User talk:AzorzaI: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:24, 19 June 2023

March 2022

Hello, I'm Awesome Aasim. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Berat, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 19:33, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Serbia in the Eurovision Song Contest, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Voisava Kastrioti. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The content I removed was due to editors not contributing to the talk page. Aleksandarstankov (talk) 09:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring is not acceptable, regardless of the others' participation in talk page. See WP:EW. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So what am I supposed to do? Let other editors continue with their POV, which is (most likely) based on nationalistic motives?

I'm glad you put full protection on that page, at least it won't be a target of such editors. Aleksandarstankov (talk) 20:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are supposed to read WP:EW carefully. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Teya Dora

The article Teya Dora has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mccapra (talk) 21:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Teya Dora moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Teya Dora, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:27, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Teya Dora for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teya Dora is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teya Dora until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 00:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Thanks for the corrwction on Huma Hatun's page,just asking if the fact Mehmed II knew Serbian would also be irelevant because his stepmother was of Serbian origin? Asking because it seems you have experience Deus vult fratres! (talk) 13:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greek was the predominant language of the Ottoman world going back to Hellenistic times. It was taught in many levels of Ottoman education and was a common knowledge skill among Sultans and other high-positioned individuals. However, that's far from the case with the Serbian language (or other Balkan languages). All Sultans or janissaries who knew Serbian language are known to have been born into Serb Orthodox families.

While it's true that language can never confirm ethnicity, I think it's worth to mention in this particular case since Huma Hatun are theorized to be Serb, despite her son's (rare) fluency in Serbian. And yes you're right, it is also possible that Mara Brankovic could have also been a possible teacher. Aleksandarstankov (talk) 14:09, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brankovic was definietly the teacher of Mehmed. This doesn't ruin the theory that Huma was Serb. However, Mehmed was a Philhellene; the reason? I also need a explanation Deus vult fratres! (talk) 14:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 :Greek was '''the predominant language of''' the Ottoman world going back to Hellenistic times. It was taught in many levels of Ottoman education and was a common knowledge skill among Sultans and other high-positioned individuals. However, that's far from the case with the Serbian language (or other Balkan languages). All Sultans or janissaries who knew Serbian language are known to have been born into Serb Orthodox families.
 :While it's true that language can never confirm ethnicity, I think it's worth to mention in this particular case since Huma Hatun are theorized to be Serb, despite her son's (rare) fluency in Serbian. And yes you're right, it is also possible that Mara Brankovic could have also been a possible teacher.  [[User:Aleksandarstankov|Aleksandarstankov]] ([[User talk:Aleksandarstankov#top|talk]]) 14:09, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
+::Brankovic was definietly the teacher of Mehmed. This doesn't ruin the theory that Huma was Serb. However, Mehmed was a Philhellene; the reason? I also need a explanation [[User:Deus vult fratres!|Deus vult fratres!]] ([[User talk:Deus vult fratres!|talk]]) 14:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC)