Jump to content

Talk:2020 United States elections: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Revert sections that about whining/WP:Soapboxing rather then improving the article
Bias: Reply
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
Line 43: Line 43:
:::Yeah this entire site is heavily biased and full of misinformation now. Hilariously all of the articles that are protected and used for context are all heavily biased. I now see why every teacher I had said to not cite this website because even “protected” articles are full of bad data and biased information. I used to support and donate to the site but it seems now they aren’t really a neutral source of information like they claim. [[Special:Contributions/2600:1004:B292:5A8F:D0B2:294:BAB2:FD29|2600:1004:B292:5A8F:D0B2:294:BAB2:FD29]] ([[User talk:2600:1004:B292:5A8F:D0B2:294:BAB2:FD29|talk]]) 17:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
:::Yeah this entire site is heavily biased and full of misinformation now. Hilariously all of the articles that are protected and used for context are all heavily biased. I now see why every teacher I had said to not cite this website because even “protected” articles are full of bad data and biased information. I used to support and donate to the site but it seems now they aren’t really a neutral source of information like they claim. [[Special:Contributions/2600:1004:B292:5A8F:D0B2:294:BAB2:FD29|2600:1004:B292:5A8F:D0B2:294:BAB2:FD29]] ([[User talk:2600:1004:B292:5A8F:D0B2:294:BAB2:FD29|talk]]) 17:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
::::sounds like a conspiracy theorist, baring the classic flag of “everyone’s out to get me”. When do you get off your high horse and realize not everything is false? [[Special:Contributions/2601:248:5001:87C0:78FF:FFF3:141E:1576|2601:248:5001:87C0:78FF:FFF3:141E:1576]] ([[User talk:2601:248:5001:87C0:78FF:FFF3:141E:1576|talk]]) 20:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
::::sounds like a conspiracy theorist, baring the classic flag of “everyone’s out to get me”. When do you get off your high horse and realize not everything is false? [[Special:Contributions/2601:248:5001:87C0:78FF:FFF3:141E:1576|2601:248:5001:87C0:78FF:FFF3:141E:1576]] ([[User talk:2601:248:5001:87C0:78FF:FFF3:141E:1576|talk]]) 20:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
:::::the entire article is nothing more than gaslighting propaganda and anyone with two eyes and a brain saw what happened with the fraudulent 2020 election and the protest of the American people that happened on January 6th...not to mention the violence perpetrated on the American people by the American Government! [[Special:Contributions/75.104.34.50|75.104.34.50]] ([[User talk:75.104.34.50|talk]]) 12:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
== Semi-protected edit request on 11 September 2023 ==
== Semi-protected edit request on 11 September 2023 ==



Revision as of 12:54, 3 April 2024

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 January 2021 and 12 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dpe12. Peer reviewers: Strr34, Aah153.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Net Seat Change for House Elections

Shouldn't the table at the top include the net seat change for House elections? This would improve consistency, as the table already shows the Electoral College vote numbers and the net seat change for Senate elections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LordofChaos55 (talkcontribs) 19:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Added. We had been holding off because there were some uncalled races, but at this point there's just one outstanding race left and we can always change the number once it's decided. Orser67 (talk) 23:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strange edit

I tried to undo an edit, and for some reason although the edit had removed 1,141 bytes, undoing it only added 2. It clearly did not undo the edit, but now it's saying I can't undo it because I've already undone it.

curprev 01:55, 19 September 2021‎ 24.59.152.85 talk‎ 191,651 bytes +2‎ Undid revision 1045139020 by 24.59.152.85 (talk) undo

curprev 01:47, 19 September 2021‎ 24.59.152.85 talk‎ 191,649 bytes −1,141‎ grammar undo Tags: Visual edit references removed

democrat nominee, not democratic nominee. its a party

change democratic, to democrat. its not the democratic party. its the democrat party. get the simple grammar right if youre going to publish that 2600:8803:D008:EE00:9C6B:E899:959F:F9F9 (talk) 01:45, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Democratic is the proper adjective. Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 02:04, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And Democrat Party (epithet), well, it's an epithet. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:20, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's the party of Democrats therefore it's the "Democrat party" if they wanted to be called the "Democratic Party" they should have called themselves "Democratics." 68.161.87.251 (talk) 21:21, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

“Deadly Attack” on January 6th makes the false implication that it was rioters that caused the death instead of a police officer shooting a protestor. 50.27.110.27 (talk) 15:17, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, "deadly attack" means it was an attack that was deadly, which it was to several people, including police officers. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No police officers did not die from the attack.. one was naturl causes the next day. and now foot0age0 is comming out on officers w0ho lied0 about even being injured. not only lied about that but lied about preforming cpr on a woman. It's sad that people will lie to pus0h their own agenda a lot like the company. no one needs their context pushed on the to try to control how people 2607:FB91:1E4F:D75B:90D6:840E:7F16:C405 (talk) 09:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah this entire site is heavily biased and full of misinformation now. Hilariously all of the articles that are protected and used for context are all heavily biased. I now see why every teacher I had said to not cite this website because even “protected” articles are full of bad data and biased information. I used to support and donate to the site but it seems now they aren’t really a neutral source of information like they claim. 2600:1004:B292:5A8F:D0B2:294:BAB2:FD29 (talk) 17:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
sounds like a conspiracy theorist, baring the classic flag of “everyone’s out to get me”. When do you get off your high horse and realize not everything is false? 2601:248:5001:87C0:78FF:FFF3:141E:1576 (talk) 20:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the entire article is nothing more than gaslighting propaganda and anyone with two eyes and a brain saw what happened with the fraudulent 2020 election and the protest of the American people that happened on January 6th...not to mention the violence perpetrated on the American people by the American Government! 75.104.34.50 (talk) 12:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 11 September 2023

Merlyn78 (talk) 17:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Trump's Election Speech (the one that incited the January 6th Attack on the Capitol) was given on January 6th, 2021. In his speech, he even said he would march with them, immediately after the speech. Wikipedia is, incorrectly, reporting that the speech took place on November 3rd, 2020.

Again, the correct date on which the speech took place on January 6th, 2021.

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Don't see where in this article we mention that speech. Where do you see it specifically? Cannolis (talk) 18:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]