User talk:BilCat: Difference between revisions
→Recent edit: Reply |
Nick Thorne (talk | contribs) →Royal Australian Navy article: new section |
||
| Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
:That's probably best asked on that talk page. Howeever, I don't think it matters, as the point is what is important here. [[User:BilCat|BilCat]] ([[User talk:BilCat#top|talk]]) 21:39, 1 June 2023 (UTC) |
:That's probably best asked on that talk page. Howeever, I don't think it matters, as the point is what is important here. [[User:BilCat|BilCat]] ([[User talk:BilCat#top|talk]]) 21:39, 1 June 2023 (UTC) |
||
== Royal Australian Navy article == |
|||
Aussie information editor has re-reverted their change to insert figures that fail a reference check. He appears to not understand [[WP:SYNTH]]. I have left an edit warring warning on their talk page but have not re-reverted as I am up against 3RR, the spirit although not the letter of the law.[[User:Nick Thorne| - <b style="color: darkblue">Nick Thorne</b>]] [[User talk:Nick Thorne|<sup style="color: darkblue">''talk''</sup>]] 05:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 05:50, 5 June 2023
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
 | Before posting, please read and follow the notes below.
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Any chance you can take a look at this article? I'm banging my head against a brick wall with plane spotters and frankly I'm not going to fight and go 3RR. Perhaps you could take a look and intervene with a sensible solution? 10mmsocket (talk) 19:30, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Violeta Zü
Something odd going on with the edits, that you recently rolled back, by Violeta Zü (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). All three of them were to templated parameter values near the top of the article. Should we report it, maybe as a suspected bot?
As an aside, why do I get the feeling that AI propaganda bots will soon be invading our editorial community in volume? "The encyclopedia that any AI can edit"?
— Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 06:51, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
- I just thought it was some kind of test/vandalism. You can ask at WP:AN and see if others have seen edits like that. BilCat (talk) 07:05, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
X-65 CRANE
DARPA announced the assignment of the X-65 designation to the CRANE program on May 15th of this year. Sources [1] and [2]. Should I include link in the edit summary next time? MestskyVlk (talk) 20:09, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
- Yes please. BilCat (talk) 20:35, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
- @MestskyVlk, if, by chance, you want to write X-65 CRANE article, I have uploaded a picture of her (it was tweeted by DARPA, so it's in public domain). Comrade a!rado🇷🇺 (C🪆T) 06:50, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- Nice! We can all collaborate on a draft article, if y'all're interested. I'm not sure it meets WP:GNG yet, but most likely will as more information is forthcoming. BilCat (talk) 18:51, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- @MestskyVlk, if, by chance, you want to write X-65 CRANE article, I have uploaded a picture of her (it was tweeted by DARPA, so it's in public domain). Comrade a!rado🇷🇺 (C🪆T) 06:50, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Four years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:28, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Recent edit
about my edit that you recently reverted:
Is the tale in question a made up sarcasm (as in the concept)? In retrospect it could be, however it is phrased as an actual story (as does sometimes get adopted onto wp's guidelines, e.g. don't beat a dead horse, etc). What do you think? 209.6.123.10 (talk) 21:20, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- That's probably best asked on that talk page. Howeever, I don't think it matters, as the point is what is important here. BilCat (talk) 21:39, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Royal Australian Navy article
Aussie information editor has re-reverted their change to insert figures that fail a reference check. He appears to not understand WP:SYNTH. I have left an edit warring warning on their talk page but have not re-reverted as I am up against 3RR, the spirit although not the letter of the law. - Nick Thorne talk 05:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC)