User talk:Larryzhao123

Your Revert

Thank you for reverting. The topics don't separate in mobile mode, at least not for me on some old archives. I tried to solve this problem by adding a new header, to no avail. I would've reverted myself, you were quicker. Best wishes. --Maresa63 (talk) 16:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Your Message on My Talk Page

Hi.

You removed my edit saying it was poorly referenced and removed the image, without explaining why in both cases. Neither was defamatory or controversial in any way. Why did you do these changes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SineofTan (talk • contribs) 20:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

SineofTan, I'll put the image on. I only meant to rev one of the edits but RW reverted all. Larryzhao123 (talk | contribs) 20:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion on my last article

Hi,

I saw your request of speedy deletion on my article, but it's not something for promotion or things like that, all my articles are translation of italian article on wikipedia already approved. All these pages have several references. So i hope you can remove the tag. Thank you UrbanBio (talk 17:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Message from User:Wadiefong

Hello, Larryzhao123, I received a warning that I had vandalized a wiki page. Can you please help me? I am new to wikipedia editing. I edited the Uglydoll wiki page, as I actually own some of the handmade Uglydolls, as well as spoke to David Horvath (the co-creator of Uglydolls with Sun-Min Kim), to accurately add info to some of the characters on the page. I did add a reference to a photo, but then deleted it, due to privacy issues. Can you please tell me what I did wrong? I honestly did not intend to cause any harm. I am new to this platform. Any help would be greatly appreciated. If this is not the correct area to ask questions, please help and let me know how I can properly respond. Thank you. wadiefong — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wadiefong (talk • contribs)

Responded to user on their talk page. ~ Tridwoxi (talk) (contribs) 02:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Please

Refrain from editing another users comments. See the Talk page guidelines for more info. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 22:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

MJL, Sorry about this. Larryzhao123 (talk | contribs) 23:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Can you explain why you reverted my edits?

Edits on John Mark Ramseyer's page are supported by multiple sources. I'm not saying anything here other than what appears in published, cited articles, and I don't know why you undid my edits. 58.140.209.16 (talk) 17:15, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, can you cite the sources? Larryzhao123 (talk | contribs) 17:19, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

They are cited as sources 7 and 8 within the article, from Straits Times and Inside Higher Ed. Other editors have been adding equivocating language to muddle the scholarly consensus, but this is not what is reflected in the cited sources. 58.140.209.16 (talk) 17:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

OK. I'll check it Larryzhao123 (talk | contribs) 17:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. 58.140.209.16 (talk) 17:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

I found that the references contains the information. Thanks. Larryzhao123 (talk | contribs) 17:39, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Great! I appreciate your help. Have a good day. 58.140.209.16 (talk) 17:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Thanks for your clarification of your report, calling my attention to the edit filter log. It would be a good idea to mention things like that in the original report. Since you know where to look to see the evidence,and the person responding to the report doesn't, at the very least you can save them some trouble, and sometimes, as on this occasion, you can save them from missing the evidence altogether. JBW (talk) 21:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

JBW, Thanks. Larry Z Contact me my edits 21:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Larryzhao123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, I'm not a LTA. I joined the English Wikipedia and I'm not a LTA. I really like to contribute to the encyclopedia. Thanks.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hi, I'm not a LTA. I joined the English Wikipedia and I'm not a LTA. I really like to contribute to the encyclopedia. Thanks. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi, I'm not a LTA. I joined the English Wikipedia and I'm not a LTA. I really like to contribute to the encyclopedia. Thanks. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi, I'm not a LTA. I joined the English Wikipedia and I'm not a LTA. I really like to contribute to the encyclopedia. Thanks. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}