User:Alexcrocker12345/Conservation biology/Madunn99 Peer Review: Difference between revisions
Discussed some ways the article could be updated and expanded |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Some areas of the article could use some information as well. An addition discussing some modern major events in the field could be beneficial along with expanded information of the history of the field discussing more important individuals. A very interesting part of the page involves the heading :Economic values and natural capital" and that information could be further discussed along with the societal/personal affects of the conservation biology. If available, some information could be presented about the ecological damage affects certain groups of people more than others. |
Some areas of the article could use some information as well. An addition discussing some modern major events in the field could be beneficial along with expanded information of the history of the field discussing more important individuals. A very interesting part of the page involves the heading :Economic values and natural capital" and that information could be further discussed along with the societal/personal affects of the conservation biology. If available, some information could be presented about the ecological damage affects certain groups of people more than others. |
||
<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> |
<nowiki>(~~~~)</nowiki> |
Latest revision as of 20:00, 19 February 2023
Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
[edit]- Whose work are you reviewing?
Alexcrocker12345
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alexcrocker12345/Conservation_biology?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Conservation biology
Evaluate the drafted changes
[edit]Some good changes could be made to the article involving both the information and the references used. Several references extend to over a century old, such as some of the ones utilized for defining conservation biology. While the information may still be useful and good for a historical perspective, in makes sense to think that the idea of what the field encompasses has changed and therefore a more updated definition could be utilized as well. Several data points and their references are also linked to the 2000s, like those that discuss biodiversity, and I believe updating the information would be good to demonstrate are more truthful and correct article along with demonstrating the current conditions of the world, or at least a more current condition. The images that deal with information, such as the 2016 image discussing the ecosystem vitality objectives, could be updated to fit the more modern times as well. While this image is dated to 2016, a several year skip could mean rather drastic changes has occurred and should be reported.
Some areas of the article could use some information as well. An addition discussing some modern major events in the field could be beneficial along with expanded information of the history of the field discussing more important individuals. A very interesting part of the page involves the heading :Economic values and natural capital" and that information could be further discussed along with the societal/personal affects of the conservation biology. If available, some information could be presented about the ecological damage affects certain groups of people more than others.
(~~~~)