Talk:Ace Attorney: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:07, 28 June 2023

Ace Attorney has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 7, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Video games: Visual novels GA‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

GA

This article has been rated as GA-class on the project's quality scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the visual novels task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Ace Attorney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:50, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ace Attorney/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 13:01, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be back in three days with a full review. --ProtoDrake (talk) 13:01, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Since I can't see anything in the references or prose to give me pause, I'd say this merits an Instant Pass. --ProtoDrake (talk) 09:23, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.--IDV^talk 09:43, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ace Attorney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Minor Edit - Gameplay

The gameplay section stated, in the photo: A cross-examination from the first game. However, it was from Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney Justice for All, which is the second game in the series. It is during the first cross-examination of the first case in said game. I modified it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kid Gamer (talk • contribs) 20:10, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect. This is from the second cross-examination of the second case of the first game. The exclamation marks are the dead giveaway, as they only appear in the first game. Changed back.TurnaboutDave (talk) 22:03, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Changed text to table - rendering in wrong section

Hi,

I've converted text on the releases in the series into two tables to make the data easier to read.

For some unclear reason the second table is rendering in the wrong section even though it is located immediately after the the first table in the wiki mark up in the correct section. Anyone know why?

DomUK (talk) 19:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of The Great Ace Attorney Chronicles into Ace Attorney#Compilations

The article is just redundant to the two games that are in the compilation and the compilation doesn't change much about them. It doesn't need a separate article to describe it per WP:OVERLAP. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 03:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It has its own reception section, in part because it was the first time that the 2nd game was released in the West, so it was reviewed with the compilation.

That said, let me offer an alternative solution: Merge this, Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney Trilogy and the upcoming Apollo Justice: Ace Attorney Trilogy into a new article, "Ace Attorney compilations", so that each compilation can have its own reception section. Masem (t) 03:46, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The reception section of the original Great Ace Attorney: Adventures is nigh non existent, so I think the compilation's reception can be merged there, or split somehow. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 65: / Line 65: @@
 :It has its own reception section, in part because it was the first time that the 2nd game was released in the West, so it was reviewed with the compilation.
 :That said, let me offer an alternative solution: Merge this, [[Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney Trilogy]] and the upcoming [[Apollo Justice: Ace Attorney Trilogy]] into a new article, "Ace Attorney compilations", so that each compilation can have its own reception section. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 03:46, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
+::The reception section of the original Great Ace Attorney: Adventures is nigh non existent, so I think the compilation's reception can be merged there, or split somehow.  [[User:Zxcvbnm|ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ]] ([[User talk:Zxcvbnm|ᴛ]]) 04:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)