Jump to content

User talk:Brittanyseales: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification: Your Articles for Creation submission has been declined (AFCH)
Notification: Your Articles for Creation submission has been declined (AFCH)
 
Line 60: Line 60:


~[[User:Liance|Liance]]<sup>[[User talk:Liance|talk]]</sup> 12:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->
~[[User:Liance|Liance]]<sup>[[User talk:Liance|talk]]</sup> 12:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:SubQuery|SubQuery]] (July 11) ==
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by David Gerard was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: <br />
* [[WP:ORGDEPTH|''in-depth'']] (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
* [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|''reliable'']]
* [[Wikipedia:No original research#Secondary|''secondary'']]
* [[WP:ORGIND|''strictly independent'']] of the subject <br />
Make sure you add references that meet ''all four'' of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Still zero solid [[WP:RS]]es. Crypto sources, blog posts and primary sources are not sufficient. Can you find three sources in, say mainstream financial press? - 22:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}
* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:SubQuery]] and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].
* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:SubQuery '''Articles for creation help desk''']</span>, on the <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:David_Gerard&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:SubQuery '''reviewer's talk page''']</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

[[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 22:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

Latest revision as of 22:33, 11 July 2024

Your submission at Articles for creation: SubQuery (June 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 01:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Brittanyseales! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 01:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]
Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Brittanyseales, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:SubQuery to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liancetalk 12:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SubQuery (June 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~Liancetalk 12:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SubQuery (July 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David Gerard was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
David Gerard (talk) 22:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]