelli |year=2008 |isbn=978-8808164629 |edition=4th |language=Italian |trans-title=Modern Architecture: a critical History.}}</ref>
With the [[Industrial Revolution]], the material chosen were more likely [[Wrought iron|wrought]], [[cast iron]] or, later, [[reinforced concrete]]. In this way, also the shape of the infrastructures started to change. Some example of curved structures were the [[Palm House, Kew Gardens]] by Turner and Burton and the[[The Crystal Palace]] by Paxton, or on the infrastructures side, the [[Garabit viaduct]].<ref name=":2">{{Cite book |last=Frampton |first=Kenneth |title=Storia dell'architettura moderna |date=2008-09-01 |publisher=Zanichelli |year=2008 |isbn=978-8808164629 |edition=4th |language=Italian |trans-title=Modern Architecture: a critical History.}}</ref> Later in [[20th century|20<sup>th</sup> century]], [[Pier Luigi Nervi]] started studying the possibilities of [[reinforced concrete]], building his famous ribbed hangars.<ref name=":2" /><ref>{{cite book |last1=Salvadori |first1=Mario |title=Perché gli edifici stanno in piedi |publisher=Bompiani |year=1993 |isbn=978-8845215131 |edition=2nd |location=Milano |language=Italian |translator-last=Brandolini |translator-first=Sebastiano |trans-title=Why Buildings Stand Up |translator-last2=Pace |translator-first2=Carlo}}</ref>


Many other structures have been built by exploiting curved surface, the [[Philips Pavilion]] in [[Brussels]] by [[Le Corbusier]], [[L'Oceanogràfic]] in [[Valencia]] by [[Félix Candela]] and [[Alberto Domingo]].
Later in [[20th century|20<sup>th</sup> century]], [[Pier Luigi Nervi]] started studying the possibilities of [[reinforced concrete]], building his famous ribbed hangars. Many other insfrastructures have been built by exploiting curved surface,

=== Structural behaviour ===
statics
eartquake sensibility

thrust line <ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Tanturli |first=Silvia |last2=Foce |first2=Federico |date= |orig-date=2021-02 |title=Volte in muratura: verifica e ottimizzazione strutturale tra passato e presente |magazine=Lo strutturista |pages=21-31 |language=Italian |volume=06 |issue=2}}</ref>


Arch-like behaviour in other structures


=== Construction process ===
=== Construction process ===
{{main| Opus spicatum}}
{{main|Opus spicatum}}


Because of their nature, curved structures cannot stand alone until their completion, especially vaults and arches. Therefore, the construction of a supporting structure (referred to as [[centring]]) is almost always necessary. These are temporary [[falsework]] which stay in place until the keystone has been set down and the arch is stabilised.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Falsework {{!}} Temporary Structures, Shoring & Support {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/technology/falsework |access-date=2024-07-12 |website=www.britannica.com |language=en}}</ref> However, there are a few cases in which, by some expedient and careful design of the construction process, some structures have been erected without any centring.
Because of their nature, curved structures cannot stand alone until their completion, especially vaults and arches. Therefore, the construction of a supporting structure (referred to as [[centring]]) is almost always necessary. These are temporary [[falsework]] which stay in place until the keystone has been set down and the arch is stabilised.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Falsework {{!}} Temporary Structures, Shoring & Support {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/technology/falsework |access-date=2024-07-12 |website=www.britannica.com |language=en}}</ref> However, there are a few cases in which, by some expedient and careful design of the construction process, some structures have been erected without any centring.
Line 56: Line 47:


Another example of structure built with no formwork is the [[Global Vipassana Pagoda]], located in the North of [[Mumbai]], between the [[Gorai Creek]] and the [[Arabian Sea]]. It is a [[meditation]] hall covered by the largest masonry dome in the world, with an inner [[diameter]] at ground level of about 85m. The absence of centring was possible thanks to the double curvature of the dome and the special shape given to the carved sandstone blocks constituting the skin.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Global Vipassana Pagoda |url=https://dev.earth-auroville.com/global-vipassana-pagoda/ |access-date=2024-07-11 |website=Auroville Earth Institute |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Varma |first=Nandalal Rameshwar |last2=Jangid |first2=Radhey Shyam |last3=Ghosh |first3=Siddhartha |last4=Milani |first4=Gabriele |last5=Cundari |first5=Giuseppe Alfredo |last6=Varma |first6=Mahesh |date=2023-05-29 |title=Global Vipassana Pagoda: Main features and history of construction |url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10164068/ |journal=Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Living Environment, MetroLivEnv 2023 |publisher=IEEE |pages=213–218 |doi=10.1109/MetroLivEnv56897.2023.10164068 |isbn=978-1-6654-5693-7}}</ref>
Another example of structure built with no formwork is the [[Global Vipassana Pagoda]], located in the North of [[Mumbai]], between the [[Gorai Creek]] and the [[Arabian Sea]]. It is a [[meditation]] hall covered by the largest masonry dome in the world, with an inner [[diameter]] at ground level of about 85m. The absence of centring was possible thanks to the double curvature of the dome and the special shape given to the carved sandstone blocks constituting the skin.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Global Vipassana Pagoda |url=https://dev.earth-auroville.com/global-vipassana-pagoda/ |access-date=2024-07-11 |website=Auroville Earth Institute |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Varma |first=Nandalal Rameshwar |last2=Jangid |first2=Radhey Shyam |last3=Ghosh |first3=Siddhartha |last4=Milani |first4=Gabriele |last5=Cundari |first5=Giuseppe Alfredo |last6=Varma |first6=Mahesh |date=2023-05-29 |title=Global Vipassana Pagoda: Main features and history of construction |url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10164068/ |journal=Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Living Environment, MetroLivEnv 2023 |publisher=IEEE |pages=213–218 |doi=10.1109/MetroLivEnv56897.2023.10164068 |isbn=978-1-6654-5693-7}}</ref>

=== Structural behaviour ===
statics
eartquake sensibility

thrust line <ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Tanturli |first=Silvia |last2=Foce |first2=Federico |date= |orig-date=2021-02 |title=Volte in muratura: verifica e ottimizzazione strutturale tra passato e presente |magazine=Lo strutturista |pages=21-31 |language=Italian |volume=06 |issue=2}}</ref>

limit analysis theo

FEM & DEM


=== Daylighting ===
=== Daylighting ===

Revision as of 04:36, 12 July 2024

Curved Structures are constructions generated by one or more generatrices (which can be either curves or surfaces) through geometrical operations. They traditionally differentiate from the other most diffused construction technology, namely the post and lintel, which results from the addition of regular and linear architectural elements. The most common and diffused examples of curved structures are the Arch, the Vault, and the Dome.

They have been exploited for their advantageous characteristics since the first civilisations and for different purposes. The materials, the shapes and the assemblage techniques followed the technological and cultural evolution of the societies over time. Curved structures have been preferred to cover large spaces of public buildings. In spite of their sensitivity to earthquakes, they work well from the structural point of view. By the way, in the next sections, a broad view over some of the curved structures characteristics is given.

The Geometry of curved structures

From the geometrical point of view, curved structures are three-dimensional solids. They are generated starting from genetratrices which undergo the geometrical operations of extrusion or revolution. The three classes of structures stated previously can be explained as follows:

  • An arch is generated by the revolution of a point or a surface around a centre (or, from a mechanical standpoint it can be thought as a section of a vault);
  • A Vault is generated by the extrusion of an arched surface;
  • A Dome is generated by the revolution of an arched surface around an axis.[1]

More complex shapes can be generated by boolean operations on a set of interacting volumes. The simplest examples, resulting from the intersection of two or more vaults and the successive subtraction of the excess volumes, are:

  • The Groin vault or Cross Vault, resulting in a set of lunettes (either of circular or pointed vaults);
  • The Domical Vault - and the particular case of the Cloister - which is formed by a set of fuses;
  • The Umbrella Vault, a set of ribbed fuses, joint at the top and terminating in lunettes at the base;
  • The Pendentive or Penditive dome, generated by subtracting volumes from a dome;
  • The Saddle Vault, generated by either translating one parabola through a second one or by a ruled surface.[1]

The actions performed to make these solids are the same needed to generate them in a CAD[2] or - to some extent - in a FEM[3] software environment to design objects and analyse them if need be.

Gaussian curvature and shape-resistant structures

Example of surfaces to which all the possible surfaces can be reduced to. Starting from the foreground: the Hyperboloid (negative), the Cylinder (null), and the Sphere (positive Gaussian curvature).

Differently from the post and lintel construction, which capacity depends upon the resistance of the single members, curved structures can rely on their shape too. Indeed, in a curved structure subject to a given loading condition, the axial stress flows towards the springers following a definite path, which depends on the boundary conditions, namely the constraints and the loads.

However, single curvature structures (that is, simple vaults) show less capacity than double curvature ones (e.g., domes, domical and cloister and saddle). This is because a simple vault - from a geometric point of view - corresponds to a developable surface, which has null Gaussian curvature, therefore it can be flattened to a planar surface with no distortion. Dome-like and saddle structures have respectively a positive and a negative Gaussian curvature, being shape-resistant structures par excellence.

Architecture and engineering

All the typologies of arches, vaults and domes come from the operations stated in the previous section. They are comprehensively collected and explained in each correspondant Wikipedia article. Curved shapes were used in the past for covering large rooms in buildings, as happened for example in the Domus Aurea of Emperor Nero, the Basilica of Maxentius, the Pantheon, Rome, or Hagia Sophia. However, they could be used for infrastructures too. For instance, the Ancient Roman civilization exploited curved structures for bridges[4], aqueducts[5], sewage ducts, and arch-dam[6]. The main materials of such constructions were Masonry and Roman concrete.

With the Industrial Revolution, the material chosen were more likely wrought, cast iron or, later, reinforced concrete. In this way, also the shape of the infrastructures started to change. Some example of curved structures were the Palm House, Kew Gardens by Turner and Burton and theThe Crystal Palace by Paxton, or on the infrastructures side, the Garabit viaduct.[7] Later in 20th century, Pier Luigi Nervi started studying the possibilities of reinforced concrete, building his famous ribbed hangars.[7][8]

Many other structures have been built by exploiting curved surface, the Philips Pavilion in Brussels by Le Corbusier, L'Oceanogràfic in Valencia by Félix Candela and Alberto Domingo.

Construction process

Because of their nature, curved structures cannot stand alone until their completion, especially vaults and arches. Therefore, the construction of a supporting structure (referred to as centring) is almost always necessary. These are temporary falsework which stay in place until the keystone has been set down and the arch is stabilised.[9] However, there are a few cases in which, by some expedient and careful design of the construction process, some structures have been erected without any centring.

A widely known example is the domical vault of the Florence Cathedral, built by Filippo Brunelleschi in the 15th century. He achieved such a challenge by building a massive structure, mechanically behaving like a spherical dome, but with large ribs and exploiting the masonry herringbone bond to lean and fix every new layer on the previous one. Each layer of the structure seems to be composed by many small arches. The vault is also double-skin, with an intermediate hollow space hosting the staircases, through which air can flow to avoid humidity concentration. To resist parallel tensile stresses which may separate the fuses of the vault, Brunelleschi arranged sandstone chain along some parallel plane.[10]

Another example of structure built with no formwork is the Global Vipassana Pagoda, located in the North of Mumbai, between the Gorai Creek and the Arabian Sea. It is a meditation hall covered by the largest masonry dome in the world, with an inner diameter at ground level of about 85m. The absence of centring was possible thanks to the double curvature of the dome and the special shape given to the carved sandstone blocks constituting the skin.[11][12]

Structural behaviour

statics eartquake sensibility

thrust line [13]

limit analysis theo

FEM & DEM

Daylighting

Daylighting is usually guaranteed by openings at the end of vaulted bays, as happens in Gloucester Cathedral, Chartres Cathedral, or Sainte-Chapelle (Paris), and specifically in the lunettes (where the vaults end against a wall) like in the Church of Santa Maria del Suffragio in L'Aquila (Italy) and in the Church of San Paolo in Albano Laziale (Italy).[14]

Another structurally relevant place for an opening is the top of the domes, where in many cases an oculus can be found. Sometimes it is bare, as in the Roman Pantheon, while often is covered by another architectural element referred to as Lantern, as happens - for instance - in the Florence Cathedral.[15]

Thermal behaviour

Acoustics

Some double curvature structures are known for the echo[16] or the reverberation phenomena they create.[17] These are due to the size of the spaces and the materials exploited for the structure or the finishing (usually hard and with small pores). The shape does a lot in preventing or enhancing the effect. Cross or cloister vaults do not generate an echo. Pointed domes easily create reverberation more than echo.[18] At the same time, spherical surfaces are highly reflective due to their concavity [19]. Indeed, hemispheres, paraboloid, or similar surfaces are eager to reflect and redirect sound, sometimes constituting a whispering gallery. Examples of whispering galleries can be found in well-known architectures like St Paul's Cathedral in London, where the phenomenon has been studied by Lord Rauyleigh[20] or the Archbasilica of Saint John Lateran[21] in Rome, but also in caves like the Ear of Dionysius in Syracuse, Sicily, which has been treated by Wallace Clement Sabine.[21]

The existing variety of domes is due to the assignation of symbolic meanings related to history and cultures, ranging from funerary[22] to palatine and religious architecture,[23] but also the response to practical problems[24]. A recent study addressed how in the Baroque staircase of the Royal Palace of Caserta (Italy), designed by Luigi Vanvitelli, the double dome could make the listeners feel as if they were enveloped by the music. Thus enhancing the marvel typically researched by baroque architects.[25]

A modern example of architecture thought to respond and participate to sound was the Philips Pavilion designed by Le Corbusier and Iannis Xenakis for the Expo 58 in Brussels.[26][27]

References

  1. ^ a b Migliari, Riccardo (2009-07-09). Geometria Descrittiva. Metodi e costruzioni (Vol. 1) (in Italian). CittàStudi. ISBN 978-8825173291.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  2. ^ "AUTODESK AutoCAD 2025 Online User Manual". AUTODESK AutoCAD 2025 User Guide. Retrieved 2024-07-11.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  3. ^ "Strand7 Online User Guide". Strand7 Finite Element Analysis. Retrieved 2024-07-11.
  4. ^ O'Connor, Colin (1993). Roman bridges. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-39326-3.
  5. ^ Gagarin, Michael; Fantham, Elaine, eds. (2010). The Oxford encyclopedia of ancient Greece and Rome. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-517072-6. OCLC 326681108.
  6. ^ Smith, Norman Alfred Fisher (1971). A history of dams. London: P. Davies. ISBN 978-0-432-15090-0.
  7. ^ a b Frampton, Kenneth (2008-09-01). Storia dell'architettura moderna [Modern Architecture: a critical History.] (in Italian) (4th ed.). Zanichelli. ISBN 978-8808164629.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  8. ^ Salvadori, Mario (1993). Perché gli edifici stanno in piedi [Why Buildings Stand Up] (in Italian). Translated by Brandolini, Sebastiano; Pace, Carlo (2nd ed.). Milano: Bompiani. ISBN 978-8845215131.
  9. ^ "Falsework | Temporary Structures, Shoring & Support | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2024-07-12.
  10. ^ King, Ross (2000). Brunelleschi's Dome: How a Renaissance Genius Reinvented Architecture. London: Chatto & Windus. ISBN 9781620401941.
  11. ^ "Global Vipassana Pagoda". Auroville Earth Institute. Retrieved 2024-07-11.
  12. ^ Varma, Nandalal Rameshwar; Jangid, Radhey Shyam; Ghosh, Siddhartha; Milani, Gabriele; Cundari, Giuseppe Alfredo; Varma, Mahesh (2023-05-29). "Global Vipassana Pagoda: Main features and history of construction". Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Living Environment, MetroLivEnv 2023. IEEE: 213–218. doi:10.1109/MetroLivEnv56897.2023.10164068. ISBN 978-1-6654-5693-7.
  13. ^ Tanturli, Silvia; Foce, Federico. "Volte in muratura: verifica e ottimizzazione strutturale tra passato e presente". Lo strutturista (in Italian). Vol. 06, no. 2. pp. 21–31.
  14. ^ "Lunette | Renaissance, Fortification & Defense | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2024-07-11.
  15. ^ "Lantern | Chinese, Pagoda & Pagoda Roof | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2024-07-11.
  16. ^ Wölfel, Matthias; McDonough, John (2009). Distant Speech Recognition. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. p. 48. ISBN 978-0470714072.
  17. ^ Valente, Michael; Holly Hosford-Dunn; Ross J. Roeser (2008). Audiology. Thieme. pp. 425–426. ISBN 978-1-58890-520-8.
  18. ^ Davis, Lara; Maïni, Satprem (2003–2016). "BUILDING WITH ARCHES, VAULTS AND DOMES" (PDF). Auroville Earth Institute. pp. 108–110. Retrieved 2024-07-11.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
  19. ^ Kayili, Mutbul (2005). "Acoustic Solutions in Classic Ottoman Architecture" (PDF). FSTC (Foundation for Science Technology and Civilisation) Limited. pp. 1–15. 4087. Retrieved 2024-07-11.
  20. ^ Rayleigh, John William Strutt (1899–1920). Scientific papers. University of California Libraries. Cambridge : University Press.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
  21. ^ a b Sabine, Wallace Clement (1922). Collected papers on acoustics. University of California Libraries. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
  22. ^ Grabar, Oleg (1963-12-01). "The Islamic Dome, Some Considerations". Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 22 (4): 191–198. doi:10.2307/988190. ISSN 0037-9808.
  23. ^ Smith, Earl Baldwin (1971). The dome: a study in the history of ideas. Princeton monographs in art and archaeology (2. print ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. ISBN 978-0-691-03875-9.
  24. ^ Petersen, Andrew (2002-03-11). Dictionary of Islamic Architecture. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-61366-3.
  25. ^ Berardi, Umberto; Iannace, Gino; Trematerra, Amelia (2017-03-02). "The Acoustics of the Double Elliptical Vault of the Royal Palace of Caserta (Italy)". Buildings. 7 (1): 18. doi:10.3390/buildings7010018. ISSN 2075-5309.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  26. ^ "Padiglione Philips a Bruxelles". Arketipo (in Italian). 2007-09-20. Retrieved 2024-07-12.
  27. ^ "IL PADIGLIONE PHILIPS e IL POÈME ELECTRONIQUE – Bruxelles (1956-1958)". Philosofia (in Italian). 2005-11-26. Retrieved 2024-07-12.

Further readings