Wikipedia:Picture peer review/WingsOfADragonfly: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
←Created page with '{{subst:Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Template | image = Wings of a dragonfly.jpg.jpg | name = Wings of a dragonfly | caption = A dragonfly's wings | c...' |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[Wikipedia:Picture peer review/WingsOfADragonfly|Wings of a dragonfly]]=== |
===[[Wikipedia:Picture peer review/WingsOfADragonfly|Wings of a dragonfly]]=== |
||
[[Image:Wings of a dragonfly |
[[Image:Wings of a dragonfly.jpg|thumb|A dragonfly's wings]] |
||
This macro shot clearly emphasises the intricate pattern on the wings of a dragonfly. |
This macro shot clearly emphasises the intricate pattern on the wings of a dragonfly. |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
;Comments: |
;Comments: |
||
*I would appreciate it if someone can critique this image and carry out any improvements, if necessary on this image. I am happy with the contrast and sharpness on this but if any of you think it can be improved, please go ahead and do it. I would be grateful. |
|||
* |
|||
** Whilst the image has some asthetic value it is not particularly sharp, there is some CA and the main subject is not entirely in focus. There are lots of images on the dragonfly page that show as much detail in the wings but also have the body visible. You also need to include the image in an article to be eligiable for featured picture status. [[User:Noodle snacks|Noodle snacks]] ([[User talk:Noodle snacks|talk]]) 05:42, 15 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
***I've uploaded an alternative version of it. You can see it on the image page or here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Wings_of_a_dragonfly2.jpg |
|||
;Seconder: |
;Seconder: |
||
* |
* |
||
Latest revision as of 06:51, 15 November 2008
This macro shot clearly emphasises the intricate pattern on the wings of a dragonfly.
- Creator
- Ganeshrg
- Nominated by
- Ganeshrg (talk) 05:28, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- I would appreciate it if someone can critique this image and carry out any improvements, if necessary on this image. I am happy with the contrast and sharpness on this but if any of you think it can be improved, please go ahead and do it. I would be grateful.
- Whilst the image has some asthetic value it is not particularly sharp, there is some CA and the main subject is not entirely in focus. There are lots of images on the dragonfly page that show as much detail in the wings but also have the body visible. You also need to include the image in an article to be eligiable for featured picture status. Noodle snacks (talk) 05:42, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- I've uploaded an alternative version of it. You can see it on the image page or here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Wings_of_a_dragonfly2.jpg
- Whilst the image has some asthetic value it is not particularly sharp, there is some CA and the main subject is not entirely in focus. There are lots of images on the dragonfly page that show as much detail in the wings but also have the body visible. You also need to include the image in an article to be eligiable for featured picture status. Noodle snacks (talk) 05:42, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Seconder