Jump to content

User talk:Chunky Rice: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Chunky Rice (talk | contribs)
5,262 edits
→Really?: respond
Notification: tagging for deletion of File:Vegas Showdown.JPG. (TW)
 
(36 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{busy}}
{{busy}}
[[User talk:Chunky Rice/Archive 1|Archive 1]] - March 6, 2007 - October 15, 2007
[[User talk:Chunky Rice/Archive 1|Archive 1]] - March 6, 2007 - October 15, 2007<br>
[[User talk:Chunky Rice/Archive 2|Archive 2]] - October 17, 2007 - March 25, 2009<br>
[[User talk:Chunky Rice/Archive 3|Archive 3]] - April 7, 2009 - November 23, 2015
__FORCETOC__
__FORCETOC__


== Buffy the Vampire Slayer Collectible Card Game ==


== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] ==
If you can provide details of your sources (paper sources work fine) I'm going to ask fort that deletion to be overthrown, as IMHO it was IDONTLIKEIT bullshit, and was rushed through before a serious attempt to see if the article could meet [[WP:N]] could be made. [[User:Artw|Artw]] 17:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
: TBH I would have waited until you had the sources in hand, but even if it does take longer and the deletion is upheld theres no reason the article can't be listed for review again. [[User:Artw|Artw]] 18:07, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
:: Well that worked better than I thought it would - good on you! [[User:Artw|Artw]] 21:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
::: I've added one ref, which will help a lot, though if we could gert those print refs in it would be rock solid. TBH if the afd runs properly I don;t really see deletion being a very likely outcome. [[User:Artw|Artw]] 22:28, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
== Summary? ==
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691991546 -->


== [[WP:ACE2016|ArbCom Elections 2016]]: Voting now open! ==
I don't understand how that is nessercy. Anyway, you seem like a positive editor so I am inviting you to join my wiki, the [http://alienresearch.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page Alien research Wiki] a research project on alien theories, life, allegations and so on. Opinions and original research is welcome. [[User:The sunder king|The sunder king]] 17:45, 18 October 2007 (UTC)


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Chunky Rice. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2016|2016 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
:Well thanks for your warning anyway, but a "blockable offense"? that makes blocking sound like somekind of law. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:The sunder king|The sunder king]] ([[User talk:The sunder king|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/The sunder king|contribs]]) 17:51, 18 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== Removed comment ==


If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2016/Candidates|the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/399|the voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
You told him to go away and cool off right after he got blocked for 24 hours. Seemed like pouring gas on the fire...--[[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs]] 19:30, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
:I was hoping you'd spot it yourself, after I called attention to it. I was trying to keep it as quiet as possible, so as not to aggravate things further.--[[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs]] 20:27, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/8&oldid=750548963 -->
==Image copyright problem with File:Star Wars Pocketmodel.JPG==
[[Image:Copyright-problem.svg|64px|left|alt=Image Copyright problem|link=]]
Thank you for uploading [[:File:Star Wars Pocketmodel.JPG]].


This image is a [[derivative work]], containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
== Violet Blue (author) ==


While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.
Thanks for chiming in on the VB talk page. I'm concerned about EscalenteXP posting personal information about one of the other editors (WikiWikiMoore's real name, presumably) but I'm not sure about the protocol for dealing with it. What do I do? Can I delete it from their comment? Can an admin? Thanks, [[User:KathrynA|KathrynA]] 20:04, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


Wikipedia takes [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright]] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the '''license''' and the '''source''' of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a '''[[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags|copyright tag]]''' to the [[Help:Image page|image description page]].
== WP:RFA ==
I've left a comment [[WP:RFA#OrangeMike|there]]. Regards, [[User:Rudget|<font size="+1">''R''</font>udget]] <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rudget|zŋ]]</sub> 18:32, 14 November 2007 (UTC)


If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Chunky_Rice}} your upload log].
==Notability templates discussion==
Thanks for contributing to my discussion with Gavin.collins regarding the importance and notability tags. Feel free to butt into my discussions anytime, especially if I'm wrong about something and need to be corrected. :) [[User:Rray|Rray]] ([[User talk:Rray|talk]]) 17:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)


If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. {{You can request undeletion}} Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice --> [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 14:35, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
==My apologies==
==Image copyright problem with File:Tigris and Euphrates game.JPG==
...for taking out my frustration at the edit-warring on only you. Though you were culpable, pointing fingers rarely helps when hands on keyboard are more needed to fix the problem. Again, my apologies. - [[User:Arcayne|<span style="color:black">'''Arcayne'''</span>]] [[User talk:Arcayne|<small><span style="color:gray">(<sup>'''cast a spell'''</sup>)</span></small>]] 13:48, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
[[Image:Copyright-problem.svg|64px|left|alt=Image Copyright problem|link=]]
==AfD nomination of [[Erection]]==
Thank you for uploading [[:File:Tigris and Euphrates game.JPG]].
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|left|48px|]]An editor has nominated [[Erection]], an article on which you have worked or that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion process|deletion]]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "[[WP:NOT|What Wikipedia is not]]").


This image is a [[derivative work]], containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at {{#if:Erection | [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erection]] | [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erection]] }} and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).


While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the [[WP:AfD|articles for deletion]] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.<!-- Template:AFDNote --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 19:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


Wikipedia takes [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright]] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the '''license''' and the '''source''' of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a '''[[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags|copyright tag]]''' to the [[Help:Image page|image description page]].
Send some discussion to me!!! i just got here and am bored ~~ <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:21mandy21|21mandy21]] ([[User talk:21mandy21|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/21mandy21|contribs]]) 23:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Chunky_Rice}} your upload log].
== Command & Conquer Factions deletion nomination ==


If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. {{You can request undeletion}} Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice --> [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 14:35, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Could you perhaps also provide alternatives as to which deletion tags are more appropriate then? I've summarized my rationale on the article's talk page. [[Special:Contributions/84.192.112.199|84.192.112.199]] ([[User talk:84.192.112.199|talk]]) 22:46, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
==Image copyright problem with File:To Court the King game.JPG==
[[Image:Copyright-problem.svg|64px|left|alt=Image Copyright problem|link=]]
Thank you for uploading [[:File:To Court the King game.JPG]].


This image is a [[derivative work]], containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
: Yes, I was reading up on the help files pending your response, and added a "prod" tag, which should be the correct tag this time around. The issue with this article seems to be that it consists entirely out of already existing content from other articles, mixed in with the page creator's personal interpretations on the subject, rather than the sourced analysis the parent articles provide. Seems both a bit redundant and unnessary. [[Special:Contributions/84.192.112.199|84.192.112.199]] ([[User talk:84.192.112.199|talk]]) 22:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)


While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.
== Eufeeds notability ==


Wikipedia takes [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright]] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the '''license''' and the '''source''' of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a '''[[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags|copyright tag]]''' to the [[Help:Image page|image description page]].
Thanks Chunky Rice for your reply. I examined minutely the 'Non-Critiria' and particularly the notion of 'Notability'. In my opinion Eufeeds.eu has more than one sources to prove the objective evidence of notability. There are a lot of articles on internet and the European Journalism Centre, creator of this website, is already mentioned on Wikipedia. Please note also how similar websites like Imooty are included on Wikipidia with the same kind of references of Eufeeds. Of course Eufeeds doesn't have "fame" or "importance" because is a new website but is notabily concerns the fact that it is the first rss aggregator that cover all EU countries with more than 300 newpapers feeds. Please let me know your opinion (and yor critiria of notability), because I would like to rewrite the Eufeeds page in the best way is possible. 1:02 31 January 2008 (UTC) [[User:Kugno|Kugno]]


If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Chunky_Rice}} your upload log].
== vandalizm ==


If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. {{You can request undeletion}} Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice --> [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 14:36, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
i'm not sure what you are referring to, but dont ever send me a message like that again tool. if you are talking about the clemson page, that wasn't me.. so you can go fuck yourself
==Image copyright problem with File:Through the Desert game.JPG==
[[User:Enjoisktboarding|Enjoisktboarding]] ([[User talk:Enjoisktboarding|talk]]) 21:16, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:Copyright-problem.svg|64px|left|alt=Image Copyright problem|link=]]
Thank you for uploading [[:File:Through the Desert game.JPG]].


This image is a [[derivative work]], containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
== Rampage Darts ==
([[User:Blue alert82|Blue alert82]] ([[User talk:Blue alert82|talk]]) 00:30, 19 April 2008 (UTC)) I would like to know why one of my country's largest sports organisations wikipedia article has been removed. Hopefully you can explain this to me and the rest of the darts community in my country, as we are very disturbed that someone who obviously knows little about our country has removed this notable organisations page.


While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.
== No Use For Nickels ==


Wikipedia takes [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright]] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the '''license''' and the '''source''' of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a '''[[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags|copyright tag]]''' to the [[Help:Image page|image description page]].
An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#No Use For Nickels|deletion review]] of [[:No Use For Nickels]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. [[User:Tikiwont|Tikiwont]] ([[User talk:Tikiwont|talk]]) 09:31, 21 April 2008 (UTC)


If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Chunky_Rice}} your upload log].
== Request for Mediation? ==


If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. {{You can request undeletion}} Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice --> [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 14:36, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello - I am alerting you that we are preparing a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Dungeons_%26_Dragons#Request_for_Mediation_with_Gavin.collins.3F Request for Mediation] regarding [[User:Gavin.collins|Gavin.collins]]. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 12:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
==Image copyright problem with File:Through the Desert Game close up.JPG==
[[Image:Copyright-problem.svg|64px|left|alt=Image Copyright problem|link=]]
Thank you for uploading [[:File:Through the Desert Game close up.JPG]].


This image is a [[derivative work]], containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
:I am alerting you that we are now considering a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Dungeons_%26_Dragons#Request_for_Arbitration_with_Gavin.collins.3F Request for Arbitration] regarding him as an alternative to mediation, and would like your opinion on the matter. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 13:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.
== Notability of No Use For Nickels ==


Wikipedia takes [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright]] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the '''license''' and the '''source''' of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a '''[[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags|copyright tag]]''' to the [[Help:Image page|image description page]].
Thanks for the information. Would an entry on [http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/NUFN thefreedictionary.com] be at all sufficient as a secondary source? Thanks for your time. [[User:Juliancaza|Juliancaza]] ([[User talk:Juliancaza|talk]]) 01:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Chunky_Rice}} your upload log].
==[[The Miniatures Page]]==
Sorry to bother you, but as an admin (and maybe as a lawyer, I don't know) could I get your opinion on this page? A new, so-far SPA, editor has been adding content to this page which I thought appropriate to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Miniatures_Page&diff=prev&oldid=207822913 remove] (and have removed <s>twice</s> three times now). Obviously, an article about a website is '''not''' a BLP, but this is all uncited material and does have some reference to the Editor of the site (presumeably referring to Armintrout) in the added text. Thanks. [[User:Craw-daddy|--Craw-daddy]] | [[User talk:Craw-daddy|T]] | 10:25, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
:Thanks for having a look. I guess that I'll try to keep an eye on the page and revert if/when that stuff is re-inserted. Would it be appropriate to report it to AIV if it gets re-inserted (several times)? (I ask because sometimes I'm not sure what might qualify as "vandalism" aside from the obvious things.) I can do that if/when it comes to it, I just want to know if that's the right place to report it. [[User:Craw-daddy|--Craw-daddy]] | [[User talk:Craw-daddy|T]] | 14:24, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. {{You can request undeletion}} Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice --> [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 14:37, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
== Don't bother warning ==
==Image copyright problem with File:Gheos.JPG==
[[Image:Copyright-problem.svg|64px|left|alt=Image Copyright problem|link=]]
Thank you for uploading [[:File:Gheos.JPG]].


This image is a [[derivative work]], containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
If you see a page getting edited in such a manner as was seen [[User talk:Gavin.collins|here]], don't warn the IP behind it - hardblock it. These IPs are essentially one-off VOAs. -<font color="32CD32">''[[User:Jéské Couriano|Jéské]]''</font> <font color="4682B4"><sup>([[User talk:Jéské Couriano/Discussions|v^_^v]] [[Special:Contributions/Jéské Couriano|Karistaa Usko]])</sup></font> 00:19, 25 April 2008 (UTC)


While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.
== RFA Thanks ==


Wikipedia takes [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright]] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the '''license''' and the '''source''' of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a '''[[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags|copyright tag]]''' to the [[Help:Image page|image description page]].
Thanks for your participation at my recent Request for adminship. I’ll keep your concerns in mind as I continue to work within the project. I hope you find I live up to your expectations of administrators. Best, [[User:Risker|Risker]] ([[User talk:Risker|talk]]) 16:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)


If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Chunky_Rice}} your upload log].
==Last names==
Last names are major pieces of biographical information. You can't make claims about last names without citing a reliable source. There's no disputing this. We can get an admin in here to tell you the same thing. --[[Special:Contributions/69.22.254.108|69.22.254.108]] ([[User talk:69.22.254.108|talk]]) 17:31, 16 May 2008 (UTC)


If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. {{You can request undeletion}} Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice --> [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 14:41, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
== Analogy ==
==Image copyright problem with File:Vegas Showdown.JPG==
[[Image:Copyright-problem.svg|64px|left|alt=Image Copyright problem|link=]]
Thank you for uploading [[:File:Vegas Showdown.JPG]].


This image is a [[derivative work]], containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
Kudos for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship&diff=212908245&oldid=212907896 this excellent analogy]. Hope that Malleus can see the logic. [[User:Unschool|Unschool]] ([[User talk:Unschool|talk]]) 20:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)


While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.
==[[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Running/Encyclopedia Dramatica‎]]==


Wikipedia takes [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright]] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the '''license''' and the '''source''' of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a '''[[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags|copyright tag]]''' to the [[Help:Image page|image description page]].
Hi! I just wanted to let you know that I re-closed the listing as "speedy keep" because the page creator's deletion consent was based upon an inaccurate explanation of a guideline. I began typing the closure while the discussion was open, and in no way is this intended to imply any incorrect action on your part. —[[User:David Levy|David Levy]] 23:14, 16 May 2008 (UTC)


If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Chunky_Rice}} your upload log].
==Thanks==
No, no hard feelings at all. I still remember you as the guy who helps keep [[Controversies about the word niggardly]] from falling off a cliff! I respect your opinions. Best, [[User:Noroton|Noroton]] ([[User talk:Noroton|talk]]) 23:57, 16 May 2008 (UTC)


If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. {{You can request undeletion}} Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice --> [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 14:42, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
==Top Chef citations==
I just found a citation for Dan Talde. It's not hard. Let's collaborate like Wikipedians and do this together. It'll only make the site and the article stronger. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 18:14, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

:You can't unilaterally say it's uncontroversial. If it's uncontroversial, then why doesn't the network give out their names, the way American Idol, Hell's Kitchen and others do? --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 18:28, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

::Invoking your admin status as a way to try to trump another editor is frowned upon by other admins. An admin should uphold the highest tenets of Wikipedia. And there's no mystery involved -- I'd simply post at the Admin incidents noticeboard. Is all this worth it to ''not'' give citations? --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 18:31, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

:::The vast numbers of people who will read this global encyclopedia, now and in the future, can't simply tune in. Or take your or anyone's word for it. Being able to independently confirm what an editor adds is one of the very cornerstones of Wikipedia. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 18:34, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

::::We write for people in Australia, England, South Africa, wherever. Wikipedia has a global perspective. Citations need to be something people can look up, whether it's a screengrab or a quote from a DVD commentary or whatever else, and not everyone can just tune in to see the show to see if a particular editor got the information right. Having uncited claims is dangerous and sets a bad precedent. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 18:39, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

:::::The requirement is that an edit be [[WP:VERIFY|verifiable]] to someone wanting to look it up independently.

:::::Look, then, how about this: Put a line at the top of the names saying: "Last names are not supplied by the network but are given on air during episodes." At least that way people know where the alleged last names came from. I think this is far below the standard we should be upholding, but I offer it in the spirit of collaboration and compromise. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 18:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

::::::Availability is at the heart of [[WP:VERIFY|verifiability]]. Something is available in a library, in a bookstore, online, on DVD. How can someone verify anything without having access to it? In any event, if you've found pages on Bravo.com that list the last names, then that's a verifiable source, and I thank you for going to trouble to provide it. I'm being serious, not sarcastic &mdash; tone of voice obviously gets lost in plain print, and I want to convey my sincere appreciation. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 23:36, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

:::::::I don't know what to say. I've tried being collegial and collaborative, and specifically looked for the good. I'm saddened you seem to have turned this personal. I say this because you've asked what happens if the Bravo site goes down. An admin knows: It's the same as with any other online source that goes down. An admin knows this, so what am I to conclude about your singling out a point already covered under Wikipedia policies and guidelines?

:::::::I've never encountered an admin who actively campaigns against fuller, verifiable citations. I'll simply trust that you won't go out of your way to ''remove'' citations that other editors put in.--[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 00:12, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

::::::::Now, really, there was no need for the snide comments and to make assumptions about me. That's very disappointing. I made an assumption myself, but it was one of good faith: That an admin would know [[WP:DEADREF]].

::::::::I also find it troubling that you rationalize low-bar research techniques as "common sense."

::::::::Perhaps we can figuratively shake hands, walk away, and leave things be. Fair enough? Shake? No hard feelings? --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 00:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

:::::::::You're an OK guy, CR. I mean that. Whatever our differing policy interpretations, I'm glad to see someone taking this encyclopedic endeavor seriously, taking time to discuss the big picture, and caring, ultimately, about digging out facts. With regards to a colleague, --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 00:58, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

== KathrynA and Violet Blue ==

Replied in my talk section. --[[User:BenBurch|BenBurch]] ([[User talk:BenBurch|talk]]) 17:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

== Butserfest ==
Sorry if this isn't where i am supposed to ask this but I am new to all this and I am finding it all a bit complicated. How could I strengthen my article butserfest to make it more "notable". Thanks for your time{{unsigned|Jtoppy}}

== use of db-* ==
I got a message from you that said I should always put something in the comment field. I would think that using the appropriate tag, like db-bio, would be enough.
[[User:BobBagwill|BobBagwill]] ([[User talk:BobBagwill|talk]]) 16:45, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

== thanks for helping me clear the poor CSDs ==

i.e. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frans_Parsons&action=history here]. I'm working on them as well. Something's [[WP:DUCK|ducky]]. <sub>[[User_talk:Travellingcari|TravellingCari]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Travellingcari|the Busy Bee]]</sup> 17:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

== [[Whittard of Chelsea]] ==

Thanks for rejecting this speedy delete. The article was originally deleted by another admin a while back, just as I was removing the tags to decline!! I rewrote and referenced it as, frankly, any company established in 1886 with 160 stores and part of the English tea trade history seems inherently notable. Again, thank you. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Pedro|<b>Pedro</b>]] : [[User_talk:Pedro|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;Chat&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 17:43, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

:Agreed, I put some sources on the talk page if someone wants to work on it. <sub>[[User_talk:Travellingcari|TravellingCari]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Travellingcari|the Busy Bee]]</sup> 17:46, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

== sports bio flagging ==

So the most I should have done was to flag them as a rugbyleague-bio-stub? Should I create a SouthAfrica-rugbyleague-bio-stub? --[[User:BobBagwill|BobBagwill]] ([[User talk:BobBagwill|talk]]) 17:53, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

== Violet Blue Author ==

Hello So I am asking you as you have helped before and I don't know the correct venue to bring this up. (Feel free to point me to where I should be talking about this. Over at the Violet article there is more edit waring and one player BenBurch is attacking me directly for not reason I can see. He also went on to my talk page and added a CIO warning and then in the Violet Blue talk page suggested that I should ignored because "a admin" warned me. This seems like manipulation of wikipidea and personal attacks on me. It would be great if you could respond on my talk page. Thank[[User:Wikiwikimoore|Wikiwikimoore]] ([[User talk:Wikiwikimoore|talk]])

:: Is there a way to talk to you privately or semi privately? I need to ask if it is appropriate to post something publicly but don't know how to ask the question with out making the information public. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Wikiwikimoore|Wikiwikimoore]] ([[User talk:Wikiwikimoore|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Wikiwikimoore|contribs]]) 09:05, 3 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Image source problem with Image:7_of_hearts_-_metastasis.JPG==
[[Image:Nuvola apps important blue.svg|64px|left|Image Copyright problem]]
Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:7_of_hearts_-_metastasis.JPG]]'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the [[copyright]] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the [[GFDL]]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at [[Wikipedia:Non-free content]], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use]]. See [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags]] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=upload&user=Chunky_Rice this link]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the image is copyrighted under a [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|non-free license]] (per [[Wikipedia:Fair use]]) then '''the image will be deleted [[WP:CSD#I7|48 hours]] after 06:45, 3 July 2008 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> [[User:OsamaK|O]][[User talk:OsamaK|sama]][[Special:Contributions/OsamaK|K]] 06:45, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

: The additional info is ''not'' enough. The source is simply the answer of "Where did you find this image?" or "If a reader (or researcher) wants to [[WP:V|verify]] the trust of this image, Where should he go?". We're all here to make Wikipedia (That anyone can edit) better, let's make it more trust! Banner was removed, Everyone is welcome to talk with me :), I have added it (if I didn't forget) when I was running an image bot.--[[User:OsamaK|O]][[User talk:OsamaK|sama]][[Special:Contributions/OsamaK|K]] 19:20, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

== New funny business about card games/sports ==

Greetings! As you have likely seen on your user page, there is a new account active ([[User:Alexandra Georgiana Eremia]]) that is starting up with the card game/card sport business as well as vandalizing some other user accounts. (See, in particular, the "contributions" to the user pages/archinves of [[User:Barneca]]). I would start reverting all of this stuff, but some of it would be easier for someone with rollback and/or admin powers, such as the redirect of Barneca's talk page. As I think I have pointed to before, this kind of activity has been documented at [[User:Barneca/watch/bvr]]. Thanks in advance! [[User:Craw-daddy|--Craw-daddy]] | [[User talk:Craw-daddy|T]] | 15:53, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
:Hmmm, never mind, [[User:Oxymoron83|Oxymoron83]] was quick onto the scene. :) Thanks anyway! [[User:Craw-daddy|--Craw-daddy]] | [[User talk:Craw-daddy|T]] | 16:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

==Image source problem with Image:7_of_hearts_-_metastasis.JPG==
[[Image:Nuvola apps important blue.svg|64px|left|Image Copyright problem]]
Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:7_of_hearts_-_metastasis.JPG]]'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the [[copyright]] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the [[GFDL]]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at [[Wikipedia:Non-free content]], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use]]. See [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags]] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=upload&user=Chunky_Rice this link]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the image is copyrighted under a [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|non-free license]] (per [[Wikipedia:Fair use]]) then '''the image will be deleted [[WP:CSD#I7|48 hours]] after 21:40, 11 July 2008 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> [[User:OsamaK|O]][[User talk:OsamaK|sama]][[Special:Contributions/OsamaK|K]] 21:40, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

: Oh yeah! I think it still lacks a source. I tag it twice because I forgot removing it from my list.. Please review it again, and comment in Image talk, An admin will say his view of policy.--[[User:OsamaK|O]][[User talk:OsamaK|sama]][[Special:Contributions/OsamaK|K]] 21:43, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

::Most images, that uploaded to Wikipedia, includes: ''"Scanned from"'', ''"Taken from"'', or ''"Found on"'' a website, book, or self-work. That's it.--[[User:OsamaK|O]][[User talk:OsamaK|sama]][[Special:Contributions/OsamaK|K]] 07:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

: The question is ''not'' who scanned it. It's: Where is it existing.. I think you did it well. Thank you.--[[User:OsamaK|O]][[User talk:OsamaK|sama]][[Special:Contributions/OsamaK|K]] 19:51, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

== Violet Blue (author) ==

Can you take a look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AN#Good_editor_being_forced_away_by_legal_threats.3F this thread] at AN regarding [[Violet Blue (author)]] and offer any insight or knowledge on the situation? Thanks. [[User:KnightLago|KnightLago]] ([[User talk:KnightLago|talk]]) 00:32, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


== Respect Thread Conversions ==

I'm looking for folks to help convert Respect Threads to wiki formatting on Project Fanboy: WikiFans. Respect Threads, showcase scans of feats performed by comic book characters and have gained an audience on several comic book message boards. A few other wiki editors and myself are trying to convert them from the unprofessional look of a bunch of posts on a message board to the formatting common with WikiMedia wiki's. To view an example of what we're doing, here is a link to [http://www.projectfanboy.com/wikifans/index.php/Respect:_Silver_Surfer Respect Silver Surfer].

I was wondering if you might have time to contribute your comic book knowledge and/or scans of comic book characters performing feats, and help us out with our Respect Articles project?[[User:Millennium Cowboy|Millennium Cowboy]] ([[User talk:Millennium Cowboy|talk]]) 02:54, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

== [[Dumbth]] ==

I'm sorry, but I don't see any context here. It's just, "Dumbth is a term coined by American commedian Steve Allen". It tells you nothing. Heck, I think, "He is a funny man with a red car" tells you more. I ask you to reconsider speedying this. --[[User:UsaSatsui|UsaSatsui]] ([[User talk:UsaSatsui|talk]]) 21:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

==User is being bullied==
I have been monitoring the [[telescope]] article [[Talk: Telescope|talkpage]] and clearly [[user: InternetHero]] feels distressed by the continuous edit warring that is happening in the article. The issue is the invention of the telescope and its history. Other articles state that Arab scientists created the telescope. I have looked and discussed and researched the issue and I too feel insulted when the debate is discussed. However I have seen that some users have reverted many of the above users edit even when he provided citations. I think this is the most important issue. Relevant information is not being added and clearly violates [[WP:POV]]. I have sources to support that above users statements with citations. [[user:DigitalC]] and [[user:Deamon138]] are the ones doing so.

Furthermore there is no mention on the History of the telescope within the article, just a consensus on European involvement only whereas the Timeline of the Telescope clearly states Egyption, Islamic and Italian scienctists involvement among a few others. I will the raising the issue with another admin also. [[User:LOTRrules|<font color="blue">'''Lord of Moria (Avicenna)'''</font>]] <sub>[[User talk:LOTRrules|'''<font color="purple">Talk</font>''']]</sub> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/LOTRrules|'''<font color="gold">'''Contribs'''</font>''']]</sup> 19:59, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

:This matter is at [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/InternetHero]], and comments may be added there. FYI. --[[User:Hordaland|Hordaland]] ([[User talk:Hordaland|talk]]) 14:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

==ANI notice==
Thanks for the heads up! [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 22:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

== Wikipedia voting question ==

Hi, sorry to bother you, but you've helped me out in the past and I don't really know who to turn to regarding certain Wikipedia questions. An article I worked on ([[Samwell (entertainer)|Samwell]]) is up for deletion. It's been up for about a year and has been added to and modified, mostly for the better, so I'd really like the article to stay put. My question is this: who usually ends up voting when an article is up for deletion? How do people know there's a vote taking place? I love that Wikipedia is a huge democracy, but I don't understand how users know what to vote for or when. Thanks for your time, I know you're busy. [[User:Shatner1|Shatner1]] ([[User talk:Shatner1|talk]]) 05:15, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
:I'll answer this, if you do not mind, Chunky. People know the article is up for deletion through both an AfD notice at the top of the page and (usually) an AfD notification on the talk page (if they've been involved in editing it). Also, please note that AfD is not a vote; the main factor administrators look at is the persuasiveness of the arguments for keeping or deleting. -<font color="32CD32">''[[User:Jéské Couriano|Jéské]]''</font> <font color="4682B4"><sup>([[User talk:Jéské Couriano/Discussions|v^_^v]] [[Special:Contributions/Jéské Couriano|Bodging WP edit by edit]])</sup></font> 05:30, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

==[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/13th Child|13th Child AFD (Group horror AFD)]]==

You need to add the AfD notice to each of the nominated articles for proper notification. -[[User:Chunky Rice|Chunky Rice]] ([[User talk:Chunky Rice|talk]]) 22:22, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

: Several of us have recommended speedy closure of your AFD due to improper use of the bulk nomination process. You can't nominate a group of unconnected motion pictures because it creates a real mess. I recommend you request closure of the current AFD and renominate each one separately. I know it's a lot of work, but every motion picture has different issues when it comes to establishing notability. Cheers. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] ([[User talk:23skidoo|talk]]) 02:40, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

:: Ok, thanks for the information you two. Normally i never need to nominate articles in a group wise fashion though i have seen it happen before. I fully agree that the only connection between these articles is that they were all contested by one and the same user. The nomination of all of those together was more to keep things organized by allowing one place to discuss all of them; But i agree that the group AFD makes it rather hard to comment on them as the issues with the articles is not the same.

:: It seems the articles have already been nominated for AFD separately so i closed this AFD as a procedural keep. But seeing this entire situation i think the PROD template needs a haul over; Either removal of it should be limited to valid reasons, or we should just stick with AFD templates. Watching each and every page to see if a prod remains in place is simply not a time saver. [[User:Excirial|<font color="191970">'''Excirial''']]</font><sup> ([[User talk:Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Talk</font>]],[[Special:Contributions/Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Contribs</font>]])</sup> 05:50, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

== How am I attacking you??? ==

I just asked you a question! How is that attacking you??? [[User:Ministry of Love|miniluv]] ([[User talk:Ministry of Love|talk]]) 21:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
:As you may notice, I've asked Ministry of Love to disengage from this conflict on his talk page, and I suggest that you do the same. I don't see this line of discussion going anywhere productive. I think that someone who he doesn't feel directly in conflict with may have an easier time explaining Wikipedia policies and guidelines. -[[User:Chunky Rice|Chunky Rice]] ([[User talk:Chunky Rice|talk]]) 22:08, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

:: Thanks for that rice. I think that it is indeed better that someone else takes over this, as i assume Mililuv's opinions about me are set in stone by now. And in all honesty i cannot blame him for that; while i have the feeling i'm only trying to help by explaining whats wrong (and at the same time following the prod policy) it could easily be misconceived for trying to point out errors while trying to delete the previously prodded articles no matter what. Its likewise the other way around: By now i already outed that my opinion about incivility and seeking confrontation, but that is at the same time just an opinion which can just as well be untrue. I guess there is to much prejudice on both sides by now to allow for a friendly discussion.

:: For the matter i left a note at [[User talk:Barton Foley]], the editor who originally placed the prods asking him if he would want to look into the matter of tagging the articles if necessarily. As said before i would normally just check them for notability myself, but at this time i think that any new AFD (No matter if its correct) from me on one these articles would (Rightfully) fall under [[WP:COI]] or [[WP:STALK|Harassment]]. I don't feel i have a special bias against these articles, but seeing the situation as is, its better for me to disengage from both the discussion and involvement with these articles as a whole. Thanks again for offering to take over. [[User:Excirial|<font color="191970">'''Excirial''']]</font><sup> ([[User talk:Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Talk</font>]],[[Special:Contributions/Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Contribs</font>]])</sup> 06:27, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

== The situation around [[User:Ministry of Love]]. ==

Hi rice!

Just to inform you, [[User:Barton Foley]] decided to start an AFD for [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2008_September_18#13th_Child the 13th child]. As this is a second nomination (The previous one was procedurally kept) he asked me to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Excirial#AfD_13th_Child help him] with the technicalities of the nomination itself. However it seems that Ministry of Love interpreted that assistance as another attempts of mine to remove the article, and is currently arguing with baron (on his talk page) and Kafziel (on ANI) over what baron has done. (I expected that might happen, but i am not going to ignore a question on how things must be done simply because of an interpretation. Though i find it rather annoying that this is dragging another editor in who has completely no involvement with or blame regarding this situation).

As the situation around the horror related articles is growing rather large and complex (Its still discussed at ANI, the AFD, and several talk pages) Ministry of Love is starting to ask questions about my motivations and why i am trying to "bully" him. At the same time he seems rather lost in a forest of rules. I don't think he understands the notability guideline as he tried to improve a few articles with, well, nothing that falls under that guideline whatsoever. At the same time he seems to misunderstand the procedural keep from the previous AFD was not a keep for the individual articles, but rather a means of closing the AFD due to no inter-relationships between the articles. While i kind of wanted to give him a breakdown of what happened so far to explain why certain steps have been taken (So he might get some idea what is doing on), i think that me doing that would do more harm then good.

However as he is likely to ask you next, feel free to send me a message if you need to know my reasoning for what has been done so far. By now i guess we are at a level that could warrant a mediation or dispute resolution request, but then again it would add another layer of complexity to a situation that is more based on misunderstanding and misintrepretation then anything else. [[User:Excirial|<font color="191970">'''Excirial''']]</font><sup> ([[User talk:Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Talk</font>]],[[Special:Contributions/Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Contribs</font>]])</sup> 17:54, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
:So it's like that, is it?? I'm not going to argue with Excircial here on Sticky Rice's page but I do wish someone would take a good long look at how I've been treated here. I'm just a girl who likes horror movies. I saw that someone was trying to delete [[7eventy 5ive]] which is one of the few afrocentric horror movies ever made. I did what it said on the notice and removed it. No sooner did I do that than people started trying bamboozle me with all kinds of false information and thinly veiled threats!!! Take a look at my page!!! You'll see why I feel like I'm being bullied!! Now my actions are being unnecessarily characterised as "attacks" and "arguing"!! I'm not attacking anyone and I'm not arguing with anyone!! I'm just trying to improve horror movie articles but that seems to be causing everyone a huge problem. [[User:Ministry of Love|miniluv]] ([[User talk:Ministry of Love|talk]]) 21:38, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

:: I left a rather long section on [[User:Ministry of Love|miniluv's]] talk page which tries to explain what happened here. I hope that this time we are a bit more on the same wavelengths when trying to communicate, and i hope that this response clears the cloudy sky between us a little bit. I have no problems whatsoever if a clear vandal is angry at me, but i rather don't like disagreements with someone of who is clearly trying to be a constructive editor. Even more so when the entire disagreement is nothing more then misunderstanding and quite likely caused by lack of good faith from my side. [[User:Excirial|<font color="191970">'''Excirial''']]</font><sup> ([[User talk:Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Talk</font>]],[[Special:Contributions/Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Contribs</font>]])</sup> 11:29, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

== [[Brandon Michael Vayda]] ==

Hi Chunky!! Can you please take a look at the history of [[Brandon Michael Vayda]]??? I think the process got a little messed up in the frenzy to undo anything I had touched. Thank you!!! [[User:Ministry of Love|miniluv]] ([[User talk:Ministry of Love|talk]]) 20:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

== D&D articles for Wikipedia 0.7 ==

Hi there! :)

As someone who's worked on D&D and/or RPG articles before, I'm inviting you to participate in our goal to both improve articles that have been selected to be placed in the next Wikipedia DVD release, as well as nominate more to be selected for this project. Please see the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons#Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for D&D|WikiProject D&D talk page]] for more details. :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 05:38, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

== Stalking me? ==

Certainly not! You're doing your best for the project, same as I. (And frankly, compared to some folks here, you're not all that much of an inclusionist; some folks here have no more judgement than my buddy [[Forrest J Ackerman|Forry Ackerman]]!) --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]] &#x007C; [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 16:21, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

== Gavin.collins RFC/U ==

Hello. A [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct|request for comment on user conduct]] has recently been filed regarding [[User:Gavin.collins|Gavin.collins]]. Since you had been involved in discussions prior to his Request for Mediation, I thought that you would want to know. You can see the RFC/U [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Gavin.collins 2|here]]. Thank you. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 00:55, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

== Recent name change of article to [[Controversies concerning the word "niggardly"]] ==

I'm not sure how much this matters to you now, but back in '07 you commented on the name of this article from [[Controversies about the word niggardly]] (previous discussion [[Controversies about the word niggardly#Requested move|here]] and two sections down as well). Someone just unilaterally changed the name, and I'm objecting, for now, at that person's talk page.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADanieltiger45&diff=261924095&oldid=216615879] It's not a bigggie, but if you have an opinion and think it's worth it, please chime in at [[Talk:Controversies concerning the word "niggardly"#Recent name change]] and maybe we can settle it easily. I expect it'll be amicable. Thanks. -- [[User:Noroton|Noroton]] ([[User talk:Noroton|talk]]) 18:10, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

== Acquire board game ==

I'm looking for the version of acquire that is in one of your pictures. Which version is it? It's the version with raised tiles. Thanks, Dorothy - duffy@byulaw.net <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.182.219.132|67.182.219.132]] ([[User talk:67.182.219.132|talk]]) 23:23, 19 January 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


==Spam?==
Spammy?! Dont ya think thats a bit much? It needs a redo. But first it needs to be deleted so we can start from scratch. Still... Spammy? What kinda name is that? I started that page lol. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/69.206.224.176|69.206.224.176]] ([[User talk:69.206.224.176|talk]]) 15:00, 5 February 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Chunky Rice? ==

It's good you explained it. I was about to ask if [[Condoleezza Rice]] had that nickname when she was a bit pudgy in her younger years. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]] 23:42, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

== Your request ==

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Kww_2&diff=282378748&oldid=282378285 has been granted].&mdash;[[User:Kww|Kww]]([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 17:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

== Really? ==

You're an admin? And you so completely fail to understand the goals and the priorities of the project? How bizarre. Anyway, I won't war over it, so do whatever you think you have to do. But I think the right answer here is clear. Wikipedia is not a free homepage provider. [[User:Friday|Friday]] [[User talk:Friday|(talk)]] 17:22, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
:Given how you handle your tools, I'll wear your disdain as a badge of honor. -[[User:Chunky Rice|Chunky Rice]] ([[User talk:Chunky Rice#top|talk]]) 17:36, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:42, 6 June 2017

Archive 1 - March 6, 2007 - October 15, 2007
Archive 2 - October 17, 2007 - March 25, 2009
Archive 3 - April 7, 2009 - November 23, 2015


ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Chunky Rice. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Star Wars Pocketmodel.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 14:35, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Tigris and Euphrates game.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 14:35, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:To Court the King game.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 14:36, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Through the Desert game.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 14:36, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Through the Desert Game close up.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 14:37, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Gheos.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 14:41, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Vegas Showdown.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 14:42, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chunky_Rice&oldid=784112837"