Jump to content

Talk:Prince Louis of Wales: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
{{WikiProject United Kingdom|class=Start|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject United Kingdom|class=Start|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Commonwealth|class=Start|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Commonwealth|class=Start|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject London|class=|importance=}}
}}
}}
{{Old AfD multi | date = 6 September 2017 | result = '''delete''' | page =Third child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge}}
{{Old AfD multi | date = 6 September 2017 | result = '''delete''' | page =Third child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge}}

Revision as of 17:52, 11 September 2022


Mountbatten-Windsor

Even in the article it is clearly stated “members of the Royal Family who are entitled to the style and dignity of HRH Prince or Princess do not need a surname” Why you are rewriting history and even adding Princess Anne’s article to Mountbatten-Windsor surname which they never use. She married two times. How his full name can be that much different than his birth certificate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Berfu (talkcontribs) 18:02, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also I checked other royal biographies such as royals from Denmark, Sweden or Monaco. Under full_name, only their names are listed, no surnames or even their birth titles. But If there is need I’m sure full names and titles in birth certificates should be used, not surnames they never used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Berfu (talkcontribs) 20:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The name Charles

"On 27 April 2018, it was announced that the baby had been named Louis Arthur Charles, the first and the middle names honoring his great-great-great-uncle Lord Mountbatten and his grandfather the Prince of Wales respectively."

Nowhere in the source it is mentioned that hy was named Arthur after prince Charles. Shouldn't it read that his last name is honouring prince Charles? And honouring instead of honoring? Winstonza (talk) 17:15, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed that. Celia Homeford (talk) 15:39, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

of Wales?

This title has not been granted to Prince Louis so surely, he is not "of Wales" Yikmo21 (talk) 18:10, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See my reply in the page of his sister. Sira Aspera (talk) 19:09, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image

I was wondering if anyone could check if an updated copyright-free image is available. Being a child, this is now clearly obsolete even though it dates back to only three years ago.Sira Aspera (talk) 19:40, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Titles and styles section

All other royal biographies have this section and I don’t know why someone keep erasing his or his siblings. Even If you argue palace never issued “Prince Louis of Cornwall and Cambridge” name you cannot erase other two names since multiple sources (palace too) clearly listed him first as “Prince Louis of Cambridge” and later “Prince Louis of Wales”. Same thing happenes to Princess Charlotte of Wales and Prince George of Wales too. Why remove whole section? Justi7 (talk) 17:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]