Fault-tolerant messaging: Difference between revisions
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v2.0beta15) |
m Reverted 1 edit by 176.29.156.160 (talk) to last revision by Kvng |
||
(19 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Multiple issues| |
|||
'''Fault Tolerant Messaging''' or Failover Abstraction is the ability to transparently “failover” |
|||
{{Advert|date=October 2021}} |
|||
a call or request from one service transport protocol to another upon failure with no |
|||
{{Unreferenced|date=November 2023}} |
|||
changes to the functional code or business logic implementation. In [[elemenope]], this ability to “failover” is achieved via Dispatcher Failover [DFo] configuration. The [[elemenope]] framework has the ability to configure multiple nested failover chains. A typical use of the DFo functionality is the |
|||
{{merge to|Reliability (computer networking)|date=August 2024|discuss=Talk:Reliability_(computer_networking)#Merge_from_Fault-tolerant_messaging}} |
|||
failover from a synchronous service transport protocol to an asynchronous service transport |
|||
}} |
|||
protocol. For instance, when an XML-RPC service is down, the messages may be failed |
|||
over to an asynchronous JMS queue implementation for processing when the service is |
|||
available. |
|||
'''Fault Tolerant Messaging''' in the context of computer systems and networks, refers to a design approach and set of techniques aimed at ensuring reliable and continuous communication between components or nodes even in the presence of errors or failures. This concept is especially critical in distributed systems, where components may be geographically dispersed and interconnected through networks, making them susceptible to various potential points of failure. |
|||
==Sources== |
|||
* [https://www.scribd.com/document/4736435/elemenope-userguide-v1-2 elemenope User Guide] |
|||
⚫ | |||
[[elemenope]] |
|||
The primary objective of fault-tolerant messaging is to maintain the integrity and availability of information exchange among system components, even when some components or communication channels encounter disruptions or errors. These errors may arise from hardware failures, network outages, software bugs, or other unexpected events. |
|||
==External links== |
|||
''As of 29 May 2007, this article is derived in whole or in part from [http://elemenope.org/doc/userguide/LICENSE The Elemenope User Guide]. The copyright holder has licensed the content utilized under [[Wikipedia:Text of the GNU Free Documentation License|GFDL]]. All relevant terms must be followed.'' |
|||
Key characteristics and mechanisms commonly employed in fault-tolerant messaging include: |
|||
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20070205042557/http://www.elemenope.org/ elemenope home page] |
|||
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20070928071913/http://elemenope.org/doc/userguide/userguide-1.1.pdf elemenope User Guide] |
|||
# Redundancy: One of the fundamental principles of fault tolerance is redundancy, which involves duplicating critical components or data to create backup copies. Redundant systems can seamlessly take over the responsibilities of failed components, ensuring continuous operation and mitigating the impact of failures. |
|||
# Error Detection and Correction: Fault-tolerant messaging systems often incorporate mechanisms to detect errors, such as checksums or error-detection codes, enabling them to identify corrupted or incomplete data. Moreover, error correction techniques like [[Forward Error Correction]] (FEC) may be utilized to reconstruct missing or damaged data. |
|||
# Message Acknowledgment and Retransmission: To ensure the reliable delivery of messages, fault-tolerant messaging protocols often include acknowledgment mechanisms. When a sender transmits a message, the receiver acknowledges its receipt, and if no acknowledgment is received, the sender may retransmit the message. |
|||
# Timeouts and Heartbeats: Timeout mechanisms are used to detect unresponsive or stalled communication channels. If a component does not receive a response within a specified time frame, it may trigger appropriate actions, such as retrying the communication or activating failover procedures. Heartbeats, or periodic status messages, are often employed to indicate that a component is still operational. |
|||
# Error Recovery and Fault Isolation: Fault-tolerant messaging systems implement procedures to recover from errors gracefully. This may involve reconfiguring the system to bypass failed components, isolating faults, or initiating self-repair processes. |
|||
# Load Balancing: In distributed systems, [[Load balancing (computing)|load balancing]] techniques distribute the workload across multiple components to avoid overburdening any single node and reduce the risk of individual component failures affecting the entire system. |
|||
# Consistency and Replication: In replicated environments, maintaining data consistency across multiple copies is essential. Techniques like two-phase commit and quorum-based approaches help ensure consistency in distributed systems. |
|||
Several common protocols and technologies are employed to provide fault-tolerant messaging in distributed systems. These protocols are designed to ensure reliable communication, error detection and correction, and seamless failover mechanisms. Some of the most widely used protocols for fault-tolerant messaging include: |
|||
# [[Transmission Control Protocol]] (TCP): TCP is a reliable, connection-oriented protocol that ensures data delivery and integrity. It provides acknowledgment mechanisms, retransmission of lost packets, and flow control to manage data transfer between communicating nodes. |
|||
# [[Advanced Message Queuing Protocol]] (AMQP): AMQP is an open standard messaging protocol that facilitates message-oriented communication between applications. It supports reliable message delivery, acknowledgment, and queuing mechanisms to ensure fault tolerance in message processing. |
|||
# [[Message Queuing Telemetry Transport]] (MQTT): MQTT is a lightweight messaging protocol often used in [[Internet of Things]] (IoT) applications. It supports [[quality of service]] levels for message delivery, including guaranteed delivery, making it fault-tolerant in unreliable network conditions. |
|||
# WebSockets: WebSockets provide a persistent, bidirectional communication channel between clients and servers. They can be utilized with custom error handling and retry mechanisms to enhance fault tolerance in real-time web applications. |
|||
# [[Apache Kafka]]: Kafka is a distributed streaming platform that provides fault tolerance through replication and partitioning of data. It is widely used for real-time data streaming and processing in distributed systems. |
|||
# Publish/Subscribe (Pub/Sub): mechanism for messaging between components. By leveraging replication capabilities, it can be made fault-tolerant. |
|||
⚫ | |||
* [[Replication (computing)]] |
|||
* [[Consistency model]] |
|||
* [[CAP theorem]] |
|||
* [[Advanced Message Queuing Protocol]] |
|||
[[Category:Software architecture]] |
[[Category:Software architecture]] |
Latest revision as of 15:15, 4 September 2024
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Fault Tolerant Messaging in the context of computer systems and networks, refers to a design approach and set of techniques aimed at ensuring reliable and continuous communication between components or nodes even in the presence of errors or failures. This concept is especially critical in distributed systems, where components may be geographically dispersed and interconnected through networks, making them susceptible to various potential points of failure.
The primary objective of fault-tolerant messaging is to maintain the integrity and availability of information exchange among system components, even when some components or communication channels encounter disruptions or errors. These errors may arise from hardware failures, network outages, software bugs, or other unexpected events.
Key characteristics and mechanisms commonly employed in fault-tolerant messaging include:
- Redundancy: One of the fundamental principles of fault tolerance is redundancy, which involves duplicating critical components or data to create backup copies. Redundant systems can seamlessly take over the responsibilities of failed components, ensuring continuous operation and mitigating the impact of failures.
- Error Detection and Correction: Fault-tolerant messaging systems often incorporate mechanisms to detect errors, such as checksums or error-detection codes, enabling them to identify corrupted or incomplete data. Moreover, error correction techniques like Forward Error Correction (FEC) may be utilized to reconstruct missing or damaged data.
- Message Acknowledgment and Retransmission: To ensure the reliable delivery of messages, fault-tolerant messaging protocols often include acknowledgment mechanisms. When a sender transmits a message, the receiver acknowledges its receipt, and if no acknowledgment is received, the sender may retransmit the message.
- Timeouts and Heartbeats: Timeout mechanisms are used to detect unresponsive or stalled communication channels. If a component does not receive a response within a specified time frame, it may trigger appropriate actions, such as retrying the communication or activating failover procedures. Heartbeats, or periodic status messages, are often employed to indicate that a component is still operational.
- Error Recovery and Fault Isolation: Fault-tolerant messaging systems implement procedures to recover from errors gracefully. This may involve reconfiguring the system to bypass failed components, isolating faults, or initiating self-repair processes.
- Load Balancing: In distributed systems, load balancing techniques distribute the workload across multiple components to avoid overburdening any single node and reduce the risk of individual component failures affecting the entire system.
- Consistency and Replication: In replicated environments, maintaining data consistency across multiple copies is essential. Techniques like two-phase commit and quorum-based approaches help ensure consistency in distributed systems.
Several common protocols and technologies are employed to provide fault-tolerant messaging in distributed systems. These protocols are designed to ensure reliable communication, error detection and correction, and seamless failover mechanisms. Some of the most widely used protocols for fault-tolerant messaging include:
- Transmission Control Protocol (TCP): TCP is a reliable, connection-oriented protocol that ensures data delivery and integrity. It provides acknowledgment mechanisms, retransmission of lost packets, and flow control to manage data transfer between communicating nodes.
- Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP): AMQP is an open standard messaging protocol that facilitates message-oriented communication between applications. It supports reliable message delivery, acknowledgment, and queuing mechanisms to ensure fault tolerance in message processing.
- Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT): MQTT is a lightweight messaging protocol often used in Internet of Things (IoT) applications. It supports quality of service levels for message delivery, including guaranteed delivery, making it fault-tolerant in unreliable network conditions.
- WebSockets: WebSockets provide a persistent, bidirectional communication channel between clients and servers. They can be utilized with custom error handling and retry mechanisms to enhance fault tolerance in real-time web applications.
- Apache Kafka: Kafka is a distributed streaming platform that provides fault tolerance through replication and partitioning of data. It is widely used for real-time data streaming and processing in distributed systems.
- Publish/Subscribe (Pub/Sub): mechanism for messaging between components. By leveraging replication capabilities, it can be made fault-tolerant.