History of communism: Difference between revisions
m gaps |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|none}} <!-- "none" is preferred when the title is sufficiently descriptive; see [[WP:SDNONE]] --> |
|||
<div class="messagebox merge">[[Image:Merge-arrows.gif|left|50px]] It has been suggested that this article or section be [[Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages|merged]] with ''[[:{{NAMESPACE}}:Communism|Communism]]''. ([[:{{NAMESPACE}} talk:Communism#merge/split with "History of communism"|Discuss]])</div>[[Category:Articles to be merged|{{PAGENAME}}]] |
|||
{{use British English|date=May 2019}} |
|||
{{attention}} |
|||
{{use mdy dates|date=May 2019}} |
|||
{{Template:Communism}} |
|||
{{communism sidebar|aspects}} |
|||
'''History of [[Communism]]''' as a political movement begins in the middle of the 19th century. |
|||
The '''history of communism''' encompasses a wide variety of [[Ideology|ideologies]] and [[political movement]]s sharing the core principles of [[common ownership]] of [[wealth]], [[economy|economic enterprise]], and [[property]].<ref name=Lansford>{{cite book |last=Lansford |first=Thomas |title=Communism |date=2007 |pages=9–24, 36–44 |publisher=[[Cavendish Square Publishing]] |location=New York |isbn=978-0761426288}}</ref> Most modern forms of [[communism]] are grounded at least nominally in [[Marxism]], a theory and method conceived by [[Karl Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels]] during the 19th century.<ref name="Oxford1">{{cite book |last=Leopold |first=David |editor1-last=Freeden |editor1-first=Michael |editor2-last=Stears |editor2-first=Marc |editor3-last=Sargent |editor3-first=Lyman Tower |title=The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies |date=2015 |pages=20–38 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |location=Oxford |isbn=978-0198744337}}</ref> Marxism subsequently gained a widespread following across much of Europe, and throughout the late 1800s its militant supporters were instrumental in a number of unsuccessful revolutions on that continent.<ref name="Lansford"/> During the same era, there was also a proliferation of communist parties which rejected armed revolution, but embraced the Marxist ideal of [[collective property]] and a [[classless society]].<ref name="Lansford"/> |
|||
Although Marxist theory suggested that [[industrial society|industrial societies]] were the most suitable places for [[social revolution]] (either through peaceful transition or by force of arms), communism was mostly successful in underdeveloped countries with endemic poverty such as the [[Republic of China (1912–1949)|Republic of China]].<ref name="Oxford1"/> In 1917, the [[Communist Party of the Soviet Union|Bolshevik Party]] seized power during the [[Russian Revolution]] and in 1922 created the [[Soviet Union]], the world's first [[List of socialist states|self-declared]] [[socialist state]].<ref name="Oxford2">{{cite book |last=Schwarzmantle |first=John |editor-last=Breuilly |editor-first=John |title=The Oxford Handbook of the History of Nationalism |date=2017 |pages=643–651 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |location=Oxford |isbn=978-0198768203}}</ref> The Bolsheviks thoroughly embraced the concept of [[proletarian internationalism]] and [[world revolution]], seeing their struggle as an international rather than a purely regional cause.<ref name="Oxford1"/><ref name="Oxford2"/> This was to have a phenomenal impact on the spread of communism during the 20th century as the Soviet Union installed new [[Marxism–Leninism|Marxist–Leninist]] governments in Central and Eastern Europe following [[World War II]] and indirectly backed the ascension of others in the Americas, Asia and Africa.<ref name="Lansford"/> Pivotal to this policy was the [[Communist International]], also known as the Comintern, formed with the perspective of aiding and assisting [[Communist party|communist parties]] around the world and fostering revolution.<ref name="Oxford2"/> This was one major cause of tensions during the [[Cold War]] as the [[United States]] and its military allies equated the [[World communism|global spread of communism]] with [[Soviet Empire|Soviet expansionism]] by proxy.<ref name="Revolutions">{{cite book |last=MacFarlane |first=S. Neil |editor-last=Katz |editor-first=Mark |title=The USSR and Marxist Revolutions in the Third World |date=1990 |pages=6–11 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |location=Cambridge |isbn=978-0812216202}}</ref> |
|||
Communism is a branch of the broader [[socialist]] movement. The communist movement differentiates itself from other branches of the socialist movement through various things - such as, a commitment to [[revolution|revolutionary]] strategies for overthrowing [[capitalism]]. |
|||
By 1985, one-third of the world's population lived under a Marxist–Leninist system of government in one form or another.<ref name="Lansford"/> However, there was significant debate among communist and Marxist ideologues as to whether most of these countries could be meaningfully considered Marxist at all since many of the basic components of the Marxist system were [[Revisionism (Marxism)|altered and revised]] by such countries.<ref name="Revolutions"/> There was a rapid decline of communism in the late 1980s and early 1990s, including the [[dissolution of the Soviet Union]] in 1991 and several other [[Marxist–Leninist state]]s repudiating or abolishing the ideology altogether.<ref name="Dunn">{{cite book |last=Dunn |first=Dennis |title=A History of Orthodox, Islamic, and Western Christian Political Values |date=2016 |pages=126–131 |publisher=[[Palgrave-Macmillan]] |location=Basingstoke |isbn=978-3319325668}}</ref> Later historians have proposed different explanations for this decline, including arguments that Marxist-Leninist governments failed to live up to the ideal of a [[communist society]], that there was a general trend towards increasing [[authoritarianism]], that they suffered from excessive bureaucracy, and that they had inefficiencies in their economies.<ref name="Lansford"/><ref name="Ball & Dagger 2019">{{cite encyclopedia |title=Communism |encyclopedia=[[Encyclopædia Britannica]] |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/communism |access-date=10 June 2020 |date=2019 |orig-date=1999 |editor1-last=Ball |editor1-first=Terence |edition=revised |editor2-last=Dagger |editor2-first=Richard}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Djilas |first=Milovan |date=1991 |title=The Legacy of Communism in Eastern Europe |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/45290119 |journal=The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs |volume=15 |issue=1 |pages=83–92 |jstor=45290119 |issn=1046-1868}}</ref> As of the 21st century, only a small number of Marxist–Leninist states remain, namely [[China]], [[Cuba]], [[Laos]], [[North Korea]] and [[Vietnam]].<ref name="Lansford"/><ref>{{cite web |url=https://laviedesidees.fr/IMG/pdf/20090715_entretienwang.pdf |title=Political change and democracy in China |author-link=Wang Shaoguang |last=Shaoguang |first=Wang |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170909060743/https://laviedesidees.fr/IMG/pdf/20090715_entretienwang.pdf |archive-date=9 September 2017}}</ref> With the exception of North Korea, all of these states have started allowing more economic competition while maintaining one-party rule.<ref name="Ball & Dagger 2019" /> |
|||
==Early Communism== |
|||
== Origins of communism == |
|||
The notion of communism - the idea of a classless, stateless society based on communal ownership of property and wealth, stretches far back in Western thought long predating ''The Communist Manifesto''. Some have even traced communist ideas back to ancient times, such as in [[Plato]]'s ''[[The Republic]]''; or (perhaps with more justification) in the life of the early Christian Church, as described in the [[Acts of the Apostles]] (see [[Christian communism]]). |
|||
=== Communism in antiquity === |
|||
{{further|Pre-Marxist communism|Primitive communism|Religious communism}} |
|||
[[File:Duble herma of Socrates and Seneca Antikensammlung Berlin 07.jpg|thumb|left|The 1st century BC Roman philosopher [[Seneca the Younger|Seneca]] believed that humans had fallen from a [[Golden Age]] of primitive communism<ref name="Pierson2013">{{cite book |first=Christopher |last=Pierson |title=Just Property: A History in the Latin West. Volume One: Wealth, Virtue, and the Law |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pZ02AAAAQBAJ&pg=PA54 |year=2013 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |location=Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-967328-5 |page=54 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref>]] |
|||
Many historical groups have been considered as following forms of [[communism]]. [[Karl Marx]] and other early communist theorists believed that [[hunter-gatherer]] societies as were found in the [[Paleolithic]] through to [[Agrarian society|horticultural societies]] as found in the [[Chalcolithic]] were essentially egalitarian and he, therefore, termed their ideology to be [[primitive communism]].<ref>{{cite web |first=Dino |last=Felluga |title=Introductory Guide to Critical Theory – ''Modules on Marx: On the Stages of Economic Development'' |date=1 January 2011 |publisher=[[Purdue University]] |access-date=3 February 2021 |url=http://www.purdue.edu/guidetotheory/marxism/modules/marxstages.html}}</ref> One of the first writers to espouse a belief in the primitive communism of the past was the [[Ancient Rome|Roman]] [[Stoicism|Stoic]] philosopher [[Seneca the Younger|Seneca]] who stated," How happy was the primitive age when the bounties of nature lay in common...They held all nature in common which gave them secure possession of the public wealth."<ref name="Laidler">{{cite book |first=Harry W. |last=Laidler |title=History of Socialism: An Historical Comparative Study of Socialism, Communism, Utopia |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=F3qQXS_FjZkC |date=2013 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |isbn=978-1-136-23143-8 |pages=17 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> Because of this he believed that such primitive societies were the richest as there was no poverty.<ref name="Laidler" /> Other [[Greco-Roman]] writers that believed in a prehistoric humanity that practiced communism include [[Diodorus Siculus]], [[Virgil]], and [[Ovid]].{{sfn|van Ree|2015|p=17}} Similarly the early [[Church Fathers]], like their pagan predecessors, maintained that humans society had declined to its current state from a now lost egalitarian social order.{{sfn|van Ree|2015|p=19}} |
|||
Around the late 5th century BC in [[Ancient Greece]], ideas similar to communism were becoming widespread to the extent that they were parodied by the dramatist [[Aristophanes]] in his comedy [[The Assemblywomen]] in which the women of Athens seize control of the ''[[Ecclesia (ancient Greece)|Ecclesia]]'' or city government and abolish all private property while making the sharing of women and the collective rearing of children mandatory.<ref name="Dawson1992">{{cite book |first=Doyne |last=Dawson |title=Cities of the Gods: Communist Utopias in Greek Thought |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HwsWp43OWjsC&pg=PA39 |date=1992 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |isbn=978-0-19-536150-6 |pages=37–43 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> Over a decade later in [[Plato's Republic]] [[Socrates]] declares that an ideal state would eliminate all forms of private property among the elite of society to the extent that even children and wives are shared.<ref name="Plato">{{cite book |author=Plato |author-link=Plato |title=Plato's Republic, Books 1–10 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ccr8skxseKQC |year=2001 |publisher=Agora Publications, Inc. |isbn=978-1-887250-25-2 |pages=192–193 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref>{{sfn|Laidler|2013|pp=12–13}} He asserts that such practices would prevent internal conflict within a society and promote a sense of unity and common identity.{{sfn|Plato|2001|pp=189–191}} Around AD 500 in [[Iran]], the [[Zoroastrianism|Zoroastrian]] priest and reformist [[Mazdak]] purportedly founded a movement preaching religious communism while under the patronage of the [[Sasanian Empire|Sassanian]] [[King of Kings|King]] [[Kavad I]] who initially supported the priest and his reforms, but later had the [[Mazdakism|Mazdakians]] repressed and Mazdak executed.<ref name="Studies1978">{{cite book |author=[[American University]] (Washington, D.C.). Foreign Area Studies |title=Iran, a Country Study |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Lvvrt670CB8C&pg=PA114 |year=1978 |publisher=[[Department of Defense]], [[Department of the Army]] |pages=114 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> |
|||
In the [[16th century]], English writer St. [[Thomas More]], in his treatise ''[[Utopia (book)|Utopia]]'', portrayed a society based on common ownership of property, whose leaders administered it through the application of reason. |
|||
=== Developments in Christian communism === |
|||
Several groupings in the English Civil War, but especially the [[Diggers]] (or [[True Levellers]]) espoused clear communistic, but agrarian ideals. (Cromwell and the Grandees' attitude to these groups was at best ambivalent and often hostile – see [[Eduard Bernstein|Bernstein]]'s classic book ''[[Cromwell and Communism]]''). |
|||
{{Main|Christian communism}} |
|||
[[Early Christianity]] supported a form of common ownership based on the teachings in the [[New Testament]] which emphasised sharing.{{sfn|van Ree|2015|p=19}} For example, in the [[Book of Acts]] the passages {{bibleverse|Acts|2:44–45}} and {{bibleverse|Acts|4:32–37}} state all believers held their possessions communally and would distribute goods based on need.<ref name="Busky2002">{{cite book |first=Donald F. |last=Busky |title=Communism in History and Theory: From Utopian socialism to the fall of the Soviet Union |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=O-bi65fwN7kC |year=2002 |publisher=[[Greenwood Publishing Group]] |isbn=978-0-275-97748-1 |page=14 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> Additionally, the related Jewish sect known as the [[Essenes]] was committed to, "social and material egalitarianism."{{sfn|Service|2007|pp=14–15}} Despite these practices falling into decline even before the Christianization of the [[Roman Empire]], the principles of sharing property and holding goods in common continued within the Christian traditions of [[monasticism]].{{sfn|van Ree|2015|p=19}}{{sfn|Service|2007|pp=14–15}} |
|||
From the [[High Middle Ages]] to the [[early modern period]] in Europe, various groups supporting [[Christian communism|Christian communist]] and [[Intentional community|communalist]] ideas were occasionally adopted by reformist Christian sects. An early 12th century [[Proto-Protestantism|proto-Protestant]] group originating in [[Lyon]], [[Kingdom of Burgundy-Arles]] known as the [[Waldensians]] held their property in common in accordance with the Book of Acts, but were persecuted by the Catholic Church and retreated to the [[Piedmont]].<ref name="Boer2019">{{cite book |first=Roland |last=Boer |title=Red Theology: On the Christian Communist Tradition |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=L8KODwAAQBAJ&pg=PA15 |date= 2019 |publisher=[[Brill Publishing|Brill]] |isbn=978-90-04-39477-3 |pages=15–16 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> Some Waldensians led a schism after they felt the group's leader was becoming [[authoritarian]].<ref name="Brackney 2012 p. 321">{{cite book | last=Brackney | first=W.H. | title=Historical Dictionary of Radical Christianity | publisher=Scarecrow Press | series=G – Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary Subjects Series | year=2012 | isbn=978-0-8108-7179-3 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZP6fv8LqJ4MC&pg=PA321 | access-date=2023-03-02 | page=321}}</ref> With the rise of the [[Mendicant Orders]] in the 13th century groups such as the [[Franciscans]] began challenging the concept of private property to the extent it had to be defended by [[Pope John XXII]] in his 1328 papal bull ''Quia vir reprobus'', in which he ruled that because God had gifted Adam with the Earth as his domain, the ownership of property was divinely sanctioned.<ref name="Freeman2011">{{cite book |first=Michael |last=Freeman |title=Human Rights: An Interdisciplinary Approach |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uEgE9OJtKoIC&pg=PA19 |year=2011 |publisher=[[Polity Press]] |page=19 |isbn=9780745639666 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref><ref name="Barilan2012">{{cite book |first=Yechiel Michael |last=Barilan |title=Human Dignity, Human Rights, and Responsibility: The New Language of Global Bioethics and Biolaw |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Na738vsuylUC&pg=PA63 |year=2012 |publisher=[[MIT Press]] |page=63 |isbn=9780262304887 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> Also beginning in the 13th century a [[laity|lay order]] known as the [[Beghards]], originating in the [[Low Countries]], started to spread among the underprivileged groups of society, taking in members who renounced private property and dedicated themselves to communal living and pious, frugal lifestyles as artisans.<ref name="Cross2005">{{cite book |editor1-last=Cross |editor1-first=Frank |editor2-last=Livingstone |editor2-first=Elizabeth |title=The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fUqcAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA180 |year=2005 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |page=180 |isbn=978-0-19-280290-3}}</ref><ref name="Barkun2012">{{cite book |first=Reinaldo L. |last=Román |editor-first=Michael |editor-last=Barkun |title=Millennialism and Violence |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0XOvwyRTlBQC&pg=PA66 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |year=1996 |page=66 |chapter=Christian Themes: Mainstream Traditions and Millenarian Violence |isbn=9781136308482 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> Although the practices were successful enough to spread to other areas on the continent such as France and Germany, the Beghards were later repeatedly condemned by the Catholic Church.<ref name=Cath1907>{{cite encyclopedia |title=Beguines; Beghards |encyclopedia=The Catholic Encyclopedia |volume=2 |first=Ernest |last=Gilliat-Smith |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=m8xJAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA390 |year=1907 |publisher=Robert Appleton Company |page=390}}</ref><ref name="Cross2005" /> Around 1300 the [[Apostolic Brethren]] in northern Italy were taken over by [[Fra Dolcino]] who formed a sect known as the [[Dulcinians]] which advocated ending feudalism, dissolving hierarchies in the church, and holding all property in common.<ref name="Boer2019" /> The 14th century [[English people|English]] [[Scholastic philosophy|scholastic]] and founder of [[Lollardy]], [[John Wycliffe]], preached of an idealized Christian state with collective ownership and disapproved of those rejecting the, "common charity and common property of Christian men."<ref name="Traill1894">{{cite book |first=Henry Duff |last=Traill |title=Social England: From the accession of Edward I. to the death of Henry VII |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lcJZAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA163 |year=1894 |publisher=[[Cassell (publisher)|Cassell]] |pages=163–165 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref><ref name="Lechler1904">{{cite book |first=Gotthard Victor |last=Lechler |title=John Wycliffe and His English Precursors |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZHIJAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA181 |year=1904 |publisher=[[Religious Tract Society]] |page=358 |isbn=978-0-404-16235-1 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref><ref name=Kaufmann1883 />{{rp|54}} Around the same time the revolutionary priest [[John Ball (priest)|John Ball]], who was later executed for his prominent role in the doomed [[Peasants' Revolt|Wat Tyler Rebellion]] allegedly declared, "things cannot go well in England, nor ever will, until all goods are held in common."{{sfn|Brown|2009|p=12}} |
|||
Criticism of the idea of private property continued into the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] era of the [[18th century]], through such thinkers as [[Jean Jacques Rousseau]]. "[[Utopian socialism|Utopian socialist]]" writers such as [[Robert Owen]] are also sometimes regarded as communists. |
|||
[[File:Campanella Civitas Solis.jpg|thumb|[[Tommaso Campanella]]'s ''[[The City of the Sun|Civitas Solis]]'' envisioned a utopian city where private property is abolished<ref name="Carrafiello1998">{{cite book |first=Michael L. |last=Carrafiello |title=Robert Parsons and English Catholicism, 1580–1610 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9-PqBAN_yIAC&pg=PA79 |year=1998 |publisher=[[Susquehanna University Press]] |isbn=978-1-57591-012-3 |page=79 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref>]] |
|||
In [[Tábor]], [[Kingdom of Bohemia|Bohemia]] during the 15th century [[Hussite Wars]], the radical [[Taborites]] attempted to institute a system they called a "community of goods" where, "there is no mine or thine but all is held in common", but once initiated the scheme was quickly abandoned.{{sfn|Kautsky|1897|pp=58–60}}{{sfn|van Ree|2015|p=21}} They have been considered precursors of totalitarian governance while under leadership of the dictatorial [[Jan Želivský]].<ref name="Wagner 1983 p. ">{{cite book | last=Wagner | first=M.L. | title=Petr Chelčický: A Radical Separatist in Hussite Bohemia | publisher=Herald Press | series=Studies in Anabaptist and Mennonite history | year=1983 | isbn=978-0-8361-1257-3 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iojZAAAAMAAJ&q=%22taborite%22+%22totalitarianism%22 | language=sk | access-date=2023-03-02 | page=}}</ref><ref name="Pavlicek Šmahel 2015 p. 227">{{cite book | last1=Pavlicek | first1=O. | last2=Šmahel | first2=F. | title=A Companion to Jan Hus | publisher=Brill | series=Brill's Companions to the Christian Tradition | year=2015 | isbn=978-90-04-28272-8 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dzJzBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA227 | access-date=2023-03-02 | page=227}}</ref><ref name="Berenger Simpson 2014 p. 68">{{cite book | last1=Berenger | first1=J. | last2=Simpson | first2=C.A. | title=A History of the Habsburg Empire 1273–1700 | publisher=Taylor & Francis | year=2014 | isbn=978-1-317-89570-1 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rWQSBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA68 | access-date=2023-03-04 | page=68}}</ref><ref name="Malia Emmons 2006 p. 52">{{cite book | last1=Malia | first1=M.E. | last2=Emmons | first2=T. | title=History's Locomotives: Revolutions and the Making of the Modern World | publisher=Yale University Press | year=2006 | isbn=978-0-300-12690-7 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7rDBKN3kvM4C&pg=PA52 | access-date=2023-03-04 | page=52}}</ref> After Taborite power was broken at [[Battle of Lipany|Lipany]] their successors fled to [[Moravia]] forming the [[Moravian Church]] under the [[pacifism|pacifist]] spiritual leader [[Petr Chelčický]] who harbored both Christian communist and [[Christian anarchism|Christian anarchist]] beliefs.<ref name="Kaufmann1883">{{cite book |first=Moritz |last=Kaufmann |title=Socialism and Communism in Their Practical Application |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kIUIAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA91 |year=1883 |publisher=Society for promoting Christian knowledge |isbn=978-0-7905-9010-3 |pages=96–98 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref>{{sfn|Kautsky|1897|pp=78–82}} The extent to which Chelčický's followers, also known as the ''Bohemian Brethren'', adhered to his ideals, namely the abstinence from property, trade, and government, is disputed, and by the 16th century the Brethren definitely no longer embraced them.<ref name="Kaufmann1883" />{{sfn|Kautsky|1897|pp=86–89}} During the [[Protestant Reformation]] of the 16th century the [[Radical Reformation|radical]] [[Anabaptism|Anabaptists]], who originated in [[Old Swiss Confederacy|Switzerland]], endorsed the communalization of goods as practiced in the Book of Acts.{{sfn|van Ree|2015|pp=23–25}} The most notable Anabaptist groups were the [[Hutterites]], founded by [[Jacob Hutter]], who settled in Moravia in the 1520s and the [[Münster rebellion|Münster Anabaptists]] who were eradicated in battle during their attempt in 1535 to forcibly convert the city of [[Münster]] into a theocratic [[New Jerusalem]].{{sfn|van Ree|2015|pp=23–25}} Various groups on the side of the [[Roundheads]] during the [[English Civil War]] in the mid-17th century propagated the [[redistribution of wealth]] on an egalitarian basis, namely the [[Levellers]] and the [[Diggers]] although only the latter group under [[Gerrard Winstanley]] promoted a propertyless, communist society.{{sfn|Service|2007|p=16}}<ref name="Afanasyevv1967">{{cite book |first=Viktor Grigoryevich |last=Afanasyevv |title=Scientific Communism: (a Popular Outline) |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fOJRAQAAIAAJ |year=1967 |publisher=[[Progress Publishers]] |pages=15–16 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> |
|||
European writers began depicting idealized communist societies in [[Utopian and dystopian fiction|utopian fiction]] from the 16th century onward. Inspired by largely fictional accounts of [[Indigenous peoples of the Americas|native]] communities in the [[New World]], the English [[humanism|humanist]] and future [[Lord Chancellor]] [[Thomas More]], wrote the utopian novel ''[[Utopia (More book)|Utopia]]'' (1516) in which the main character decries private property after traveling to an idyllic island without money or private property and where, "everything is under state control."<ref name="Fokkema2011">{{cite book |first=Douwe Wessel |last=Fokkema |title=Perfect Worlds: Utopian Fiction in China and the West |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=J2pgKnJvDJAC |year=2011 |publisher=[[Amsterdam University Press]] |isbn=978-90-8964-350-6 |pages=33–35 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref>{{sfn|Laidler|2013|pp=22–24}}<ref name="Bridgett1891">{{cite book |first=Thomas Edward |last=Bridgett |title=Life and Writings of Sir Thomas More: Lord Chancellor of England and Martyr Under Henry VIII |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hdRLAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA103 |year=1891 |publisher=[[Burns & Oates]] |isbn=978-0-598-99084-6 |page=103 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> More coined the term ''utopia'' as a name for his idealized community, which means "nowhere" in Latin, evincing the fact that More did not consider such a society attainable in reality. [[Tommaso Campanella]]'s 1601 work ''[[The City of the Sun]]'' propagated the concept of a society where the products of society should be shared equally.{{sfn|Service|2007|p=15}} In Campanella's utopia all people are well educated, there is only a four-hour work day, there is no private property, the population practices [[eugenics]] to improve mental and physical fitness, most time is devoted to either leisure or self improvement, and society is managed by a ruling scientist who bases his administration on scientific principles all in the interest of benefiting society as a whole.<ref name="Afanasyevv1967" /><ref name="Morrison2016">{{cite book |first=Tessa |last=Morrison |title=Unbuilt Utopian Cities 1460 to 1900: Reconstructing their Architecture and Political Philosophy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=P3e1CwAAQBAJ&pg=PA52 |date=2016 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |isbn=978-1-317-00556-8 |page=52 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> Utopian communist societies were also described by the French writers [[François Fénelon]] and [[Denis Vairasse]] while English writer [[Francis Bacon]] wrote of a utopia that merely had a "communism in knowledge."{{sfn|van Ree|2015|pp=38–39}}{{sfn|Laidler|2013|p=32}} |
|||
The [[Shakers]] of the 18th century praticed a [[communalism|communal]] way of living (a sort of [[religious communism]]). |
|||
=== Communism during the Enlightenment === |
|||
Some believe that early communist-like utopias also existed outside of [[Europe]], in [[Native American (Americas)|Native American]] society, and other pre-[[Colonialism]] societies in the [[Western Hemisphere]]. Almost every member of a tribe had his or her own contribution to society, and land and natural resources would often be shared peacefully among the tribe. Some such tribes in [[North America]] and [[South America]] still existed well into the twentieth century. |
|||
During the [[Age of Enlightenment]] in 18th century France, some liberal writers increasingly began to criticize the institution of private property even to the extent they demanded its abolition.{{sfn|Fried|Sanders|1992|pp=14–15}} One of the first secular visions for a communist society is contained within the [[Catholic Church in France|French Catholic]] [[abbé]] [[Jean Meslier]]'s posthumously published ''Testament'' (1729).<ref name="Afanasyevv1967" />{{sfn|van Ree|2015|p=46}} Similarly the [[Abbé de Mably]], also a French philosopher wrote that the individual ownership of land was the source of all mischief and that wealthy inequality brought about social ruin that could only be reversed by adopting a society based on collective ownership."<ref name="Woolsey">{{cite book |first=Theodore Dwight |last=Woolsey |author-link=Theodore Dwight Woolsey |title=Communism and Socialism in Their History and Theory: A Sketch |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XwcOAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA1 |year=1880 |publisher=[[Charles Scribner's Sons|C. Scribner's Sons]] |pages=98–102 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=The Cambridge Modern History |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=duBEoYo9Z8kC&pg=PA34 |year=1904 |pages=33–34}}</ref> He did however temper his views by surmising that any attempts at enacting true equality and communal ownership would prove to be too costly and destructive to be worth implementing.<ref name="Engels1999">{{cite book |first=Friedrich |last=Engels |author-link=Friedrich Engels |title=Socialism: Utopian and Scientific |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_A7P0fL_kYsC&pg=PA11 |year=1999 |publisher=[[Resistance Books]] |isbn=978-0-909196-86-8 |pages=11 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> Another French thinker, [[Étienne-Gabriel Morelly]] also contended that private property was the source of all vice in society and developed the basic principles for a communist society namely, the abolition of property, the right to live and work for all, and the duty of all citizens to work for the common good.<ref name="Woolsey"/><ref name="Engels1999"/> The French philosopher [[Jean Jacques Rousseau]] in his hugely influential ''[[The Social Contract]]'' (1762) outlined the basis for a political order based on popular sovereignty rather than the rule of monarchs, and in his ''[[Discourse on Inequality]]'' (1755) inveighed against the corrupting effects of private property claiming that the invention of private property had led to the, "crimes, wars, murders, and suffering" that plagued civilization.{{sfn|Fried|Sanders|1992|pp=31–33}}{{sfn|Priestland|2010|pp=5–7}} |
|||
{{quote box|width=300px|align=left|quote=I believe that no one will contest the justness of this proposition: that where no property exists, none of its pernicious consequences could exist...if you were to take away property, the blind and pitiless self-interest that accompanies it, you would cause all the prejudices in errors that they sustain to collapse.|source=—[[Étienne-Gabriel Morelly]], 1755{{sfn|Fried|Sanders|1992|pp=17–20}}}} |
|||
[[File:Portrait de Victor d'Hupay (cropped).png|thumb|[[Victor d'Hupay]] referred to himself as an ''auteur communiste'' or "communist author" in 1782{{sfn|Billington|2011|pp=79–80}}]] |
|||
[[File:NicolasRestifdeLaBretonne.jpg|thumb|left|[[Restif de la Bretonne]] used the term "communism" in 1793 to describe a society where all private property was eliminated{{sfn|Billington|2011|pp=81–82}}]] |
|||
In 1785 the popular French novelist [[Restif de la Bretonne]] wrote a book review on [[Victor d'Hupay|Victor d'Hupay's]] 1779 book ''[[Project for a Philosophical Community]]'' which described a plan for a [[communal experiment]] in Marseille where all private property was banned and which could be considered, "the first full blueprint for a secular communist society in the world."{{sfn|Billington|2011|pp=79–80}}<ref name="Linebaugh2014"/> In the review Restif noted that d'Hupay had referred to himself as a [[:fr:communiste|communiste]], the French form of the word "communist", in a 1782 letter, the first recorded instance of that term.{{sfn|Billington|2011|pp=79–80}} Restif himself wrote many novels centered around the idea of eliminating private property, first using the term "community of goods" in 1783 and then the term "communism" in 1793, rendered in French as [[:fr:communisme|communisme]].{{sfn|Billington|2011|pp=81–82}}<ref name="Hodges">{{cite book |first=Donald C. |last=Hodges |author-link=Donald C. Hodges |title=Sandino's Communism: Spiritual Politics for the Twenty-First Century |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Pu7zAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA36 |date= 2014 |publisher=[[University of Texas Press]] |isbn=978-0-292-71564-6 |pages=7 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> |
|||
Karl Marx saw communism as the original state of mankind from which it arose, through classical society, and then feudalism, to its current state of capitalism. He then proposed that the next step in social evolution would be a return to communism, but at a higher level than when mankind had originally practiced primitive communism. |
|||
[[File:François-Noël Babeuf.jpg|thumb|[[François-Noël Babeuf]] was a notable advocate for the abolition of private property during the [[French Revolution]]{{sfn|Lansford|2007|p=26}}]] |
|||
In its contemporary form, the ideology of communism grew out of the workers' movement of 19th century Europe. At that time, as the [[Industrial Revolution]] advanced, socialist critics blamed capitalism for creating a new class of poor, urban factory workers who toiled under harsh conditions, and for widening the gulf between rich and poor. |
|||
These currents of thought in [[French philosophy]] proved influential during the [[French Revolution]] of 1789 in which various [[Criticism of monarchy|anti-monarchists]], particularly the [[Jacobin (politics)|Jacobins]], supported the idea of redistributing wealth equally among the people, including [[Jean-Paul Marat]] and [[Gracchus Babeuf]]. The latter was involved in the [[Conspiracy of the Equals]] of 1796 intending to establish a revolutionary regime based on communal ownership, egalitarianism and the redistribution of property.{{sfn|Priestland|2010|pp=18–19}} Babeuf was directly influenced by Morelly's anti-property utopian novel ''The Code of Nature'' and quoted it extensively, although he was under the erroneous impression it was written by [[Diderot]].{{sfn|Fried|Sanders|1992|pp=17–20}}Also during the revolution the publisher [[Nicholas Bonneville]], the founder of the Parisian revolutionary [[Society of the Friends of Truth|Social Club]] used his printing press to spread the communist treatises of Restif and [[Sylvain Maréchal]].{{sfn|Billington|2011|p=84}} Maréchal, who later joined Babeuf's conspiracy, would state in his ''[[The Manifesto of the Equals|Manifesto of the Equals]]'' (1796), "we aim at something more sublime and more just, the COMMON GOOD or the COMMUNITY OF GOODS" and "The French Revolution is just a precursor of another revolution, far greater, far more solemn, which will be the last."<ref name="Blaisdell2012">{{cite book |first=Bob |last=Blaisdell |title=The Communist Manifesto and Other Revolutionary Writings: Marx, Marat, Paine, Mao Tse-Tung, Gandhi and Others |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RDjCAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA92 |date=2012 |publisher=Courier Corporation |isbn=978-0-486-11396-8 |pages=92–94 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> Restif also continued to write and publish books on the topic of communism throughout the Revolution.{{sfn|Billington|2011|pp=81–82}} Accordingly, through their egalitarian programs and agitation Restif, Maréchal, and Babeuf became the progenitors of modern communism.{{sfn|Billington|2011|p=71}} Babeuf's plot was detected, however, and he and several others involved were arrested and executed. Because of his views and methods, Babeuf is sometimes referred to as the first revolutionary communist, although at the time Babeuf himself used the term "communitist".<ref>{{cite book |last=Rose |first=Robert Barrie |title=Gracchus Babeuf: the first revolutionary communist |date=1978 |publisher=Arnold |isbn=0-7131-5993-6 |pages=32, 332 |oclc=780996378}}</ref><ref name="Hodges"/> Despite this setback, the example of the [[Revolutionary France|French Revolutionary]] regime and Babeuf's doomed insurrection was an inspiration for French socialist thinkers such as [[Henri de Saint-Simon]], [[Louis Blanc]], [[Charles Fourier]] and [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]].{{sfn|Service|2007|pp=16–17}} Proudhon, the founder of modern anarchism and libertarian socialism would later famously declare "[[property is theft!]]" a phrase first invented by the French revolutionary [[Jacques Pierre Brissot|Brissot de Warville]].{{sfn|Woolsey|1880|p=102}} |
|||
=== Post-French Revolution communism === |
|||
== Karl Marx and The Communist Manifesto == |
|||
Importantly because one of Babeuf's co-conspirators, [[Philippe Buonarroti]], survived the crackdown on the Conspiracy of the Equals he was able, later in his life, to write the influential book ''Babeuf's Conspiracy for Equality'' first published in 1828 which chronicled and popularized Babeouf's beliefs.<ref name="Greene2017">{{cite book |first=Doug Enaa |last=Greene |title=Communist Insurgent: Blanqui's Politics of Revolution |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DmkwDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT46 |date= 2017 |publisher=[[Haymarket Books]] |isbn=978-1-60846-888-1 |page=46 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> In it Buonarroti asserted that in society, "burdens, productions, and advantages ought to be equally divided," and believed that this division would lead to, "the greatest possible happiness of all."{{sfn|Hodges|2014|pp=36–37}} Bournatti's writings led to a revival of Babeuf's thought in France and the dissemination of political theories referred to as [[Neo-Babouvism]]. According to Bournatti's Neo-Babouvism a revolutionary elite of "wise and courageous" citizens who cared only for "ensuring the triumph of equality" would be needed to uplift the masses and establish a new society based on egalitarian principles.{{sfn|Lowy|2020|pp=71–72}} |
|||
[[Image:Kmarx.jpg|frame|left|Karl Marx]] |
|||
[[Image:communist-manifesto.png|right|200px|The Communist Manifesto]] |
|||
Although Marx addressed a wide range of issues, he is most famous for his analysis of history in terms of class struggle, summed up in the famous line from the introduction to the ''[[Communist Manifesto]]'': "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of [[class struggle]]". |
|||
By the 1830s and 1840s, the egalitarian concepts of communism and the related ideas of [[socialism]] had become widely popular in French revolutionary circles thanks to the writings of social critics and philosophers such as [[Pierre Leroux]] and [[Théodore Dézamy]], whose critiques of bourgeoisie [[liberalism]] and [[individualism]] led to a widespread intellectual rejection of ''[[laissez-faire]]'' [[capitalism]] on economic, philosophical and moral grounds.<ref name="CorcoranFuchs1983">{{cite book |first1=Paul E. |last1=Corcoran |first2=Christian |last2=Fuchs |author2-link=Christian Fuchs (sociologist) |title=Before Marx: Socialism and Communism in France, 1830–48 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aOuuCwAAQBAJ |date= 1983 |publisher=[[Palgrave-Macmillan]] UK |isbn=978-1-349-17146-0 |pages=3–5, 22 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> According to Leroux writing in 1832, "To recognise no other aim than individualism is to deliver the lower classes to brutal exploitation. The proletariat is no more than a revival of antique slavery." He also asserted that private ownership of the means of production allowed for the exploitation of the lower classes and that private property was a concept divorced from human dignity.<ref name="CorcoranFuchs1983" /> Dézamy would assert in his 1842 book {{lang|fr|Code la Communaté}} that what was needed was a," complete and unrestricted society of communal property" in which all activity was centralized.<ref name="Brie2019">{{cite book |first=Michael |last=Brie |title=Rediscovering Lenin: Dialectics of Revolution and Metaphysics of Domination |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RbOmDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA128 |date=2019 |publisher=[[Springer Science+Business Media|Springer]] |isbn=978-3-030-23327-3 |pages=128 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> The systematic, historical and materialist analysis of the nature of communism in Dézamy's work led Marx to consider him among the first [[Scientific socialism|scientific socialists]] along with [[:fr:Jules Gay|Jules Gay]].<ref>Marx, K., and F. Engels, ''The Holy Family: Critique of Critical Criticism.'' Ch. VI 3. Online at: http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/holy-family/ch06_3_d.htm.</ref> It was only in the year 1840 that proponents of common ownership in France, including the socialists Théodore Dézamy, [[Étienne Cabet]], and [[Jean-Jacques Pillot]] began to widely adopt the word "communism" as a term for their belief system.{{sfn|van Ree|2015|p=10}} |
|||
''The Communist Manifesto'', also known as ''The Manifesto of the Communist Party'', first published on [[February 21]], [[1848]] by [[Karl Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels]], is one of the world's most historically influential [[Politics|political]] tracts. Commissioned by the [[Communist League]] and written by founding Communist theorists [[Karl Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels]], it laid out the League's purposes and program. The Manifesto suggested a course of action for a [[proletariat|proletarian]] revolution to overthrow [[capitalism]] and, eventually, to bring about a [[classlessness|classless]] society. |
|||
A landmark event that established the popularity of the communist movement in France occurred in 1840 when Dézamy along with Pillot and [[Albert Laponneraye]] organized a pro-communist banquet in [[Belleville, Paris|Belleville]], France, the "first public manifestation of the communist party" in France which proved so successful that further planned communist banquets had to be outlawed by the French government.{{sfn|Lowy|2020|pp=65–66}}<ref name="Linebaugh2014">{{cite book |first=Peter |last=Linebaugh |title=Stop, Thief!: The Commons, Enclosures, and Resistance |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Cd4EAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA205 |date=2014 |publisher=[[PM Press]] |isbn=978-1-60486-747-3 |pages=205–206 |via=[[Google Books]] }}{{Dead link|date=August 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> Also in 1840 a society of "Egalitarian Workers" following a communist program was founded in Paris and a general strike was called whose leaders were reportedly inspired by communist ideals.{{sfn|Lowy|2020|pp=65–66}} During the 1840s Étienne Cabet had a following of between {{gaps|100|000}} and {{gaps|200|000}} French workers and was considered by [[Friedrich Engels]] to be the representative of the French proletariat.{{sfn|Lindemann|1983|p=68}} One of the most prominent and influential French communists of the 1840s was [[Auguste Blanqui]] who was notable for his belief that violent revolutionary action should be used to overthrow the bourgeosie dominated state.<ref name="Marx2019">{{cite book |editor-last=Fernbach |editor-first=David |chapter=Introduction. |title=Political Writings |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WbunDwAAQBAJ |date=2019 |first=Karl |last=Marx |author-link=Karl Marx |publisher=[[Verso Books]] |isbn=978-1-78873-686-2 |pages=18–19 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> In Blanqui's estimation a revolution would be most successful if it was executed by a small, secretive group which could then install a "dictatorship of the proletariat."<ref name="Marx2019"/> Dézamy disagreed with any program endorsing a dictatorship, believing instead that the chief focus should be on cultivating proletarian unity through propaganda and education.{{sfn|Lowy|2020|pp=71–72}} |
|||
The introduction begins with a call to arms: |
|||
The works and teachings of these French writers, many now self identifying as communists, went on to inspire new communist groups such as the [[League of the Just]], an organization founded in Paris in 1836 by the Christian communist German [[émigrés]] [[Wilhelm Weitling]] and [[Karl Schapper]].{{sfn|van Ree|2015|pp=44–45}} A second group, the [[Communist Correspondence Committee]], was formed in Brussels in 1846 by another pair of German émigrés [[Karl Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels]].<ref name="Henderson1976">{{cite book |first=William Otto |last=Henderson |title=The Life of Friedrich Engels |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4eYXc1B1vPoC&pg=PA93 |year=1976 |publisher=[[Taylor & Francis]] |isbn=978-0-7146-4002-0 |page=93 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> The two groups were merged in 1847 to form the [[Communist League]] which was headed by Schapper who then proceeded to task the co-founding members Marx and Engels with writing a manifesto laying out the principles of the new political party.<ref name="Mehring2013">{{cite book |first=Franz |last=Mehring |author-link=Franz Mehring |title=Karl Marx: The Story of His Life |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rZpTAQAAQBAJ |date=2013 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |isbn=978-1-134-55883-4 |page=139 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref><ref name="Fuchs2015">{{cite book |first=Christian |last=Fuchs |author-link=Christian Fuchs (sociologist) |title=Reading Marx in the Information Age: A Media and Communication Studies Perspective on Capital |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QrrMCgAAQBAJ |date=2015 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |isbn=978-1-317-36449-8 |page=357 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> |
|||
:''A spectre is haunting [[Europe]] -- the spectre of communism. All the powers of old Europe have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this spectre: [[Pope]] and [[Tsar]], [[Klemens Wenzel von Metternich|Metternich]] and [[François Guizot|Guizot]], [[France|French]] Radicals and [[Germany|German]] police-spies.'' |
|||
=== Marxism === |
|||
:''Where is the party in opposition that has not been decried as communistic by its opponents in power? Where is the opposition that has not hurled back the branding reproach of communism, against the more advanced opposition parties, as well as against its [[reactionary]] adversaries?'' |
|||
{{Main|Marxism}} |
|||
==== Karl Marx ==== |
|||
The program described in the Manifesto -- that is to say, the policies the Communists of its day sought to implement -- is termed ''[[socialism]]'' or ''communism''. These policies included, among others, the abolition of [[land ownership]] and the right to [[inheritance]], the progressive [[income tax]], and the nationalization of [[means of production]] and [[transport]]. These policies, which would be implemented by a revolutionary government ''(the dictatorship of the proletariat)'', would (the authors believed) be a precursor to the [[state]]less and [[social class|class]]less society envisioned by the socialists. The term "Communism" is also used to refer to the beliefs and practices of the Communist Party, including that of the [[Soviet Union]] which differed substantially from Marx and Engels' conception. |
|||
{{Main|Karl Marx}} |
|||
{{blockquote|text=Communism is the riddle of history solved, and it knows itself to be this solution.|sign=[[Karl Marx]], 1844<ref>{{cite book |last=Marx |first=Karl |author-link=Karl Marx |title=Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of Nov, 5, 1844 |date=1844 |chapter-url=http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/comm.htm |chapter=Private Property and Communism |via=[[Marxists Internet Archive]]}}</ref>|source=}} |
|||
[[File:Karl Marx 001.jpg|thumb|[[Karl Marx]], whose variety of communist theory is known as [[Marxism]]]] |
|||
In the 1840s, German philosopher and sociologist [[Karl Marx]], who was living in England after fleeing the authorities in [[Kingdom of Prussia|Prussia]], where he was considered a political threat, began publishing books in which he outlined his theories for a variety of communism now known as [[Marxism]]. Marx was financially aided and supported by another German émigré, [[Friedrich Engels]] (1820–1895), who like Marx had fled from the German authorities in 1849.{{sfn|Service|2007|pp=24–25}} Marx and Engels took on many influences from earlier socialists such as the [[Utopian socialist]] [[Saint-Simonianism|Saint-Simonist]] school.<ref name="Moggach2011">{{cite book |first=Douglas |last=Moggach |title=Politics, Religion, and Art: Hegelian Debates |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yJ0wre5qeosC&pg=PA168 |date=2011 |publisher=[[Northwestern University Press]] |isbn=978-0-8101-2729-6 |page=168 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> Politically, they were influenced by [[Maximilien Robespierre]] and several other radical figures of the French Revolution whilst economically they were influenced by [[David Ricardo]].<ref>{{cite journal |last=Lowy |first=Michael |date=September–October 1989 |title='The Poetry of the Past': Marx and the French Revolution |url=https://newleftreview.org/issues/i177/articles/michael-lowy-the-poetry-of-the-past-marx-and-the-french-revolution |access-date=2022-12-05 |journal=New Left Review|issue=I/177 |pages=111–124 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Tucker |first=G. S. L. |date=1961 |title=Ricardo and Marx |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2601601 |journal=Economica |volume=28 |issue=111 |pages=252–269 |doi=10.2307/2601601 |jstor=2601601 |issn=0013-0427}}</ref> Philosophically, they were influenced by [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]].{{sfn|Service|2007|p=13}} Engels regularly met Marx at [[Chetham's Library]] in [[Manchester]], England from 1845 and the alcove where they met remains identical to this day.<ref>{{cite news|title=101 Treasures of Chetham's |quote=Philosophers Karl Marx and Frederich Engels met to research their Communist theory in Chetham's Library |url=http://www.chethams.org.uk/treasures/treasures_marx.html |work=Chetham's Library |access-date=25 November 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111110142928/http://www.chethams.org.uk/treasures/treasures_marx.html |archive-date=10 November 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=War and cotton lent Chetham's its name in Manchester |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/manchester/hi/people_and_places/history/newsid_8545000/8545348.stm |work=[[BBC News]] |date=2 March 2010 |access-date=25 November 2011}}</ref> It was here that Engels relayed his experiences of industrial Manchester, chronicled in the ''[[The Condition of the Working Class in England in 1844|Condition of the Working Class in England]]'', highlighting the struggles of the working class. |
|||
Marx stated that "the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of [[class struggles]]", something that he believed was happening between the [[bourgeoisie]] (the select few [[upper class]] and [[upper middle class]]) who then controlled society and the [[proletariat]] (the [[working class]] masses) who toiled to produce everything, but who had no political control. He advanced the idea that human society moved through a series of progressive stages from primitive communism through to [[slavery]], [[feudalism]] and then capitalism; and that this, in turn, would be replaced by communism. For Marx, communism was seen as inevitable yet uncertain and desirable. |
|||
It is this concept of the transition from socialism to communism which many critics of the Manifesto, particularly during and after the Soviet era, have alighted upon. Anarchists, liberals, and conservatives have all asked how an organization such as the revolutionary state could ever (as Marx put it elsewhere) wither away. Both traditional understandings of the attraction of political power and more recent theories of [[organizational studies|organizational behavior]] suggest instead that a group or organization given political power will tend to preserve its privilege rather than to permit it to wither away into a state of no privilege -- even if that privilege is given in the name of revolution and of the establishment of equality. |
|||
Marx founded the [[Communist Correspondence Committee]] in 1846 through which the various communists, [[Socialism|socialists]] and other [[left wing|leftists]] across Europe could keep in contact with one another in the face of political repression. He then published ''The Communist Manifesto'' in 1848, which would prove to be one of the most influential communist texts ever written. He subsequently began work on a multi-volume epic that would examine and criticise the capitalist economy and the effect that it had upon politics, society and philosophy{{snd}}the first volume of the work which was known as ''[[Capital: Critique of Political Economy]]'' was published in 1869. However, Marx and Engels were not only interested in writing about communism, as they were also active in supporting revolutionary activity that would lead to the creation of communist governments across Europe. They helped to found the [[International Workingmen's Association]] which would later become known as the [[First International]] to unite various communists and socialists, with Marx being elected to the Association's General Council.{{sfn|Service|2007|pp=27–28}} |
|||
:''When, in the course of development, class distinctions have disappeared, and all production has been concentrated in the hands of a vast association of the whole [[nation]], the public power will lose its political character. Political power, properly so called, is merely the organized power of one class for oppressing another. If the proletariat during its contest with the bourgeoisie is compelled, by the force of circumstances, to organize itself as a class; if, by means of a revolution, it makes itself the ruling class, and, as such, sweeps away by force the old conditions of production, then it will, along with these conditions, have swept away the conditions for the existence of class antagonisms and of classes generally, and will thereby have abolished its own supremacy as a class.'' |
|||
Marx summarized his system with the slogan, "[[From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs]]."<ref name="CGP P1">{{cite book |last=Marx |first=Karl |author-link=Karl Marx |title=Critique of the Gotha Program |year=1875 |access-date=15 July 2008 |chapter=Part I |chapter-url=https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1875/gotha/ch01.htm |title-link=Critique of the Gotha Program |via=[[Marxists Internet Archive]]}}</ref> This phrasing used to formulate the principles of communism is borrowed from earlier socialist political activists such as [[August Becker (socialist)|August Becker]] and [[Louis Blanc]].<ref>{{cite book |title=Was wollen die Kommunisten? |language=de |trans-title=What do the communists want? |date=1844 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FUg9AAAAcAAJ&dq=%22Jeder+nach+seinen+F%C3%A4higkeiten%2C+jedem+nach+seinen+Bed%C3%BCrfnissen%21%22&pg=PA34 |pages=34 |last1=Becker |first1=August |author-link=August Becker |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=Louis |last=Blanc |title=Plus de Girondins |date=1851 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KFc9AAAAcAAJ&pg=PA92 |pages=92 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref>{{sfn|Lindemann|1983|p=50}} |
|||
The famous last lines of The Manifesto |
|||
==== Early development of Marxism ==== |
|||
:''The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a communist revolution. '''The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.''''' |
|||
During the latter half of the 19th century, various left-wing organisations across Europe continued to campaign against the many [[Autocracy|autocratic]] right-wing regimes that were then in power. In France, socialists set up a government known as the [[Paris Commune]] after the fall of [[Napoleon III]] in 1871, but they were soon overthrown and many of their members executed by counter-revolutionaries.{{sfn|Service|2007|p=28}} Meanwhile, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels joined the [[Social Democratic Party of Germany|German Social-Democratic Party]] which had been created in 1875, but which was outlawed in 1879 by the German government, then led by Chancellor [[Otto von Bismarck]], who deemed it to be a political threat due to its revolutionary nature and increasing number of supporters.{{sfn|Service|2007|p=29}} In 1890, the party was re-legalised and by this time it had fully adopted Marxist principles. It subsequently achieved a fifth of the vote in the German elections and some of its leaders, such as [[August Bebel]] and [[Wilhelm Liebknecht]], became well-known public figures.{{sfn|Service|2007|p=36}} |
|||
{{quote box|width=246px|align=right|quote=The communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a communist revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.|source=—[[Karl Marx]], 1848<ref>{{cite book |last=Marx |first=Karl |author-link=Karl Marx |title=[[The Communist Manifesto]] |date=1848 |chapter-url=https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch04.htm |chapter=Chapter IV. Position of the Communists in Relation to the Various Existing Opposition Parties |via=[[Marxists Internet Archive]]}}</ref>}} |
|||
:'''''Working men of all countries, unite!''''' |
|||
At the time, Marxism took off not only in Germany, but it also gained popularity in [[Hungary]], the [[Habsburg monarchy]] and the [[Netherlands]], although it did not achieve such success in other European nations like the [[United Kingdom]], where Marx and Engels had been based.{{sfn|Service|2007|pp=39–41}} Nonetheless, the new political ideology had gained sufficient support that an organisation was founded known as the [[Second International]] to unite the various Marxist groups around the world.{{sfn|Service|2007|pp=36–37}} |
|||
As Marxism took off, it also began to come under criticism from other European intellectuals, including fellow socialists and leftists. For instance, the Russian [[Collectivist anarchism|collectivist anarchist]] [[Mikhail Bakunin]] criticised what he believed were the flaws in the Marxian theory that the state would eventually dissolve under a Marxist government, instead he believed that the state would gain in power and become [[authoritarian]]. Criticism also came from other sociologists such as the German [[Max Weber]], who whilst admiring Marx disagreed with many of his assumptions on the nature of society. Some Marxists tried to adapt to these criticisms and the changing nature of capitalism and [[Eduard Bernstein]] emphasised the idea of Marxists bringing legal challenges against the current administrations over the treatment of the working classes rather than simply emphasising violent revolution as more orthodox Marxists did. Other Marxists opposed Bernstein and other revisionists, with many including [[Karl Kautsky]], [[Otto Bauer]], [[Rudolf Hilferding]], [[Rosa Luxemburg]], [[Vladimir Lenin]] and [[Georgi Plekhanov]] sticking steadfast to the concept of violently overthrowing what they saw as the bourgeoisie-controlled government and instead establishing a [[dictatorship of the proletariat]]. |
|||
== The October Revolution == |
|||
[[Image:lenin4.jpg|thumb|right|Vladimir Lenin]] |
|||
The 1917 October Revolution, led by [[Vladimir Lenin]] was the first large scale attempt to put Marxist ideas about a workers' state into practice. The new government faced counter-revolution, civil war and foreign intervention. Socialist revolution in [[Germany]] and other western countries failed and the [[Soviet Union]] was on its own. An intense period of debate and stopgap solutions ensued, [[war communism]] and the [[New Economic Policy]] (NEP). Lenin died and [[Joseph Stalin]] gradually assumed control, eliminating rivals for power. He instituted a ruthless program of [[industrialisation]] which, while successful, was prosecuted at great cost in human suffering. |
|||
== Periodisation of international communism of 1993 == |
|||
Modern followers of [[Leon Trotsky]] maintain that as predicted by Lenin, Trotsky, and others already in the 1920s, Stalin's "socialism in one country" was unable to maintain itself, and according to some Marxist critics, the [[Soviet Union|USSR]] ceased to show the characteristics of a socialist state long before its formal dissolution. |
|||
The historical existence of the [[Communist International]] (Comintern) and the broader communist movement is divided among periods, regarding changes in the general policy it followed.{{Sfn|Priestland|2010|p={{page needed|date=April 2022}}}}{{sfn|Service|2007|p={{page needed|date=April 2022}}}}<ref>{{cite book |first=Richard |last=Pipes |title=Communism: A History |date=2003 |publisher=Random House Publishing |isbn=978-0812968644}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=Duncan |last=Hallas |title=The Comintern: The History of the Third International |date=1985}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |editor-first=S. A. |editor-last=Smith |title=The Oxford Handbook of the History of Communism |date=2014 |chapter=10 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |isbn=9780199602056 |doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199602056.001.0001}}</ref> |
|||
* The [[War Communism]] period (1918–1921) which saw the forming of the International, the [[Russian Civil War]], a general revolutionary upheaval after the [[October Revolution]] resulting in the formation of the first communist parties across the world and the defeat of [[Revolutions of 1917–1923|workers' revolutionary movements]] in [[Spartacist uprising|Germany]], [[Hungarian Soviet Republic|Hungary]], [[Finnish Civil War|Finland]] and [[Polish–Soviet War|Poland]]. |
|||
* The [[New Economic Policy]] period (1921–1929) which marked the end of the civil war in Russia and new economic measures taken by the Bolshevik government, the toning down of the revolutionary wave in Europe and internal struggles within the Bolshevik Party and the Comintern after Lenin's death and before Stalin's absolute consolidation of power. |
|||
* The [[Third Period]] (1929–1934), an [[ultra-left]] turn which saw rapid [[industrialization]] and [[collectivization]] in the [[History of the Soviet Union (1927–1953)|Soviet Union under Stalin's rule]], the refusal by communists to cooperate with [[Social democracy|social democrats]] in other countries (labeling them [[Social fascism|social fascists]]) and the ultimate rise of [[Adolf Hitler]] in Germany which led to the abandonment of the hard-line policy of this period. These years also saw the complete subordination of all communist parties across the world to the directives of the [[All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks)]], making the Comintern more or less an organ of the [[Communist Party of the Soviet Union]]. |
|||
* The [[Popular Front]] period (1934–1939) which marked the call by Comintern to all popular and democratic forces (not just communist) to unite in popular fronts against fascism. Products of this period were the popular front governments in the [[French Third Republic]] and the [[Second Spanish Republic]]. However, this period was also marked by widespread purges of anyone suspected as an enemy of the Stalinist regime, both in the Soviet Union and abroad. These mass purges resulted in the breaking up of the [[Popular Front (Spain)|Popular Front]] in Spain amidst the [[Spanish Civil War]] and the fall of Spain to [[Francisco Franco]]. |
|||
* The period of advocating peace (1939–1941), a result of the signing of the [[Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact]] which resulted in the [[Soviet invasion of Poland]]. In this period, communists were advocating non-participation in [[World War II]], labeling the war as imperialist. The term revolutionary defeatism was used by Comintern in this period to refer to anti-war propaganda by communists in Western Europe against their national governments. |
|||
* The [[Eastern Front (World War II)|Eastern Front]] period, sometimes called the Second Popular Front (1941–1943), was the last period of the Comintern, starting immediately after the [[Operation Barbarossa|German invasion of the Soviet Union]], with Stalin's 3 July 1941 call to the entire free world to unite and fight [[Nazism]] by all means. This was a period of [[militant anti-fascism]], the emergence of national liberation movements all across occupied Europe and ultimately the dissolution of the Comintern in 1943. |
|||
* The [[Cold War#Containment and the Truman Doctrine (1947–1953)|Early Cold War]]{{Broken anchor|date=2024-09-11|bot=User:Cewbot/log/20201008/configuration|target_link=Cold War#Containment and the Truman Doctrine (1947–1953)|reason= The anchor (Containment and the Truman Doctrine (1947–1953)) [[Special:Diff/1113326865|has been deleted]].}} (1947–1960) in which the Soviet Union and the [[Red Army]] installed the [[Eastern Bloc]] communist regimes in most of [[Eastern Europe]] (except for Yugoslavia and Albania, which had independent communist regimes). A major effort to support communist party activity in Western democracies, especially the [[Italian Communist Party]] and the [[French Communist Party]], fell short of gaining positions in the government. |
|||
* The [[Cold War#From confrontation to détente (1962–1979)|Late Cold War]] (1960–1970s) in which China turned against the Soviet Union and organized alternative communist parties in many countries. Intense attention was given to revolutionary movements in the [[Third World]] which were successful in some places such as Cuba and Vietnam. Communism was decisively defeated in other states, including [[Malayan Emergency|Malaya]] and [[Indonesian mass killings of 1965–66|Indonesia]]. In 1972–1979, there was [[détente]] between the Soviet Union and the United States. |
|||
* The end of communism in Europe (1980–1992) in which Soviet client states were heavily on the defensive as in [[Soviet–Afghan War|Afghanistan]] and [[Nicaraguan Revolution|Nicaragua]]. The United States escalated the conflict with very heavy military spending. After a series of short-lived leaders, [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] came to power in the Kremlin and began a policy of [[glasnost]] and [[perestroika]], designed to revive the stagnating [[Economy of the Soviet Union|Soviet economy]]. European satellites led by Poland grew increasingly independent and in 1989 they all expelled the communist leadership. [[East Germany]] merged into [[West Germany]] with Moscow's approval. At the end of 1991, the Soviet Union itself was dissolved into non-communist independent states. Many communist parties around the world either collapsed, or became independent non-communist entities. However, China, North Korea, Laos, Vietnam and Cuba maintained communist regimes. After 1980, China adopted a market oriented economy that welcomed large-scale trade and friendly relations with the United States. |
|||
== Early socialist states (1917–1944) == |
|||
Following [[World War II]], Marxist ideology, often with Soviet military backing, spawned a rise in revolutionary communist parties all over the world. Some of these parties were eventually able to gain power, and establish their own version of a Marxist state. Such nations included the [[People's Republic of China]], [[Vietnam]], [[Romania]], [[East Germany]], [[Albania]], [[Poland]], [[Cambodia]], [[Ethiopia]], [[South Yemen]], [[Yugoslavia]], and others. In some cases, these nations did not get along. The most notable examples were rifts that occurred between the Soviet Union and China, as well as Soviet Union and Yugoslavia (in 1948), whose leaders disagreed on certain elements of Marxism and how it should be implemented into society. |
|||
=== Russian Revolution, Leninism, and formation of the Soviet Union === |
|||
{{main|Russian Revolution}} |
|||
{{multiple image |
|||
| align = right |
|||
| total_width = 300 |
|||
| image1 = Lenin in 1920 (cropped).jpg |
|||
| caption1 = [[Vladimir Lenin]], founder of the [[Soviet Union]] and leader of the [[Bolshevik party]]. |
|||
| image2 = Bundesarchiv Bild 183-R15068, Leo Dawidowitsch Trotzki.jpg |
|||
| caption2 = [[Leon Trotsky]], founder of the [[Red Army]] and key figure in the [[October Revolution]]. |
|||
}} |
|||
At the start of the 20th century, the [[Russian Empire]] was an [[autocracy]] controlled by [[Tsar Nicholas II]], with millions of the country's largely agrarian population living in abject [[poverty]]. The [[anti-communist]] historian [[Robert Service (historian)|Robert Service]] noted that "poverty and oppression constituted the best soil for Marxism to grow in".{{sfn|Service|2007|p=46}} The man most responsible for introducing the ideology into the country was [[Georgi Plekhanov]], although the movement itself was largely organised by [[Vladimir Lenin]], who had for a time been exiled to a prison camp in [[Siberia]] by the Tsarist government for his beliefs.{{sfn|Service|2007|pp=48–49}} A Marxist group known as the [[Russian Social Democratic Labour Party]] was formed in the country, although it soon divided into two main factions, namely the [[Bolsheviks]] led by Lenin and the [[Mensheviks]] led by [[Julius Martov]]. In 1905, [[1905 Russian Revolution|there was a revolution]] against the Tsar's rule in which [[workers' council]]s known as [[soviets]] were formed in many parts of the country and the Tsar was forced to implement democratic reform, introducing an elected government, the [[Duma]].{{sfn|Service|2007|pp=50–51}} |
|||
[[File:Lev Trotsky 1906-3.3 V1.jpg|250x250px|thumb|left|The [[Saint Petersburg Soviet|Soviet of Workers' Deputies of St. Petersburg]] in 1905, Trotsky in the center. The [[soviet (council)|soviets]] were an early example of a [[workers council]].]] |
|||
In 1917, with further social unrest against the Duma and its part in involving Russia in [[World War I]], the Bolsheviks took power in the [[October Revolution]]. They began remodelling the country by nationalizing various industries and confiscating land from wealthy aristocrats and redistributing it amongst the peasants. They subsequently pulled out of the war against Germany by signing the [[Treaty of Brest-Litovsk]] which was unpopular amongst many in Russia, for it gave away large areas of land to Germany. Lenin's government also instituted a number of progressive measures such as [[Universal access to education|universal education]], [[universal healthcare|healthcare]] and [[Women in Russia|equal rights for women]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Adams |first1=Katherine H. |last2=Keene |first2=Michael L. |title=After the Vote Was Won: The Later Achievements of Fifteen Suffragists |date=2014 |publisher=McFarland |isbn=978-0-7864-5647-5 |page=109 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oyaxYvSG6gAC&dq=lenin+universal+literacy+after+the+vote+was+won&pg=PA109 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Ugri͡umov |first1=Aleksandr Leontʹevich |title=Lenin's Plan for Building Socialism in the USSR, 1917–1925 |date=1976 |publisher=Novosti Press Agency Publishing House |page=48 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gXknAQAAMAAJ&q=lenin+universal+literacy |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Service |first1=Robert |title=Lenin: A Political Life: Volume 1: The Strengths of Contradiction |date=1985 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-1-349-05591-3 |page=98 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ntiuCwAAQBAJ&q=universal+education&pg=PA98 |language=en}}</ref> The initial stage of the October Revolution which involved the assault on [[Petrograd]] occurred largely without any human [[Casualty (person)|casualties]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Shukman |first1=Harold |title=The Blackwell Encyclopedia of the Russian Revolution |date=5 December 1994 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-0-631-19525-2 |page=343 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ScabEAAAQBAJ&dq=october+revolution+bloodless&pg=PA343 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Bergman |first1=Jay |title=The French Revolutionary Tradition in Russian and Soviet Politics, Political Thought, and Culture |date=2019 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-884270-5 |page=224 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5UKjDwAAQBAJ&dq=october+revolution+bloodless&pg=PA224 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=McMeekin |first1=Sean |title=The Russian Revolution: A New History |date=30 May 2017 |publisher=Basic Books |isbn=978-0-465-09497-4 |pages=1–496 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aXmZDgAAQBAJ&dq=october+revolution+bloodless&pg=PT155 |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
From the outset, the new government faced resistance from a myriad of forces with differing perspectives, including [[anarchists]], [[social democrats]], who took power in the [[Democratic Republic of Georgia]], [[Socialist-Revolutionaries]], who formed the [[Komuch]] in [[Samara, Russia]], scattered tsarist resistance forces known as the [[White movement|White Guard]] as well as [[Western world|Western]] powers. This led to the events of the [[Russian Civil War]] which the Bolsheviks won and subsequently consolidated their power over the entire country, centralising power from the [[Moscow Kremlin|Kremlin]] in the capital city of [[Moscow]]. In the early 1920s, Lenin began recruiting black workers, accusing American political parties of not doing more to campaign for [[Civil rights movement (1896–1954)|black civil rights]]. A handful of [[African Americans|African American]] activists were fascinated by communism, and [[Cyril Briggs]] led an organization called [[African Blood Brotherhood]].<ref>{{cite news |title=Black communism in the Great Depression |url=https://redflag.org.au/index.php/node/7362 |access-date=2 October 2020 |publisher=Katie Wood |date=2020-09-07}}</ref> In 1922, the [[Russian Socialist Federative Soviet Republic]] was officially redesignated to lead the [[Union of Soviet Socialist Republics]], simply known as the [[Soviet Union]]. |
|||
Many of these self-proclaimed Marxist nations (often styled [[People's Republic]]s) eventually became authoritarian states, with stagnating economies. This caused some debate about whether or not these nations were in fact led by "true Marxists". Critics of Marxism speculated that perhaps Marxist ideology itself was to blame for the nations' various problems. Followers of the currents within Marxism which opposed Stalin, principally cohered around Leon Trotsky, tended to locate the failure at the level of the failure of [[world revolution]]: for communism to have succeeded, they argue, it needed to encompass all the international trading relationships that capitalism had previously developed. |
|||
In 1924, Lenin resigned as [[leader of the Soviet Union]] due to poor health and soon died, with [[Joseph Stalin]] subsequently taking over control. |
|||
The Chinese experience seems to be unique. Rather than falling under a single family's self-serving and dynastic interpretation of Marxism as happened in North Korea and before 1989 in Eastern Europe, the Chinese government after the end of the struggles over the Mao legacy in 1980, seems to have solved the succession crises that have plagued Leninist governments (which China remains) since the death of Lenin himself. Key to this success is another Leninism which is a NEP (New Economic Policy) writ very large; Lenin's own NEP of the 1920s was the "permission" given to markets including speculation to operate by the Party which retained final control. The Russian experience in Perestroika was that markets under socialism were so opaque as to be both inefficient and corrupt but especially after China's application to join the WTO this does not seem to be the case. |
|||
=== Comintern, Mongolian invasion, and communist uprisings in Europe === |
|||
== The Stalin Era == |
|||
{{Main|Communist International|Soviet intervention in Mongolia|Revolutions of 1917–1923}} |
|||
[[Image:Stalin_02.jpg|right|frame|Joseph Stalin]] |
|||
[[File:Communist-International-1920.jpg|thumb|The [[Communist International]] published a [[Communist International (magazine)|theoretical magazine of the same name]] in a variety of European languages from 1919 to 1943]] |
|||
At the Fifteenth [[CPSU Party Congress|Congress]] of the [[Communist Party of the Soviet Union]] in December 1927, [[Stalin]] attacked the left by expelling [[Trotsky]] and his supporters from the party and then moving against the right by abandoning [[Lenin]]'s [[New Economic Policy]] which had been championed by [[Nikolai Bukharin]] and [[Alexei Ivanovich Rykov]]. Warning delegates of an impending capitalist encirclement, he stressed that survival and development could only occur by pursuing the rapid development of [[heavy industry]]. Stalin remarked that the [[Soviet Union]] was "fifty to a hundred years behind the advanced countries" (the [[United States]], [[France]], Germany, the [[United Kingdom]], etc.), and thus must narrow "this distance in ten years." In a perhaps eerie foreboding of [[World War II]], Stalin declared, "Either we do it or we shall be crushed." |
|||
In 1919, the [[Bolshevik government]] in Russia instigated the creation of an international communist organisation that would act as the Third International after the collapse of the [[Second International]] in 1916. This was known as the [[Communist International]], although it was commonly abbreviated as the Comintern. Throughout its existence, the Comintern would be dominated by the Kremlin despite its internationalist stance. Meanwhile, in 1921, the Soviet Union invaded its neighboring [[Bogd Khanate of Mongolia|Mongolia]] to aid a popular uprising against the [[Republic of China (1912–1949)|Chinese who then controlled the country]], instituting a pro-Soviet government which declared the nation to be the [[Mongolian People's Republic]] in 1924.{{sfn|Service|2007|pp=115–116}} |
|||
The Comintern and other such Soviet-backed communist groups soon spread across much of the world, though particularly in Europe, where the influence of the recent Russian Revolution was still strong. In [[Weimar Republic|Germany]], the [[Spartacist uprising]] took place in 1919 when armed [[Spartacus League]] communists attempted to set up a Bolshevik-style council republic, but the government put the rebellion down violently with the use of right-wing paramilitary groups, the [[Freikorps]]. The noted German communists [[Rosa Luxemburg]] and [[Karl Liebknecht]] were killed extrajudicially three days later.{{sfn|Service|2007|p=86}} Within a few months, a group of communists seized power amongst public unrest in the German region of [[Bavaria]], forming the [[Bavarian Soviet Republic]], although once more this was put down violently by the Freikorps, who historians believe killed around 1,200 communists and their sympathisers.{{sfn|Service|2007|pp=90–92}} |
|||
To oversee the radical transformation of the Soviet Union, the party, under Stalin's direction, established ''Gosplan'' (the State General Planning Commission), a state organ responsible for guiding the socialist economy toward accelerated industrialization. In April 1929 Gosplan released two joint drafts that began the process that would industrialize the primarily agrarian nation. This 1,700 page report became the basis the first [[Five-Year Plan]] for National Economic Construction, or ''[[Piatiletka]]'', calling for the doubling of Soviet capital stock between 1928 and 1933.<sup>[[#Notes|1]]</sup> |
|||
That same year, political turmoil in [[First Hungarian Republic|Hungary]] following their defeat in World War I led to a coalition government of the [[Social Democratic Party of Hungary|Social Democratic Party]] and the [[Hungarian Communist Party|Communist Party]] taking control. The [[Hungarian Communist Party]] led by [[Béla Kun]] soon became dominant and instituted various communist reforms in the country, but the country itself was subsequently invaded by its neighbouring [[Kingdom of Romania|Romania]] within a matter of months who overthrew the government, with its leaders either escaping abroad or being executed.{{sfn|Service|2007|pp=86–90}} In 1921, a [[Biennio Rosso|communist revolt]] against the [[Kingdom of Italy]] occurred whilst supportive factory workers were on strike in [[Turin]] and [[Milan]] in [[northern Italy]], but the government acted swiftly and put down the rebellion.{{sfn|Service|2007|pp=92–94}} That same year, a [[March Action|further communist rebellion]] took place in the Weimar Republic only to be crushed, but another occurred in 1923{{Which|date=May 2023}} which once again was also defeated by the government.{{sfn|Service|2007|pp=95–96}} The [[Bulgarian Communist Party]] had also attempted an uprising in 1923, but like most of their counterparts across Europe they were defeated.{{sfn|Service|2007|pp=117–118}} |
|||
Shifting from Lenin's NEP, the first Five-Year Plan established central planning as the basis of economic decision-making and the stress on rapid heavy industrialization (''see'' [[Economy of the Soviet Union]]). It began the rapid process of transforming a largely agrarian nation consisting of peasants into an industrial superpower. In effect, the initial goals were laying the foundations for future [[exponential growth|exponential economic growth]]. |
|||
=== Front organisations === |
|||
The new economic system put forward by the first Five-Year plan entailed a complicated series of planning arrangements (''see'' [[Economy of the Soviet Union#Planning|Overview of the Soviet economic planning process]]). The first Five-Year plan focused on the mobilization of natural resources to build up the country's heavy industrial base by increasing output of [[coal]], [[iron]], and other vital resources. At a high human cost, this process was largely successful, forging a capital base for industrial development more rapidly than any country in history. |
|||
{{Main|Communist front}} |
|||
[[Communist parties]] were tight knit organizations that exerted tight control over the members. To reach sympathisers unwilling to join the party, front organizations were created that advocated party-approved positions. Under the leadership of [[Grigory Zinoviev]] in the Kremlin, the Comintern established fronts in many countries in the 1920s and after. To coordinate their activities, the Comintern set up various international umbrella organizations (linking groups across national borders) such as the [[Young Communist International]] (youth), [[Profintern]] (trade unions),<ref>{{cite journal |first=Ian |last=Birchall |title='Profintern: Die Rote Gewerkschaftsinternationale 1920–1937' review (in English) of a German language study by Reiner Tosstorff. |journal=[[Historical Materialism (journal)|Historical Materialism]] |date=2009 |volume=17 |issue=4 |pages=164–176|doi=10.1163/146544609X12537556703557 }}</ref> [[Krestintern]] (peasants), [[International Red Aid]] (humanitarian aid), and [[Red Sport International]] (organized sports), among others. In Europe, front organizations were especially influential in Italy<ref>Joan Urban, ''Moscow and the Italian Communist Party: from Togliatti to Berlinguer'' (1986) p. 157.</ref> and France which became the base for Communist front organizer [[Willi Münzenberg]] in 1933.<ref>{{cite book |first=Julian |last=Jackson |title=The Popular Front in France: Defending Democracy, 1934–38 |date=1990 |pages=x |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |isbn=978-0521312523}}</ref> These organizations were dissolved by the late 1930s or early 1940s. |
|||
The [[Pan-Pacific Trade Union Secretariat]] (PPTUS) was set up in 1927 by the Profintern (the Comintern's trade union arm) with the mission of promoting communist trade unions in China, Japan, Korea, the Philippines, Australia, New Zealand and other nations in the western Pacific.<ref>{{cite book|first1=Harvey |last1=Klehr |author1-link=Harvey Klehr |first2=John Earl |last2=Haynes |author2-link=John Earl Haynes |first3=Fridrikh Igorevich |last3=Firsov |title=The Secret World of American Communism |date=1996 |pages=42 |publisher=[[Yale University Press]] |isbn=978-0300068559}}</ref> Trapeznik (2009) says the PPTUS was a "Communist-front organization" and "engaged in overt and covert political agitation in addition to a number of clandestine activities".<ref>{{cite journal |first=Alexander |last=Trapeznik |title='Agents of Moscow' at the Dawn of the Cold War: The Comintern and the Communist Party of New Zealand |journal=[[Journal of Cold War Studies]] |volume=11 |number=1 |date=Winter 2009 |pages=124–149 |doi=10.1162/jcws.2009.11.1.124 |s2cid=57558503 |quote=quote on p. 144}}</ref> |
|||
The mobilization of resources by state planning augmented the country's industrial base. From 1928 to 1932, pig [[iron]] output, necessary for development of nonexistent industrial infrastructure rose from 3.3 million to 10 million tons per year. [[Coal]], the integral product fueling modern economies and Stalinist [[industrialization]], successfully rose from 35.4 million to 75 million tons, and output of [[iron ore]] rose from 5.7 million to 19 million tons. A number of industrial complexes such as [[Magnitogorsk]] and [[Kuznetsk]], the [[Moscow]] and [[Nizhny Novgorod|Gorky]] automobile plants, the [[Urals]] and Kramatorsk heavy [[machinery]] plants, and Kharkov, [[Stalingrad]] and Cheliabinsk [[tractor]] plants had been built or were under construction. |
|||
There were numerous communist front organizations in Asia, many oriented to students and youth.<ref>For listings of front organizations in East Asia see Malcolm Kennedy, ''History of Communism in East Asia'' (Praeger Publishers, 1957) pp. 118, 127–128, 130, 277, 334, 355, 361–367, 374, 415, 421, 424, 429, 439, 444, 457–458, 470, 482.</ref> According to one historian, in the labor union movement of the 1920s in [[History of Japan|Japan]], the "[[Hyogikai]] never called itself a communist front but in effect, this was what it was". He points out it was repressed by the government "along with other communist front groups".<ref>{{cite book |first=Stephen S. |last=Large |title=Organized Workers and Socialist Politics in Interwar Japan |date=2010 |pages=85 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |isbn=9780521136310}}</ref> In the 1950s, Scalapino argues: "The primary Communist-front organization was the Japan Peace Committee". It was founded in 1949.<ref>{{cite book |first=Robert A. |last=Scalapino |title=The Japanese Communist Movement 1920–1967 |date=1967 |pages=117 |publisher=[[University of California Press]] |isbn=978-0520011342}}</ref> |
|||
Based largely on these figures the Five Year Industrial Production Plan had been fulfilled by 93.7 percent in only four years, while parts devoted to heavy-industry part were fulfilled by 108%. Stalin in December 1932 declared the plan a success to the Central Committee, since increases in the output of [[coal]] and [[iron]] would fuel future development. |
|||
=== Stalinism === |
|||
While undoubtedly marking a tremendous leap in industrial capacity, the Five Year Plan was extremely harsh on industrial workers; quotas were extremely difficult to fulfill, requiring that miners put in 16 to 18-hour workdays. Failure to fulfill the quotas could result in treason charges. |
|||
{{main|Stalinism|First five-year plan (Soviet Union)}} |
|||
Working conditions were poor, even hazardous. By some estimates, 127,000 workers died during the four years (from 1928 to 1932). Due to the allocation of resources for industry along with decreasing productivity since collectivization, a famine occurred. The use of forced labor must also not be overlooked. In the construction of the industrial complexes, inmates of [[labor camp]]s were used as expendable resources. |
|||
[[File:Stalin birthday2.jpg|thumb|right|Members of the [[Communist Party of China]] celebrating Stalin's birthday in 1949]] |
|||
In 1924, [[Joseph Stalin]], a key Bolshevik follower of Lenin, took power in the Soviet Union.{{sfn|Brown|2009|pp=62–77}} Stalin was supported in his leadership by [[Nikolai Bukharin]], but he had various important opponents in the government, most notably [[Lev Kamenev]], [[Leon Trotsky]], and [[Grigory Zinoviev]]. Stalin initiated his own process of building a communist society, creating a variant of communism known as [[Marxism–Leninism]]. As a part of this, he abandoned some of the capitalist, market policies that had been allowed to continue under Lenin such as the [[New Economic Policy]]. [[Stalinism|Stalinist]] policies radically altered much of the Soviet Union's [[Agriculture in the Soviet Union|agricultural production]], modernising it by introducing tractors and other machinery, [[Collectivization in the Soviet Union|forced collectivisation of the farms]] and forced collection of grains from the peasants in accordance with predecided targets. There was food available for industrial workers, but those peasants who refused to move starved, especially in [[Kazakh famine of 1930–1933|Kazakhstan]] and [[Holodomor|Ukraine]]. The [[Communist Party of the Soviet Union|All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks)]] targeted [[kulak]]s, who owned a little land. |
|||
From 1921 until 1954, during the period of state-guided, forced industrialization, it is claimed 3.7 million people were sentenced for alleged counter-revolutionary crimes, including 0.6 million sentenced to death, 2.4 million sentenced to [[labor camp]]s, and 0.7 million sentenced to [[expatriation]]. Some other estimates put these figures much higher. Much like with the famines, the evidence supporting these high numbers is disputed by some historians, although this is a minority view. |
|||
Stalin took control of the Comintern and introduced a policy in the international organisation of opposing all leftists who were not [[Marxism–Leninism|Marxist–Leninists]], labelling them to be [[Social fascism|social fascists]], although many communists such as [[Jules Humbert-Droz]] disagreed with him on this policy, believing that the left should unite against the rise of right-wing movements like [[fascism]] across Europe.{{sfn|Service|2007|p=167}} In the early 1930s, Stalin reversed course and promoted [[popular front]] movements whereby communist parties would collaborate with socialists and other political forces. A high priority was mobilizing wide support for the Republican cause in the [[Spanish Civil War]].{{sfn|Brown|2009|pp=88–90}} |
|||
In November 1928 the [[Central Committee]] decided to implement forced [[collectivization]]. This marked the end of the [[NEP]], which had allowed peasants to sell their surpluses on the open market. Grain requisitioning intensified and peasants were forced to give up their private plots of land and property, to work for [[collective farm]]s, and to sell their produce to the state for a low price set by the state itself. |
|||
==== Great Purge ==== |
|||
Given the goals of the First Five Year Plan, the state sought increased political control of agriculture, hoping to feed the rapidly growing urban areas and to export grain, a source of foreign currency needed to import technologies necessary for heavy-industrialization. |
|||
{{Main|Great Purge}} |
|||
The [[Great Purge]] mainly operated from December 1936 to November 1938, although the features of arrest and summary trial followed by execution were well entrenched in the Soviet system since the days of Lenin as Stalin systematically destroyed the older generation of pre-1918 leaders. Stalin did so usually under the justification that the accused were enemy spies or deemed "[[Enemy of the people|enemies of the people]]"; in the Red Army, a majority of generals were executed and hundreds of thousands of other "enemies of the people" were sent to the [[gulag]], where inhumane conditions in Siberia led a quick death.<ref>{{cite book |first=Anne |last=Applebaum |author-link=Anne Applebaum |title=[[Gulag: A History]] |date=2003 |isbn=978-1400034093 |publisher=Anchor Books}}</ref>{{efn|The exact number of purge victims is unknown by a factor of 10. Estimates range from several million upwards to 20 million. Historian [[Robert Service (historian)|Robert Service]] believes that 1.5 million were arrested and {{gaps|200|000}} were eventually released. Service, chapter 31, especially p. 356. The lowest estimates by [[J. Arch Getty]] ''et al.'' give more than {{gaps|300|000}} executions in each of the years 1937 and 1938.{{sfn|Getty|Manning|1993}}}} |
|||
The opening of the Soviet archives has vindicated the lower estimates put forth by the "revisionist school" scholars,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Getty |first1=J. Arch |last2=Rittersporn |first2=Gábor |last3=Zemskov |first3=Viktor |title=Victims of the Soviet penal system in the pre-war years: a first approach on the basis of archival evidence |journal=[[American Historical Review]] |date=1993 |volume=98 |issue=4 |pages=1017–1049 |doi=10.2307/2166597 |jstor=2166597 |url=http://sovietinfo.tripod.com/GTY-Penal_System.pdf |quote=The long-awaited archival evidence on repression in the period of the Great Purges shows that levels of arrests, political prisoners, executions, and general camp populations tend to confirm the orders of magnitude indicated by those labeled as 'revisionists' and mocked by those proposing high estimates.}}</ref> despite the popular press continuing to use higher estimates and containing serious errors.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Wheatcroft |first=Stephen G. |author-link=Stephen G. Wheatcroft |title=Victims of Stalinism and the Soviet Secret Police: The Comparability and Reliability of the Archival Data. Not the Last Word |journal=[[Europe-Asia Studies]] |volume=51 |issue=2 |year=1999 |url=http://sovietinfo.tripod.com/WCR-Secret_Police.pdf |pages=340–342 |doi=10.1080/09668139999056 |quote=For decades, many historians counted Stalin' s victims in 'tens of millions', which was a figure supported by Solzhenitsyn. Since the collapse of the USSR, the lower estimates of the scale of the camps have been vindicated. The arguments about excess mortality are far more complex than normally believed. R. Conquest, ''The Great Terror: A Re-assessment'' (London, 1992) does not really get to grips with the new data and continues to present an exaggerated picture of the repression. The view of the 'revisionists' has been largely substantiated. ({{harvnb|Getty|Manning|1993}}) The popular press, even ''TLS'' and ''The Independent'', have contained erroneous journalistic articles that should not be cited in respectable academic articles.}}</ref> By 2009, historian [[Archie Brown (historian)|Archie Brown]] reported that estimates were now lower; about 1.7 million were arrested in 1937–1938 and half were shot.{{sfn|Brown|2009|p=76}} |
|||
By 1936 about 90% of Soviet agriculture was collectivized. In many cases peasants bitterly opposed this process and often slaughtered their animals rather than give them to collective farms. [[Kulak]]s, prosperous peasants, were forcibly resettled to [[Siberia]] (a large portion of the kulaks served at forced [[labor camp]]s). However, just about anyone opposing collectivization was deemed a "[[kulak]]." The policy of liquidation of kulaks as a class, formulated by Stalin at the end of 1929, meant executions, and deportation to [[forced labor]] camps. |
|||
=== Pre-war dissident communists === |
|||
Despite the expectations, collectivization led to a catastrophic drop in farming productivity, which did not regain the NEP level until 1940. The upheaval associated with collectivization was particularly severe in Ukraine, and the heavily Ukrainian adjoining Volga regions, a fact which has led many Ukrainian scholars to argue that there was a deliberate policy of starving the Ukrainians. The number of people who died in the famines is estimated at between three and to ten million in Ukraine alone, not counting the adjoining regions. Soviet sources vary between denying the existence of the famine and estimating much smaller numbers of dead. The actual number of casualties is bitterly disputed to this day. In 1975, [[Vyacheslav M. Abramov|Abramov]] and [[Kocharli]] estimated that 265,800 [[kulak]] families were sent to the [[Gulag]] in 1930. In 1979, [[Roy Medvedev]] used Abramov's and Kocharli's estimate to calculate that 2.5 million peasants were exiled between 1930 and 1931, but he suspected that he underestimated the total number. |
|||
The [[International Right Opposition]] and [[Trotskyism]] are examples of dissidents who still claim communism today, but they are not the only ones. In Germany, the split in the SPD had initially led to a variety of Communist unions and parties forming which included the councilist tendencies of the AAU-D, AAU-E and [[KAPD]]. Councilism had a limited impact outside of Germany, but a number of international organisations formed. In Spain, a fusion of left and right dissidents led to the formation of the [[POUM]]. Additionally, the Spanish [[Confederación Nacional del Trabajo|CNT]] was associated with the development of the [[Federación Anarquista Ibérica|FAI]] political party, a non-Marxist party which stood for revolutionary communism. |
|||
== Spreading communism (1945–1957) == |
|||
==The Cold War == |
|||
As the [[Cold War]] took effect around 1947, the Kremlin set up new international coordination bodies including the [[World Federation of Democratic Youth]], the [[International Union of Students]], the [[World Federation of Trade Unions]], the [[Women's International Democratic Federation]] and the [[World Peace Council]]. Malcolm Kennedy says the "Communist 'front' system included such international organizations as the WFTU, WFDY, IUS, WIDF and WPC, besides a host of lesser bodies bringing journalists, lawyers, scientists, doctors and others into the widespread net".<ref>{{cite book |last=Kennedy |first=Malcolm |date=1957 |title=History of Communism in East Asia |publisher=[[Praeger Publishers]] |pages=126}}</ref> |
|||
The [[World Federation of Trade Unions]] (WFTU) was established in 1945, to unite trade union confederations across the world and it was based in Prague. While it had non-communist unions it was largely dominated by the Soviets. In 1949 the British, American and other non-Communist unions broke away from the WFTU to form the rival [[International Confederation of Free Trade Unions]] (ICFTU). The labor movement in Europe became so polarized between the communist unions and social democratic and Christian labor unions, whereas front operations could no longer hide the sponsorship and they became less important.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Carew |first=Anthony |title=The Schism within the World Federation of Trade Unions: Government and Trade-Union Diplomacy |date=December 1984 |journal=[[International Review of Social History]] |volume=29 |number=3 |pages=297–335|doi=10.1017/S002085900000794X |s2cid=145428599 |doi-access=free }}</ref> |
|||
After [[World War II]], the [[Soviet Union]] became a world superpower with its leader Joseph Stalin. This resulted in a great rivalry between the [[United States|U.S.]] and the U.S.S.R., the Cold War. The U.S. and the U.S.S.R., [[communism]] and [[capitalism]] fought for influence and power over the world and in this struggle, numerous revolutions happened around the world, in countries as diverse as [[Cuba]], [[China]], [[Korea]], [[Vietnam]] and [[Laos]]. |
|||
=== Soviet Union after World War II === |
|||
===Eastern Europe=== |
|||
{{Main|History of the Soviet Union (1953–1964)}} |
|||
The devastation of the war resulted in a massive recovery program involving the rebuilding of industrial plants, housing and transportation as well as the demobilization and migration of millions of soldiers and civilians. In the midst of this turmoil during the winter of 1946–1947, the Soviet Union experienced the [[Soviet famine of 1946–1947|worst natural famine in the 20th century]].{{sfn|Gorlizki|Khlevniuk|2004|p=3ff}} There was no serious opposition to Stalin as the [[NKVD]] secret police continued to send possible suspects to the gulag. |
|||
Relations with the United States and Britain went from friendly to hostile, as they denounced Stalin's political controls over eastern Europe and his [[blockade of Berlin]]. By 1947, the [[Cold War]] had begun. Stalin himself believed that capitalism was a hollow shell and would crumble under increased non-military pressure exerted through proxies in countries like Italy. However, he greatly underestimated the economic strength of the West and instead of triumph saw the West build up alliances that were designed to permanently stop or contain Soviet expansion. In early 1950, Stalin gave the go-ahead for [[North Korea]]'s invasion of [[South Korea]], expecting a short war. He was stunned when the Americans entered and defeated the North Koreans, putting them almost on the Soviet border. Stalin supported [[China]]'s entry into the [[Korean War]] which drove the Americans back to the prewar boundaries, but which escalated tensions. The United States decided to mobilize its economy for a long contest with the Soviets, built the [[Thermonuclear weapon|hydrogen bomb]] and strengthened the [[NATO]] alliance that covered [[Western Europe]].<ref>{{cite book |first=John Lewis |last=Gaddis |author-link=John Lewis Gaddis |title=The Cold War: A New History |date=2006 |publisher=[[Penguin Books]]}}</ref> |
|||
'''East Germany''' |
|||
According to Gorlizki and Khlevniuk (2004), Stalin's consistent and overriding goal after 1945 was to consolidate the nation's superpower status and in the face of his growing physical decrepitude to maintain his own hold on total power. Stalin created a leadership system that reflected historic czarist styles of paternalism and repression, yet was also quite modern. At the top, personal loyalty to Stalin counted for everything. However, Stalin also created powerful committees, elevated younger specialists and began major institutional innovations. In the teeth of persecution, Stalin's deputies cultivated informal norms and mutual understandings which provided the foundations for collective rule after his death.{{sfn|Gorlizki|Khlevniuk|2004}} |
|||
[[image:Honecker.jpg|thumb|right|[[Erich Honecker]], leader of the GDR from 1971 until 1989.]] |
|||
At the [[Yalta Conference]], held in February 1945 before the capitulation of the [[Third Reich]], the [[United States]], [[United Kingdom]], and the [[Soviet Union]] agreed on the division of Germany into occupation zones. Following Germany's surrender, the [[Allied Control Council]], representing the United States, Britain, [[France]], and the Soviet Union, assumed governmental authority in post-[[World War II|war]] Germany. Economic demilitarization however (especially the stripping of industrial equipment) was the responsibility of each zone individually. |
|||
=== Eastern Europe === |
|||
The [[Potsdam Conference]] of July/August 1945 officially recognized the zones and confirmed jurisdiction of the [[Soviet Military Administration in Germany]] (''Sowjetische Militäradministration in Deutschland'', SMAD) from the [[Oder River|Oder]] and [[Neisse river]]s to the demarcation line. The Soviet occupation zone included the former states of [[Brandenburg]], [[Mecklenburg]], [[Saxony]], [[Saxony-Anhalt]], and [[Thuringia]]. The city of [[Berlin]] was placed under the control of the four powers. |
|||
{{Main|Eastern Bloc}} |
|||
The military success of the [[Red Army]] in [[Central and Eastern Europe]] led to a consolidation of power in communist hands. In some cases, such as Czechoslovakia, this led to enthusiastic support for socialism inspired by the Communist Party and a [[Social Democratic Party]] willing to fuse. In other cases, such as Poland or Hungary, the fusion of the Communist Party with the Social Democratic Party was forcible and accomplished through undemocratic means. In many cases, the communist parties of Central Europe were faced with a population initially quite willing to reign in market forces, institute limited nationalisation of industry and supporting the development of intensive social welfare states, whereas broadly the population largely supported socialism. However, the purges of non-communist parties that supported socialism, combined with forced collectivisation of agriculture and a Soviet-bloc wide recession in 1953 led to deep unrest. This unrest first surfaced in Berlin in 1953, where [[Brecht]] ironically suggested that "[[the Party ought to elect a new People]]". However, [[Nikita Khrushchev]]'s "[[On the Cult of Personality and Its Consequences|Secret Speech]]" of 1956 opened up internal debate, even if members were unaware, in both the [[Polish United Workers' Party|Polish]] and [[Hungarian Socialist Workers' Party|Hungarian]] communist parties. This led to the [[Polish crisis of 1956]] which was resolved through [[Polish October|change in Polish leadership]] and a negotiation between the Soviet and Polish parties over the direction of the [[Economy of Poland|Polish economy]]. |
|||
==== Hungarian Revolution of 1956 ==== |
|||
Over time however the Western zones and the Soviet zone drifted apart economically, not least because of the Soviets' much greater use of disassembly of German industry under its control as a form of [[reparations]]. Agrarian reform in the Soviet zone expropriated all land belonging to former Nazis and war criminals and generally limited ownership to 1 km². Some 500 Junker estates were converted into collective people's farms, and more than 30,000 km² were distributed among 500,000 peasant farmers, agricultural laborers, and refugees. |
|||
{{main|Hungarian Revolution of 1956}} |
|||
[[File:Szent István körút a Falk Miksa (Néphadsereg) utca felől a Honvéd utca felé nézve. A szovjet csapatok ideiglenes kivonulása 1956. október 31-én. Fortepan 24787.jpg|thumb|Soviet [[T-54]] tanks in Budapest on 31 October]] |
|||
The [[Hungarian Revolution of 1956]] was a major challenge to Moscow's control of Eastern Europe.<ref>{{cite book |first1=Erwin A. |last1=Schmidl |first2=László |last2=Ritter |first3=Peter |last3=Dennis |title=The Hungarian Revolution 1956 |date=2006 |publisher=[[Osprey Publishing]] |asin=B01K3JYZEO}}</ref> This revolution saw general strikes, the formation of independent workers councils, the restoration of the [[Hungarian Social Democratic Party|Social Democratic Party]] as a party for revolutionary communism of a non-Soviet variety and the formation of two underground independent communist parties. The [[Hungarian Socialist Workers' Party|mainstream Communist Party]] was controlled for a period of about a week by non-Soviet aligned leaders. Two non-communist parties that supported the maintenance of socialism also regained their independence. This flowering of dissenting communism was crushed by a combination of a military invasion supported by heavy artillery and airstrikes; mass arrests, at least a thousand juridical executions and an uncounted number of [[summary execution]]s; the crushing of the Central Workers Council of Greater Budapest; mass refugee flight; and a worldwide propaganda campaign. The effect of the Hungarian Revolution on other communist parties varied significantly, resulting in large membership losses in Anglophone communist parties.{{sfn|Brown|2009|pp=278–292}} |
|||
Growing economic differences combined with developing political tensions between the USA and the USSR manifested in the refusal in 1947 of the SMAD to take part in the USA's [[Marshall Plan]]. In March 1948, the United States, Britain, and France met in London and agreed to unite the Western zones and to establish a West German republic. The Soviet Union responded by leaving the Allied Control Council and prepared to create an East German state. |
|||
==== Prague Spring of 1968 ==== |
|||
A SMAD decree of June 10 granted permission for the formation of antifascist democratic political parties in the Soviet zone; elections to new state legislatures were scheduled for October 1946. A democratic-antifascist coalition, which included the [[Communist Party of Germany]] (KPD), the [[Social Democratic Party of Germany|Social Democratic Party]] (SPD), the new [[Christian Democratic Union (East Germany)|Christian Democratic Union]] (Christlich-Demokratische Union--CDU), and the [[Liberal Democratic Party of Germany]] (Liberal Demokratische Partei Deutschlands --LDPD), was formed in July 1945. The KPD (with 600,000 members) and the SPD (with 680,000 members), which was under strong pressure from the Communists, merged in April 1946 to form the [[Socialist Unity Party of Germany]] (Sozialistische Einheitspartei Deutschlands--SED). |
|||
{{main|Prague Spring}} |
|||
The [[Czechoslovak Communist Party]] began an ambitious reform agenda under [[Alexander Dubček]]. The plan to limit central control and make the economy more independent of the party threatened bedrock beliefs. On 20 August 1968, Soviet leader [[Leonid Brezhnev]] ordered a [[Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia|massive military invasion]] by [[Warsaw Pact]] forces that destroyed the threat of internal liberalization.<ref>{{cite book |editor1-first=Günter |editor1-last=Bischof |editor1-link=Günter Bischof |editor2-first=Stefan |editor2-last=Karner |editor3-first=Peter |editor3-last=Ruggenthaler |title=The Prague Spring and the Warsaw Pact Invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EquVE6gEB6AC |year=2010 |publisher=[[Rowman & Littlefield]] |isbn=9780739143063 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> At the same time, the Soviets threatened retaliation against the [[British-French-Israeli invasion of Egypt]]. The upshot was a collapse of any tendency toward [[détente]] and the resignations of more intellectuals from communist parties in the West.<ref>{{cite book |first=Maude |last=Bracke |title=Which Socialism, Whose Détente? West European Communism and the Czechoslovak Crisis of 1968 |date=2009}}</ref> |
|||
=== West Germany === |
|||
The SED modelled itself as a Soviet-style "party of the new type." To that end, German communist [[Walter Ulbricht]] became first secretary of the SED, and the Politburo, Secretariat, and Central Committee were formed. According to the [[Leninist]] principle of [[democratic centralism]], each party body was controlled by its members. Ulbricht, as party chief, carried out the will of the members of his party. The SED committed itself ideologically to [[Marxism-Leninism]] and the international class struggle. |
|||
[[West Germany]] and [[West Berlin]] were centers of East–West conflict during the Cold War and numerous communist fronts were established. For example, the [[East Germany]] organization [[Society for German–Soviet Friendship]] (GfDSF) had {{gaps|13|000}} members in West Germany, but it was banned in 1953 by some [[States of Germany|Länder]] as a communist front.{{sfn|Major|1997|p=215}} The Democratic Cultural League of Germany started off as a series of genuinely pluralistic bodies, but in 1950–1951 came under the control of the communists. By 1952, the [[Embassy of the United States, Berlin|United States Embassy]] counted 54 "infiltrated organizations" which started independently as well as 155 "front organizations" which had been communist inspired from their start.{{sfn|Major|1997|pp=217–218}} |
|||
The Association of the Victims of the Nazi Regime was set up to rally West Germans under the anti-fascist banner, but it had to be dissolved when Moscow discovered it had been infiltrated by "[[Zionism|Zionist]] agents".<ref>{{cite book |author-link=Vojtech Mastny (historian) |first=Vojtech |last=Mastny |title=The Cold War and Soviet Insecurity: The Stalin Years |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |date=1998 |pages=162}}</ref> |
|||
In November 1948, the German Economic Commission (Deutsche Wirtschaftskomission--DWK), dominated by the SED, assumed administrative authority. Five weeks after declaration of the western [[Federal Republic of Germany]], on October 7, 1949, the DWK formed a provisional government and proclaimed establishment of the [[German Democratic Republic]] (GDR). [[Wilhelm Pieck]], a SED party leader, was elected first president. |
|||
=== China === |
|||
On March 18, 1990, the SED lost its previously guaranteed majority in the [[Volkskammer]] (the parliament of the GDR) following free and fair elections. On August 23 the Volkskammer decided that the territory of East Germany including East Berlin would accede to the ambit of the basic law of the Federal Republic of Germany on October 3, 1990. As a result of [[German reunification]] on that date, the German Democratic Republic ceased to exist. |
|||
{{Main|History of the People's Republic of China}} |
|||
==== Great Leap Forward ==== |
|||
'''Albania''' |
|||
{{Main|Great Leap Forward}} |
|||
[[Mao Zedong]] and the [[Chinese Communist Party]] [[Chinese Civil War|came to power]] in China in 1949 as the [[Nationalist government|Nationalists]] headed by the [[Kuomintang]] fled to the island of Taiwan. In 1950–1953, China engaged in a large-scale, undeclared war with the [[United States]], [[South Korea]] and [[United Nations Command|United Nations forces]] in the [[Korean War]]. While its hostility ended in a military stalemate, it gave Mao the opportunity to identify and purge elements in China that seemed supportive of capitalism. At first, there was close cooperation with Stalin, who sent in technical experts to aid the industrialization process along the line of the Soviet model of the 1930s.{{sfn|Brown|2009|pp=179–193}} After Stalin's death in 1953, relations with Moscow soured{{snd}}Mao thought Stalin's successors had betrayed the Communist ideal. Mao charged that Soviet leader [[Nikita Khrushchev]] was the leader of a "revisionist clique" which had turned against Marxism and Leninism was now setting the stage for the restoration of capitalism.<ref>{{cite book |author-link=John Gittings |first=John |last=Gittings |title=The Changing Face of China: From Mao to Market |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=259WHxBah2wC&pg=PA40 |year=2006 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |page=40 |isbn=9780191622373 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> The two nations were at sword's point by 1960. Both began forging alliances with communist supporters around the globe, thereby splitting the worldwide movement into two hostile camps.<ref>{{cite book |first=Lorenz M. |last=Luthi |title=The Sino-Soviet Split: Cold War in the Communist World |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dl4TRDxqexMC&pg=PA94 |year=2010 |publisher=[[Princeton University Press]] |isbn=978-1400837625 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> |
|||
Rejecting the Soviet model of rapid urbanization, Mao Zedong and his top aide [[Deng Xiaoping]] launched the [[Great Leap Forward]] in 1957–1961 with the goal of [[Chinese industrialization|industrializing China]] overnight, using the peasant villages as the base rather than large cities.{{sfn|Brown|2009|pp=316–332}} Private ownership of land ended and the peasants worked in large collective farms that were now ordered to start up heavy industry operations, such as steel mills. Plants were built in remote locations, despite the lack of technical experts, managers, transportation or needed facilities. Industrialization failed, but the main result was a sharp unexpected decline in agricultural output, which led to mass famine and millions of deaths. The years of the Great Leap Forward in fact saw economic regression, with 1958 through 1961 being the only years between 1953 and 1983 in which China's economy saw negative growth. Political economist [[Dwight H. Perkins (economist)|Dwight Perkins]] argues, "Enormous amounts of investment produced only modest increases in production or none at all. [...] In short, the Great Leap was a very expensive disaster".<ref>{{cite book |author-link=Dwight H. Perkins (economist) |first=Dwight Heald |last=Perkins |title=China's economic policy and performance during the Cultural Revolution and its aftermath |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cVywAAAAIAAJ |year=1984 |publisher=[[Harvard Institute for International Development]] |page=12 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> Put in charge of rescuing the economy, Deng adopted pragmatic policies that the idealistic Mao disliked. For a while, Mao was in the shadows, but he returned to center stage and purged Deng and his allies in the [[Cultural Revolution]] (1966–1969).<ref>{{cite book |author-link=Ezra F. Vogel |last=Vogel |first=Ezra F. |title=[[Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China]] |year=2011 |publisher=[[Harvard University Press]] |pages=[https://books.google.com/books?id=3IaR-FxlA6AC&pg=PA40 40]–[https://books.google.com/books?id=3IaR-FxlA6AC&pg=PA42 42]}}</ref> |
|||
The communists took over after World War II, in November 1944, under the leader of the resistance, [[Enver Hoxha]]. From 1945 until 1990 Albania had one of the most repressive governments in Europe. The communist party was created in 1941 with the direction of Bolshevik Communist Parties. All those who opposed it were eliminated. Hoxha, a strict Stalinist, became the leader of this party. For many decades of his domination, Hoxha created and destroyed relationships with Belgrade, Moscow, and China, always in his personal interests. The country was isolated, first from the West (Western Europe, Canada, USA) and later even from the communist East. |
|||
==== Early post-war dissident communists ==== |
|||
In 1985, Enver Hoxha died and [[Ramiz Alia]] took his place. Initially, Alia tried to follow in Hoxha's footsteps, but in Eastern Europe the changes had already started: [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] had appeared in the [[Soviet Union]] with new policies ([[Glasnost]] and [[perestroika]]). The totalitarian regime was pressured by the US and Europe and the hate of its own people. After [[Nicolae Ceauşescu]] (the communist leader of [[Romania]]) was executed in a revolution, Alia knew he would be next if changes were not made. He signed the [[Helsinki Agreement]] (which was signed by other countries in 1975) that respected some [[human rights]]. He also allowed [[pluralism]], and even though his party won the election of 1991 it was clear that the change would not be stopped. In 1992 the general elections were won by the Democratic Party with 62% of the votes. |
|||
{{Unreferenced section|date=April 2022}} |
|||
Following the Second World War, [[Trotskyism]] was wracked by increasing internal divisions over analysis and strategy. This was combined with an industrial impotence that was widely recognised. Additionally, the success of Soviet-aligned parties in Europe and Asia led to the persecution of [[Trotskyism|Trotskyist]] intellectuals such as the infamous purge of [[Vietnamese Trotskyists]]. The war had also strained social democratic parties in the West. In some cases, such as Italy, significant bodies of membership of the Social Democratic Party were inspired by the possibility of achieving advanced socialism. In Italy, this group, combined with dissenting communists, began to discuss theory centred on the experience of work in modern factories, leading to [[autonomist Marxist]]. In the United States, this theoretical development was paralleled by the [[Johnson–Forest Tendency]] whereas in France a similar impulse occurred. |
|||
== Cold War and revisionism (1958–1979) == |
|||
'''Bulgaria''' |
|||
{{Main|Cold War|Revisionism (Marxism)}} |
|||
=== Maoism and the Cultural Revolution in China === |
|||
Bulgaria fell within the [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] sphere of influence after World War II and became a [[People's Republic]] in 1946. [[Todor Zhivkov]], First Secretary of the [[Bulgarian Communist Party]] from 1954 until 1989, became the longest serving leader of any of the Eastern bloc nations. Communist domination ended in 1990, when Bulgaria again held multiparty elections. |
|||
{{main|Maoism|Cultural Revolution}} |
|||
[[File:1967-11 1967年 毛泽东接见红卫兵油画.jpg|thumb|The propaganda oil painting of Mao during the Cultural Revolution (1967).]] |
|||
The [[Cultural Revolution]] was an upheaval that targeted intellectuals and party leaders from 1966 through 1976. Mao's goal was to purify communism by removing pro-capitalists and traditionalists by imposing [[Maoist]] orthodoxy within the [[Chinese Communist Party]]. The movement paralyzed China politically and weakened the country economically, culturally and intellectually for years. Millions of people were accused, humiliated, stripped of power and either imprisoned, killed or most often sent to work as farm laborers. Mao insisted that these he labelled [[Revisionism (Marxism)|revisionists]] be removed through violent [[class struggle]]. The two most prominent militants were Marshall [[Lin Biao]] of the army and Mao's wife [[Jiang Qing]]. China's youth responded to Mao's appeal by forming [[Red Guards (China)|Red Guard]] groups around the country. The movement spread into the military, urban workers and the Communist Party leadership itself. It resulted in widespread factional struggles in all walks of life. In the top leadership, it led to a mass purge of senior officials who were accused of taking a "[[capitalist road]]", most notably [[Liu Shaoqi]] and [[Deng Xiaoping]]. During the same period, [[Mao Zedong's cult of personality|Mao's personality cult]] grew to immense proportions. After [[Death and state funeral of Mao Zedong|Mao's death]] in 1976, the survivors were rehabilitated and many returned to power.{{sfn|Brown|2009|pp=324–332}} |
|||
'''Czechoslovakia''' |
|||
=== Cuban Revolution === |
|||
After [[World War II]], the pre-war Czechoslovakia was reestablished, the Germans were expelled from the country and [[Carpathian Ruthenia|Ruthenia]] was occupied by (officially "given to") the Soviet Union. Three years later the [[Communist Party of Czechoslovakia]] seized power (1948 to 1989) and the country came under the influence of the [[Soviet Union]]. Except for a short period in the late 1960s (the [[Prague Spring]]) the country was characterized by the absence of democracy and relative economic backwardness compared to Western Europe. In the religious sphere, [[atheism]] was officially promoted and taught. In 1969, Czechoslovakia was turned into a [[federation]] of the [[Czech Socialist Republic]] and the [[Slovak Socialist Republic]]. |
|||
{{main|Cuban Revolution|Consolidation of the Cuban Revolution}} |
|||
The [[Cuban Revolution]] was a successful armed revolt led by [[Fidel Castro]]'s [[26th of July Movement]] against the regime of Cuban dictator [[Fulgencio Batista]]. It ousted Batista on 1 January 1959, replacing his regime with Castro's revolutionary government. Throughout 1959, Fidel Castro began associating with Communist politicians.<ref>{{cite book |first=Marifeli |last=Perez-Stable |title=The Cuban Revolution: Origins, Course, and Legacy |edition=3rd |date=2011}}</ref> The United States response was highly negative, leading to a [[Bay of Pigs Invasion|failed invasion attempt in 1961]]. The Soviets decided to protect its ally by stationing nuclear weapons in Cuba in 1962. In the [[Cuban Missile Crisis]], the United States vehemently opposed the Soviet Union move. There was serious fear of nuclear war for a few days, but a compromise was reached by which Moscow publicly removed its weapons and the United States secretly removed its weapons from bases in Turkey and promised never to invade Cuba.{{sfn|Brown|2009|pp=293–312}} |
|||
On November 17, 1989, a peaceful student demonstration in [[Prague]] was severely beaten back by the Communist riot police. That event sparked a set of popular demonstrations from November 19 to late December, and a general two-hour strike of the population on November 27. By November 20 the number of peaceful protestors assembled in Prague had swelled from 200,000 the day before to an estimated half-million. With other Eastern European communist regimes falling all around it, and with growing street protests, the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia announced on November 28 they would give up their monopoly on political power. On December 10, the Communist President [[Gustáv Husák]] appointed the first largely non-communist government in Czechoslovakia since 1948, and resigned. The peaceful uprising that toppled the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia became known as the "[[Velvet Revolution]]." |
|||
=== African communism === |
|||
'''Hungary''' |
|||
{{see also|African socialism}} |
|||
[[File:T-55 Ethiopian Civil War 1991 (cropped).jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Monument to Marxism built by the [[Derg]] in [[Addis Ababa]]]] |
|||
During the [[decolonization of Africa]], the Soviet Union took a keen interest in that continent's independence movements and initially hoped that the cultivation of communist client states there would deny their economic and strategic resources to the West.<ref name="Magyar">{{cite book |title=Prolonged Wars: A Post Nuclear Challenge |last1=Magyar |first1=Karl |last2=Danopoulos |first2=Constantine |location=Honolulu |publisher=[[University Press of the Pacific]] |date=2002 |orig-year=1994 |isbn=978-0898758344 |pages=260–271}}</ref> Soviet foreign policy with regard to Africa assumed that newly independent African governments would be receptive to communist ideology and that the Soviets would have the resources to make them attractive as development partners.<ref name="Magyar"/> During the 1970s, the ruling parties of several [[sub-Saharan Africa]]n states formally embraced communism, including the [[People's Republic of Benin]], the [[People's Republic of Mozambique]], the [[People's Republic of the Congo]], the [[People's Democratic Republic of Ethiopia]], and the [[People's Republic of Angola]].<ref name=Africa1>{{cite book |last1=Markakis |first1=John |last2=Waller |first2=Michael |title=Military Marxist Regimes in Africa |date=1986 |pages=131–134 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |location=New York |isbn=978-0714632957}}</ref> Most of these regimes ensured the selective adoption and flexible application of communist theory set against a broad ideological commitment to Marxism or Leninism.<ref name=Africa1/> The adoption of communism was often seen as a means to an end and used to justify the extreme centralization of power.<ref name=Africa1/> |
|||
Angola was perhaps the only African state which made a longstanding commitment to communism,<ref>{{cite book |last1=Johnson |first1=Elliott |last2=Walker |first2=David |last3=Gray |first3=Daniel |year=2014 |title=Historical Dictionary of Marxism |series=Historical Dictionaries of Religions, Philosophies, and Movements |edition=2nd |location=Lanham, Maryland |publisher=[[Rowman & Littlefield]] |isbn=978-1-4422-3798-8 |page=294}}</ref> but this was severely hampered by its own war-burdened [[Economy of Angola|economy]], rampant [[Corruption in Angola|corruption]] and practical realities which allowed a few foreign companies to wield considerable influence despite the elimination of the domestic Angolan private sector and a substantial degree of [[Planned economy|central economic planning]].<ref name=Arming>{{cite book |last=Ferreira |first=Manuel |editor1-last=Brauer |editor1-first=Jurgen |editor2-last=Dunne |editor2-first=Paul |title=Arming the South: The Economics of Military Expenditure, Arms Production and Arms Trade in Developing Countries |date=2002 |publisher=[[Palgrave-Macmillan]] |location=Basingstoke |isbn=978-0-230-50125-6 |pages=251–255}}</ref><ref name=SSG1>{{cite book |last=Akongdit |first=Addis Ababa Othow |title=Impact of Political Stability on Economic Development: Case of South Sudan |date=2013 |pages=74–75 |publisher=AuthorHouse Ltd, Publishers |location=Bloomington |isbn=978-1491876442}}</ref> Both Angola and Ethiopia built new social and political communist institutions modeled closely after those in the Soviet Union and Cuba.<ref name=Dunn/> However, their regimes either dissolved after the collapse of the Soviet Union due to civil conflict or voluntarily repudiated communism in favour of [[social democracy]].<ref name=Dunn/> |
|||
Following the fall of Nazi Germany, Hungary became part of the Soviet area of influence and was appropriated into a [[communist state]] following a short period of democracy in 1946–1947. After 1948 Communist leader Mátyás Rákosi established a Stalinist rule in the country, which was barely bearable for the war torn country. This led to the [[1956 Hungarian Revolution|1956 Hungarian Revolution/revolt]] and announced withdrawal from the [[Warsaw Pact]] were met with military intervention by the [[Soviet Union]] and the deposition and execution of the reform-minded communist prime minister [[Imre Nagy]]. From the 1960's on to the late 1980's Hungary enjoyed a distinguished status of "[[the happiest barrack]]" within the [[Eastern Bloc]], under the rule of late controversial communist leader [[János Kádár]], who exercised autocratic rule at most of this era. In the late 1980s, Hungary led the movement to dissolve the Warsaw Pact and shifted toward multiparty democracy and a market-oriented economy. |
|||
=== Eurocommunism === |
|||
'''Moldova''' |
|||
{{main|Eurocommunism}} |
|||
An important trend in several countries in Western Europe from the late 1960s into the 1980s was [[Eurocommunism]]. It was strongest in [[Communist Party of Spain (main)|Spain's PCE]], [[Communist Party of Finland|Finland's party]] and especially in [[Partito Comunista Italiano|Italy's PCI]], where it drew on the ideas of [[Antonio Gramsci]]. It was developed by communist party members who were disillusioned with both the Soviet Union and China and sought an independent program. They accepted liberal parliamentary democracy and free speech as well as accepting with some conditions a capitalist [[market economy]]. They did not speak of the destruction of capitalism, but sought to win the support of the masses and by a gradual transformation of the bureaucracies. In 1978, the [[Communist Party of Spain]] replaced the historic "Marxist–Leninist" catchphrase with the new slogan of "Marxist, democratic and revolutionary". The movement faded in the 1980s and collapsed with the fall of communism in Eastern Europe in 1989.<ref>{{cite book |first=David |last=Priestland |author-link=David Priestland |title=The Red Flag: A History of Communism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lcxEii8rwT0C&pg=PA497 |year=2009 |publisher=Grove Press |pages=497–499 |isbn=9780802119247 |via=[[Google Books]]}}</ref> |
|||
===Other forms=== |
|||
At the end of [[World War I]], Bessarabia proclaimed independence from Russia in 1918, and united with the Kingdom of Romania the same year. The Soviet Union occupied Bessarabia in June 1940 in an agreement with Germany expressed in the [[Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact]], and though forced out again in 1941, Soviet troops reoccupied the area in August 1944. Under Soviet rule the southern and northern parts (inhabited by Ukrainians and Romanians) were transferred to Ukraine and [[Transnistria]] (largely inhabited by Russians) joined with the remainder in a Soviet republic called the "[[Moldavian SSR|Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic]]" covering Moldova's current territory. Under [[Stalin]], ethnic Russians were brought into the new republic, especially into urbanized areas, while many ethnic Romanians were deported to [[Siberia]] and [[Kazakhstan]]. |
|||
{{Further|Anarcho-communism|Left communism|Libertarian Marxism}} |
|||
[[Anarcho-communism]] is a political philosophy and anarchist school of thought which advocates the [[Anti-statism|abolition of the state]], [[capitalism]], [[wage labour]], [[Hierarchy|social hierarchies]] and [[private property]] (while retaining respect for [[personal property]], along with [[Public property|collectively-owned items, goods and services]]) in favor of [[common ownership]] of the [[means of production]] and [[direct democracy]] as well as a horizontal network of workers' councils with production and consumption based on the guiding principle "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."<ref>{{cite book |first=Ruth |last=Kinna |author-link=Ruth Kinna |chapter=Anarchism, Individualism and Communism: William Morris's Critique of Anarcho-communism |title=Libertarian Socialism |publisher=[[Palgrave Macmillan]] |date=2012 |pages=35–56 |chapter-url=https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/chapter/Anarchism_individualism_and_communism_William_Morris_s_critique_of_anarcho-communism/9469784/files/17093996.pdf}}</ref> |
|||
[[Left communism]] is a position held by the left wing of communism, which criticises the political ideas and practices espoused by Marxist–Leninists and social democrats. Left communists assert positions which they regard as more authentically Marxist than the views of Marxism–Leninism espoused by the Communist International after its Bolshevization by Joseph Stalin and during its second congress.<ref>{{cite book |first=Ian D. |last=Thatcher |author-link=Ian D. Thatcher |chapter=Left-communism: Rosa Luxemburg and Leon Trotsky compared |title=Twentieth-Century Marxism |publisher=[[Routledge]] |date=2007 |pages=42–57 |chapter-url=https://www.v8ive.com/wp-content/uploads/Grand%20Library/Philosophy/Books%20&%20Texts/-Marxist-Leninist/Daryl%20Glaser,%20David%20M.%20Walker%20-%20Twentieth-Century%20Marxism%20-%20a%20Global%20Introduction.pdf#page=43}}</ref> |
|||
The republic's name was changed to the Republic of Moldova on May 23, 1991, and it declared independence from the Soviet Union on August 27, 1991. After an initial desire to unify with Romania, a civil war began in the separatist [[Transnistria]] region in 1992 and since, the Moldovan government has no control of this region. In 2001, the [[Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova]], the ideological successor to the Soviet-era Communist Party, was elected into power. |
|||
[[Libertarian Marxism]] is a broad scope of economic and political philosophies that emphasize the anti-authoritarian and libertarian aspects of Marxism.<ref>{{cite web |first=Wayne |last=Price |title=What is Libertarian Socialism? An Anarchist-Marxist Dialogue |date=2017 |url=https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/wayne-price-what-is-libertarian-socialism-an-anarchist-marxist-dialogue.pdf}}</ref> |
|||
'''Poland''' |
|||
== End of the Eastern Bloc – Reform and collapse (1980–1992) == |
|||
[[Image:Ac.bierut.jpg|thumb|right|[[Bolesław Bierut]], Polish Communist leader.]] |
|||
{{main|Revolutions of 1989}} |
|||
The Second Polish Republic lasted until the start of [[World War II]] when Germany and the [[Soviet Union]] [[Polish September Campaign|invaded and split the Polish territory between them]] from ([[September 28]] [[1939]]). Poland was completely unprepared for the swiftness and ferocity of the attacks because of a failure to modernize her military. Poland suffered greatly in this period (see [[General Government]]). Of all the countries involved in the war, Poland lost the highest percentage of its citizens: over 6 million perished, half of them Polish [[Jew]]s. Poland's borders shifted westwards; pushing the eastern border to the [[Curzon line]] and the western border to the [[Oder-Neisse line]]. After the shift Poland emerged smaller by 76 000 km² or by 20% of its pre-war size. The shifting of borders also involved the migration of millions of people – Poles, Germans, Ukrainians, Jews. Eventually, Poland became, for the first time in history, an ethnically unified country. The Soviet Union occupation brought a new [[Communism | communist]] government to Poland, analogously to much of the rest of the Eastern Bloc. |
|||
{{Unreferenced section|date=April 2022}} |
|||
[[File:President Ronald Reagan and Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev at the first Summit in Geneva, Switzerland.jpg|thumb|left|Soviet General Secretary [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], who sought to end the Cold War between the Soviet-led [[Warsaw Pact]] and the United States-led [[NATO]] and other its other Western allies, in a meeting with President [[Ronald Reagan]]]] |
|||
Social resistance to the policies of communist regimes in Eastern Europe accelerated in strength with the rise of the [[Solidarity (Polish trade union)|Solidarity]], the first non-communist controlled trade union in the Warsaw Pact that was formed in the [[People's Republic of Poland]] in 1980. |
|||
In 1985, [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] rose to power in the Soviet Union and began policies of radical political reform involving political liberalisation called [[perestroika]] and [[glasnost]]. Gorbachev's policies were designed to dismantle the authoritarian elements of the state that were developed by Stalin, aiming to restore the supposed ideal Leninist state and retaining a [[One-party state|one-party structure]] but [[Demokratizatsiya (Soviet Union)|allowing the democratic election of competing candidates to political office within the party]]. Gorbachev also aimed to restore détente with the West and he also aimed to end the Cold War that was being waged by the Soviet Union because it was no longer economically sustainable. The Soviet Union and the United States under President [[George H. W. Bush]] joined in pushing for the dismantlement of apartheid and they also oversaw the dismantlement of [[South West Africa|South African colonial rule]] of [[Namibia]]. |
|||
In 1948 a turn towards [[Stalinism]] brought in the beginning of the next period of totalitarian rule. The [[People's Republic of Poland]] was officially proclaimed in 1952. In 1956 the régime became more liberal, freeing many people from prison and expanding some personal freedoms. Labour turmoil in 1980 led to the formation of the independent [[trade union]], "[[Solidarity]]", which over time became a political force. It eroded the dominance of the [[Polish United Workers' Party | Communist Party]]; by 1989 it had triumphed in parliamentary elections, and [[Lech Wałęsa]] a Solidarity candidate eventually won the presidency. |
|||
Meanwhile, the Eastern European communist states politically deteriorated in response to the success of the Polish [[Solidarity (Polish trade union)|Solidarity movement]] and the possibility of Gorbachev-style political liberalisation. In 1989, revolts began across Eastern Europe and China against communist regimes. In China, the government refused to negotiate with student protestors, resulting in the [[1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre|Tiananmen Square attacks]] that stopped the revolts by force. |
|||
'''Romania''' |
|||
The opening of a border gate between Austria and Hungary at the [[Pan-European Picnic]] on August 19, 1989, then set in motion a peaceful chain reaction, at the end of which there was no longer a GDR and the Eastern Bloc had disintegrated. It was the largest escape movement from East Germany since the [[Berlin Wall]] was built in 1961. But with the mass exodus at the Pan-European Picnic, the subsequent hesitant behavior of the [[Socialist Unity Party of Germany|Socialist Unity Party of East Germany]] and the non-intervention of the Soviet Union broke the dams. The revolts culminated with the revolt in [[East Germany]] against the communist regime of [[Erich Honecker]]. The event in East Germany developed into a [[Monday demonstrations in East Germany|popular mass revolt]] with [[Fall of the Berlin Wall|sections of the Berlin Wall being torn down]] and East and West Berliners uniting. Gorbachev's refusal to use Soviet forces based in East Germany to suppress the revolt was seen as a sign that the Cold War had ended. Honecker was pressured to resign from office and the new government committed itself to [[German reunification|reunification with West Germany]]. The [[Romanian Communist Party|Communist Party]] regime of [[Nicolae Ceaușescu]] in [[Socialist Republic of Romania|Romania]] was forcefully overthrown in the [[Romanian Revolution]] of 1989 and [[Trial and execution of Nicolae and Elena Ceaușescu|Ceaușescu was executed]]. The other [[Warsaw Pact]] regimes also fell during the [[Revolutions of 1989]], with the exception of the [[Socialist People's Republic of Albania]] that continued until 1992. |
|||
In August 1944 [[Romania]] turned against Germany and joined the [[Red Army]], but its role in the defeating of Germany was not recognised by the 1946 Treaty of Paris. In 1947 king Michael I Hohenzollern abdicated, and Romania became a communist state - under direct military and economic control of the [[U.S.S.R.]] until 1958. |
|||
[[File:Thefalloftheberlinwall1989.JPG|thumb|The fall of the [[Berlin Wall]] in 1989]] |
|||
Unrest and the eventual collapse of communism also occurred in [[Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia|Yugoslavia]], but the collapse of communism in Yugoslavia and the collapse of communism in the Warsaw Pact occurred for different reasons. The [[Death and state funeral of Josip Broz Tito|death of Josip Broz Tito]] in 1980 and the subsequent vacuum of strong leadership allowed the rise of rival ethnic nationalism in the multinational country. The first leader to exploit such nationalism for political purposes was [[Slobodan Milošević]], who used [[Serbian nationalism]] to seize power as [[president of Serbia]] and demanded concessions to the [[Socialist Republic of Serbia]] and [[Serbian nationalism|Serbs]] by the other republics in the Yugoslav federation. This resulted in a surge of [[Slovenian nationalism|Slovene]] and [[Croatian nationalism|Croat nationalism]] in response and the collapse of the [[League of Communists of Yugoslavia]] in 1990, the victory of nationalists in multi-party elections in most of Yugoslavia's constituent republics and eventually [[Yugoslav Wars|civil war between the various nationalities]] beginning in 1991. [[Breakup of Yugoslavia|Yugoslavia was dissolved]] in 1992. |
|||
The decades-long reign of Nicolae Ceauşescu ended in late 1989 (see [[Romanian Revolution]] of 1989), and the elections of 1990 were won by FSN. |
|||
The [[Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Soviet Union itself collapsed]] between 1990 and 1991, due to the rise of secessionist nationalism and the outbreak of a political power dispute between Gorbachev and [[Boris Yeltsin]], the new leader of the [[Russian Federation]]. The collapse of the Soviet Union was also aided by political pressure from capitalist powers, loans from world banks, and pressure for liberal democracy and increased consumerism within the Soviet Bloc.<ref>{{Citation |last=Bartel |first=Fritz |title=The Triumph of Broken Promises: The End of the Cold War and the Rise of Neoliberalism |date=2022-08-09 |url=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.4159/9780674275805/html |work=The Triumph of Broken Promises |access-date=2023-04-21 |publisher=Harvard University Press |language=en |doi=10.4159/9780674275805 |isbn=978-0-674-27580-5|s2cid=249327761 }}</ref> U.S. monetary and fiscal policy raised interest rates, making borrowing money very difficult for the Soviet Union.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Gatejel |first=Luminita |date=2016 |title=Appealing for a Car: Consumption Policies and Entitlement in the USSR, the GDR, and Romania, 1950s–1980s |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/slavic-review/article/abs/appealing-for-a-car-consumption-policies-and-entitlement-in-the-ussr-the-gdr-and-romania-1950s1980s/CF2AF8D052EE6A109200FD21E5379EA6 |journal=Slavic Review |language=en |volume=75 |issue=1 |pages=122–145 |doi=10.5612/slavicreview.75.1.122 |s2cid=203276304 |issn=0037-6779}}</ref> With the [[Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Soviet Union collapsing]], Gorbachev prepared the country to become a loose federation of independent states called the [[Commonwealth of Independent States]]. Hardline communist leaders in the military reacted to Gorbachev's policies with the [[August Coup]] of 1991 in which hardline communist military leaders overthrew Gorbachev and seized control of the government. This regime only lasted briefly as widespread popular opposition erupted in street protests and refused to submit. Gorbachev was restored to power, but the various [[Republics of the Soviet Union|Soviet republics]] were now set for independence. On 25 December 1991, Gorbachev officially announced the dissolution of the Soviet Union, ending the existence of the world's first communist state. |
|||
'''Yugoslavia''' |
|||
== Contemporary communism (1993–present) == |
|||
Democratic Federative Yugoslavia was reconstituted at the [[AVNOJ]] conference in [[Jajce]] ([[November 29]] to [[December 4]] [[1943]]) while negotiations with the royal [[government in exile]] continued. On [[November 29]] [[1945]] the Federative People's Republic of Yugoslavia was established as a [[socialist state]] (also by AVNOJ in Jajce). On [[January 31]], [[1946]], the [[Constitution of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia|new constitution]] of FPR Yugoslavia established the six constituent republics. |
|||
{{See also|21st-century communist theorists|List of anti-capitalist and communist parties with national parliamentary representation}} |
|||
With the fall of the communist governments in the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc, the influence of state-based [[Marxism–Leninism|Marxist–Leninist]] ideologies in the world was weakened, but there are still many communist movements of various types and sizes around the world. Three other communist nations, particularly those in [[East Asia]] such as the People's Republic of China, Vietnam and Laos, all moved toward [[Market economy|market economies]], but without any major [[privatization]] of the state sector during the 1980s and 1990s (see [[socialism with Chinese characteristics]] and [[doi moi]] for more details). [[Spain]], [[France]], [[Portugal]] and [[Greece]] have very publicly strong communist movements that play an open and active leading role in the vast majority of their labor marches and strikes as well as also [[anti-austerity protests]], all of which are large, pronounced events with much visibility. Worldwide marches on [[International Workers Day]] sometimes give a clearer picture of the size and influence of current communist movements, particularly within Europe.{{citation needed|date=July 2019}} |
|||
[[Cuba]] has recently emerged from the [[Special Period|crisis]] which was sparked by the fall of the Soviet Union due to the growth in the volume of its trade with its new allies, [[Venezuela]] and China (the former nation has recently adopted a [[socialism of the 21st century]] according to [[Hugo Chavez|Hugo Chávez]]). Various other countries throughout [[Latin America and the Caribbean]] have also made similar shifts to more clearly socialistic policies and rhetoric in a phenomenon which academics are calling the [[pink tide]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lopes |first1=Dawisson Belém |last2=de Faria |first2=Carlos Aurélio Pimenta |date=January–April 2016 |title=When Foreign Policy Meets Social Demands in Latin America |journal=Contexto Internacional |type=[[Literature review]] |publisher=[[Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro]] |volume=38 |issue=1 |pages=11–53|doi=10.1590/S0102-8529.2016380100001 |quote=No matter the shades of pink in the Latin American 'pink tide', and recalling that political change was not the norm for the whole region during that period, there seems to be greater agreement when it comes to explaining its emergence. In terms of this canonical interpretation, the left turn should be understood as a feature of general redemocratisation in the region, which is widely regarded as an inevitable result of the high levels of inequality in the region. |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="Jared2">{{cite web |last1=Abbott |first1=Jared |title=Will the Pink Tide Lift All Boats? Latin American Socialisms and Their Discontents |url=http://www.dsausa.org/will_the_pink_tide_lift_all_boats |access-date=5 April 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170406111124/http://www.dsausa.org/will_the_pink_tide_lift_all_boats|archive-date=6 April 2017 |url-status=dead |publisher=[[Democratic Socialists of America]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Oikonomakis |first1=Leonidas |title=Europe's pink tide? Heeding the Latin American experience |date=16 March 2015 |url=https://www.thepressproject.gr/endetails.php?aid=74480 |access-date=5 April 2017 |website=The Press Project}}</ref> |
|||
The first [[president]] was [[Ivan Ribar]] and [[prime minister]] [[Josip Broz Tito]]. In 1953, [[Tito]] was elected as president and later in 1963 named "[[President for life]]". |
|||
[[North Korea]] claims that its success in avoiding the downfall of socialism is a result of its homegrown ideology of ''[[Juche]]'' which it adopted in the 1970s, replacing Marxism–Leninism. Cuba has an ambassador to North Korea and China still protects North Korean territorial integrity even as it simultaneously refuses to supply the state with material goods or other significant assistance.{{citation needed|date=July 2019}} |
|||
Yugoslavia, unlike other Eastern and Central European communist countries, chose a course independent of the [[Soviet Union]] (see [[Informbiro]]), and was not a member of the [[Warsaw pact]] nor [[NATO]], but rather than that initiated a [[Non-Aligned Movement]] in 1956. |
|||
In [[Nepal]], the [[Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist–Leninist)]] leader [[Man Mohan Adhikari]] briefly became [[Prime Minister of Nepal]] and national leader from 1994 to 1995 and the [[Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) (1994)|Maoist]] guerrilla leader [[Prachanda]] was elected prime minister by the [[Constituent Assembly of Nepal]] in 2008. Prachanda has since been deposed as prime minister, leading the Maoists to abandon their legalistic approach and return to their typical street actions and militancy and to lead sporadic [[general strike]]s using their quite substantial influence on the Nepalese labor movement. These actions have oscillated between mild and intense, only the latter of which tends to make world news. They consider Prachanda's removal to be unjust.{{citation needed|date=July 2019}} Since 2008, Nepal has been ruled by a coalition of communist parties: [[Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist–Leninist)]] and [[Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre)]] which they merged in 2018 in the [[Nepal Communist Party]]. |
|||
Following the "fall of Communism" in the rest of Eastern Europe, nationalism replaced communism as the dominant force in Yugoslav politics as each of the six constituent republics elected a new government democratically. |
|||
The previous national government of [[India]] depended on the parliamentary support of the [[Communist Party of India (Marxist)]] and Communist Party of India. Presently CPI(M) along with CPI leads the [[Government of Kerala|state government]] in [[Kerala]]. The armed wing of the [[Communist Party of India (Maoist)]], the [[People's Liberation Guerrilla Army (India)|People's Liberation Guerrilla Army]], is fighting the [[Naxalite–Maoist insurgency]] against the [[Government of India]] and is active in [[Red corridor|some parts of the country]]. Indian government forces have been successful in eliminating insurgency to quite an extent.{{when|date=May 2015}}{{citation needed|date=July 2019}} |
|||
===China=== |
|||
[[Image:China, Mao (2).jpg|right|250px|thumb|Mao declared the founding of the PRC on October 1, 1949.]] |
|||
After [[World War II]], the [[Chinese Civil War]] between the [[Communist Party of China]] and the [[Kuomintang]] ended in 1949 with the Communists in control of [[mainland China]] and the Kuomintang in control of [[Taiwan]] and some outlying islands of [[Fujian]]. On [[October 1]], 1949, [[Mao Zedong]] declared the People's Republic of China and established a [[communist state]]. |
|||
In [[Cyprus]], the veteran communist [[Dimitris Christofias]] of [[AKEL]] won the [[2008 Cypriot presidential election|2008 presidential election]], the first and only communist head of state of a [[European Union]] country.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-02/28/content_7689565.htm |title=New Cyprus president takes office with pledge for solution |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080303075841/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-02/28/content_7689565.htm |archive-date=3 March 2008 |work=[[Xinhua News Agency]] |date=28 February 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Kambas |first=Michele |date=24 February 2008 |url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUKL2442130720080224?sp=true |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090112024113/http://uk.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUKL2442130720080224?sp=true |url-status=dead |archive-date=January 12, 2009 |title=Communist Christofias wins Cyprus presidential vote |work=[[Reuters]] |access-date=17 December 2011}}</ref> |
|||
Under Mao, China's unity and sovereignty was assured for the first time in decades, and there was development of infrastructure, industry, healthcare, and education, which they believe helped in raising living standards. However, Mao's [[Great Leap Forward]] and [[Cultural Revolution]] came with severe economic costs. The Great Leap, in particular, was at least partly responsible in igniting a massive [[famine]] in which, according to some Western sources tern [http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat1.htm sources], 20 - 30 million people died. Most Western and some Chinese analysts attribute this to the Great Leap Forward. Others, including Mao at the time, attribute this famine to natural disasters and question the high death rate. |
|||
In [[Ukraine]] and [[Russia]], the communists came second in the [[2002 Ukrainian parliamentary election]] and the [[2003 Russian legislative election]], respectively. The [[Communist Party of the Russian Federation]] remains strong in Russia, but the [[2014 Ukrainian parliamentary election]] following the [[Russian military intervention in Ukraine (2014–present)|Russian invasion of Ukraine]] and the [[annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation|annexation of Crimea]] resulted in the loss of its 32 members and no [[Verkhovna Rada]] representation by the [[Communist Party of Ukraine]].<ref name=CpvIU271804>{{cite news|url=http://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/233404.html |title=People's Front 0.33% ahead of Poroshenko Bloc with all ballots counted in Ukraine elections |work=[[Interfax-Ukraine]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141112013057/http://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/233404.html |archive-date=12 November 2014 |date=8 November 2014}}</ref> The party has been banned since 2015. |
|||
Following the dramatic economic failures of the early 1960s, Mao began to step down from some of his leadership roles. Mao remained head of the Party but was removed from day to day management of economic affairs, which came under the control of a more moderate leadership under the dominant influence of [[Liu Shaoqi]], [[Deng Xiaoping]] and others who initiated economic reforms. |
|||
In the [[Czech Republic]], the [[Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia]] came third in the 2002 elections<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.volby.cz/pls/ps2002/ps2?xjazyk=EN |title=Election for the Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic held on 14–15.6.2002 |website=volby.cz}}</ref> as did the [[Portuguese Communist Party]] in 2005.<ref>{{cite journal |url=https://www.cne.pt/sites/default/files/dl/resultados_ar_2005_rectificacao.pdf |title=Comissão Nacional de Eleições |language=pt |trans-title=National Election Commission |journal=Diário da República – I Série-a |number=55 |date=18 March 2005 |pages=2437–2438}}</ref> |
|||
In 1966 Mao launched the [[Cultural Revolution]], which is viewed by his opponents (including both Western analysts and many Chinese people who were youth at the time) as a strike back at his rivals by mobilizing the youth of the country in support of his thought and purging the moderate leadership, but is viewed by his supporters as an experiment in direct democracy and a genuine attempt at purging Chinese society of corruption and other negative influences. Serious disorder followed and Mao was forced to stop the revolution in [[1968]] by deploying the army, but gradually under the leadership of [[Zhou Enlai]] moderate forces regained influence. After Mao's death, [[Deng Xiaoping]] succeeded in winning the power struggle, and Mao's widow, [[Jiang Qing]] and her associates, the [[Gang of Four (China)|Gang of Four]], who had assumed control of the country, were arrested and put on trial. |
|||
In [[South Africa]], the [[South African Communist Party]] (SACP) is a member of the [[Tripartite alliance]] alongside the [[African National Congress]] and the [[Congress of South African Trade Unions]]. [[Sri Lanka]] has communist ministers in their national governments.{{citation needed|date=July 2019}} |
|||
Since then, the government has gradually and greatly loosened governmental control over people's personal lives, and began transitioning China's planned economy into a [[mixed economy]]. These economic reforms led to the rapid development of the consumer and export sectors of the economy, the creation of a [[middle class]] (especially in coastal cities where most industrial development is concentrated) that now constitute 15% of the population, higher living standards (which is shown via dramatic increases in GDP per capita, consumer spending, life expectancy, literacy rate, and total grain output), and a much wider range of personal rights and freedoms for average Chinese. |
|||
In [[Zimbabwe]], former president [[Robert Mugabe]] of the [[ZANU–PF|Zimbabwe African National Union – Patriotic Front]], the country's longstanding leader, was a professed communist.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/may/24/zimbabwe-tv-lunch-with-mugabes |title=Lunch with the Mugabes |work=[[The Guardian]] |first=David |last=Smith |location=Johannesburg |date=24 May 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220218225943/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/may/24/zimbabwe-tv-lunch-with-mugabes |archive-date=18 February 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/zimbabwe504/profile.html |title=From Liberator to Tyrant: Recollections of Mugabe |work=[[PBS]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308151547/https://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/zimbabwe504/profile.html |archive-date=8 March 2021}}</ref> |
|||
However, some poorer workers and peasants in China, especially in the interior, have been left behind by the refroms. The reforms have been associated with new disparities in wealth, environmental pollution, widespread [[unemployment]] associated with layoffs, and sine often unwelcome cultural influences. |
|||
[[Colombia]] has been in the midst of a [[civil war]] which has been waged since 1966 between the Colombian government and aligned [[Paramilitarism in Colombia|right-wing paramilitaries]] against two communist guerrilla groups, namely the [[FARC|Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia–People's Army]] (FARC–EP) and the [[National Liberation Army (Colombia)|National Liberation Army]] (ELN).{{citation needed|date=July 2019}} |
|||
The Communist Party of China remains in control and has maintained repressive policies against groups which it feels are threats, such as [[Falun Gong]] and the separatist movement in [[Tibet]]. |
|||
The [[Revolutionary Communist Party, USA]] led by its chairman [[Bob Avakian]] currently organizes for a revolution in the United States to overthrow the capitalist system and replace it with a [[socialist state]].<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zlG5cQAACAAJ |title=Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America: (Draft Proposal) |author=[[Revolutionary Communist Party, USA|Revolutionary Communist Party]] |year=2010 |publisher=R C P Publications |isbn=9780898510072}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/left-wing-radicals-ferguson-missouri-protests |title=What the Heck is the Revolutionary Communist Party' Doing In Ferguson? |last=Scott |first=Dylan |website=Talking Points Memo |date=21 August 2014 |access-date=21 March 2019}}</ref> |
|||
===North Korea === |
|||
Kim's government moved rapidly to establish a Soviet-style system, with political power monopolised by the KWP. The establishment of a [[socialist]] economic system followed. Most of the country's productive assets had been owned by the Japanese or by Koreans held to have been collaborators. The [[nationalization]] of these assets in 1946 placed 70% of industry under state control. By 1949 this percentage had risen to 90%. Since then virtually all manufacturing, finance and internal and external trade has been conducted by the state. |
|||
As of the early 2020s, the [[Philippines]] is still experiencing a [[Communist rebellion in the Philippines|low-scale guerrilla insurgency]] by the [[New People's Army]], the armed wing of the outlawed [[Communist Party of the Philippines]]. Actions of an armed group likely affiliated with NPA resulted in eight casualties after a gunfight with the [[Philippine Armed Forces]] in late March 2021.<ref>{{cite web |title=Philippine Military Kills 8 Suspected NPA Rebels in Firefight |url=https://www.benarnews.org/english/news/philippine/communist-guerrillas-killed-03242021123804.html |access-date=27 March 2021 |website=Benar News |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
In agriculture, on which the viability of an economy which was still basically agricultural depended, the government moved more slowly, but equally firmly, towards socialism. The land reform of 1946 redistributed the bulk of agricultural land to the poor and landless peasant population, an undoubtedly popular and beneficial move. In 1954, however, a partial [[collectivization]] was carried out, with peasants being urged, and often forced, into agricultural co-operatives. By 1958 virtually all farming was being carried out collectively, and the co-operatives were increasingly merged into larger productive units. |
|||
== See also == |
|||
Like all the postwar Communist states, the DPRK undertook massive state investment in heavy industry, state infrastructure and military strength, neglecting the production of consumer goods. By paying the collectivized peasants low state-controlled prices for their product, and using the surplus thus extracted to pay for industrial development, the state carried out a series of three-year plans, which brought industry's share of the economy from 47% in 1946 to 70% in 1959, despite the intervening devastation of the [[Korean War]]. There were huge increases in electricity production, steel production and machine building. The large output of tractors and other agricultural machinery achieved a great increase in agricultural productivity. |
|||
* [[The Black Book of Communism]] |
|||
* [[Bolshevization]] |
|||
* [[Comparison of Nazism and Stalinism]] |
|||
* [[Crimes against humanity under communist regimes]] |
|||
* [[Criticism of communist party rule]] |
|||
* [[Foreign relations of China]] |
|||
* [[Foreign relations of Cuba]] |
|||
* [[Foreign relations of Laos]] |
|||
* [[Foreign relations of North Korea]] |
|||
* [[Foreign relations of the Soviet Union]] |
|||
* [[Foreign relations of Vietnam]] |
|||
* [[Mass killings under communist regimes]] |
|||
== References == |
|||
As a result of these revolutionary changes, there is no doubt that the population was better fed and, at least in urban areas, better housed than they had been before the war, and also better than were most people in the South in this period. Observers generally agree that standards of living rose rapidly in the DPRK in the later 1950s and into the 1960s, certainly more rapidly than in the South, where there had been no land reform and little prior industrial development. There was, however, a chronic shortage of consumer goods, and the urban population lived under a system of extreme labor discipline and constant demands for greater productivity. As a result, the South was able to outpace the North during the 1970s. |
|||
{{notelist}} |
|||
{{reflist|30em}} |
|||
<!-- These need to be converted to inline citations: |
|||
* Michael Lynch, ''Reaction and Revolution: Russia 1894–1924'', Hodder Murray, 2005, {{ISBN|0-340-88589-0}}. |
|||
* Robert Harvey, ''A Short History of Communism'', Thomas Dunne Books, 2004, {{ISBN|0-312-32909-1}}. |
|||
* Richard Pipes, ''Communism: A History'', Modern Library, 2001, {{ISBN|0-8129-6864-6}}. --> |
|||
=== |
=== Bibliography === |
||
* {{cite book |last=Billington |first=James H. |author-link=James H. Billington |title=Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=saTynFUNPD8C |date=2011 |publisher=[[Transaction Publishers]] |isbn=978-1-4128-1401-0}} |
|||
[[Image:Cuba,_Castro_(31).jpg|thumb|left|200px|Fidel Castro and a crowd waving the Cuban flag]] |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Brown |first=Archie |author-link=Archie Brown (historian) |title=The Rise and Fall of Communism |date= 2009 |publisher=[[HarperCollins]] |isbn=978-0-06-188548-8}} |
|||
The original Communist Party of Cuba was formed in the 1920s and was a member of the [[Comintern]]. It was later renamed the ''People's Socialist Party'' for electoral reasons. Its policy was dictated from Moscow, and supported [[Batista]] in whose government it had [[minister without portfolio|Ministers Without Portfolio]]. The People's Socialist Party was initially critical of Castro. |
|||
* {{cite book |last1=Fried |first1=Albert |last2=Sanders |first2=Ronald |author2-link=Ronald Sanders (writer) |title=Socialist Thought: A Documentary History |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9ucdcMyq5KsC |year=1992 |publisher=[[Columbia University Press]] |isbn=978-0-231-08265-5 |via=[[Google Books]]}} |
|||
* {{cite book |editor1-last=Getty |editor1-first=J. Arch. |editor2-last=Manning |editor2-first=Roberta T. |year=1993 |title=Stalinist Terror: New Perspectives |place=Cambridge}} |
|||
* {{cite book |last1=Gorlizki |first1=Yoram |last2=Khlevniuk |first2=Oleg |author2-link=Oleg Khlevniuk |title=Cold Peace: Stalin and the Soviet Ruling Circle, 1945–1953 |date=2004 |pages=3ff |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |isbn=9780195165814 |doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195165814.001.0001 |url=https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=105899376}} |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Kautsky |first=Karl |author-link=Karl Kautsky |title=Communism in Central Europe in the Time of the Reformation |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QecEAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA50 |year=1897 |publisher=T. F. Unwin |via=[[Google Books]]}} |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Lindemann |first=Albert S. |author-link=Albert Lindemann |title=A History of European Socialism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Dx4bwybp_FUC |date= 1983 |publisher=[[Yale University Press]] |isbn=978-0-300-03246-8 |via=[[Google Books]]}} |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Lowy |first=Michael |author-link=Michael Löwy |date=2020 |title=The Theory of Revolution in the Young Marx |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-44160-6 |oclc=1239987105 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EfAeEAAAQBAJ |via=[[Google Books]]}} |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Major |first=Patrick |title=The Death of the KPD: Communism and Anti-Communism in West Germany, 1945–1956 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |date=1997}} |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Priestland |first=David |author-link=David Priestland |year=2010 |title=The Red Flag: Communism and the Making of the Modern World |publisher=[[Penguin Books]] |isbn=978-0-14-029520-7 |oclc=762107381}} |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Service |first=Robert |author-link=Robert Service (historian) |title=Comrades!: A History of World Communism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Frgm5QodnFoC |publisher=[[Harvard University Press]] |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-674-02530-1 |location=Cambridge |via=[[Google Books]]}} |
|||
* {{cite book |last=van Ree |first=Erik |title=Boundaries of Utopia – Imagining Communism from Plato to Stalin |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dzesCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA10 |date=2015 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |isbn=978-1-134-48533-8 |via=[[Google Books]]}} |
|||
== Further reading == |
|||
In July 1961, two years after the 1959 [[Cuban Revolution]], the ''Integrated Revolutionary Organizations (ORI)'' was formed by the merger of [[Fidel Castro]]'s [[26th of July Movement]], the ''People's Socialist Party'' led by [[Blas Roca]] and the ''Revolutionary Directory March 13th'' led by [[Faure Chomón]]. On March 26, 1962 the ORI became the ''United Party of the Cuban Socialist Revolution'' (PURSC) which, in turn, became the '''Communist Party of Cuba''' on October 3, 1965. The Communist party remains the only legal political party in Cuba. |
|||
; Books |
|||
* Borkenau, Franz. ''World communism; a history of the Communist International'' (1938) [https://archive.org/details/worldcommunismhi00bork online ] |
|||
* Crozier, Brian. ''The Rise and Fall of the Soviet Empire'' (1999), long detailed popular history |
|||
* {{cite book|author=Davin, Delia|title=Mao: A Very Short Introduction|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GfShg2lD8Y4C|year=2013|publisher=Oxford UP|isbn=9780191654039}} |
|||
* Deakin, F. W. ed. ''A history of world communism'' (1975) [https://archive.org/details/historyofworldco00deak online ] |
|||
* [[François Furet|Furet, François]]. ''The Passing of an Illusion: The Idea of Communism in the Twentieth Century'' (1999). |
|||
* Garver, John W. ''China's Quest: The History of the Foreign Relations of the People's Republic'' (2nd ed. 2018) comprehensive scholarly history. [https://www.amazon.com/Chinas-Quest-History-Relations-Republic/dp/0190884355/ excerpt] |
|||
* Harvey, Robert, ''A Short History of Communism'' (2004), {{ISBN|0-312-32909-1}}. |
|||
* Kotkin, Stephen. ''Stalin, Volume I: Paradoxes of Power, 1878–1928'' (2014) highly detailed scholarly biography; vol 2 ''Stalin: Waiting for Hitler, 1929–1941'' (2017) |
|||
* Pathak, Rakesh, and Yvonne Berliner. ''Communism in Crisis 1976–89'' (2012) |
|||
* [[Pipes, Richard]]. ''Communism: A History'' (2003) |
|||
* Pons, Silvio and Robert Service, eds. ''A Dictionary of 20th-Century Communism'' (Princeton University Press, 2010). 944 pp. {{ISBN|978-0-691-13585-4}} [https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=30700 online review] |
|||
* Priestland, David. ''The Red Flag: A History of Communism'' (2010) |
|||
* Sandle, Mark. ''Communism'' (2nd ed. 2011), short introduction |
|||
* [[Robert Service (historian)|Service, Robert]]. ''Lenin: A Biography'' (2000) [https://www.amazon.com/Lenin-Biography-Robert-Service/dp/0674008286/ excerpt and text search]; also [https://archive.org/details/leninabiography00serv online ] |
|||
* Service, Robert. ''Stalin'' (2005) [https://archive.org/details/stalinbiography00serv_0 online ] |
|||
* Seton-Watson, Hugh. ''From Lenin to Khrushchev, the history of world communism'' (1954) [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.547600 online ] |
|||
* [[Taubman, William]]. ''[[Khrushchev: The Man and His Era]]'' (2004) [https://www.amazon.com/Khrushchev-Man-His-William-Taubman/dp/0393324842/ excerpt and text search]; also [https://archive.org/details/khrushchevmanhis00taub complete text ] |
|||
* [[Taubman, William]]. ''Gorbachev: His Life and Times'' (2018) |
|||
* Tucker, Robert C. ''Stalin as Revolutionary, 1879–1929'' (1973); ''Stalin in Power: The Revolution from Above, 1929–1941.'' (1990) [https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=103246514 online ed.] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120525095410/https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=103246514 |date=May 25, 2012 }} a standard biography; [https://web.archive.org/web/20000707012840/http://www.historyebook.org/ online at ACLS e-books] |
|||
* Ulam, Adam B. ''Expansion and Coexistence: Soviet Foreign Policy 1917–73'' (1974) [https://archive.org/details/expansioncoexist00adam online ] |
|||
; Journals |
|||
For the first ten years of its formal existence, the Communist Party was relatively inactive outside of the [[Politburo]]. The 100 person Central Committee rarely met and it was ten years after its founding that the first regular Party Congress was held. In 1969, membership of the party was only 55,000 or 0.6% of the population making the CPC the smallest ruling Communist party in the world. In the 1970s the party's apparatus began to develop. By the time of the first [[Party Congress]] in 1975 the party had grown to just over 200,000 members, the Central Committee was meeting regularly and the organisational apparatus giving the party the leading role in society that ruling Communist parties generally hold. By 1980 the party had grown to over 430,000 members and grew further to 520,000 by 1985. Apparatuses of the party had grown to ensure that its leading cadres were appointed to key government positions throughout the bureaucracy. |
|||
* ''[[American Communist History]]'' (United States) |
|||
* ''[[Communisme]]'' (France) |
|||
* ''[[Twentieth Century Communism]]'' (United Kingdom) |
|||
; Primary sources |
|||
The crisis created by the collapse of the Soviet bloc led to the Fourth Party Congress in 1991 being one of unprecedented openness and debate as the leadership tried to create a wide public consensus to respond to the "Special Period". Three million people engaged in pre-Congress debate and discussions on issues such as political structure and economic policy. The 1991 Congress redefined the party as "the party of the Cuban nation" rather than the "party of the working class". The prohibition on religious believers joining the party was lifted. As well, [[José Martí]] was elevated to the level of [[Karl Marx]] and [[Lenin]] in the party's ideological pantheon. |
|||
* Daniels, Robert V., ed. ''A Documentary History of Communism in Russia: From Lenin to Gorbachev'' (1993) |
|||
* Daniels, Robert V. ed. [https://archive.org/details/documentaryhisto02ibta ''A Documentary History of Communism: Communism and the World''] (1985) |
|||
* Gruber, Helmut. ''International Communism in the Era of Lenin: A Documentary History'' (1967) |
|||
; Memoirs |
|||
Much of the debate resulted from an internal struggle between advocates of a Cuban [[perestroika]], i.e. the use of market mechanisms and the liberalisation of strictures on free speech and dissent and others who argued that speedy reforms would undercut the unity of the nation and the party's political dominance and possibly lead to the government's collapse as had happened to [[Communist state]]s in Eastern Europe. The outcome was political reforms which fell far short of reform demands to permit candidates to campaign for office on competing programs. Economically, however, some modest market reforms were introduced, particularly in agriculture, in an effort to reverse the country's economic decline after the cessation of aid and trade subsidies from the USSR. Increased tensions between the US and Cuba also gave the conservatives the upper hand in the mid-1990s and the government responded more and more harshly to dissident groups. |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Chambers |first=Whittaker |author-link=Whittaker Chambers |title=Witness |publisher=[[Random House]] |location=New York |url=https://archive.org/details/witnesscha00cham |url-access=registration |year=1952}} |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Davis |first=Hope Hale |author-link=Hope Hale Davis |title=Great Day Coming: A Memoir of the 1930s |publisher=Steerforth Press |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=N6sEAQAAIAAJ |year=1994 |isbn=9781883642174 |via=[[Google Books]]}} |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Tchernavin |first=Tatiana |author-link=Tatiana Tchernavin |translator=Natalie Duddington (under the pseudonym N. Alexander) |translator-link=Natalie Duddington |title=Escape From The Soviets |publisher=E. P. Dutton and Co. |url=https://archive.org/details/escapefromthesov028118mbp |year=1934}} |
|||
* {{cite book |last1=Ulanovskaya |first1=Maya |author1-link=Maya Ulanovskaya |first2=Nadezhda |last2=Ulanovskaya |author2-link=Nadezhda Ulanovskaya |translator-first=Stefani |translator-last=Hoffman |title=The Family Story |publisher=Lulu |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=irfJDAAAQBAJ |year=2016 |isbn=9781326667573 |via=[[Google Books]]}} |
|||
; Animation |
|||
By the time of the Fifth Party Congress in 1997, political liberalisation was no longer on the agenda. The economic resolution debated at the conference called for the expansion of tourism in order to bring in more hard currency but did not call for economic reforms while the political resolution opposed any political liberalization and constituted a defence of the one party system. |
|||
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7972232.stm Mapping the fall of communism] |
|||
{{communism}} |
|||
{{DEFAULTSORT:History Of Communism}} |
|||
===Vietnam=== |
|||
The Vietnamese Communist party was founded by [[Ho Chi Minh]] and other exiles living in [[China]] as the '''Vietnam Communist Party''' but soon changed its name to the ''Indochinese Communist Party'' after its founding conference held in [[Hong Kong]] in February 1930. The First National Party Congress was held in secret in [[Macau]] in 1935. At the same time, a [[Comintern]] congress in [[Moscow]] adopted a policy towards a [[popular front]] against [[fascism]] and directed Communist movements around the world to collaborate with anti-fascist forces regardless of their orientation towards [[socialism]]. This required the ICP to regard all nationalist parties in [[Indochina]] as potential allies. |
|||
The party was formally dissolved in 1945 in order to hide its [[Communist]] affiliation and its activites were folded into the [[Viet Minh]], which had been founded four years earlier as a [[common front]] for national liberation. The party was refounded as the ''Vietnam Workers Party'' at the Second National Party Congress in [[Tuyen Quang]] in 1951. The congress was held in territory in northern Vietnam controlled by the Viet Minh during the [[French Indochinese War]]. After the war ended, the communists established their rule of the [[Democratic Republic of Vietnam]] (North Vietnam), located above the 17th parallel. In the 1950s a radical [[land reform]] program was conducted in which ten of thousands of land owners and suspected dissidents were killed. The Third National Congress, held in [[Hanoi]] in 1960 formalized the tasks of constructing socialism in what was by then [[North Vietnam]] and committed the party to carrying out the revolution in the [[anti-communist]] South. At the Fourth National Party Congress held in 1976 after the North's victory in the [[Vietnam War]], the party's name was changed to the '''Communist Party of Vietnam'''. |
|||
===Laos=== |
|||
Political unrest in neighbouring [[Vietnam]] dragged [[Laos]] into the greater [[Second Indochina War]] (see also [[Secret War]]) which was a destabilising factor that contributed to civil war and several coups d'état. In 1975 the communist [[Pathet Lao]] movement overthrew the royalist government of [[King Savang Vatthana]] and took control of the country, which they promptly renamed the Lao People's Democratic Republic. |
|||
===Ethiopia=== |
|||
In 1974 a pro-[[Soviet]] [[Marxist-Leninist]] military [[junta]], the [[Derg]], deposed [[Emperor]] [[Haile Selassie of Ethiopia|Haile Selassie]], who had ruled since 1930, and established a one-party [[socialist]] state. The ensuing regime suffered several bloody [[coup d'etat|coups]], uprisings, wide-scale [[drought]], and massive [[refugee]] problem. It was eventually defeated in 1991 by a coalition of rebel forces under the name [[Ethiopian Peoples' Revolutionary Democratic Front]] (EPRDF). |
|||
===South Yemen=== |
|||
In June 1969, a radical Marxist wing of the Yemeni [[National Liberation Front (Yemen)|National Liberation Front]] gained power in South Yemen and changed the country's name on 1 December 1970, to the '''[[People's Democratic Republic of Yemen]]'''. In the PDRY, all political parties were amalgamated into the [[Yemeni Socialist Party]] (YSP), which became the only legal party. The PDRY established close ties with the Soviet Union, China, Cuba, and radical [[Palestinians]]. |
|||
Efforts toward unification with [[North Yemen]] proceeded from 1988 and, on 22 May 1990, the unified [[Republic of Yemen]] was declared. |
|||
===Angola=== |
|||
The '''[[Angola|People's Republic of Angola]]''' was established by the [[Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola]] (MPLA) in 1975, following the end of [[Portugual|Portuguese]] colonial rule. Poet and freedom fighter [[Agostinho Neto]] became the first president upon independence, and he was succeeded by [[José Eduardo dos Santos]] in 1979. |
|||
In 1976, the MPLA adopted Marxism-Leninism as the party ideology. It maintained close ties with the Soviet Union and the Communist bloc, establishing similar socialist economic policies and a one-party state. Several thousand Cuban troops were deployed in the country to combat an ongoing insurgency (see [[Angolan Civil War]]) and bolster the regime's security. In 1991, the MPLA and its rival factions agreed to turn Angola into a multi-party state. |
|||
==The collapse of the Soviet Union== |
|||
When [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], the youngest member of the Soviet Politburo, was elected General-Secretary in March 1985, it signalled a generational change in the Eastern bloc. In an attempt to revitalize the stagnating Communist Party and the state economy, Gorbachev introduced reforms such as ''[[glasnost]]'' ("openness") and ''[[perestroika]]'' ("restructuring"). Gorbachev believed that democratization would remove corrupt and incompetent apparatchiks from the Soviet system, but instead, a significant number of Communist Party opponents rose to prominence. At the same time, Gorbachev's liberalization of the state-controlled media allowed decades of frustration and disillusionment with the system to surface after years of repression. |
|||
On [[February 7]], [[1990]] the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union agreed to give up its monopoly of [[power (sociology)|power]]. The USSR's constituent republics began to assert their national sovereignty over Moscow, and started a "war of laws" with the central Moscow government, in which the governments of the constituent republics repudiated all-union legislation where it conflicted with local laws, asserting control over their local economies and refusing to pay tax revenue to the central Moscow government. This strife caused economic dislocation, as supply lines in the economy were broken, and caused the Soviet economy to decline further. |
|||
Gorbachev made desperate and ill-fated attempts to assert control, notably in the [[Baltic Republics]], but the power and authority of the central government had been dramatically and irreversibly undermined. On [[March 11]], 1990, [[Lithuania]] declared the restitution of independence and announced that it was pulling out of the Soviet Union. However, the [[Red Army]] had a strong presence there. The Soviet Union initiated an economic blockade of Lithuania and kept troops there "to secure the rights of ethnic Russians." In [[January]] of [[1991]], clashes between Soviet troops and Lithuanian civilians occurred, leaving 20 dead. This further weakened the Soviet Union's legitimacy, internationally and domestically. On [[March 30]], [[1990]], the [[Estonia|Estonian]] supreme council declared Soviet power in Estonia since [[1940]] to have been illegal, and started a process to reestablish Estonia as an independent state. |
|||
On [[March 17]], 1991, in an all-Union [[referendum]] 78% of all voters voted for the retention of the Soviet Union in a reformed form. The Baltics, [[Armenia]], [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]] and [[Moldavian SSR|Moldova]] boycotted the referendum. In each of the other 9 republics, a majority of the voters supported the retention of the Soviet Union. |
|||
In June 1991, direct elections were held for the post of president of the [[Russian SFSR]]. The populist candidate [[Boris Yeltsin]], who was an outspoken critic of Mikhail Gorbachev, won 57% percent of the vote, defeating Gorbachev's preferred candidate, former Premier [[Nikolai Ryzhkov]], who won 16% of the vote. |
|||
Faced with growing republic separatism, Gorbachev attempted to restructure the Soviet Union into a less centralized state. On [[August 20]], [[1991]], the republics were to sign a new union [[treaty]], making them independent republics in a federation with a common [[president]], foreign policy and [[military]]. The new treaty was strongly supported by the [[Central Asia|Central Asian]] republics, who needed the economic power and markets of the Soviet Union to prosper. However, the more radical reformists were increasingly convinced that a rapid transition to a market economy was required and were more than happy to contemplate the disintegration of the USSR if that was required to achieve their aims. In contrast to the reformers' lukewarm approach to the new treaty, the conservatives, still strong within the CPSU and military establishment, were completely opposed to anything which might contribute to the weakening of the Soviet state. |
|||
On [[August 19]], 1991, Gorbachev's vice president [[Gennadi Yanayev]], prime minister [[Valentin Pavlov]], defense minister [[Dmitriy Yazov]], KGB chief [[Vladimir Kryuchkov]], and other senior officials acted to prevent the signing of the union treaty by forming the "State Committee on the State Emergency." (see [[Soviet coup attempt of 1991]]) The "Committee" put Gorbachev (vacationing in the [[Crimea]]) under house arrest and attempted to restore the union state. The coup leaders quickly issued an emergency decree suspending political activity and banning most newspapers. |
|||
[[Image:Gorbachev and Yeltsin.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Gorbachev has accused Boris Yeltsin, his old rival and Russia's first post-Soviet president, of tearing the USSR apart out of a desire to advance his own personal interests.]] |
|||
While coup organizers expected popular support for their actions, the public sympathy in Moscow was largely against them. Thousands of people came out to defend the "White House," then the symbolic seat of Russian sovereignty. The organizers tried but ultimately failed to arrest Boris Yeltsin, who rallied mass opposition to the coup. |
|||
After three days, on [[August 21]], the coup collapsed, the organizers were detained, and Gorbachev returned as president of the Soviet Union. But Gorbachev's powers were now fatally compromised. Neither union nor Russian power structures heeded his commands. Through the fall of 1991, the Russian government took over the union government, ministry by ministry. In [[November]] 1991, Yeltsin issued a decree banning the CPSU throughout the Russian republic. |
|||
After the coup, the Soviet republics accelerated their process towards independence, declaring their sovereignty one by one. On [[September 6]], 1991, the Soviet government recognized the independence of the three Baltic states. In [[December 1]], 1991, [[Ukraine]] declared its independence from the USSR after a popular referendum in which 90% of voters opted for independence. |
|||
On [[December 8]], 1991, the leaders of the Russian, Ukrainian, and [[Belarusian SSR|Belarusian]] republics met in [[Belavezhskaya Pushcha]] to issue a declaration that the Soviet Union was dissolved and replaced by the [[Commonwealth of Independent States]] (CIS). Gorbachev became president without a country. On [[December 25]], 1991, he resigned as president of the USSR and turned the powers of his office over to Boris Yeltsin. The next day, the Supreme Soviet voted to dissolve itself and repealed the declaration written in [[1922]] that had officially established the USSR. By the end of the year, all official Soviet institutions had ceased operations, thereby ending the world's largest and most influential Communist regime. |
|||
The four principal elements of the old Soviet system were the hierarchy of soviets, ethnic [[federation|federalism]], state [[socialism]], and Communist Party dominance. Gorbachev's program of ''perestroika'' produced radical unanticipated effects that brought that system down. Gorbachev successfully built a coalition of political leaders supportive of reform and created new arenas and bases of power. He implemented these measures because of economic problems and political inertia that clearly threatened to put the Soviet Union into a state of long-term stagnation. |
|||
But by using structural reforms to widen opportunities for leaders and popular movements in the union republics to gain influence, Gorbachev also made it possible for nationalist, orthodox communist, and populist forces to oppose his attempts to liberalize and revitalize Soviet socialism. Although some of the new movements aspired to replace the Soviet system altogether with a liberal democratic one, others demanded independence for the national republics. Still others insisted on the restoration of the old Soviet ways. Ultimately, Gorbachev could not forge a compromise among these forces. |
|||
== Communism Today == |
|||
After the fall of the [[Communist state]]s in the [[Eastern Bloc]], the communist movement arguably became more fragmented than ever, and certainly weaker than it has ever been since 1917. Communist groups and parties all across the world went their separate paths. However, Communism has survived the fall of the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc. |
|||
Out of the five remaining communist states, China, Vietnam, and Laos have moved toward market economies but without major privatization of the state sector; and Cuba has recently emerged from the crisis sparked by the fall of the Soviet Union given the growth in its volume of trade with its new allies Venezuela and China. North Korea, however, has had less success in coping with the collapse of the Soviet bloc than its Communist counterparts. |
|||
Meanwhile, the communist movement in the capitalist world is slowly emerging from the deep crisis of the 1990s and is drawing increasing support. In the [[Moldova]], the local Communist party won the 2001 and 2005 parliamentary elections. In India, the Communist Party is a key coalition partner of the ruling Congress Party and retains its control over the state of [[West Bengal]]. In [[Ukraine]] and [[Russia]], the Communists came second in the 2002 and 2003 elections, respectively. In the [[Czech Republic]], the Communist party came third in the 2002 elections, and so did the Communist party of [[Portugal]] in 2005. In [[Venezuela]], the Communist Party is closely aligned with the government under [[Hugo Chávez]]. |
|||
Communist [[guerrilla]]s are actively fighting the governments of [[Nepal]], [[Philippines]], [[Colombia]] and [[Peru]]. |
|||
there is also quite an strong communist opposition to [[Islamic republic of iran]] led by [[worker-communist party of iran]] and it offshoot,[[worker-communist party of iran-hekmatist]], both claim that they are continue the path of [[mansoor hekmat]],famous iranian communist and founder of the worker-commuist parties of iran and iraq. |
|||
these parties are trying to overthrow the islamic republic. |
|||
== See also == |
|||
* [[Cold War]] |
|||
* [[History of the Soviet Union]] |
|||
== References == |
|||
* Robert Harvey, ''A Short History of Communism'', Thomas Dunne Books, 2004, ISBN 0312329091 |
|||
* Richard Pipes, ''Communism: A History'', Modern Library, 2001, ISBN 0812968646 |
|||
[[pt:História do Comunismo]] |
|||
[[Category:Communism]] |
[[Category:Communism]] |
||
[[Category:History |
[[Category:History of political thought|Communism]] |
||
[[Category:History of socialism|Communism]] |
Latest revision as of 05:26, 22 December 2024
Part of a series on |
Communism |
---|
Communism portal Socialism portal |
The history of communism encompasses a wide variety of ideologies and political movements sharing the core principles of common ownership of wealth, economic enterprise, and property.[1] Most modern forms of communism are grounded at least nominally in Marxism, a theory and method conceived by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels during the 19th century.[2] Marxism subsequently gained a widespread following across much of Europe, and throughout the late 1800s its militant supporters were instrumental in a number of unsuccessful revolutions on that continent.[1] During the same era, there was also a proliferation of communist parties which rejected armed revolution, but embraced the Marxist ideal of collective property and a classless society.[1]
Although Marxist theory suggested that industrial societies were the most suitable places for social revolution (either through peaceful transition or by force of arms), communism was mostly successful in underdeveloped countries with endemic poverty such as the Republic of China.[2] In 1917, the Bolshevik Party seized power during the Russian Revolution and in 1922 created the Soviet Union, the world's first self-declared socialist state.[3] The Bolsheviks thoroughly embraced the concept of proletarian internationalism and world revolution, seeing their struggle as an international rather than a purely regional cause.[2][3] This was to have a phenomenal impact on the spread of communism during the 20th century as the Soviet Union installed new Marxist–Leninist governments in Central and Eastern Europe following World War II and indirectly backed the ascension of others in the Americas, Asia and Africa.[1] Pivotal to this policy was the Communist International, also known as the Comintern, formed with the perspective of aiding and assisting communist parties around the world and fostering revolution.[3] This was one major cause of tensions during the Cold War as the United States and its military allies equated the global spread of communism with Soviet expansionism by proxy.[4]
By 1985, one-third of the world's population lived under a Marxist–Leninist system of government in one form or another.[1] However, there was significant debate among communist and Marxist ideologues as to whether most of these countries could be meaningfully considered Marxist at all since many of the basic components of the Marxist system were altered and revised by such countries.[4] There was a rapid decline of communism in the late 1980s and early 1990s, including the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 and several other Marxist–Leninist states repudiating or abolishing the ideology altogether.[5] Later historians have proposed different explanations for this decline, including arguments that Marxist-Leninist governments failed to live up to the ideal of a communist society, that there was a general trend towards increasing authoritarianism, that they suffered from excessive bureaucracy, and that they had inefficiencies in their economies.[1][6][7] As of the 21st century, only a small number of Marxist–Leninist states remain, namely China, Cuba, Laos, North Korea and Vietnam.[1][8] With the exception of North Korea, all of these states have started allowing more economic competition while maintaining one-party rule.[6]
Origins of communism
[edit]Communism in antiquity
[edit]Many historical groups have been considered as following forms of communism. Karl Marx and other early communist theorists believed that hunter-gatherer societies as were found in the Paleolithic through to horticultural societies as found in the Chalcolithic were essentially egalitarian and he, therefore, termed their ideology to be primitive communism.[10] One of the first writers to espouse a belief in the primitive communism of the past was the Roman Stoic philosopher Seneca who stated," How happy was the primitive age when the bounties of nature lay in common...They held all nature in common which gave them secure possession of the public wealth."[11] Because of this he believed that such primitive societies were the richest as there was no poverty.[11] Other Greco-Roman writers that believed in a prehistoric humanity that practiced communism include Diodorus Siculus, Virgil, and Ovid.[12] Similarly the early Church Fathers, like their pagan predecessors, maintained that humans society had declined to its current state from a now lost egalitarian social order.[13]
Around the late 5th century BC in Ancient Greece, ideas similar to communism were becoming widespread to the extent that they were parodied by the dramatist Aristophanes in his comedy The Assemblywomen in which the women of Athens seize control of the Ecclesia or city government and abolish all private property while making the sharing of women and the collective rearing of children mandatory.[14] Over a decade later in Plato's Republic Socrates declares that an ideal state would eliminate all forms of private property among the elite of society to the extent that even children and wives are shared.[15][16] He asserts that such practices would prevent internal conflict within a society and promote a sense of unity and common identity.[17] Around AD 500 in Iran, the Zoroastrian priest and reformist Mazdak purportedly founded a movement preaching religious communism while under the patronage of the Sassanian King Kavad I who initially supported the priest and his reforms, but later had the Mazdakians repressed and Mazdak executed.[18]
Developments in Christian communism
[edit]Early Christianity supported a form of common ownership based on the teachings in the New Testament which emphasised sharing.[13] For example, in the Book of Acts the passages Acts 2:44–45 and Acts 4:32–37 state all believers held their possessions communally and would distribute goods based on need.[19] Additionally, the related Jewish sect known as the Essenes was committed to, "social and material egalitarianism."[20] Despite these practices falling into decline even before the Christianization of the Roman Empire, the principles of sharing property and holding goods in common continued within the Christian traditions of monasticism.[13][20]
From the High Middle Ages to the early modern period in Europe, various groups supporting Christian communist and communalist ideas were occasionally adopted by reformist Christian sects. An early 12th century proto-Protestant group originating in Lyon, Kingdom of Burgundy-Arles known as the Waldensians held their property in common in accordance with the Book of Acts, but were persecuted by the Catholic Church and retreated to the Piedmont.[21] Some Waldensians led a schism after they felt the group's leader was becoming authoritarian.[22] With the rise of the Mendicant Orders in the 13th century groups such as the Franciscans began challenging the concept of private property to the extent it had to be defended by Pope John XXII in his 1328 papal bull Quia vir reprobus, in which he ruled that because God had gifted Adam with the Earth as his domain, the ownership of property was divinely sanctioned.[23][24] Also beginning in the 13th century a lay order known as the Beghards, originating in the Low Countries, started to spread among the underprivileged groups of society, taking in members who renounced private property and dedicated themselves to communal living and pious, frugal lifestyles as artisans.[25][26] Although the practices were successful enough to spread to other areas on the continent such as France and Germany, the Beghards were later repeatedly condemned by the Catholic Church.[27][25] Around 1300 the Apostolic Brethren in northern Italy were taken over by Fra Dolcino who formed a sect known as the Dulcinians which advocated ending feudalism, dissolving hierarchies in the church, and holding all property in common.[21] The 14th century English scholastic and founder of Lollardy, John Wycliffe, preached of an idealized Christian state with collective ownership and disapproved of those rejecting the, "common charity and common property of Christian men."[28][29][30]: 54 Around the same time the revolutionary priest John Ball, who was later executed for his prominent role in the doomed Wat Tyler Rebellion allegedly declared, "things cannot go well in England, nor ever will, until all goods are held in common."[31]
In Tábor, Bohemia during the 15th century Hussite Wars, the radical Taborites attempted to institute a system they called a "community of goods" where, "there is no mine or thine but all is held in common", but once initiated the scheme was quickly abandoned.[33][34] They have been considered precursors of totalitarian governance while under leadership of the dictatorial Jan Želivský.[35][36][37][38] After Taborite power was broken at Lipany their successors fled to Moravia forming the Moravian Church under the pacifist spiritual leader Petr Chelčický who harbored both Christian communist and Christian anarchist beliefs.[30][39] The extent to which Chelčický's followers, also known as the Bohemian Brethren, adhered to his ideals, namely the abstinence from property, trade, and government, is disputed, and by the 16th century the Brethren definitely no longer embraced them.[30][40] During the Protestant Reformation of the 16th century the radical Anabaptists, who originated in Switzerland, endorsed the communalization of goods as practiced in the Book of Acts.[41] The most notable Anabaptist groups were the Hutterites, founded by Jacob Hutter, who settled in Moravia in the 1520s and the Münster Anabaptists who were eradicated in battle during their attempt in 1535 to forcibly convert the city of Münster into a theocratic New Jerusalem.[41] Various groups on the side of the Roundheads during the English Civil War in the mid-17th century propagated the redistribution of wealth on an egalitarian basis, namely the Levellers and the Diggers although only the latter group under Gerrard Winstanley promoted a propertyless, communist society.[42][43]
European writers began depicting idealized communist societies in utopian fiction from the 16th century onward. Inspired by largely fictional accounts of native communities in the New World, the English humanist and future Lord Chancellor Thomas More, wrote the utopian novel Utopia (1516) in which the main character decries private property after traveling to an idyllic island without money or private property and where, "everything is under state control."[44][45][46] More coined the term utopia as a name for his idealized community, which means "nowhere" in Latin, evincing the fact that More did not consider such a society attainable in reality. Tommaso Campanella's 1601 work The City of the Sun propagated the concept of a society where the products of society should be shared equally.[47] In Campanella's utopia all people are well educated, there is only a four-hour work day, there is no private property, the population practices eugenics to improve mental and physical fitness, most time is devoted to either leisure or self improvement, and society is managed by a ruling scientist who bases his administration on scientific principles all in the interest of benefiting society as a whole.[43][48] Utopian communist societies were also described by the French writers François Fénelon and Denis Vairasse while English writer Francis Bacon wrote of a utopia that merely had a "communism in knowledge."[49][50]
Communism during the Enlightenment
[edit]During the Age of Enlightenment in 18th century France, some liberal writers increasingly began to criticize the institution of private property even to the extent they demanded its abolition.[51] One of the first secular visions for a communist society is contained within the French Catholic abbé Jean Meslier's posthumously published Testament (1729).[43][52] Similarly the Abbé de Mably, also a French philosopher wrote that the individual ownership of land was the source of all mischief and that wealthy inequality brought about social ruin that could only be reversed by adopting a society based on collective ownership."[53][54] He did however temper his views by surmising that any attempts at enacting true equality and communal ownership would prove to be too costly and destructive to be worth implementing.[55] Another French thinker, Étienne-Gabriel Morelly also contended that private property was the source of all vice in society and developed the basic principles for a communist society namely, the abolition of property, the right to live and work for all, and the duty of all citizens to work for the common good.[53][55] The French philosopher Jean Jacques Rousseau in his hugely influential The Social Contract (1762) outlined the basis for a political order based on popular sovereignty rather than the rule of monarchs, and in his Discourse on Inequality (1755) inveighed against the corrupting effects of private property claiming that the invention of private property had led to the, "crimes, wars, murders, and suffering" that plagued civilization.[56][57]
I believe that no one will contest the justness of this proposition: that where no property exists, none of its pernicious consequences could exist...if you were to take away property, the blind and pitiless self-interest that accompanies it, you would cause all the prejudices in errors that they sustain to collapse.
In 1785 the popular French novelist Restif de la Bretonne wrote a book review on Victor d'Hupay's 1779 book Project for a Philosophical Community which described a plan for a communal experiment in Marseille where all private property was banned and which could be considered, "the first full blueprint for a secular communist society in the world."[59][61] In the review Restif noted that d'Hupay had referred to himself as a communiste, the French form of the word "communist", in a 1782 letter, the first recorded instance of that term.[59] Restif himself wrote many novels centered around the idea of eliminating private property, first using the term "community of goods" in 1783 and then the term "communism" in 1793, rendered in French as communisme.[60][62]
These currents of thought in French philosophy proved influential during the French Revolution of 1789 in which various anti-monarchists, particularly the Jacobins, supported the idea of redistributing wealth equally among the people, including Jean-Paul Marat and Gracchus Babeuf. The latter was involved in the Conspiracy of the Equals of 1796 intending to establish a revolutionary regime based on communal ownership, egalitarianism and the redistribution of property.[64] Babeuf was directly influenced by Morelly's anti-property utopian novel The Code of Nature and quoted it extensively, although he was under the erroneous impression it was written by Diderot.[58]Also during the revolution the publisher Nicholas Bonneville, the founder of the Parisian revolutionary Social Club used his printing press to spread the communist treatises of Restif and Sylvain Maréchal.[65] Maréchal, who later joined Babeuf's conspiracy, would state in his Manifesto of the Equals (1796), "we aim at something more sublime and more just, the COMMON GOOD or the COMMUNITY OF GOODS" and "The French Revolution is just a precursor of another revolution, far greater, far more solemn, which will be the last."[66] Restif also continued to write and publish books on the topic of communism throughout the Revolution.[60] Accordingly, through their egalitarian programs and agitation Restif, Maréchal, and Babeuf became the progenitors of modern communism.[67] Babeuf's plot was detected, however, and he and several others involved were arrested and executed. Because of his views and methods, Babeuf is sometimes referred to as the first revolutionary communist, although at the time Babeuf himself used the term "communitist".[68][62] Despite this setback, the example of the French Revolutionary regime and Babeuf's doomed insurrection was an inspiration for French socialist thinkers such as Henri de Saint-Simon, Louis Blanc, Charles Fourier and Pierre-Joseph Proudhon.[69] Proudhon, the founder of modern anarchism and libertarian socialism would later famously declare "property is theft!" a phrase first invented by the French revolutionary Brissot de Warville.[70]
Post-French Revolution communism
[edit]Importantly because one of Babeuf's co-conspirators, Philippe Buonarroti, survived the crackdown on the Conspiracy of the Equals he was able, later in his life, to write the influential book Babeuf's Conspiracy for Equality first published in 1828 which chronicled and popularized Babeouf's beliefs.[71] In it Buonarroti asserted that in society, "burdens, productions, and advantages ought to be equally divided," and believed that this division would lead to, "the greatest possible happiness of all."[72] Bournatti's writings led to a revival of Babeuf's thought in France and the dissemination of political theories referred to as Neo-Babouvism. According to Bournatti's Neo-Babouvism a revolutionary elite of "wise and courageous" citizens who cared only for "ensuring the triumph of equality" would be needed to uplift the masses and establish a new society based on egalitarian principles.[73]
By the 1830s and 1840s, the egalitarian concepts of communism and the related ideas of socialism had become widely popular in French revolutionary circles thanks to the writings of social critics and philosophers such as Pierre Leroux and Théodore Dézamy, whose critiques of bourgeoisie liberalism and individualism led to a widespread intellectual rejection of laissez-faire capitalism on economic, philosophical and moral grounds.[74] According to Leroux writing in 1832, "To recognise no other aim than individualism is to deliver the lower classes to brutal exploitation. The proletariat is no more than a revival of antique slavery." He also asserted that private ownership of the means of production allowed for the exploitation of the lower classes and that private property was a concept divorced from human dignity.[74] Dézamy would assert in his 1842 book Code la Communaté that what was needed was a," complete and unrestricted society of communal property" in which all activity was centralized.[75] The systematic, historical and materialist analysis of the nature of communism in Dézamy's work led Marx to consider him among the first scientific socialists along with Jules Gay.[76] It was only in the year 1840 that proponents of common ownership in France, including the socialists Théodore Dézamy, Étienne Cabet, and Jean-Jacques Pillot began to widely adopt the word "communism" as a term for their belief system.[77]
A landmark event that established the popularity of the communist movement in France occurred in 1840 when Dézamy along with Pillot and Albert Laponneraye organized a pro-communist banquet in Belleville, France, the "first public manifestation of the communist party" in France which proved so successful that further planned communist banquets had to be outlawed by the French government.[78][61] Also in 1840 a society of "Egalitarian Workers" following a communist program was founded in Paris and a general strike was called whose leaders were reportedly inspired by communist ideals.[78] During the 1840s Étienne Cabet had a following of between 100000 and 200000 French workers and was considered by Friedrich Engels to be the representative of the French proletariat.[79] One of the most prominent and influential French communists of the 1840s was Auguste Blanqui who was notable for his belief that violent revolutionary action should be used to overthrow the bourgeosie dominated state.[80] In Blanqui's estimation a revolution would be most successful if it was executed by a small, secretive group which could then install a "dictatorship of the proletariat."[80] Dézamy disagreed with any program endorsing a dictatorship, believing instead that the chief focus should be on cultivating proletarian unity through propaganda and education.[73]
The works and teachings of these French writers, many now self identifying as communists, went on to inspire new communist groups such as the League of the Just, an organization founded in Paris in 1836 by the Christian communist German émigrés Wilhelm Weitling and Karl Schapper.[81] A second group, the Communist Correspondence Committee, was formed in Brussels in 1846 by another pair of German émigrés Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.[82] The two groups were merged in 1847 to form the Communist League which was headed by Schapper who then proceeded to task the co-founding members Marx and Engels with writing a manifesto laying out the principles of the new political party.[83][84]
Marxism
[edit]Karl Marx
[edit]Communism is the riddle of history solved, and it knows itself to be this solution.
In the 1840s, German philosopher and sociologist Karl Marx, who was living in England after fleeing the authorities in Prussia, where he was considered a political threat, began publishing books in which he outlined his theories for a variety of communism now known as Marxism. Marx was financially aided and supported by another German émigré, Friedrich Engels (1820–1895), who like Marx had fled from the German authorities in 1849.[86] Marx and Engels took on many influences from earlier socialists such as the Utopian socialist Saint-Simonist school.[87] Politically, they were influenced by Maximilien Robespierre and several other radical figures of the French Revolution whilst economically they were influenced by David Ricardo.[88][89] Philosophically, they were influenced by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.[90] Engels regularly met Marx at Chetham's Library in Manchester, England from 1845 and the alcove where they met remains identical to this day.[91][92] It was here that Engels relayed his experiences of industrial Manchester, chronicled in the Condition of the Working Class in England, highlighting the struggles of the working class.
Marx stated that "the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles", something that he believed was happening between the bourgeoisie (the select few upper class and upper middle class) who then controlled society and the proletariat (the working class masses) who toiled to produce everything, but who had no political control. He advanced the idea that human society moved through a series of progressive stages from primitive communism through to slavery, feudalism and then capitalism; and that this, in turn, would be replaced by communism. For Marx, communism was seen as inevitable yet uncertain and desirable.
Marx founded the Communist Correspondence Committee in 1846 through which the various communists, socialists and other leftists across Europe could keep in contact with one another in the face of political repression. He then published The Communist Manifesto in 1848, which would prove to be one of the most influential communist texts ever written. He subsequently began work on a multi-volume epic that would examine and criticise the capitalist economy and the effect that it had upon politics, society and philosophy – the first volume of the work which was known as Capital: Critique of Political Economy was published in 1869. However, Marx and Engels were not only interested in writing about communism, as they were also active in supporting revolutionary activity that would lead to the creation of communist governments across Europe. They helped to found the International Workingmen's Association which would later become known as the First International to unite various communists and socialists, with Marx being elected to the Association's General Council.[93]
Marx summarized his system with the slogan, "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."[94] This phrasing used to formulate the principles of communism is borrowed from earlier socialist political activists such as August Becker and Louis Blanc.[95][96][97]
Early development of Marxism
[edit]During the latter half of the 19th century, various left-wing organisations across Europe continued to campaign against the many autocratic right-wing regimes that were then in power. In France, socialists set up a government known as the Paris Commune after the fall of Napoleon III in 1871, but they were soon overthrown and many of their members executed by counter-revolutionaries.[98] Meanwhile, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels joined the German Social-Democratic Party which had been created in 1875, but which was outlawed in 1879 by the German government, then led by Chancellor Otto von Bismarck, who deemed it to be a political threat due to its revolutionary nature and increasing number of supporters.[99] In 1890, the party was re-legalised and by this time it had fully adopted Marxist principles. It subsequently achieved a fifth of the vote in the German elections and some of its leaders, such as August Bebel and Wilhelm Liebknecht, became well-known public figures.[100]
The communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a communist revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.
At the time, Marxism took off not only in Germany, but it also gained popularity in Hungary, the Habsburg monarchy and the Netherlands, although it did not achieve such success in other European nations like the United Kingdom, where Marx and Engels had been based.[102] Nonetheless, the new political ideology had gained sufficient support that an organisation was founded known as the Second International to unite the various Marxist groups around the world.[103]
As Marxism took off, it also began to come under criticism from other European intellectuals, including fellow socialists and leftists. For instance, the Russian collectivist anarchist Mikhail Bakunin criticised what he believed were the flaws in the Marxian theory that the state would eventually dissolve under a Marxist government, instead he believed that the state would gain in power and become authoritarian. Criticism also came from other sociologists such as the German Max Weber, who whilst admiring Marx disagreed with many of his assumptions on the nature of society. Some Marxists tried to adapt to these criticisms and the changing nature of capitalism and Eduard Bernstein emphasised the idea of Marxists bringing legal challenges against the current administrations over the treatment of the working classes rather than simply emphasising violent revolution as more orthodox Marxists did. Other Marxists opposed Bernstein and other revisionists, with many including Karl Kautsky, Otto Bauer, Rudolf Hilferding, Rosa Luxemburg, Vladimir Lenin and Georgi Plekhanov sticking steadfast to the concept of violently overthrowing what they saw as the bourgeoisie-controlled government and instead establishing a dictatorship of the proletariat.
Periodisation of international communism of 1993
[edit]The historical existence of the Communist International (Comintern) and the broader communist movement is divided among periods, regarding changes in the general policy it followed.[104][105][106][107][108]
- The War Communism period (1918–1921) which saw the forming of the International, the Russian Civil War, a general revolutionary upheaval after the October Revolution resulting in the formation of the first communist parties across the world and the defeat of workers' revolutionary movements in Germany, Hungary, Finland and Poland.
- The New Economic Policy period (1921–1929) which marked the end of the civil war in Russia and new economic measures taken by the Bolshevik government, the toning down of the revolutionary wave in Europe and internal struggles within the Bolshevik Party and the Comintern after Lenin's death and before Stalin's absolute consolidation of power.
- The Third Period (1929–1934), an ultra-left turn which saw rapid industrialization and collectivization in the Soviet Union under Stalin's rule, the refusal by communists to cooperate with social democrats in other countries (labeling them social fascists) and the ultimate rise of Adolf Hitler in Germany which led to the abandonment of the hard-line policy of this period. These years also saw the complete subordination of all communist parties across the world to the directives of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks), making the Comintern more or less an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
- The Popular Front period (1934–1939) which marked the call by Comintern to all popular and democratic forces (not just communist) to unite in popular fronts against fascism. Products of this period were the popular front governments in the French Third Republic and the Second Spanish Republic. However, this period was also marked by widespread purges of anyone suspected as an enemy of the Stalinist regime, both in the Soviet Union and abroad. These mass purges resulted in the breaking up of the Popular Front in Spain amidst the Spanish Civil War and the fall of Spain to Francisco Franco.
- The period of advocating peace (1939–1941), a result of the signing of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact which resulted in the Soviet invasion of Poland. In this period, communists were advocating non-participation in World War II, labeling the war as imperialist. The term revolutionary defeatism was used by Comintern in this period to refer to anti-war propaganda by communists in Western Europe against their national governments.
- The Eastern Front period, sometimes called the Second Popular Front (1941–1943), was the last period of the Comintern, starting immediately after the German invasion of the Soviet Union, with Stalin's 3 July 1941 call to the entire free world to unite and fight Nazism by all means. This was a period of militant anti-fascism, the emergence of national liberation movements all across occupied Europe and ultimately the dissolution of the Comintern in 1943.
- The Early Cold War[broken anchor] (1947–1960) in which the Soviet Union and the Red Army installed the Eastern Bloc communist regimes in most of Eastern Europe (except for Yugoslavia and Albania, which had independent communist regimes). A major effort to support communist party activity in Western democracies, especially the Italian Communist Party and the French Communist Party, fell short of gaining positions in the government.
- The Late Cold War (1960–1970s) in which China turned against the Soviet Union and organized alternative communist parties in many countries. Intense attention was given to revolutionary movements in the Third World which were successful in some places such as Cuba and Vietnam. Communism was decisively defeated in other states, including Malaya and Indonesia. In 1972–1979, there was détente between the Soviet Union and the United States.
- The end of communism in Europe (1980–1992) in which Soviet client states were heavily on the defensive as in Afghanistan and Nicaragua. The United States escalated the conflict with very heavy military spending. After a series of short-lived leaders, Mikhail Gorbachev came to power in the Kremlin and began a policy of glasnost and perestroika, designed to revive the stagnating Soviet economy. European satellites led by Poland grew increasingly independent and in 1989 they all expelled the communist leadership. East Germany merged into West Germany with Moscow's approval. At the end of 1991, the Soviet Union itself was dissolved into non-communist independent states. Many communist parties around the world either collapsed, or became independent non-communist entities. However, China, North Korea, Laos, Vietnam and Cuba maintained communist regimes. After 1980, China adopted a market oriented economy that welcomed large-scale trade and friendly relations with the United States.
Early socialist states (1917–1944)
[edit]Russian Revolution, Leninism, and formation of the Soviet Union
[edit]At the start of the 20th century, the Russian Empire was an autocracy controlled by Tsar Nicholas II, with millions of the country's largely agrarian population living in abject poverty. The anti-communist historian Robert Service noted that "poverty and oppression constituted the best soil for Marxism to grow in".[109] The man most responsible for introducing the ideology into the country was Georgi Plekhanov, although the movement itself was largely organised by Vladimir Lenin, who had for a time been exiled to a prison camp in Siberia by the Tsarist government for his beliefs.[110] A Marxist group known as the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party was formed in the country, although it soon divided into two main factions, namely the Bolsheviks led by Lenin and the Mensheviks led by Julius Martov. In 1905, there was a revolution against the Tsar's rule in which workers' councils known as soviets were formed in many parts of the country and the Tsar was forced to implement democratic reform, introducing an elected government, the Duma.[111]
In 1917, with further social unrest against the Duma and its part in involving Russia in World War I, the Bolsheviks took power in the October Revolution. They began remodelling the country by nationalizing various industries and confiscating land from wealthy aristocrats and redistributing it amongst the peasants. They subsequently pulled out of the war against Germany by signing the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk which was unpopular amongst many in Russia, for it gave away large areas of land to Germany. Lenin's government also instituted a number of progressive measures such as universal education, healthcare and equal rights for women.[112][113][114] The initial stage of the October Revolution which involved the assault on Petrograd occurred largely without any human casualties.[115][116][117]
From the outset, the new government faced resistance from a myriad of forces with differing perspectives, including anarchists, social democrats, who took power in the Democratic Republic of Georgia, Socialist-Revolutionaries, who formed the Komuch in Samara, Russia, scattered tsarist resistance forces known as the White Guard as well as Western powers. This led to the events of the Russian Civil War which the Bolsheviks won and subsequently consolidated their power over the entire country, centralising power from the Kremlin in the capital city of Moscow. In the early 1920s, Lenin began recruiting black workers, accusing American political parties of not doing more to campaign for black civil rights. A handful of African American activists were fascinated by communism, and Cyril Briggs led an organization called African Blood Brotherhood.[118] In 1922, the Russian Socialist Federative Soviet Republic was officially redesignated to lead the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, simply known as the Soviet Union.
In 1924, Lenin resigned as leader of the Soviet Union due to poor health and soon died, with Joseph Stalin subsequently taking over control.
Comintern, Mongolian invasion, and communist uprisings in Europe
[edit]In 1919, the Bolshevik government in Russia instigated the creation of an international communist organisation that would act as the Third International after the collapse of the Second International in 1916. This was known as the Communist International, although it was commonly abbreviated as the Comintern. Throughout its existence, the Comintern would be dominated by the Kremlin despite its internationalist stance. Meanwhile, in 1921, the Soviet Union invaded its neighboring Mongolia to aid a popular uprising against the Chinese who then controlled the country, instituting a pro-Soviet government which declared the nation to be the Mongolian People's Republic in 1924.[119]
The Comintern and other such Soviet-backed communist groups soon spread across much of the world, though particularly in Europe, where the influence of the recent Russian Revolution was still strong. In Germany, the Spartacist uprising took place in 1919 when armed Spartacus League communists attempted to set up a Bolshevik-style council republic, but the government put the rebellion down violently with the use of right-wing paramilitary groups, the Freikorps. The noted German communists Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht were killed extrajudicially three days later.[120] Within a few months, a group of communists seized power amongst public unrest in the German region of Bavaria, forming the Bavarian Soviet Republic, although once more this was put down violently by the Freikorps, who historians believe killed around 1,200 communists and their sympathisers.[121]
That same year, political turmoil in Hungary following their defeat in World War I led to a coalition government of the Social Democratic Party and the Communist Party taking control. The Hungarian Communist Party led by Béla Kun soon became dominant and instituted various communist reforms in the country, but the country itself was subsequently invaded by its neighbouring Romania within a matter of months who overthrew the government, with its leaders either escaping abroad or being executed.[122] In 1921, a communist revolt against the Kingdom of Italy occurred whilst supportive factory workers were on strike in Turin and Milan in northern Italy, but the government acted swiftly and put down the rebellion.[123] That same year, a further communist rebellion took place in the Weimar Republic only to be crushed, but another occurred in 1923[which?] which once again was also defeated by the government.[124] The Bulgarian Communist Party had also attempted an uprising in 1923, but like most of their counterparts across Europe they were defeated.[125]
Front organisations
[edit]Communist parties were tight knit organizations that exerted tight control over the members. To reach sympathisers unwilling to join the party, front organizations were created that advocated party-approved positions. Under the leadership of Grigory Zinoviev in the Kremlin, the Comintern established fronts in many countries in the 1920s and after. To coordinate their activities, the Comintern set up various international umbrella organizations (linking groups across national borders) such as the Young Communist International (youth), Profintern (trade unions),[126] Krestintern (peasants), International Red Aid (humanitarian aid), and Red Sport International (organized sports), among others. In Europe, front organizations were especially influential in Italy[127] and France which became the base for Communist front organizer Willi Münzenberg in 1933.[128] These organizations were dissolved by the late 1930s or early 1940s.
The Pan-Pacific Trade Union Secretariat (PPTUS) was set up in 1927 by the Profintern (the Comintern's trade union arm) with the mission of promoting communist trade unions in China, Japan, Korea, the Philippines, Australia, New Zealand and other nations in the western Pacific.[129] Trapeznik (2009) says the PPTUS was a "Communist-front organization" and "engaged in overt and covert political agitation in addition to a number of clandestine activities".[130]
There were numerous communist front organizations in Asia, many oriented to students and youth.[131] According to one historian, in the labor union movement of the 1920s in Japan, the "Hyogikai never called itself a communist front but in effect, this was what it was". He points out it was repressed by the government "along with other communist front groups".[132] In the 1950s, Scalapino argues: "The primary Communist-front organization was the Japan Peace Committee". It was founded in 1949.[133]
Stalinism
[edit]In 1924, Joseph Stalin, a key Bolshevik follower of Lenin, took power in the Soviet Union.[134] Stalin was supported in his leadership by Nikolai Bukharin, but he had various important opponents in the government, most notably Lev Kamenev, Leon Trotsky, and Grigory Zinoviev. Stalin initiated his own process of building a communist society, creating a variant of communism known as Marxism–Leninism. As a part of this, he abandoned some of the capitalist, market policies that had been allowed to continue under Lenin such as the New Economic Policy. Stalinist policies radically altered much of the Soviet Union's agricultural production, modernising it by introducing tractors and other machinery, forced collectivisation of the farms and forced collection of grains from the peasants in accordance with predecided targets. There was food available for industrial workers, but those peasants who refused to move starved, especially in Kazakhstan and Ukraine. The All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) targeted kulaks, who owned a little land.
Stalin took control of the Comintern and introduced a policy in the international organisation of opposing all leftists who were not Marxist–Leninists, labelling them to be social fascists, although many communists such as Jules Humbert-Droz disagreed with him on this policy, believing that the left should unite against the rise of right-wing movements like fascism across Europe.[135] In the early 1930s, Stalin reversed course and promoted popular front movements whereby communist parties would collaborate with socialists and other political forces. A high priority was mobilizing wide support for the Republican cause in the Spanish Civil War.[136]
Great Purge
[edit]The Great Purge mainly operated from December 1936 to November 1938, although the features of arrest and summary trial followed by execution were well entrenched in the Soviet system since the days of Lenin as Stalin systematically destroyed the older generation of pre-1918 leaders. Stalin did so usually under the justification that the accused were enemy spies or deemed "enemies of the people"; in the Red Army, a majority of generals were executed and hundreds of thousands of other "enemies of the people" were sent to the gulag, where inhumane conditions in Siberia led a quick death.[137][a]
The opening of the Soviet archives has vindicated the lower estimates put forth by the "revisionist school" scholars,[139] despite the popular press continuing to use higher estimates and containing serious errors.[140] By 2009, historian Archie Brown reported that estimates were now lower; about 1.7 million were arrested in 1937–1938 and half were shot.[141]
Pre-war dissident communists
[edit]The International Right Opposition and Trotskyism are examples of dissidents who still claim communism today, but they are not the only ones. In Germany, the split in the SPD had initially led to a variety of Communist unions and parties forming which included the councilist tendencies of the AAU-D, AAU-E and KAPD. Councilism had a limited impact outside of Germany, but a number of international organisations formed. In Spain, a fusion of left and right dissidents led to the formation of the POUM. Additionally, the Spanish CNT was associated with the development of the FAI political party, a non-Marxist party which stood for revolutionary communism.
Spreading communism (1945–1957)
[edit]As the Cold War took effect around 1947, the Kremlin set up new international coordination bodies including the World Federation of Democratic Youth, the International Union of Students, the World Federation of Trade Unions, the Women's International Democratic Federation and the World Peace Council. Malcolm Kennedy says the "Communist 'front' system included such international organizations as the WFTU, WFDY, IUS, WIDF and WPC, besides a host of lesser bodies bringing journalists, lawyers, scientists, doctors and others into the widespread net".[142]
The World Federation of Trade Unions (WFTU) was established in 1945, to unite trade union confederations across the world and it was based in Prague. While it had non-communist unions it was largely dominated by the Soviets. In 1949 the British, American and other non-Communist unions broke away from the WFTU to form the rival International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU). The labor movement in Europe became so polarized between the communist unions and social democratic and Christian labor unions, whereas front operations could no longer hide the sponsorship and they became less important.[143]
Soviet Union after World War II
[edit]The devastation of the war resulted in a massive recovery program involving the rebuilding of industrial plants, housing and transportation as well as the demobilization and migration of millions of soldiers and civilians. In the midst of this turmoil during the winter of 1946–1947, the Soviet Union experienced the worst natural famine in the 20th century.[144] There was no serious opposition to Stalin as the NKVD secret police continued to send possible suspects to the gulag.
Relations with the United States and Britain went from friendly to hostile, as they denounced Stalin's political controls over eastern Europe and his blockade of Berlin. By 1947, the Cold War had begun. Stalin himself believed that capitalism was a hollow shell and would crumble under increased non-military pressure exerted through proxies in countries like Italy. However, he greatly underestimated the economic strength of the West and instead of triumph saw the West build up alliances that were designed to permanently stop or contain Soviet expansion. In early 1950, Stalin gave the go-ahead for North Korea's invasion of South Korea, expecting a short war. He was stunned when the Americans entered and defeated the North Koreans, putting them almost on the Soviet border. Stalin supported China's entry into the Korean War which drove the Americans back to the prewar boundaries, but which escalated tensions. The United States decided to mobilize its economy for a long contest with the Soviets, built the hydrogen bomb and strengthened the NATO alliance that covered Western Europe.[145]
According to Gorlizki and Khlevniuk (2004), Stalin's consistent and overriding goal after 1945 was to consolidate the nation's superpower status and in the face of his growing physical decrepitude to maintain his own hold on total power. Stalin created a leadership system that reflected historic czarist styles of paternalism and repression, yet was also quite modern. At the top, personal loyalty to Stalin counted for everything. However, Stalin also created powerful committees, elevated younger specialists and began major institutional innovations. In the teeth of persecution, Stalin's deputies cultivated informal norms and mutual understandings which provided the foundations for collective rule after his death.[146]
Eastern Europe
[edit]The military success of the Red Army in Central and Eastern Europe led to a consolidation of power in communist hands. In some cases, such as Czechoslovakia, this led to enthusiastic support for socialism inspired by the Communist Party and a Social Democratic Party willing to fuse. In other cases, such as Poland or Hungary, the fusion of the Communist Party with the Social Democratic Party was forcible and accomplished through undemocratic means. In many cases, the communist parties of Central Europe were faced with a population initially quite willing to reign in market forces, institute limited nationalisation of industry and supporting the development of intensive social welfare states, whereas broadly the population largely supported socialism. However, the purges of non-communist parties that supported socialism, combined with forced collectivisation of agriculture and a Soviet-bloc wide recession in 1953 led to deep unrest. This unrest first surfaced in Berlin in 1953, where Brecht ironically suggested that "the Party ought to elect a new People". However, Nikita Khrushchev's "Secret Speech" of 1956 opened up internal debate, even if members were unaware, in both the Polish and Hungarian communist parties. This led to the Polish crisis of 1956 which was resolved through change in Polish leadership and a negotiation between the Soviet and Polish parties over the direction of the Polish economy.
Hungarian Revolution of 1956
[edit]The Hungarian Revolution of 1956 was a major challenge to Moscow's control of Eastern Europe.[147] This revolution saw general strikes, the formation of independent workers councils, the restoration of the Social Democratic Party as a party for revolutionary communism of a non-Soviet variety and the formation of two underground independent communist parties. The mainstream Communist Party was controlled for a period of about a week by non-Soviet aligned leaders. Two non-communist parties that supported the maintenance of socialism also regained their independence. This flowering of dissenting communism was crushed by a combination of a military invasion supported by heavy artillery and airstrikes; mass arrests, at least a thousand juridical executions and an uncounted number of summary executions; the crushing of the Central Workers Council of Greater Budapest; mass refugee flight; and a worldwide propaganda campaign. The effect of the Hungarian Revolution on other communist parties varied significantly, resulting in large membership losses in Anglophone communist parties.[148]
Prague Spring of 1968
[edit]The Czechoslovak Communist Party began an ambitious reform agenda under Alexander Dubček. The plan to limit central control and make the economy more independent of the party threatened bedrock beliefs. On 20 August 1968, Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev ordered a massive military invasion by Warsaw Pact forces that destroyed the threat of internal liberalization.[149] At the same time, the Soviets threatened retaliation against the British-French-Israeli invasion of Egypt. The upshot was a collapse of any tendency toward détente and the resignations of more intellectuals from communist parties in the West.[150]
West Germany
[edit]West Germany and West Berlin were centers of East–West conflict during the Cold War and numerous communist fronts were established. For example, the East Germany organization Society for German–Soviet Friendship (GfDSF) had 13000 members in West Germany, but it was banned in 1953 by some Länder as a communist front.[151] The Democratic Cultural League of Germany started off as a series of genuinely pluralistic bodies, but in 1950–1951 came under the control of the communists. By 1952, the United States Embassy counted 54 "infiltrated organizations" which started independently as well as 155 "front organizations" which had been communist inspired from their start.[152]
The Association of the Victims of the Nazi Regime was set up to rally West Germans under the anti-fascist banner, but it had to be dissolved when Moscow discovered it had been infiltrated by "Zionist agents".[153]
China
[edit]Great Leap Forward
[edit]Mao Zedong and the Chinese Communist Party came to power in China in 1949 as the Nationalists headed by the Kuomintang fled to the island of Taiwan. In 1950–1953, China engaged in a large-scale, undeclared war with the United States, South Korea and United Nations forces in the Korean War. While its hostility ended in a military stalemate, it gave Mao the opportunity to identify and purge elements in China that seemed supportive of capitalism. At first, there was close cooperation with Stalin, who sent in technical experts to aid the industrialization process along the line of the Soviet model of the 1930s.[154] After Stalin's death in 1953, relations with Moscow soured – Mao thought Stalin's successors had betrayed the Communist ideal. Mao charged that Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev was the leader of a "revisionist clique" which had turned against Marxism and Leninism was now setting the stage for the restoration of capitalism.[155] The two nations were at sword's point by 1960. Both began forging alliances with communist supporters around the globe, thereby splitting the worldwide movement into two hostile camps.[156]
Rejecting the Soviet model of rapid urbanization, Mao Zedong and his top aide Deng Xiaoping launched the Great Leap Forward in 1957–1961 with the goal of industrializing China overnight, using the peasant villages as the base rather than large cities.[157] Private ownership of land ended and the peasants worked in large collective farms that were now ordered to start up heavy industry operations, such as steel mills. Plants were built in remote locations, despite the lack of technical experts, managers, transportation or needed facilities. Industrialization failed, but the main result was a sharp unexpected decline in agricultural output, which led to mass famine and millions of deaths. The years of the Great Leap Forward in fact saw economic regression, with 1958 through 1961 being the only years between 1953 and 1983 in which China's economy saw negative growth. Political economist Dwight Perkins argues, "Enormous amounts of investment produced only modest increases in production or none at all. [...] In short, the Great Leap was a very expensive disaster".[158] Put in charge of rescuing the economy, Deng adopted pragmatic policies that the idealistic Mao disliked. For a while, Mao was in the shadows, but he returned to center stage and purged Deng and his allies in the Cultural Revolution (1966–1969).[159]
Early post-war dissident communists
[edit]Following the Second World War, Trotskyism was wracked by increasing internal divisions over analysis and strategy. This was combined with an industrial impotence that was widely recognised. Additionally, the success of Soviet-aligned parties in Europe and Asia led to the persecution of Trotskyist intellectuals such as the infamous purge of Vietnamese Trotskyists. The war had also strained social democratic parties in the West. In some cases, such as Italy, significant bodies of membership of the Social Democratic Party were inspired by the possibility of achieving advanced socialism. In Italy, this group, combined with dissenting communists, began to discuss theory centred on the experience of work in modern factories, leading to autonomist Marxist. In the United States, this theoretical development was paralleled by the Johnson–Forest Tendency whereas in France a similar impulse occurred.
Cold War and revisionism (1958–1979)
[edit]Maoism and the Cultural Revolution in China
[edit]The Cultural Revolution was an upheaval that targeted intellectuals and party leaders from 1966 through 1976. Mao's goal was to purify communism by removing pro-capitalists and traditionalists by imposing Maoist orthodoxy within the Chinese Communist Party. The movement paralyzed China politically and weakened the country economically, culturally and intellectually for years. Millions of people were accused, humiliated, stripped of power and either imprisoned, killed or most often sent to work as farm laborers. Mao insisted that these he labelled revisionists be removed through violent class struggle. The two most prominent militants were Marshall Lin Biao of the army and Mao's wife Jiang Qing. China's youth responded to Mao's appeal by forming Red Guard groups around the country. The movement spread into the military, urban workers and the Communist Party leadership itself. It resulted in widespread factional struggles in all walks of life. In the top leadership, it led to a mass purge of senior officials who were accused of taking a "capitalist road", most notably Liu Shaoqi and Deng Xiaoping. During the same period, Mao's personality cult grew to immense proportions. After Mao's death in 1976, the survivors were rehabilitated and many returned to power.[160]
Cuban Revolution
[edit]The Cuban Revolution was a successful armed revolt led by Fidel Castro's 26th of July Movement against the regime of Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista. It ousted Batista on 1 January 1959, replacing his regime with Castro's revolutionary government. Throughout 1959, Fidel Castro began associating with Communist politicians.[161] The United States response was highly negative, leading to a failed invasion attempt in 1961. The Soviets decided to protect its ally by stationing nuclear weapons in Cuba in 1962. In the Cuban Missile Crisis, the United States vehemently opposed the Soviet Union move. There was serious fear of nuclear war for a few days, but a compromise was reached by which Moscow publicly removed its weapons and the United States secretly removed its weapons from bases in Turkey and promised never to invade Cuba.[162]
African communism
[edit]During the decolonization of Africa, the Soviet Union took a keen interest in that continent's independence movements and initially hoped that the cultivation of communist client states there would deny their economic and strategic resources to the West.[163] Soviet foreign policy with regard to Africa assumed that newly independent African governments would be receptive to communist ideology and that the Soviets would have the resources to make them attractive as development partners.[163] During the 1970s, the ruling parties of several sub-Saharan African states formally embraced communism, including the People's Republic of Benin, the People's Republic of Mozambique, the People's Republic of the Congo, the People's Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, and the People's Republic of Angola.[164] Most of these regimes ensured the selective adoption and flexible application of communist theory set against a broad ideological commitment to Marxism or Leninism.[164] The adoption of communism was often seen as a means to an end and used to justify the extreme centralization of power.[164]
Angola was perhaps the only African state which made a longstanding commitment to communism,[165] but this was severely hampered by its own war-burdened economy, rampant corruption and practical realities which allowed a few foreign companies to wield considerable influence despite the elimination of the domestic Angolan private sector and a substantial degree of central economic planning.[166][167] Both Angola and Ethiopia built new social and political communist institutions modeled closely after those in the Soviet Union and Cuba.[5] However, their regimes either dissolved after the collapse of the Soviet Union due to civil conflict or voluntarily repudiated communism in favour of social democracy.[5]
Eurocommunism
[edit]An important trend in several countries in Western Europe from the late 1960s into the 1980s was Eurocommunism. It was strongest in Spain's PCE, Finland's party and especially in Italy's PCI, where it drew on the ideas of Antonio Gramsci. It was developed by communist party members who were disillusioned with both the Soviet Union and China and sought an independent program. They accepted liberal parliamentary democracy and free speech as well as accepting with some conditions a capitalist market economy. They did not speak of the destruction of capitalism, but sought to win the support of the masses and by a gradual transformation of the bureaucracies. In 1978, the Communist Party of Spain replaced the historic "Marxist–Leninist" catchphrase with the new slogan of "Marxist, democratic and revolutionary". The movement faded in the 1980s and collapsed with the fall of communism in Eastern Europe in 1989.[168]
Other forms
[edit]Anarcho-communism is a political philosophy and anarchist school of thought which advocates the abolition of the state, capitalism, wage labour, social hierarchies and private property (while retaining respect for personal property, along with collectively-owned items, goods and services) in favor of common ownership of the means of production and direct democracy as well as a horizontal network of workers' councils with production and consumption based on the guiding principle "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."[169]
Left communism is a position held by the left wing of communism, which criticises the political ideas and practices espoused by Marxist–Leninists and social democrats. Left communists assert positions which they regard as more authentically Marxist than the views of Marxism–Leninism espoused by the Communist International after its Bolshevization by Joseph Stalin and during its second congress.[170]
Libertarian Marxism is a broad scope of economic and political philosophies that emphasize the anti-authoritarian and libertarian aspects of Marxism.[171]
End of the Eastern Bloc – Reform and collapse (1980–1992)
[edit]Social resistance to the policies of communist regimes in Eastern Europe accelerated in strength with the rise of the Solidarity, the first non-communist controlled trade union in the Warsaw Pact that was formed in the People's Republic of Poland in 1980.
In 1985, Mikhail Gorbachev rose to power in the Soviet Union and began policies of radical political reform involving political liberalisation called perestroika and glasnost. Gorbachev's policies were designed to dismantle the authoritarian elements of the state that were developed by Stalin, aiming to restore the supposed ideal Leninist state and retaining a one-party structure but allowing the democratic election of competing candidates to political office within the party. Gorbachev also aimed to restore détente with the West and he also aimed to end the Cold War that was being waged by the Soviet Union because it was no longer economically sustainable. The Soviet Union and the United States under President George H. W. Bush joined in pushing for the dismantlement of apartheid and they also oversaw the dismantlement of South African colonial rule of Namibia.
Meanwhile, the Eastern European communist states politically deteriorated in response to the success of the Polish Solidarity movement and the possibility of Gorbachev-style political liberalisation. In 1989, revolts began across Eastern Europe and China against communist regimes. In China, the government refused to negotiate with student protestors, resulting in the Tiananmen Square attacks that stopped the revolts by force.
The opening of a border gate between Austria and Hungary at the Pan-European Picnic on August 19, 1989, then set in motion a peaceful chain reaction, at the end of which there was no longer a GDR and the Eastern Bloc had disintegrated. It was the largest escape movement from East Germany since the Berlin Wall was built in 1961. But with the mass exodus at the Pan-European Picnic, the subsequent hesitant behavior of the Socialist Unity Party of East Germany and the non-intervention of the Soviet Union broke the dams. The revolts culminated with the revolt in East Germany against the communist regime of Erich Honecker. The event in East Germany developed into a popular mass revolt with sections of the Berlin Wall being torn down and East and West Berliners uniting. Gorbachev's refusal to use Soviet forces based in East Germany to suppress the revolt was seen as a sign that the Cold War had ended. Honecker was pressured to resign from office and the new government committed itself to reunification with West Germany. The Communist Party regime of Nicolae Ceaușescu in Romania was forcefully overthrown in the Romanian Revolution of 1989 and Ceaușescu was executed. The other Warsaw Pact regimes also fell during the Revolutions of 1989, with the exception of the Socialist People's Republic of Albania that continued until 1992.
Unrest and the eventual collapse of communism also occurred in Yugoslavia, but the collapse of communism in Yugoslavia and the collapse of communism in the Warsaw Pact occurred for different reasons. The death of Josip Broz Tito in 1980 and the subsequent vacuum of strong leadership allowed the rise of rival ethnic nationalism in the multinational country. The first leader to exploit such nationalism for political purposes was Slobodan Milošević, who used Serbian nationalism to seize power as president of Serbia and demanded concessions to the Socialist Republic of Serbia and Serbs by the other republics in the Yugoslav federation. This resulted in a surge of Slovene and Croat nationalism in response and the collapse of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia in 1990, the victory of nationalists in multi-party elections in most of Yugoslavia's constituent republics and eventually civil war between the various nationalities beginning in 1991. Yugoslavia was dissolved in 1992.
The Soviet Union itself collapsed between 1990 and 1991, due to the rise of secessionist nationalism and the outbreak of a political power dispute between Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin, the new leader of the Russian Federation. The collapse of the Soviet Union was also aided by political pressure from capitalist powers, loans from world banks, and pressure for liberal democracy and increased consumerism within the Soviet Bloc.[172] U.S. monetary and fiscal policy raised interest rates, making borrowing money very difficult for the Soviet Union.[173] With the Soviet Union collapsing, Gorbachev prepared the country to become a loose federation of independent states called the Commonwealth of Independent States. Hardline communist leaders in the military reacted to Gorbachev's policies with the August Coup of 1991 in which hardline communist military leaders overthrew Gorbachev and seized control of the government. This regime only lasted briefly as widespread popular opposition erupted in street protests and refused to submit. Gorbachev was restored to power, but the various Soviet republics were now set for independence. On 25 December 1991, Gorbachev officially announced the dissolution of the Soviet Union, ending the existence of the world's first communist state.
Contemporary communism (1993–present)
[edit]With the fall of the communist governments in the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc, the influence of state-based Marxist–Leninist ideologies in the world was weakened, but there are still many communist movements of various types and sizes around the world. Three other communist nations, particularly those in East Asia such as the People's Republic of China, Vietnam and Laos, all moved toward market economies, but without any major privatization of the state sector during the 1980s and 1990s (see socialism with Chinese characteristics and doi moi for more details). Spain, France, Portugal and Greece have very publicly strong communist movements that play an open and active leading role in the vast majority of their labor marches and strikes as well as also anti-austerity protests, all of which are large, pronounced events with much visibility. Worldwide marches on International Workers Day sometimes give a clearer picture of the size and influence of current communist movements, particularly within Europe.[citation needed]
Cuba has recently emerged from the crisis which was sparked by the fall of the Soviet Union due to the growth in the volume of its trade with its new allies, Venezuela and China (the former nation has recently adopted a socialism of the 21st century according to Hugo Chávez). Various other countries throughout Latin America and the Caribbean have also made similar shifts to more clearly socialistic policies and rhetoric in a phenomenon which academics are calling the pink tide.[174][175][176]
North Korea claims that its success in avoiding the downfall of socialism is a result of its homegrown ideology of Juche which it adopted in the 1970s, replacing Marxism–Leninism. Cuba has an ambassador to North Korea and China still protects North Korean territorial integrity even as it simultaneously refuses to supply the state with material goods or other significant assistance.[citation needed]
In Nepal, the Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist–Leninist) leader Man Mohan Adhikari briefly became Prime Minister of Nepal and national leader from 1994 to 1995 and the Maoist guerrilla leader Prachanda was elected prime minister by the Constituent Assembly of Nepal in 2008. Prachanda has since been deposed as prime minister, leading the Maoists to abandon their legalistic approach and return to their typical street actions and militancy and to lead sporadic general strikes using their quite substantial influence on the Nepalese labor movement. These actions have oscillated between mild and intense, only the latter of which tends to make world news. They consider Prachanda's removal to be unjust.[citation needed] Since 2008, Nepal has been ruled by a coalition of communist parties: Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist–Leninist) and Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre) which they merged in 2018 in the Nepal Communist Party.
The previous national government of India depended on the parliamentary support of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and Communist Party of India. Presently CPI(M) along with CPI leads the state government in Kerala. The armed wing of the Communist Party of India (Maoist), the People's Liberation Guerrilla Army, is fighting the Naxalite–Maoist insurgency against the Government of India and is active in some parts of the country. Indian government forces have been successful in eliminating insurgency to quite an extent.[when?][citation needed]
In Cyprus, the veteran communist Dimitris Christofias of AKEL won the 2008 presidential election, the first and only communist head of state of a European Union country.[177][178]
In Ukraine and Russia, the communists came second in the 2002 Ukrainian parliamentary election and the 2003 Russian legislative election, respectively. The Communist Party of the Russian Federation remains strong in Russia, but the 2014 Ukrainian parliamentary election following the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the annexation of Crimea resulted in the loss of its 32 members and no Verkhovna Rada representation by the Communist Party of Ukraine.[179] The party has been banned since 2015.
In the Czech Republic, the Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia came third in the 2002 elections[180] as did the Portuguese Communist Party in 2005.[181]
In South Africa, the South African Communist Party (SACP) is a member of the Tripartite alliance alongside the African National Congress and the Congress of South African Trade Unions. Sri Lanka has communist ministers in their national governments.[citation needed]
In Zimbabwe, former president Robert Mugabe of the Zimbabwe African National Union – Patriotic Front, the country's longstanding leader, was a professed communist.[182][183]
Colombia has been in the midst of a civil war which has been waged since 1966 between the Colombian government and aligned right-wing paramilitaries against two communist guerrilla groups, namely the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia–People's Army (FARC–EP) and the National Liberation Army (ELN).[citation needed]
The Revolutionary Communist Party, USA led by its chairman Bob Avakian currently organizes for a revolution in the United States to overthrow the capitalist system and replace it with a socialist state.[184][185]
As of the early 2020s, the Philippines is still experiencing a low-scale guerrilla insurgency by the New People's Army, the armed wing of the outlawed Communist Party of the Philippines. Actions of an armed group likely affiliated with NPA resulted in eight casualties after a gunfight with the Philippine Armed Forces in late March 2021.[186]
See also
[edit]- The Black Book of Communism
- Bolshevization
- Comparison of Nazism and Stalinism
- Crimes against humanity under communist regimes
- Criticism of communist party rule
- Foreign relations of China
- Foreign relations of Cuba
- Foreign relations of Laos
- Foreign relations of North Korea
- Foreign relations of the Soviet Union
- Foreign relations of Vietnam
- Mass killings under communist regimes
References
[edit]- ^ The exact number of purge victims is unknown by a factor of 10. Estimates range from several million upwards to 20 million. Historian Robert Service believes that 1.5 million were arrested and 200000 were eventually released. Service, chapter 31, especially p. 356. The lowest estimates by J. Arch Getty et al. give more than 300000 executions in each of the years 1937 and 1938.[138]
- ^ a b c d e f g Lansford, Thomas (2007). Communism. New York: Cavendish Square Publishing. pp. 9–24, 36–44. ISBN 978-0761426288.
- ^ a b c Leopold, David (2015). Freeden, Michael; Stears, Marc; Sargent, Lyman Tower (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 20–38. ISBN 978-0198744337.
- ^ a b c Schwarzmantle, John (2017). Breuilly, John (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 643–651. ISBN 978-0198768203.
- ^ a b MacFarlane, S. Neil (1990). Katz, Mark (ed.). The USSR and Marxist Revolutions in the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 6–11. ISBN 978-0812216202.
- ^ a b c Dunn, Dennis (2016). A History of Orthodox, Islamic, and Western Christian Political Values. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 126–131. ISBN 978-3319325668.
- ^ a b Ball, Terence; Dagger, Richard, eds. (2019) [1999]. "Communism". Encyclopædia Britannica (revised ed.). Retrieved June 10, 2020.
- ^ Djilas, Milovan (1991). "The Legacy of Communism in Eastern Europe". The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs. 15 (1): 83–92. ISSN 1046-1868. JSTOR 45290119.
- ^ Shaoguang, Wang. "Political change and democracy in China" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on September 9, 2017.
- ^ Pierson, Christopher (2013). Just Property: A History in the Latin West. Volume One: Wealth, Virtue, and the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 54. ISBN 978-0-19-967328-5 – via Google Books.
- ^ Felluga, Dino (January 1, 2011). "Introductory Guide to Critical Theory – Modules on Marx: On the Stages of Economic Development". Purdue University. Retrieved February 3, 2021.
- ^ a b Laidler, Harry W. (2013). History of Socialism: An Historical Comparative Study of Socialism, Communism, Utopia. Routledge. p. 17. ISBN 978-1-136-23143-8 – via Google Books.
- ^ van Ree 2015, p. 17.
- ^ a b c van Ree 2015, p. 19.
- ^ Dawson, Doyne (1992). Cities of the Gods: Communist Utopias in Greek Thought. Oxford University Press. pp. 37–43. ISBN 978-0-19-536150-6 – via Google Books.
- ^ Plato (2001). Plato's Republic, Books 1–10. Agora Publications, Inc. pp. 192–193. ISBN 978-1-887250-25-2 – via Google Books.
- ^ Laidler 2013, pp. 12–13.
- ^ Plato 2001, pp. 189–191.
- ^ American University (Washington, D.C.). Foreign Area Studies (1978). Iran, a Country Study. Department of Defense, Department of the Army. p. 114 – via Google Books.
- ^ Busky, Donald F. (2002). Communism in History and Theory: From Utopian socialism to the fall of the Soviet Union. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 14. ISBN 978-0-275-97748-1 – via Google Books.
- ^ a b Service 2007, pp. 14–15.
- ^ a b Boer, Roland (2019). Red Theology: On the Christian Communist Tradition. Brill. pp. 15–16. ISBN 978-90-04-39477-3 – via Google Books.
- ^ Brackney, W.H. (2012). Historical Dictionary of Radical Christianity. G – Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary Subjects Series. Scarecrow Press. p. 321. ISBN 978-0-8108-7179-3. Retrieved March 2, 2023.
- ^ Freeman, Michael (2011). Human Rights: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Polity Press. p. 19. ISBN 9780745639666 – via Google Books.
- ^ Barilan, Yechiel Michael (2012). Human Dignity, Human Rights, and Responsibility: The New Language of Global Bioethics and Biolaw. MIT Press. p. 63. ISBN 9780262304887 – via Google Books.
- ^ a b Cross, Frank; Livingstone, Elizabeth, eds. (2005). The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. Oxford University Press. p. 180. ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3.
- ^ Román, Reinaldo L. (1996). "Christian Themes: Mainstream Traditions and Millenarian Violence". In Barkun, Michael (ed.). Millennialism and Violence. Routledge. p. 66. ISBN 9781136308482 – via Google Books.
- ^ Gilliat-Smith, Ernest (1907). "Beguines; Beghards". The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 2. Robert Appleton Company. p. 390.
- ^ Traill, Henry Duff (1894). Social England: From the accession of Edward I. to the death of Henry VII. Cassell. pp. 163–165 – via Google Books.
- ^ Lechler, Gotthard Victor (1904). John Wycliffe and His English Precursors. Religious Tract Society. p. 358. ISBN 978-0-404-16235-1 – via Google Books.
- ^ a b c Kaufmann, Moritz (1883). Socialism and Communism in Their Practical Application. Society for promoting Christian knowledge. pp. 96–98. ISBN 978-0-7905-9010-3 – via Google Books.
- ^ Brown 2009, p. 12.
- ^ Carrafiello, Michael L. (1998). Robert Parsons and English Catholicism, 1580–1610. Susquehanna University Press. p. 79. ISBN 978-1-57591-012-3 – via Google Books.
- ^ Kautsky 1897, pp. 58–60.
- ^ van Ree 2015, p. 21.
- ^ Wagner, M.L. (1983). Petr Chelčický: A Radical Separatist in Hussite Bohemia. Studies in Anabaptist and Mennonite history (in Slovak). Herald Press. ISBN 978-0-8361-1257-3. Retrieved March 2, 2023.
- ^ Pavlicek, O.; Šmahel, F. (2015). A Companion to Jan Hus. Brill's Companions to the Christian Tradition. Brill. p. 227. ISBN 978-90-04-28272-8. Retrieved March 2, 2023.
- ^ Berenger, J.; Simpson, C.A. (2014). A History of the Habsburg Empire 1273–1700. Taylor & Francis. p. 68. ISBN 978-1-317-89570-1. Retrieved March 4, 2023.
- ^ Malia, M.E.; Emmons, T. (2006). History's Locomotives: Revolutions and the Making of the Modern World. Yale University Press. p. 52. ISBN 978-0-300-12690-7. Retrieved March 4, 2023.
- ^ Kautsky 1897, pp. 78–82.
- ^ Kautsky 1897, pp. 86–89.
- ^ a b van Ree 2015, pp. 23–25.
- ^ Service 2007, p. 16.
- ^ a b c Afanasyevv, Viktor Grigoryevich (1967). Scientific Communism: (a Popular Outline). Progress Publishers. pp. 15–16 – via Google Books.
- ^ Fokkema, Douwe Wessel (2011). Perfect Worlds: Utopian Fiction in China and the West. Amsterdam University Press. pp. 33–35. ISBN 978-90-8964-350-6 – via Google Books.
- ^ Laidler 2013, pp. 22–24.
- ^ Bridgett, Thomas Edward (1891). Life and Writings of Sir Thomas More: Lord Chancellor of England and Martyr Under Henry VIII. Burns & Oates. p. 103. ISBN 978-0-598-99084-6 – via Google Books.
- ^ Service 2007, p. 15.
- ^ Morrison, Tessa (2016). Unbuilt Utopian Cities 1460 to 1900: Reconstructing their Architecture and Political Philosophy. Routledge. p. 52. ISBN 978-1-317-00556-8 – via Google Books.
- ^ van Ree 2015, pp. 38–39.
- ^ Laidler 2013, p. 32.
- ^ Fried & Sanders 1992, pp. 14–15.
- ^ van Ree 2015, p. 46.
- ^ a b Woolsey, Theodore Dwight (1880). Communism and Socialism in Their History and Theory: A Sketch. C. Scribner's Sons. pp. 98–102 – via Google Books.
- ^ The Cambridge Modern History. 1904. pp. 33–34.
- ^ a b Engels, Friedrich (1999). Socialism: Utopian and Scientific. Resistance Books. p. 11. ISBN 978-0-909196-86-8 – via Google Books.
- ^ Fried & Sanders 1992, pp. 31–33.
- ^ Priestland 2010, pp. 5–7.
- ^ a b Fried & Sanders 1992, pp. 17–20.
- ^ a b c Billington 2011, pp. 79–80.
- ^ a b c Billington 2011, pp. 81–82.
- ^ a b Linebaugh, Peter (2014). Stop, Thief!: The Commons, Enclosures, and Resistance. PM Press. pp. 205–206. ISBN 978-1-60486-747-3 – via Google Books.[permanent dead link ]
- ^ a b Hodges, Donald C. (2014). Sandino's Communism: Spiritual Politics for the Twenty-First Century. University of Texas Press. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-292-71564-6 – via Google Books.
- ^ Lansford 2007, p. 26.
- ^ Priestland 2010, pp. 18–19.
- ^ Billington 2011, p. 84.
- ^ Blaisdell, Bob (2012). The Communist Manifesto and Other Revolutionary Writings: Marx, Marat, Paine, Mao Tse-Tung, Gandhi and Others. Courier Corporation. pp. 92–94. ISBN 978-0-486-11396-8 – via Google Books.
- ^ Billington 2011, p. 71.
- ^ Rose, Robert Barrie (1978). Gracchus Babeuf: the first revolutionary communist. Arnold. pp. 32, 332. ISBN 0-7131-5993-6. OCLC 780996378.
- ^ Service 2007, pp. 16–17.
- ^ Woolsey 1880, p. 102.
- ^ Greene, Doug Enaa (2017). Communist Insurgent: Blanqui's Politics of Revolution. Haymarket Books. p. 46. ISBN 978-1-60846-888-1 – via Google Books.
- ^ Hodges 2014, pp. 36–37.
- ^ a b Lowy 2020, pp. 71–72.
- ^ a b Corcoran, Paul E.; Fuchs, Christian (1983). Before Marx: Socialism and Communism in France, 1830–48. Palgrave-Macmillan UK. pp. 3–5, 22. ISBN 978-1-349-17146-0 – via Google Books.
- ^ Brie, Michael (2019). Rediscovering Lenin: Dialectics of Revolution and Metaphysics of Domination. Springer. p. 128. ISBN 978-3-030-23327-3 – via Google Books.
- ^ Marx, K., and F. Engels, The Holy Family: Critique of Critical Criticism. Ch. VI 3. Online at: http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/holy-family/ch06_3_d.htm.
- ^ van Ree 2015, p. 10.
- ^ a b Lowy 2020, pp. 65–66.
- ^ Lindemann 1983, p. 68.
- ^ a b Marx, Karl (2019). "Introduction.". In Fernbach, David (ed.). Political Writings. Verso Books. pp. 18–19. ISBN 978-1-78873-686-2 – via Google Books.
- ^ van Ree 2015, pp. 44–45.
- ^ Henderson, William Otto (1976). The Life of Friedrich Engels. Taylor & Francis. p. 93. ISBN 978-0-7146-4002-0 – via Google Books.
- ^ Mehring, Franz (2013). Karl Marx: The Story of His Life. Routledge. p. 139. ISBN 978-1-134-55883-4 – via Google Books.
- ^ Fuchs, Christian (2015). Reading Marx in the Information Age: A Media and Communication Studies Perspective on Capital. Routledge. p. 357. ISBN 978-1-317-36449-8 – via Google Books.
- ^ Marx, Karl (1844). "Private Property and Communism". Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of Nov, 5, 1844 – via Marxists Internet Archive.
- ^ Service 2007, pp. 24–25.
- ^ Moggach, Douglas (2011). Politics, Religion, and Art: Hegelian Debates. Northwestern University Press. p. 168. ISBN 978-0-8101-2729-6 – via Google Books.
- ^ Lowy, Michael (September–October 1989). "'The Poetry of the Past': Marx and the French Revolution". New Left Review (I/177): 111–124. Retrieved December 5, 2022.
- ^ Tucker, G. S. L. (1961). "Ricardo and Marx". Economica. 28 (111): 252–269. doi:10.2307/2601601. ISSN 0013-0427. JSTOR 2601601.
- ^ Service 2007, p. 13.
- ^ "101 Treasures of Chetham's". Chetham's Library. Archived from the original on November 10, 2011. Retrieved November 25, 2011.
Philosophers Karl Marx and Frederich Engels met to research their Communist theory in Chetham's Library
- ^ "War and cotton lent Chetham's its name in Manchester". BBC News. March 2, 2010. Retrieved November 25, 2011.
- ^ Service 2007, pp. 27–28.
- ^ Marx, Karl (1875). "Part I". Critique of the Gotha Program. Retrieved July 15, 2008 – via Marxists Internet Archive.
- ^ Becker, August (1844). Was wollen die Kommunisten? [What do the communists want?] (in German). p. 34 – via Google Books.
- ^ Blanc, Louis (1851). Plus de Girondins. p. 92 – via Google Books.
- ^ Lindemann 1983, p. 50.
- ^ Service 2007, p. 28.
- ^ Service 2007, p. 29.
- ^ Service 2007, p. 36.
- ^ Marx, Karl (1848). "Chapter IV. Position of the Communists in Relation to the Various Existing Opposition Parties". The Communist Manifesto – via Marxists Internet Archive.
- ^ Service 2007, pp. 39–41.
- ^ Service 2007, pp. 36–37.
- ^ Priestland 2010, p. [page needed].
- ^ Service 2007, p. [page needed].
- ^ Pipes, Richard (2003). Communism: A History. Random House Publishing. ISBN 978-0812968644.
- ^ Hallas, Duncan (1985). The Comintern: The History of the Third International.
- ^ Smith, S. A., ed. (2014). "10". The Oxford Handbook of the History of Communism. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199602056.001.0001. ISBN 9780199602056.
- ^ Service 2007, p. 46.
- ^ Service 2007, pp. 48–49.
- ^ Service 2007, pp. 50–51.
- ^ Adams, Katherine H.; Keene, Michael L. (2014). After the Vote Was Won: The Later Achievements of Fifteen Suffragists. McFarland. p. 109. ISBN 978-0-7864-5647-5.
- ^ Ugri͡umov, Aleksandr Leontʹevich (1976). Lenin's Plan for Building Socialism in the USSR, 1917–1925. Novosti Press Agency Publishing House. p. 48.
- ^ Service, Robert (1985). Lenin: A Political Life: Volume 1: The Strengths of Contradiction. Springer. p. 98. ISBN 978-1-349-05591-3.
- ^ Shukman, Harold (December 5, 1994). The Blackwell Encyclopedia of the Russian Revolution. John Wiley & Sons. p. 343. ISBN 978-0-631-19525-2.
- ^ Bergman, Jay (2019). The French Revolutionary Tradition in Russian and Soviet Politics, Political Thought, and Culture. Oxford University Press. p. 224. ISBN 978-0-19-884270-5.
- ^ McMeekin, Sean (May 30, 2017). The Russian Revolution: A New History. Basic Books. pp. 1–496. ISBN 978-0-465-09497-4.
- ^ "Black communism in the Great Depression". Katie Wood. September 7, 2020. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
- ^ Service 2007, pp. 115–116.
- ^ Service 2007, p. 86.
- ^ Service 2007, pp. 90–92.
- ^ Service 2007, pp. 86–90.
- ^ Service 2007, pp. 92–94.
- ^ Service 2007, pp. 95–96.
- ^ Service 2007, pp. 117–118.
- ^ Birchall, Ian (2009). "'Profintern: Die Rote Gewerkschaftsinternationale 1920–1937' review (in English) of a German language study by Reiner Tosstorff". Historical Materialism. 17 (4): 164–176. doi:10.1163/146544609X12537556703557.
- ^ Joan Urban, Moscow and the Italian Communist Party: from Togliatti to Berlinguer (1986) p. 157.
- ^ Jackson, Julian (1990). The Popular Front in France: Defending Democracy, 1934–38. Cambridge University Press. pp. x. ISBN 978-0521312523.
- ^ Klehr, Harvey; Haynes, John Earl; Firsov, Fridrikh Igorevich (1996). The Secret World of American Communism. Yale University Press. p. 42. ISBN 978-0300068559.
- ^ Trapeznik, Alexander (Winter 2009). "'Agents of Moscow' at the Dawn of the Cold War: The Comintern and the Communist Party of New Zealand". Journal of Cold War Studies. 11 (1): 124–149. doi:10.1162/jcws.2009.11.1.124. S2CID 57558503.
quote on p. 144
- ^ For listings of front organizations in East Asia see Malcolm Kennedy, History of Communism in East Asia (Praeger Publishers, 1957) pp. 118, 127–128, 130, 277, 334, 355, 361–367, 374, 415, 421, 424, 429, 439, 444, 457–458, 470, 482.
- ^ Large, Stephen S. (2010). Organized Workers and Socialist Politics in Interwar Japan. Cambridge University Press. p. 85. ISBN 9780521136310.
- ^ Scalapino, Robert A. (1967). The Japanese Communist Movement 1920–1967. University of California Press. p. 117. ISBN 978-0520011342.
- ^ Brown 2009, pp. 62–77.
- ^ Service 2007, p. 167.
- ^ Brown 2009, pp. 88–90.
- ^ Applebaum, Anne (2003). Gulag: A History. Anchor Books. ISBN 978-1400034093.
- ^ Getty & Manning 1993.
- ^ Getty, J. Arch; Rittersporn, Gábor; Zemskov, Viktor (1993). "Victims of the Soviet penal system in the pre-war years: a first approach on the basis of archival evidence" (PDF). American Historical Review. 98 (4): 1017–1049. doi:10.2307/2166597. JSTOR 2166597.
The long-awaited archival evidence on repression in the period of the Great Purges shows that levels of arrests, political prisoners, executions, and general camp populations tend to confirm the orders of magnitude indicated by those labeled as 'revisionists' and mocked by those proposing high estimates.
- ^ Wheatcroft, Stephen G. (1999). "Victims of Stalinism and the Soviet Secret Police: The Comparability and Reliability of the Archival Data. Not the Last Word" (PDF). Europe-Asia Studies. 51 (2): 340–342. doi:10.1080/09668139999056.
For decades, many historians counted Stalin' s victims in 'tens of millions', which was a figure supported by Solzhenitsyn. Since the collapse of the USSR, the lower estimates of the scale of the camps have been vindicated. The arguments about excess mortality are far more complex than normally believed. R. Conquest, The Great Terror: A Re-assessment (London, 1992) does not really get to grips with the new data and continues to present an exaggerated picture of the repression. The view of the 'revisionists' has been largely substantiated. (Getty & Manning 1993) The popular press, even TLS and The Independent, have contained erroneous journalistic articles that should not be cited in respectable academic articles.
- ^ Brown 2009, p. 76.
- ^ Kennedy, Malcolm (1957). History of Communism in East Asia. Praeger Publishers. p. 126.
- ^ Carew, Anthony (December 1984). "The Schism within the World Federation of Trade Unions: Government and Trade-Union Diplomacy". International Review of Social History. 29 (3): 297–335. doi:10.1017/S002085900000794X. S2CID 145428599.
- ^ Gorlizki & Khlevniuk 2004, p. 3ff.
- ^ Gaddis, John Lewis (2006). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Books.
- ^ Gorlizki & Khlevniuk 2004.
- ^ Schmidl, Erwin A.; Ritter, László; Dennis, Peter (2006). The Hungarian Revolution 1956. Osprey Publishing. ASIN B01K3JYZEO.
- ^ Brown 2009, pp. 278–292.
- ^ Bischof, Günter; Karner, Stefan; Ruggenthaler, Peter, eds. (2010). The Prague Spring and the Warsaw Pact Invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 9780739143063 – via Google Books.
- ^ Bracke, Maude (2009). Which Socialism, Whose Détente? West European Communism and the Czechoslovak Crisis of 1968.
- ^ Major 1997, p. 215.
- ^ Major 1997, pp. 217–218.
- ^ Mastny, Vojtech (1998). The Cold War and Soviet Insecurity: The Stalin Years. Oxford University Press. p. 162.
- ^ Brown 2009, pp. 179–193.
- ^ Gittings, John (2006). The Changing Face of China: From Mao to Market. Oxford University Press. p. 40. ISBN 9780191622373 – via Google Books.
- ^ Luthi, Lorenz M. (2010). The Sino-Soviet Split: Cold War in the Communist World. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1400837625 – via Google Books.
- ^ Brown 2009, pp. 316–332.
- ^ Perkins, Dwight Heald (1984). China's economic policy and performance during the Cultural Revolution and its aftermath. Harvard Institute for International Development. p. 12 – via Google Books.
- ^ Vogel, Ezra F. (2011). Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China. Harvard University Press. pp. 40–42.
- ^ Brown 2009, pp. 324–332.
- ^ Perez-Stable, Marifeli (2011). The Cuban Revolution: Origins, Course, and Legacy (3rd ed.).
- ^ Brown 2009, pp. 293–312.
- ^ a b Magyar, Karl; Danopoulos, Constantine (2002) [1994]. Prolonged Wars: A Post Nuclear Challenge. Honolulu: University Press of the Pacific. pp. 260–271. ISBN 978-0898758344.
- ^ a b c Markakis, John; Waller, Michael (1986). Military Marxist Regimes in Africa. New York: Routledge. pp. 131–134. ISBN 978-0714632957.
- ^ Johnson, Elliott; Walker, David; Gray, Daniel (2014). Historical Dictionary of Marxism. Historical Dictionaries of Religions, Philosophies, and Movements (2nd ed.). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield. p. 294. ISBN 978-1-4422-3798-8.
- ^ Ferreira, Manuel (2002). Brauer, Jurgen; Dunne, Paul (eds.). Arming the South: The Economics of Military Expenditure, Arms Production and Arms Trade in Developing Countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 251–255. ISBN 978-0-230-50125-6.
- ^ Akongdit, Addis Ababa Othow (2013). Impact of Political Stability on Economic Development: Case of South Sudan. Bloomington: AuthorHouse Ltd, Publishers. pp. 74–75. ISBN 978-1491876442.
- ^ Priestland, David (2009). The Red Flag: A History of Communism. Grove Press. pp. 497–499. ISBN 9780802119247 – via Google Books.
- ^ Kinna, Ruth (2012). "Anarchism, Individualism and Communism: William Morris's Critique of Anarcho-communism" (PDF). Libertarian Socialism. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 35–56.
- ^ Thatcher, Ian D. (2007). "Left-communism: Rosa Luxemburg and Leon Trotsky compared" (PDF). Twentieth-Century Marxism. Routledge. pp. 42–57.
- ^ Price, Wayne (2017). "What is Libertarian Socialism? An Anarchist-Marxist Dialogue" (PDF).
- ^ Bartel, Fritz (August 9, 2022), "The Triumph of Broken Promises: The End of the Cold War and the Rise of Neoliberalism", The Triumph of Broken Promises, Harvard University Press, doi:10.4159/9780674275805, ISBN 978-0-674-27580-5, S2CID 249327761, retrieved April 21, 2023
- ^ Gatejel, Luminita (2016). "Appealing for a Car: Consumption Policies and Entitlement in the USSR, the GDR, and Romania, 1950s–1980s". Slavic Review. 75 (1): 122–145. doi:10.5612/slavicreview.75.1.122. ISSN 0037-6779. S2CID 203276304.
- ^ Lopes, Dawisson Belém; de Faria, Carlos Aurélio Pimenta (January–April 2016). "When Foreign Policy Meets Social Demands in Latin America". Contexto Internacional (Literature review). 38 (1). Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro: 11–53. doi:10.1590/S0102-8529.2016380100001.
No matter the shades of pink in the Latin American 'pink tide', and recalling that political change was not the norm for the whole region during that period, there seems to be greater agreement when it comes to explaining its emergence. In terms of this canonical interpretation, the left turn should be understood as a feature of general redemocratisation in the region, which is widely regarded as an inevitable result of the high levels of inequality in the region.
- ^ Abbott, Jared. "Will the Pink Tide Lift All Boats? Latin American Socialisms and Their Discontents". Democratic Socialists of America. Archived from the original on April 6, 2017. Retrieved April 5, 2017.
- ^ Oikonomakis, Leonidas (March 16, 2015). "Europe's pink tide? Heeding the Latin American experience". The Press Project. Retrieved April 5, 2017.
- ^ "New Cyprus president takes office with pledge for solution". Xinhua News Agency. February 28, 2008. Archived from the original on March 3, 2008.
- ^ Kambas, Michele (February 24, 2008). "Communist Christofias wins Cyprus presidential vote". Reuters. Archived from the original on January 12, 2009. Retrieved December 17, 2011.
- ^ "People's Front 0.33% ahead of Poroshenko Bloc with all ballots counted in Ukraine elections". Interfax-Ukraine. November 8, 2014. Archived from the original on November 12, 2014.
- ^ "Election for the Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic held on 14–15.6.2002". volby.cz.
- ^ "Comissão Nacional de Eleições" [National Election Commission] (PDF). Diário da República – I Série-a (in Portuguese) (55): 2437–2438. March 18, 2005.
- ^ Smith, David (May 24, 2013). "Lunch with the Mugabes". The Guardian. Johannesburg. Archived from the original on February 18, 2022.
- ^ "From Liberator to Tyrant: Recollections of Mugabe". PBS. Archived from the original on March 8, 2021.
- ^ Revolutionary Communist Party (2010). Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America: (Draft Proposal). R C P Publications. ISBN 9780898510072.
- ^ Scott, Dylan (August 21, 2014). "What the Heck is the Revolutionary Communist Party' Doing In Ferguson?". Talking Points Memo. Retrieved March 21, 2019.
- ^ "Philippine Military Kills 8 Suspected NPA Rebels in Firefight". Benar News. Retrieved March 27, 2021.
Bibliography
[edit]- Billington, James H. (2011). Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-1-4128-1401-0.
- Brown, Archie (2009). The Rise and Fall of Communism. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06-188548-8.
- Fried, Albert; Sanders, Ronald (1992). Socialist Thought: A Documentary History. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-08265-5 – via Google Books.
- Getty, J. Arch.; Manning, Roberta T., eds. (1993). Stalinist Terror: New Perspectives. Cambridge.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Gorlizki, Yoram; Khlevniuk, Oleg (2004). Cold Peace: Stalin and the Soviet Ruling Circle, 1945–1953. Oxford University Press. pp. 3ff. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195165814.001.0001. ISBN 9780195165814.
- Kautsky, Karl (1897). Communism in Central Europe in the Time of the Reformation. T. F. Unwin – via Google Books.
- Lindemann, Albert S. (1983). A History of European Socialism. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-03246-8 – via Google Books.
- Lowy, Michael (2020). The Theory of Revolution in the Young Marx. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-44160-6. OCLC 1239987105 – via Google Books.
- Major, Patrick (1997). The Death of the KPD: Communism and Anti-Communism in West Germany, 1945–1956. Oxford University Press.
- Priestland, David (2010). The Red Flag: Communism and the Making of the Modern World. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-029520-7. OCLC 762107381.
- Service, Robert (2007). Comrades!: A History of World Communism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-02530-1 – via Google Books.
- van Ree, Erik (2015). Boundaries of Utopia – Imagining Communism from Plato to Stalin. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-48533-8 – via Google Books.
Further reading
[edit]- Books
- Borkenau, Franz. World communism; a history of the Communist International (1938) online
- Crozier, Brian. The Rise and Fall of the Soviet Empire (1999), long detailed popular history
- Davin, Delia (2013). Mao: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford UP. ISBN 9780191654039.
- Deakin, F. W. ed. A history of world communism (1975) online
- Furet, François. The Passing of an Illusion: The Idea of Communism in the Twentieth Century (1999).
- Garver, John W. China's Quest: The History of the Foreign Relations of the People's Republic (2nd ed. 2018) comprehensive scholarly history. excerpt
- Harvey, Robert, A Short History of Communism (2004), ISBN 0-312-32909-1.
- Kotkin, Stephen. Stalin, Volume I: Paradoxes of Power, 1878–1928 (2014) highly detailed scholarly biography; vol 2 Stalin: Waiting for Hitler, 1929–1941 (2017)
- Pathak, Rakesh, and Yvonne Berliner. Communism in Crisis 1976–89 (2012)
- Pipes, Richard. Communism: A History (2003)
- Pons, Silvio and Robert Service, eds. A Dictionary of 20th-Century Communism (Princeton University Press, 2010). 944 pp. ISBN 978-0-691-13585-4 online review
- Priestland, David. The Red Flag: A History of Communism (2010)
- Sandle, Mark. Communism (2nd ed. 2011), short introduction
- Service, Robert. Lenin: A Biography (2000) excerpt and text search; also online
- Service, Robert. Stalin (2005) online
- Seton-Watson, Hugh. From Lenin to Khrushchev, the history of world communism (1954) online
- Taubman, William. Khrushchev: The Man and His Era (2004) excerpt and text search; also complete text
- Taubman, William. Gorbachev: His Life and Times (2018)
- Tucker, Robert C. Stalin as Revolutionary, 1879–1929 (1973); Stalin in Power: The Revolution from Above, 1929–1941. (1990) online ed. Archived May 25, 2012, at the Wayback Machine a standard biography; online at ACLS e-books
- Ulam, Adam B. Expansion and Coexistence: Soviet Foreign Policy 1917–73 (1974) online
- Journals
- American Communist History (United States)
- Communisme (France)
- Twentieth Century Communism (United Kingdom)
- Primary sources
- Daniels, Robert V., ed. A Documentary History of Communism in Russia: From Lenin to Gorbachev (1993)
- Daniels, Robert V. ed. A Documentary History of Communism: Communism and the World (1985)
- Gruber, Helmut. International Communism in the Era of Lenin: A Documentary History (1967)
- Memoirs
- Chambers, Whittaker (1952). Witness. New York: Random House.
- Davis, Hope Hale (1994). Great Day Coming: A Memoir of the 1930s. Steerforth Press. ISBN 9781883642174 – via Google Books.
- Tchernavin, Tatiana (1934). Escape From The Soviets. Translated by Natalie Duddington (under the pseudonym N. Alexander). E. P. Dutton and Co.
- Ulanovskaya, Maya; Ulanovskaya, Nadezhda (2016). The Family Story. Translated by Hoffman, Stefani. Lulu. ISBN 9781326667573 – via Google Books.
- Animation