Old French law: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==''Pays de droit écrit''== |
==''Pays de droit écrit''== |
||
As worded by George Mousourakis, "after the revival of Roman law in the late eleventh and twelfth centuries and the spread of its study from [[Bologna]] to [[Montpellier]] and other parts of France, [[Corpus Juris Civilis|the Roman law of Justinian]] was rapidly received in southern France and came to be accepted as the living law of the land |
As worded by George Mousourakis, "after the revival of Roman law in the late eleventh and twelfth centuries and the spread of its study from [[Bologna]] to [[Montpellier]] and other parts of France, [[Corpus Juris Civilis|the Roman law of Justinian]] was rapidly received in southern France and came to be accepted as the living law of the land",<ref>{{cite book|last=Mousourakis|first=George|title=The Historical and Institutional Context of Roman Law|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cwTFDwAAQBAJ|publisher=Routledge|year=2003|page=435}}</ref> even though, as emphasized by Ernest Glasson, "''coutumes'' did develop in those southern regions, and they often contradicted Roman law."<ref>{{cite book|title=The Coutumes of France in the Library of Congress|year=2006|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ln8tTxwXiQoC|page=3}}</ref> "Prior to this, the ''pays de droit écrit'' in the south followed pre-Justinian Roman law, based primarily on the [[Codex Theodosianus|Code of Theodosius II]] (A.D. 438)",<ref>{{cite book|title=Revue générale de droit|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jo1JAQAAIAAJ|volume=24|page=524|year=1993}}</ref> as reissued in the ''[[Alarician Breviary]]''.<ref name="Padoa-Schioppa 2017, p. 185">{{cite book|last=Padoa-Schioppa|first=Antonio|year=2017|title=A History of Law in Europe: From the Early Middle Ages to the Twentieth Century|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lcwnDwAAQBAJ|page=185|publisher=Cambridge University Press}}</ref> As worded by Antonio Padoa-Schioppa, |
||
"Ernest Glasson emphasized, however, that even in the ''pays de droit ecrit'', the importance of Roman law should not be exaggerated, because ''coutumes'' did develop in those southern regions, and they often contradicted Roman law."<ref>{{cite book|title=The Coutumes of France in the Library of Congress|year=2006|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ln8tTxwXiQoC|page=3}}</ref> As worded by Antonio Padoa-Schioppa, |
|||
{{blockquote|When the monarchy was forced to take into account the reality in countries that had written laws, in order to avoid any potential subordination with respect to the [[Holy Roman Empire|{{bracket|Holy Roman}} Empire]] – of which Justinian Roman law was considered the expression – King [[Philip IV the Fair]] established in 1312, with an ordinance, that in the ''Pays de droit écrit'' Roman law was admitted, but only as a local custom, not as imperial law.<ref name="Padoa-Schioppa 2017, p. 185"/>}} |
{{blockquote|When the monarchy was forced to take into account the reality in countries that had written laws, in order to avoid any potential subordination with respect to the [[Holy Roman Empire|{{bracket|Holy Roman}} Empire]] – of which Justinian Roman law was considered the expression – King [[Philip IV the Fair]] established in 1312, with an ordinance, that in the ''Pays de droit écrit'' Roman law was admitted, but only as a local custom, not as imperial law.<ref name="Padoa-Schioppa 2017, p. 185"/>}} |
||
Revision as of 15:59, 18 March 2020
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Old French law, referred to in French as l'Ancien Droit, was the law of the Kingdom of France until the French Revolution. In the north of France were the Pays de coutumes ('customary countries'), where customary laws were in force, while at the south were the Pays de droit écrit ('countries of written law'), where Roman law had remained paramount. Roughly speaking, the line separating the two areas was the river Loire, from Geneva to the mouth of the Charente, although this was not a firm border between the two categories of law. [1] As worded by George Mousourakis, "in both zones, the law in force also included elements derived from royal, feudal, and canonical sources."[2]
Pays de coutumes
In the north existed a variety of customs with a Frankish-Germanic character.[2] The coutumes were asserted and enforced under feudalism during the Middle Ages and in the early modern period by the French kings and their vassals, especially in the lands of the Île-de-France, to the exclusion of Roman law. A number of regional customs were compiled in custumals in the 13th and 14th centuries. The Coutumes de Beauvaisis, compiled by Phillipe de Remy, had a long-lasting influence on French law. There were about 60 such customs. There were also more than 300 coutumes locales in specific towns and villages. However, by the 16th century the Coutume de Paris (first published in 1510) had been adopted in all areas except Normandy, Burgundy and Brittany. Further development of customary law had been halted by the late 16th century.[3]
Pays de droit écrit
As worded by George Mousourakis, "after the revival of Roman law in the late eleventh and twelfth centuries and the spread of its study from Bologna to Montpellier and other parts of France, the Roman law of Justinian was rapidly received in southern France and came to be accepted as the living law of the land",[4] even though, as emphasized by Ernest Glasson, "coutumes did develop in those southern regions, and they often contradicted Roman law."[5] "Prior to this, the pays de droit écrit in the south followed pre-Justinian Roman law, based primarily on the Code of Theodosius II (A.D. 438)",[6] as reissued in the Alarician Breviary.[7] As worded by Antonio Padoa-Schioppa,
When the monarchy was forced to take into account the reality in countries that had written laws, in order to avoid any potential subordination with respect to the [Holy Roman] Empire – of which Justinian Roman law was considered the expression – King Philip IV the Fair established in 1312, with an ordinance, that in the Pays de droit écrit Roman law was admitted, but only as a local custom, not as imperial law.[7]
Attempts at codifying
Louis XI. had formed the idea of using throughout his realm one custom, one weight, one measure. Henry III. announced to the States of Blois his intention of resuming this design, and he caused a code of law to be prepared, and Louis XIII. followed the same example. But these efforts were wholly lost. In the time of Louis XIV., under the direction of some of the celebrated jurists of his reign, the royal power of making laws for the whole realm was exercised, and some very admirable ordinances or statutes were enacted, but they only embraced a few isolated portions (or heads) of law. Under Louis XV., and particularly through the labours of D'Aguesseau, more royal ordinances were made; but these only remodelled detached morsels of the whole system, and the great revolution in 1790 found France governed by nearly 300 systems of customary law.[8]
In the 18th century, Voltaire declared that in travelling through France one changed the laws as often as one changed horses.[1]
When the Napoleonic Code entered into force in 1804 all the coutumes were abolished.[1] However, French customary law was incorporated into the substance of the code.[9]
North America
In 1664, under the royal act creating the French East India Company, the Custom of Paris became the only law of the land in New France.[10] In 1866 the Civil Code of Lower Canada was adopted in Lower Canada. The majority of the Code's rules borrowed heavily from the Custom of Paris.[11]
See also
References
- ^ a b c The Civil Code: an Overview
- ^ a b Mousourakis, George (2019). Comparative Law and Legal Traditions: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. p. 217.
- ^ "Legal History of France". Archived from the original on 2013-09-29. Retrieved 2010-05-31.
- ^ Mousourakis, George (2003). The Historical and Institutional Context of Roman Law. Routledge. p. 435.
- ^ The Coutumes of France in the Library of Congress. 2006. p. 3.
- ^ Revue générale de droit. Vol. 24. 1993. p. 524.
- ^ a b Padoa-Schioppa, Antonio (2017). A History of Law in Europe: From the Early Middle Ages to the Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press. p. 185.
- ^ The Law Magazine and Law Review. Vol. 1. 1856. p. 5.
- ^ Stigall, Dan E. (2017). The Santillana Codes. p. 76.
- ^ "Coutume de Paris" in the Canadian Encyclopedia
- ^ "Civil Code" in the Canadian Encyclopedia