Jump to content

Relative income hypothesis: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 72.47.139.30 (talk) unexplained removal of content (HG)
accidentally added reference Undid revision 1264765905 by KhubsuratInsaan (talk)
Tags: Undo references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
 
(30 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Economic theory}}
Developed by [[James Duesenberry]], the '''relative income hypothesis''' states that individual’s attitude to [[Consumption (economics)|consumption]] and [[saving]] is dictated more by his income in relation to others than by abstract [[standard of living]]. So an individual is less concerned with absolute level of consumption than by relative levels. The percentage of income consumed by an individual depends on his percentile position within the income distribution.
The '''relative income hypothesis''' was developed by [[James Duesenberry]] in 1949. It consists of two separate consumption hypothesis.


The first hypothesis states that an individual's attitude to [[consumption (economics)|consumption]] is dictated more by their income in relation to others than by an abstract [[standard of living]]. The percentage of income consumed by an individual depends on their percentile position within the [[income distribution]].
Secondly it hypothesises that the present consumption is not influenced merely by present levels of absolute and relative income, but also by levels of consumption attained in previous period. It is difficult for a family to reduce a level of consumption once attained. The [[aggregate ratio]] of consumption to income is assumed to depend on the level of present income relative to past peak income.


The second hypothesis states that the present consumption is influenced not merely by present levels of absolute and relative income but also by levels of consumption attained in a previous period. In Duesenberry's opinion, it is difficult for a family to reduce a level of consumption once it is attained. The aggregate ratio of consumption to income is assumed to depend on the level of present income relative to past peak income.
==References==
Duesenberry, J. S. ''Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behaviour''. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1949.


==Sources==
[[Category:Economics]]
*Duesenberry, J. S. ''Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behaviour''. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1949.[https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.84155/page/n7]
*Frank, Robert H., 2005. “The Mysterious Disappearance of James Duesenberry,” The New York Times, June 9, 2005.
*Hollander, Heinz, 2001. “On the validity of utility statements: standard theory versus Duesenberry’s,” Journal of economic Behavior & Organization 45, 3: 227–249.
*{{cite journal|author=McCormick, Ken|year=2018|title=James Duesenberry as a practitioner of behavioral economics|journal=Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy|volume=2|issue=1|pages=13–18|url=https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:beh:jbepv1:v:2:y:2018:i:1:p:13-18}}


{{Consumption}}
{{Consumption}}


[[Category:Economic theories]]
{{finance-stub}}
[[Category:Behavioral economics]]
[[Category:Hypotheses]]



[[pl:Hipoteza dochodu relatywnego]]
{{finance-stub}}

Latest revision as of 11:36, 23 December 2024

The relative income hypothesis was developed by James Duesenberry in 1949. It consists of two separate consumption hypothesis.

The first hypothesis states that an individual's attitude to consumption is dictated more by their income in relation to others than by an abstract standard of living. The percentage of income consumed by an individual depends on their percentile position within the income distribution.

The second hypothesis states that the present consumption is influenced not merely by present levels of absolute and relative income but also by levels of consumption attained in a previous period. In Duesenberry's opinion, it is difficult for a family to reduce a level of consumption once it is attained. The aggregate ratio of consumption to income is assumed to depend on the level of present income relative to past peak income.

Sources

[edit]
  • Duesenberry, J. S. Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behaviour. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1949.[1]
  • Frank, Robert H., 2005. “The Mysterious Disappearance of James Duesenberry,” The New York Times, June 9, 2005.
  • Hollander, Heinz, 2001. “On the validity of utility statements: standard theory versus Duesenberry’s,” Journal of economic Behavior & Organization 45, 3: 227–249.
  • McCormick, Ken (2018). "James Duesenberry as a practitioner of behavioral economics". Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy. 2 (1): 13–18.