Talk:Ace Attorney: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:57, 26 August 2022

Ace Attorney has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 7, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Video games: Visual novels GA‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

GA

This article has been rated as GA-class on the project's quality scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the visual novels task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Semi-protected edit request on 26 August 2022

It is requested that the semi-protected page at The Ace Attorney be created. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

73.101.94.67 (talk) 11:00, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done this has nothing to do with The Wiggles. It is unsourced and involves a bunch of random singers copied from other places. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 11:00, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly an early version of line-up table at Legacy Five, an American southern gospel group.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 22:00, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Ace Attorney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:50, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ace Attorney/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 13:01, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be back in three days with a full review. --ProtoDrake (talk) 13:01, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Since I can't see anything in the references or prose to give me pause, I'd say this merits an Instant Pass. --ProtoDrake (talk) 09:23, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.--IDV^talk 09:43, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ace Attorney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Minor Edit - Gameplay

The gameplay section stated, in the photo: A cross-examination from the first game. However, it was from Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney Justice for All, which is the second game in the series. It is during the first cross-examination of the first case in said game. I modified it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kid Gamer (talk • contribs) 20:10, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect. This is from the second cross-examination of the second case of the first game. The exclamation marks are the dead giveaway, as they only appear in the first game. Changed back.TurnaboutDave (talk) 22:03, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Changed text to table - rendering in wrong section

Hi,

I've converted text on the releases in the series into two tables to make the data easier to read.

For some unclear reason the second table is rendering in the wrong section even though it is located immediately after the the first table in the wiki mark up in the correct section. Anyone know why?

DomUK (talk) 19:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 }}
 {{Archives}}
+== Semi-protected edit request on 26 August 2022 ==
+{{edit semi-protected|The Ace Attorney|answered=no}}
+ [[Special:Contributions/73.101.94.67|73.101.94.67]] ([[User talk:73.101.94.67|talk]]) 11:00, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
+:: {{Not Done}} this has nothing to do with The Wiggles. It is unsourced and involves a bunch of random singers copied from other places. [[User:AngusWOOF|<strong style="color:#606060;">AngusWOOF</strong>]] ([[User talk:AngusWOOF#top|<span style="color:#663300;">bark</span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/AngusWOOF|<span style="color:#006600;">sniff</span>]]) 11:00, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
+:::Possibly an early version of line-up table at [[Legacy Five#Line-ups|Legacy Five]], an American southern gospel group.[[User:Shaidar cuebiyar|''shaidar cuebiyar'']] ([[User talk:Shaidar cuebiyar|talk]]) 22:00, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
 == External links modified ==