User talk:AeonFluxus: Difference between revisions
AndyTheGrump (talk | contribs) →Samael Aun Weor: more |
AeonFluxus (talk | contribs) →Samael Aun Weor: Reply |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
To add to the above, since Weor died in 1977, it is unlikely to be seen as appropriate to add much in the way of content regarding what his followers are up to now, decades later, to the biography. Generally speaking, if a movement/cult is notable per Wikipedia criteria (see [[Wikipedia:Notability]]) such matters are better discussed in an article on the organisation itself. [[User:AndyTheGrump|AndyTheGrump]] ([[User talk:AndyTheGrump|talk]]) 00:51, 10 September 2023 (UTC) |
To add to the above, since Weor died in 1977, it is unlikely to be seen as appropriate to add much in the way of content regarding what his followers are up to now, decades later, to the biography. Generally speaking, if a movement/cult is notable per Wikipedia criteria (see [[Wikipedia:Notability]]) such matters are better discussed in an article on the organisation itself. [[User:AndyTheGrump|AndyTheGrump]] ([[User talk:AndyTheGrump|talk]]) 00:51, 10 September 2023 (UTC) |
||
:Understandable. Thanks for your insights. I'm rather new to this so will continue learning and do my best. Cheers. [[User:AeonFluxus|AeonFluxus]] ([[User talk:AeonFluxus#top|talk]]) 02:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:00, 10 September 2023
Welcome!
Hi AeonFluxus! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Devokewater 20:14, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
I saw your recent posting at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection earlier, which led me to take a look at the article. There are clearly serious issues with it (most obviously in its reliance on primary sources and/or the lack of any clear sources for content, but also in questionable neutrality and excessive detail), but I'm afraid to have to inform you that your recent edit [1] isn't the appropriate way to deal with the article, and I have had to revert it. In particular, please note that per Wikipedia:Reliable sources policy, we cannot cite user generated/social media websites like Twitter, Reddit etc for such content. We require citations to publications with "a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy
", and proper sourcing for any statement that might be controversial is particularly important. I'd have to suggest that you would be best advised to familiarise yourself a bit more with Wikipedia policies in general (see links in the Welcome! above), and to direct your efforts into finding Wikipedia-acceptable sourcing before editing the article again.
I'd also advise against making comments regarding 'law enforcement' in edit summaries: see Wikipedia:No legal threats for our position on such things. Though your edit summary doesn't in my opinion constitute an outright 'legal threat', it is arguably pushing the line, and might be seen as unduly confrontational. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:29, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
To add to the above, since Weor died in 1977, it is unlikely to be seen as appropriate to add much in the way of content regarding what his followers are up to now, decades later, to the biography. Generally speaking, if a movement/cult is notable per Wikipedia criteria (see Wikipedia:Notability) such matters are better discussed in an article on the organisation itself. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:51, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Understandable. Thanks for your insights. I'm rather new to this so will continue learning and do my best. Cheers. AeonFluxus (talk) 02:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)