Jump to content

Emil Leon Post: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
FrescoBot (talk | contribs)
m Bot: link syntax and minor changes
 
Line 36: Line 36:


==Early work==
==Early work==
In his doctoral thesis, later shortened and published as "Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions" (1921), Post proved, among other things, that the [[propositional calculus]] of ''[[Principia Mathematica]]'' was complete: all [[Tautology (logic)|tautologies]] are [[theorem]]s, given the ''Principia'' axioms and the rules of [[substitution (logic)|substitution]] and [[modus ponens]]. Post also devised [[truth table]]s independently of [[Charles Sanders Peirce|C. S. Peirce]] and [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] and put them to good mathematical use. [[Jean van Heijenoort]]'s well-known source book on mathematical logic (1966) reprinted Post's classic 1921 article setting out these results.
In his doctoral thesis, later shortened and published as "Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions" (1921), Post proved, among other things, that the [[propositional calculus]] of ''[[Principia Mathematica]]'' was complete: all [[Tautology (logic)|tautologies]] are [[theorem]]s, given the ''Principia'' axioms and the rules of [[substitution (logic)|substitution]] and [[modus ponens]]. Post also devised [[truth table]]s independently of [[Charles Sanders Peirce|C. S. Peirce]] and [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] and put them to good mathematical use. [[Jean van Heijenoort]]'s well-known source book on mathematical logic (1966) reprinted Post's classic 1921 article setting out these results.


While at Princeton, Post came very close to discovering the incompleteness of ''Principia Mathematica'', which [[Kurt Gödel]] proved in 1931. Post initially failed to publish his ideas as he believed he needed a 'complete analysis' for them to be accepted.<ref name="MacTutor"/> As Post said in a postcard to Gödel in 1938:
While at Princeton, Post came very close to discovering the incompleteness of ''Principia Mathematica'', which [[Kurt Gödel]] proved in 1931. Post initially failed to publish his ideas as he believed he needed a 'complete analysis' for them to be accepted.<ref name="MacTutor"/> As Post said in a postcard to Gödel in 1938:
Line 43: Line 43:


==Recursion theory==
==Recursion theory==
In 1936, Post developed, independently of [[Alan Turing]], a mathematical model of computation that was essentially equivalent to the [[Turing machine]] model. Intending this as the first of a series of models of equivalent power but increasing complexity, he titled his paper [[Formulation 1]]. This model is sometimes called "Post's machine" or a [[Post–Turing machine]], but is not to be confused with [[Tag system|Post's tag machines]] or other special kinds of [[Post canonical system]], a computational model using [[string rewriting]] and developed by Post in the 1920s but first published in 1943. Post's rewrite technique is now ubiquitous in programming language specification and design, and so with [[Alonzo Church|Church]]'s [[lambda calculus]] is a salient influence of classical modern logic on practical computing. Post devised a method of 'auxiliary symbols' by which he could canonically represent any Post-generative language, and indeed any computable function or set at all.
In 1936, Post developed, independently of [[Alan Turing]], a mathematical model of computation that was essentially equivalent to the [[Turing machine]] model. Intending this as the first of a series of models of equivalent power but increasing complexity, he titled his paper [[Formulation 1]]. This model is sometimes called "Post's machine" or a [[Post–Turing machine]], but is not to be confused with [[Tag system|Post's tag machines]] or other special kinds of [[Post canonical system]], a computational model using [[string rewriting]] and developed by Post in the 1920s but first published in 1943. Post's rewrite technique is now ubiquitous in programming language specification and design, and so with [[Alonzo Church|Church]]'s [[lambda calculus]] is a salient influence of classical modern logic on practical computing. Post devised a method of 'auxiliary symbols' by which he could canonically represent any Post-generative language, and indeed any computable function or set at all.


Correspondence systems were introduced by Post in 1946 to give simple examples of [[undecidable problem|undecidability]].<ref name="Post46">{{cite journal|year = 1946|author = E. L. Post|author-link = Emil Post| title= A variant of a recursively unsolvable problem |journal = [[Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.]]| volume = 52|issue = 4|url=https://www.ams.org/bull/1946-52-04/S0002-9904-1946-08555-9/S0002-9904-1946-08555-9.pdf|doi=10.1090/s0002-9904-1946-08555-9|pages=264–269|doi-access = free}}</ref> He showed that the [[Post correspondence problem|Post correspondence problem]] (PCP) of satisfying their constraints is, in general, undecidable. The undecidability of the correspondence problem turned out to be exactly what was needed to obtain undecidability results in the theory of [[formal languages]].
Correspondence systems were introduced by Post in 1946 to give simple examples of [[undecidable problem|undecidability]].<ref name="Post46">{{cite journal|year = 1946|author = E. L. Post|author-link = Emil Post| title= A variant of a recursively unsolvable problem |journal = [[Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.]]| volume = 52|issue = 4|url=https://www.ams.org/bull/1946-52-04/S0002-9904-1946-08555-9/S0002-9904-1946-08555-9.pdf|doi=10.1090/s0002-9904-1946-08555-9|pages=264–269|doi-access = free}}</ref> He showed that the [[Post correspondence problem]] (PCP) of satisfying their constraints is, in general, undecidable. The undecidability of the correspondence problem turned out to be exactly what was needed to obtain undecidability results in the theory of [[formal languages]].


In an influential address to the [[American Mathematical Society]] in 1944, he raised the question of the existence of an uncomputable [[recursively enumerable set]] whose [[Turing degree]] is less than that of the [[halting problem]]. This question, which became known as [[Post's problem]], stimulated much research. It was solved in the affirmative in the 1950s by the introduction of the powerful [[Turing degree#Post's problem and the priority method|priority method]] in [[computability theory]].
In an influential address to the [[American Mathematical Society]] in 1944, he raised the question of the existence of an uncomputable [[recursively enumerable set]] whose [[Turing degree]] is less than that of the [[halting problem]]. This question, which became known as [[Post's problem]], stimulated much research. It was solved in the affirmative in the 1950s by the introduction of the powerful [[Turing degree#Post's problem and the priority method|priority method]] in [[computability theory]].

Latest revision as of 22:33, 11 November 2023

Emil Leon Post
BornFebruary 11, 1897
DiedApril 21, 1954(1954-04-21) (aged 57)
New York City, U.S.
Alma materCity College of New York (B.S., 1917)[1]
Columbia University (A.M. 1918, Ph.D. 1920)[2]
Known forFormulation 1
Post correspondence problem
Completeness-proof of Principia's propositional calculus
Post's inversion formula
Post's lattice
Post's theorem
Scientific career
FieldsMathematics, logic
InstitutionsPrinceton University
Thesis Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions  (1920)
Doctoral advisorCassius Jackson Keyser

Emil Leon Post (/pst/; February 11, 1897 – April 21, 1954) was an American mathematician and logician. He is best known for his work in the field that eventually became known as computability theory.

Life

[edit]

Post was born in Augustów, Suwałki Governorate, Congress Poland, Russian Empire (now Poland) into a Polish-Jewish family that immigrated to New York City in May 1904. His parents were Arnold and Pearl Post.[2]

Post had been interested in astronomy, but at the age of twelve lost his left arm in a car accident. This loss was a significant obstacle to being a professional astronomer, leading to his decision to pursue mathematics rather than astronomy.[3]

Post attended the Townsend Harris High School and continued on to graduate from City College of New York in 1917 with a B.S. in mathematics.[1]

After completing his Ph.D. in mathematics in 1920 at Columbia University, supervised by Cassius Jackson Keyser, he did a post-doctorate at Princeton University in the 1920–1921 academic year. Post then became a high school mathematics teacher in New York City.

Post married Gertrude Singer in 1929, with whom he had a daughter, Phyllis Post Goodman (1932–1995).[4] Post spent at most three hours a day on research on the advice of his doctor in order to avoid manic attacks, which he had been experiencing since his year at Princeton.[5]

In 1936, he was appointed to the mathematics department at the City College of New York. He died in 1954 of a heart attack following electroshock treatment for depression;[5][6] he was 57.

Early work

[edit]

In his doctoral thesis, later shortened and published as "Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions" (1921), Post proved, among other things, that the propositional calculus of Principia Mathematica was complete: all tautologies are theorems, given the Principia axioms and the rules of substitution and modus ponens. Post also devised truth tables independently of C. S. Peirce and Ludwig Wittgenstein and put them to good mathematical use. Jean van Heijenoort's well-known source book on mathematical logic (1966) reprinted Post's classic 1921 article setting out these results.

While at Princeton, Post came very close to discovering the incompleteness of Principia Mathematica, which Kurt Gödel proved in 1931. Post initially failed to publish his ideas as he believed he needed a 'complete analysis' for them to be accepted.[2] As Post said in a postcard to Gödel in 1938:

I would have discovered Gödel's theorem in 1921—if I had been Gödel.[7]

Recursion theory

[edit]

In 1936, Post developed, independently of Alan Turing, a mathematical model of computation that was essentially equivalent to the Turing machine model. Intending this as the first of a series of models of equivalent power but increasing complexity, he titled his paper Formulation 1. This model is sometimes called "Post's machine" or a Post–Turing machine, but is not to be confused with Post's tag machines or other special kinds of Post canonical system, a computational model using string rewriting and developed by Post in the 1920s but first published in 1943. Post's rewrite technique is now ubiquitous in programming language specification and design, and so with Church's lambda calculus is a salient influence of classical modern logic on practical computing. Post devised a method of 'auxiliary symbols' by which he could canonically represent any Post-generative language, and indeed any computable function or set at all.

Correspondence systems were introduced by Post in 1946 to give simple examples of undecidability.[8] He showed that the Post correspondence problem (PCP) of satisfying their constraints is, in general, undecidable. The undecidability of the correspondence problem turned out to be exactly what was needed to obtain undecidability results in the theory of formal languages.

In an influential address to the American Mathematical Society in 1944, he raised the question of the existence of an uncomputable recursively enumerable set whose Turing degree is less than that of the halting problem. This question, which became known as Post's problem, stimulated much research. It was solved in the affirmative in the 1950s by the introduction of the powerful priority method in computability theory.

Polyadic groups

[edit]

Post made a fundamental and still-influential contribution to the theory of polyadic, or n-ary, groups in a long paper published in 1940. His major theorem showed that a polyadic group is the iterated multiplication of elements of a normal subgroup of a group, such that the quotient group is cyclic of order n − 1. He also demonstrated that a polyadic group operation on a set can be expressed in terms of a group operation on the same set. The paper contains many other important results.

Selected papers

[edit]
  • Post, Emil Leon (1919). "The Generalized Gamma Functions". Annals of Mathematics. Second Series. 20 (3): 202–217. doi:10.2307/1967871. JSTOR 1967871.
  • Post, Emil Leon (1921). "Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions". American Journal of Mathematics. 43 (3): 163–185. doi:10.2307/2370324. hdl:2027/uiuo.ark:/13960/t9j450f7q. JSTOR 2370324.
  • Post, Emil Leon (1936). "Finite Combinatory Processes – Formulation 1". Journal of Symbolic Logic. 1 (3): 103–105. doi:10.2307/2269031. JSTOR 2269031. S2CID 40284503.
  • Post, Emil Leon (1940). "Polyadic groups". Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 48 (2): 208–350. doi:10.2307/1990085. JSTOR 1990085.
  • Post, Emil Leon (1943). "Formal Reductions of the General Combinatorial Decision Problem". American Journal of Mathematics. 65 (2): 197–215. doi:10.2307/2371809. JSTOR 2371809.
  • Post, Emil Leon (1944). "Recursively enumerable sets of positive integers and their decision problems". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. 50 (5): 284–316. doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1944-08111-1. Introduces the important concept of many-one reduction.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Urquhart (2008)
  2. ^ a b c O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F., "Emil Leon Post", MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive, University of St Andrews
  3. ^ Urquhart (2008), p. 429.
  4. ^ "Phyllis Post Goodman Park". NYC Parks.
  5. ^ a b Urquhart (2008), p. 430.
  6. ^ Baaz, Matthias, ed. (2011). Kurt Gödel and the Foundations of Mathematics: Horizons of Truth (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781139498432.
  7. ^ Stillwell, John (2004). "Emil Post and His Anticipation of Gödel and Turing". Mathematics Magazine. 77 (1): 3–14. doi:10.2307/3219226. ISSN 0025-570X. JSTOR 3219226.
  8. ^ E. L. Post (1946). "A variant of a recursively unsolvable problem" (PDF). Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 52 (4): 264–269. doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1946-08555-9.

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
  • Anshel, Iris Lee; Anshel, Michael (November 1993). "From the Post–Markov Theorem Through Decision Problems to Public-Key Cryptography". The American Mathematical Monthly. 100 (9). Mathematical Association of America: 835–844. doi:10.2307/2324657. JSTOR 2324657.
    Dedicated to Emil Post and contains special material on Post. This includes "Post's Relation to the Cryptology and Cryptographists of his Era: ... Steven Brams, the noted game theorist and political scientist, has remarked to us that the life and legacy of Emil Post represents one aspect of New York intellectual life during the first half of the twentieth century that is very much in need of deeper exploration. The authors hope that this paper serves to further this pursuit". (pp. 842–843)
  • Davis, Martin, ed. (1993). The Undecidable. Dover. pp. 288–406. ISBN 0-486-43228-9.
    Reprints several papers by Post.
  • Davis, Martin (1994). "Emil L. Post: His Life and Work". Solvability, Provability, Definability: The Collected Works of Emil L. Post. Birkhäuser. pp. xi–xxviii.
    A biographical essay.
  • Jackson, Allyn (May 2008). "An interview with Martin Davis". Notices of the AMS. 55 (5): 560–571.
    Much material on Emil Post from his first-hand recollections.
  • Jackson, Allyn (October 2018). "Emil Post: Psychological Fidelity". Inference: International Review of Science. doi:10.37282/991819.18.48. S2CID 240012225.
    A biographical article.
[edit]