User talk:XboxFan2006: Difference between revisions
XboxFan2006 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
XboxFan2006 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 167: | Line 167: | ||
Looking through your edits, your talk page, and how many of your edits are reverted, it's becoming clear that you may not be suited for Wikipedia. You are continually ignoring everyone's comments, half your edits are reverted as just plain wrong and your edits have strayed into outright disruption. It's quite clear you are not reading anything about Wikipedia's [[Wp:RS|sourcing]], the [[MOS:FILM|Manual of Style]] for the areas you edit in, or taking in any comments people are saying to you. You're just letting your edits get reverted and going right on doing the exact same pattern of editing on other articles. You don't get that movie articles are about the original release, you continually alter companies to be the companies that didn't make the films (it doesn't matter who owns them, it's only the actual company not their parents that matter) and many many other matters. So I'm giving you a warning. If you don't source your edits, if you don't comply with the [[WP:MOS|manual of style]] both Wikipedia's general one and [[MOS:FILM]], or if you continue making bad edits that require people to waste time cleaning up after you, you will be blocked as it's quite clear a lot of people have had enough of it. [[User:Canterbury Tail|<b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|<i style="color: Blue;">talk</i>]] 02:18, 18 June 2023 (UTC) |
Looking through your edits, your talk page, and how many of your edits are reverted, it's becoming clear that you may not be suited for Wikipedia. You are continually ignoring everyone's comments, half your edits are reverted as just plain wrong and your edits have strayed into outright disruption. It's quite clear you are not reading anything about Wikipedia's [[Wp:RS|sourcing]], the [[MOS:FILM|Manual of Style]] for the areas you edit in, or taking in any comments people are saying to you. You're just letting your edits get reverted and going right on doing the exact same pattern of editing on other articles. You don't get that movie articles are about the original release, you continually alter companies to be the companies that didn't make the films (it doesn't matter who owns them, it's only the actual company not their parents that matter) and many many other matters. So I'm giving you a warning. If you don't source your edits, if you don't comply with the [[WP:MOS|manual of style]] both Wikipedia's general one and [[MOS:FILM]], or if you continue making bad edits that require people to waste time cleaning up after you, you will be blocked as it's quite clear a lot of people have had enough of it. [[User:Canterbury Tail|<b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|<i style="color: Blue;">talk</i>]] 02:18, 18 June 2023 (UTC) |
||
:And still you're at it. You still don't understand the difference between the company that owns something and the company that owns the company that owns something. Or that film articles are based on release, not current. Disney doesn't directly own everything. At this point you're just ignoring everyone. If you continue your disruptive poor edits you will be blocked from editing. [[User:Canterbury Tail|<b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|<i style="color: Blue;">talk</i>]] 01:28, 29 June 2023 (UTC) |
:And still you're at it. You still don't understand the difference between the company that owns something and the company that owns the company that owns something. Or that film articles are based on release, not current. Disney doesn't directly own everything. At this point you're just ignoring everyone. If you continue your disruptive poor edits you will be blocked from editing. [[User:Canterbury Tail|<b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|<i style="color: Blue;">talk</i>]] 01:28, 29 June 2023 (UTC) |
||
== Blocked == |
|||
You've been given multiple warnings, and you just continue to outright ignore everything that is said to you. You are refusing to engage and continue with your campaign of unsourced, and often inaccurate, additions despite being very clearly informed that you would be blocked if you continued this path. You have chosen to ignore these warnings and instead to go on with your campaign of disruptive editing. As a result it's quite clear that you are [[WP:NOTHERE]] to improve the project and are deliberately and at this stage willfully choosing to [[WP:CIR|lack the competence]] to edit and it to ignore the community in terms of your own direction. Therefore you are blocked. [[User:Canterbury Tail|<b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|<i style="color: Blue;">talk</i>]] 12:42, 2 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing for [[WP:Disruptive editing|abuse of editing privileges]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. </div></div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef --> [[User:Canterbury Tail|<b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|<i style="color: Blue;">talk</i>]] 12:42, 2 July 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:31, 5 July 2023
XboxFan2006, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi XboxFan2006! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC) |
20th Century Studios movies
Stop your disruptive editing again in regards to this. There are no sources that back up your claims. Luigitehplumber (talk) 21:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Walt Disney Studios films (2020–2029), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cato. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Caramella Girls moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Caramella Girls, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:48, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- Please note that this group has a section in the Caramelldansen article. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 23:23, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Terminator Salvation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rideback.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
September 2022
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Terminator Salvation, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Switch (2010 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walt Disney Studios.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tough Guys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walt Disney Studios.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
October 2022
Hello, I'm WaterExplorer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Roku Channel, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. WaterExplorer (a.k.a Pedro) talk 23:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Small text in infoboxes
Hi, just wanted to let you know that small text in infoboxes should be avoided. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 22:54, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
"Possible remake" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Possible remake and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 14#Possible remake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Onel5969 TT me 13:48, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
"Braniff Productions" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Braniff Productions and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 14#Braniff Productions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Onel5969 TT me 13:49, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Disruptive/Unrelated Edits
Could you stop adding Disney to productions they had no involvement in? You're adding them to 9-year-old films, more or less. Luigitehplumber (talk) 15:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
December 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bad Trip (film). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:34, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to The Jim Henson Company. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 04:25, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
Hello XboxFan2006! Your additions to Searchlight Pictures have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Please note that adding material copied from CC-BY-SA 4.0 sources, such as you did in this edit series, is not permitted on Wikipedia due to our use of the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license. Please see WP:COMPLIC for more information. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:09, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
January 2023
Hello, I'm Centcom08. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ironheart (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Centcom08 (talk) 02:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Boogeyman (2023 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Heather Leviara (aka Green 34) 00:06, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 17
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- List of Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures international films
- added links pointing to OCS and The Last Warrior
- 20th Digital Studio
- added a link pointing to Walt Disney Studios
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Disruptive Editing
Stop adding disruptive edits to films that Disney doesn't distribute. Luigitehplumber (talk) 01:38, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Happy Madison Productions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crackle.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
March 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Marvel Animation. Heather Leviara (aka Green 34) 14:46, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Creed III, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
20th Century Studios distribution.
Please read the talk page about 20th Century Studios distribution. It is there. Thank you. LancedSoul (talk) 06:20, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- They have been warned numerous times about this. They are showing they are WP:NOTHERE. Mike Allen 05:25, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reino Aventura, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Premier Parks.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Continued addition of unsourced material
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Canterbury Tail talk 21:54, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Competence is required
Looking through your edits, your talk page, and how many of your edits are reverted, it's becoming clear that you may not be suited for Wikipedia. You are continually ignoring everyone's comments, half your edits are reverted as just plain wrong and your edits have strayed into outright disruption. It's quite clear you are not reading anything about Wikipedia's sourcing, the Manual of Style for the areas you edit in, or taking in any comments people are saying to you. You're just letting your edits get reverted and going right on doing the exact same pattern of editing on other articles. You don't get that movie articles are about the original release, you continually alter companies to be the companies that didn't make the films (it doesn't matter who owns them, it's only the actual company not their parents that matter) and many many other matters. So I'm giving you a warning. If you don't source your edits, if you don't comply with the manual of style both Wikipedia's general one and MOS:FILM, or if you continue making bad edits that require people to waste time cleaning up after you, you will be blocked as it's quite clear a lot of people have had enough of it. Canterbury Tail talk 02:18, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- And still you're at it. You still don't understand the difference between the company that owns something and the company that owns the company that owns something. Or that film articles are based on release, not current. Disney doesn't directly own everything. At this point you're just ignoring everyone. If you continue your disruptive poor edits you will be blocked from editing. Canterbury Tail talk 01:28, 29 June 2023 (UTC)