Jump to content

Constantin Gane: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
(31 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Romanian lawyer and writer (1885-1962)}}
{{short description|Romanian lawyer and writer (1885–1962)}}
{{Infobox writer
{{Infobox writer
| name = Constantin Gane
| name = Constantin Gane
Line 10: Line 10:
| birth_place = [[Botoșani]], [[Kingdom of Romania]]
| birth_place = [[Botoșani]], [[Kingdom of Romania]]
| death_date = {{death date and age|1962|5|13|1885|3|27|md=y}}
| death_date = {{death date and age|1962|5|13|1885|3|27|md=y}}
| death_place = [[Aiud prison]], [[Cluj Region]], [[Romanian People's Republic]]
| death_place = [[Aiud Prison]], [[Cluj Region]], [[Romanian People's Republic]]
| occupation = {{cslist|Lawyer|journalist|diplomat|politician}}
| occupation = {{cslist|Lawyer|journalist|diplomat|politician}}
| period = 1914–1947
| period = 1914–1947
Line 20: Line 20:
'''Constantin Gane''' (March 27, 1885 – May 13, 1962) was a [[Romania]]n novelist, amateur historian, biographer and memoirist. Born into the [[Boyars of Wallachia and Moldavia|boyar]] aristocracy of [[Western Moldavia]], he worked as a lawyer in [[Bucharest]], achieving literary notoriety with his recollections from the [[Second Balkan War]] and the [[Romania in World War I|Romanian front of World War I]]. By the 1930s, he was primarily a writer on historical and genealogical topics, famous for his contribution to [[women's history]]. An apologist for Romanian conservatism and ''[[Junimea|Junimism]]'', Gane also completed in 1936 a biography of [[Petre P. Carp]]. He was editor at ''[[Convorbiri Literare]]'' and a columnist for ''[[Cuvântul]]'', also putting out his own literary newspaper, ''Sânziana''.
'''Constantin Gane''' (March 27, 1885 – May 13, 1962) was a [[Romania]]n novelist, amateur historian, biographer and memoirist. Born into the [[Boyars of Wallachia and Moldavia|boyar]] aristocracy of [[Western Moldavia]], he worked as a lawyer in [[Bucharest]], achieving literary notoriety with his recollections from the [[Second Balkan War]] and the [[Romania in World War I|Romanian front of World War I]]. By the 1930s, he was primarily a writer on historical and genealogical topics, famous for his contribution to [[women's history]]. An apologist for Romanian conservatism and ''[[Junimea|Junimism]]'', Gane also completed in 1936 a biography of [[Petre P. Carp]]. He was editor at ''[[Convorbiri Literare]]'' and a columnist for ''[[Cuvântul]]'', also putting out his own literary newspaper, ''Sânziana''.


The late 1930s attracted Gane into fascist politics, leading him to join the [[Iron Guard]]. This in turn led to his marginalization and internment by the [[National Renaissance Front]] government, but he was allowed his freeedom in 1940, when he and other Guardists joined the Front itself (restyled as "Party of the Nation"). Returning to prominence in 1940–1941, when the Guard produced its [[National Legionary State]], Gane served as Romanian ambassador to the [[4th of August Regime|Kingdom of Greece]]. He retired from politics for the remainder of World War II, and resumed his work in literature. Again repressed following the establishment of a [[Communist Romania|Romanian communist regime]], he spent 13 years in confinement, ultimately dying at [[Aiud prison]] in 1962. His work was banned by [[Censorship in Communist Romania|communist censors]], then selectively recovered from 1969. It was revisited and republished in the [[History of Romania since 1989|post-communist decades]], although interest in it remained marginal.
The late 1930s attracted Gane into fascist politics, leading him to join the [[Iron Guard]]. This in turn led to his marginalization and internment by the [[National Renaissance Front]] government, but he was allowed his freedom in 1940, when he and other Guardists joined the Front itself (restyled as "Party of the Nation"). Returning to prominence in 1940–1941, when the Guard produced its [[National Legionary State]], Gane served as Romanian ambassador to the [[4th of August Regime|Kingdom of Greece]]. He retired from politics for the remainder of World War II, and resumed his work in literature. Again repressed following the establishment of a [[Communist Romania|Romanian communist regime]], he spent 13 years in confinement, ultimately dying at [[Aiud Prison]] in 1962. His work was banned by [[Censorship in Communist Romania|communist censors]], then selectively recovered from 1969. It was revisited and republished in the [[History of Romania since 1989|post-communist decades]], although interest in it remained marginal.


==Biography==
==Biography==
===Youth and writing career===
===Youth and writing debut===
Born in [[Botoșani]], Constantin was the son of Ștefan Gane,<ref>Iorga (1934), p. 184; Rădulescu, pp. 212–213</ref> and had an elder brother, Gheorghe or "Georges" (1883 or 1884 – August 1941), who trained as an engineer.<ref>"Ultima oră", in ''[[Universul]]'', August 20, 1941, p. 9</ref> The writer repeatedly claimed multiple descent from an old [[Boyars of Wallachia and Moldavia|boyar]] family of [[Moldavia]], the Gănești. According to genealogist Mihai Sorin Rădulescu, his only proven link to this clan was through his paternal grandmother.<ref name="msr212–213">Rădulescu, pp. 212–213</ref> Through this connection, the family were related to ''[[Postelnic]]'' Matei Gane and writer-politician [[Nicolae Gane]],<ref>G. Ursu, "Părinții lui Nicu Gane", in ''Preocupări Literare'', Issue 1/1942, pp. 3–8. See also Gorovei, pp. 227–230</ref> and also, more distantly, to ethnographer [[Arthur Gorovei]]. The latter lived in Nicolae Gane's house at [[Fălticeni]] and assisted Constantin with genealogical research.<ref>Gorovei, p. 228</ref> Ștefan Gane was originally named "Gani". He also descended from boyardom, but had more recent [[Greeks in Romania|Greek Romanian]] ancestry, traceable to the [[Phanariote]] period.<ref name="msr212–213"/> A minor ''Junimist'' (known to have been active in that movement's "small game" section, the ''caracudă''), he had met and befriended the peasant raconteur [[Ion Creangă]].<ref>C. Săteanu, "Câte ceva despre Ion Creangă", in ''[[Adevărul]]'', December 31, 1935, p. 3</ref>
Born in [[Botoșani]], Constantin was the son of Ștefan ("Ștefănică") Gane,<ref>Iorga (1934), p. 184; Monu, p. 207; Rădulescu, pp. 212–213</ref> and had an elder brother, Gheorghe or "Georges" (1883 or 1884 – August 1941), who trained as an engineer.<ref>"Ultima oră", in ''[[Universul]]'', August 20, 1941, p. 9</ref> The writer repeatedly claimed multiple descent from an old [[Boyars of Wallachia and Moldavia|boyar]] family of [[Moldavia]], the Gănești. According to genealogist Mihai Sorin Rădulescu, his only proven link to this clan was through his paternal grandmother.<ref name="msr212–213">Rădulescu, pp. 212–213</ref> Through this connection, the family were related to ''[[Postelnic]]'' Matei Gane and writer-politician [[Nicolae Gane]],<ref>G. Ursu, "Părinții lui Nicu Gane", in ''Preocupări Literare'', Issue 1/1942, pp. 3–8. See also Gorovei, pp. 227–230</ref> and also, more distantly, to ethnographer [[Arthur Gorovei]]. The latter lived in Nicolae Gane's house at [[Fălticeni]] and assisted Constantin with genealogical research.<ref>Gorovei, p. 228</ref> Ștefan Gane was originally named "Gani". He also descended from boyardom, but had more recent [[Greeks in Romania|Greek Romanian]] ancestry, traceable to the [[Phanariote]] period.<ref name="msr212–213"/> In the 1860s, he had attended the [[Französisches Gymnasium Berlin|Französisches Gymnasium]] in [[Berlin]].<ref>Monu, p. 207</ref> As a minor ''Junimist'' (known to have been active in that movement's "small game" section, the ''caracudă''), he had met and befriended the peasant raconteur [[Ion Creangă (writer)|Ion Creangă]].<ref>C. Săteanu, "Câte ceva despre Ion Creangă", in ''[[Adevărul]]'', December 31, 1935, p. 3</ref>


The writer's mother was Constanța née Canano, one of the last surviving members from a Moldavian family of notables.<ref>Gorovei, p. 232; Rădulescu, pp. 212–213</ref> Constantin later claimed that she was a descendant of [[Byzantine bureaucracy and aristocracy|Byzantine aristocracy]], a theory dismissed as self-aggrandizing by Rădulescu.<ref name="msr213">Rădulescu, p. 213</ref> He also believed that the Cananos had more distant Italian roots, against authors which suggest they were "[[Levant]]ines". Genealogist Mihai Gicoveanu proposes that his take may be correct, linking Gane to another Canano family, attested at [[Ferrara]] in the 11th century; the Moldavian Cananos' patriarch was a ''[[Căminar]]'' Constantin, active in the late 17th century—though Gane claimed to have traced his maternal descent to ''[[Postelnic]]'' Constantin Ciobanul, attested around 1560.<ref>Mihai Gicoveanu, "Jitnicerul Gheorghe Canano și familia sa", in ''Acta Moldaviae Septentrionalis'', Vol. XVIII, 2019, pp. 203–204</ref>
The writer's mother was Constanța née Canano, one of the last surviving members from a Moldavian family of notables.<ref>Gorovei, p. 232; Rădulescu, pp. 212–213</ref> Constantin later claimed that she was a descendant of [[Byzantine bureaucracy and aristocracy|Byzantine aristocracy]], a theory dismissed as self-aggrandizing by Rădulescu.<ref name="msr213">Rădulescu, p. 213</ref> He also believed that the Cananos had more distant Italian roots, against authors which suggest they were "[[Levant]]ines". Genealogist Mihai Gicoveanu proposes that his take may be correct, linking Gane to another Canano family, attested at [[Ferrara]] in the 11th century; the Moldavian Cananos' patriarch was a ''[[Căminar]]'' Constantin, active in the late 17th century—though Gane claimed to have traced his maternal descent to ''[[Postelnic]]'' Constantin Ciobanul, attested around 1560.<ref>Mihai Gicoveanu, "Jitnicerul Gheorghe Canano și familia sa", in ''Acta Moldaviae Septentrionalis'', Vol. XVIII, 2019, pp. 203–204</ref> The family was attested as belonging to the rightful peerage in January 1742, following reviews by a boyar commission which included [[Ion Neculce]].<ref>Mihai-Bogdan Atanasiu, ''Din lumea cronicarului Ion Neculce. Studiu prosopografic'', pp. 96–97. Iași: [[Alexandru Ioan Cuza University]], 2015. {{ISBN|978-606-714-193-1}}</ref> Historian Paul Cernovodeanu views the Cananos as Phanariotes—and, more specifically, as one of the 36 second-rate Phanariote boyar clans (directly below those of the ''[[Hospodar]]s'').<ref>Paul Cernovodeanu, "Mobility and Traditionalism: The Evolution of the Boyar Class in the Romanian Principalities in the 18th Century", in ''Revue des Études Sud-Est Européennes'', Vol. XXIV, Issue 3, July–September 1986, p. 251</ref>


According to his own recollections, Constantin grew up passionate about storytelling, picking up accounts from the family cook, a senior [[Roma minority in Romania|Romani]] man (and [[Slavery in Romania|former slave]]), and from his maternal grandmother, who was a [[Napoleon]] enthusiast.<ref name="vorbe4">Gane, p. 4</ref> After mediocre and unruly beginnings in school, he improved himself to take first prizes, being largely motivated by books which were offered to the highest ranking graduate.<ref>Gane, p. 8</ref> He completed [[A. T. Laurian National College|A. T. Laurian High School]] in 1903 and went on to study law in [[German Empire|Germany]], obtaining a doctorate from the [[University of Rostock]] in 1910.<ref name="cioabă">Cristina Cioabă, "Chipuri ale jertfei", in ''Cuvântul Care Zidește. Foaia Duminicală a Parohiei Șerban Vodă'', Vol. VII, Issue 13, March 2017, p. 4</ref><ref name="simion">[[Eugen Simion]] (ed.), ''Dicționarul general al literaturii Române'', Vol. 6, pp. 243–244. Bucharest: [[Editura Univers Enciclopedic]], 2007. {{ISBN|973-637-070-4}}</ref> After returning home, he worked as a lawyer for some fifteen years, both in his native town and in the national capital [[Bucharest]].<ref name="simion"/> In the early 1910s, his prose was hosted in ''[[Viața Romînească]]'' magazine.<ref name="niilr184">Iorga (1934), p. 184</ref>
According to his own recollections, Constantin grew up passionate about storytelling, picking up accounts from the family cook, a senior [[Roma minority in Romania|Romani]] man (and [[Slavery in Romania|former slave]]), and from his maternal grandmother, who was a [[Napoleon]] enthusiast.<ref name="vorbe4">Gane, p. 4</ref> After mediocre and unruly beginnings in school, he improved himself to take first prizes, being largely motivated by books which were offered to the highest ranking graduate.<ref>Gane, p. 8</ref> He completed [[A. T. Laurian National College|A. T. Laurian High School]] in 1903 and went on to study law in [[German Empire|Germany]], obtaining a doctorate from the [[University of Rostock]] in 1910.<ref name="cioabă">Cristina Cioabă, "Chipuri ale jertfei", in ''Cuvântul Care Zidește. Foaia Duminicală a Parohiei Șerban Vodă'', Vol. VII, Issue 13, March 2017, p. 4</ref><ref name="simion">[[Eugen Simion]] (ed.), ''Dicționarul general al literaturii Române'', Vol. 6, pp. 243–244. Bucharest: [[Editura Univers Enciclopedic]], 2007. {{ISBN|973-637-070-4}}</ref> After returning home, he worked as a lawyer for some fifteen years, both in his native town and in the national capital [[Bucharest]].<ref name="simion"/> In the early 1910s, his prose was hosted in ''[[Viața Romînească]]'' magazine.<ref name="niilr184">Iorga (1934), p. 184</ref>


In 1913, Gane took part as a volunteer<ref name="simion"/> in the [[Second Balkan War]], destroying his literary notebooks before his departure for the front.<ref name="vorbe4"/> From 1916,<ref name="simion"/> he also fought in the [[Romania in World War I|campaigns of World War I]], part of the 8th Chasseurs Regiment stationed at [[Mănăstirea Cașin]].<ref name="bmărm">Bianca Mărmureanu, "Viața de front a combatanților din Armata Română în anul 1917. Activități în afara confruntării cu inamicul", in ''Archiva Moldaviae'', Vol. III, 2011, pp. 133–135</ref> His combat experience was recorded in ''Amintirile unui fost holeric'' ("The Recollection of a Former Cholera Patient", 1914; [[Romanian Academy]] prize) and ''Prin viroage și coclauri'' ("Through Ravines and Boondocks", 1922). This was followed in 1923 by a family history, ''Pe aripa vremei'' ("On the Wing of Time").<ref name="simion"/> Constantin's brother Gheorghe married the [[Bessarabia]]n belle Elena Morariu-Andreevici. She was the niece of [[Silvestru Morariu Andrievici]], [[Metropolis of Bukovina|Bishop of Bukovina]], and the great-granddaughter of poet [[Constantin Stamati]].<ref>Gorovei, p. 225. See also Hariton, p. 30</ref> This made Constantin the paternal uncle of an architect, Ștefan Radu Gane (1923–1988).<ref>Hariton, p. 30</ref>
At some point before 1915, Gane was secretary to [[Conservative Party (Romania, 1880–1918)|Conservative Party]] politician [[Ioan Lahovary]].<ref name="bibescu97">[[Marthe Bibesco]], ''Jurnal politic 1939–1941'', p. 97. Bucharest: [[Editura Politică]], 1979</ref> In 1913, he took part as a volunteer<ref name="simion"/> in the [[Second Balkan War]], destroying his literary notebooks before his departure for the front.<ref name="vorbe4"/> From 1916,<ref name="simion"/> he also fought in the [[Romania in World War I|campaigns of World War I]], part of the 8th Chasseurs Regiment stationed at [[Mănăstirea Cașin]].<ref name="bmărm">Bianca Mărmureanu, "Viața de front a combatanților din Armata Română în anul 1917. Activități în afara confruntării cu inamicul", in ''Archiva Moldaviae'', Vol. III, 2011, pp. 133–135</ref> His combat experience was recorded in ''Amintirile unui fost holeric'' ("The Recollection of a Former Cholera Patient", 1914; [[Romanian Academy]] prize) and ''Prin viroage și coclauri'' ("Through Ravines and Boondocks", 1922). This was followed in 1923 by a family history, ''Pe aripa vremei'' ("On the Wing of Time").<ref name="simion"/> Constantin's brother Gheorghe married the [[Bessarabia]]n belle Elena Morariu-Andreevici. She was the niece of [[Silvestru Morariu Andrievici]], [[Metropolis of Bukovina|Bishop of Bukovina]], and the great-granddaughter of poet [[Constantin Stamati]].<ref>Gorovei, p. 225. See also Hariton, p. 30</ref> This made Constantin the paternal uncle of an architect, Ștefan Radu Gane (1923–1988).<ref>Hariton, p. 30</ref>


[[File:Gane family coat of arms.svg|thumb|200px|Coat of arms used by Gane and his family]]
[[File:Gane family coat of arms.svg|thumb|200px|Coat of arms used by Gane and his family]]
Line 38: Line 38:
Gane also held conferences and, between 1929 and 1937, a series of [[Romanian Radio Broadcasting Company|Radio Bucharest]] lectures on historical, cultural and literary themes, including the first trial of [[Mihail Kogălniceanu]], [[Dimitrie Cantemir]], and the novels of [[Stefan Zweig]].<ref name="simion"/> Other such lectures focused on details from the family life of [[Mihnea Turcitul]], or detailed theories about the meaning of the ancestral ballad ''[[Miorița]]''.<ref name="ggl22–23">[[Gheorghe Gh. Longinescu]], "Cu casca la ureche. IV", in ''Natura. Revistă pentru Răspândirea Științei'', Vol. 19, Issue 4, April 1930, pp. 22–23</ref> In the latter case, Gane argued that folk poetry had recorded the mutual enmity between Moldavia and [[Wallachia]], including their territorial conflicts over [[Putna County]]. This allowed him to date ''Miorița'' back to the 1400s or earlier.<ref name="ggl22–23"/> He also contributed to [[Ion Gigurtu]]'s ''Libertatea'', where he published a study on the formation of Romania's political parties (January 1934)<ref>"Cărți și reviste. O revistă de specialitate care se afirmă", in ''Observatorul. Revistă de Cultură Generală'', Vol. VII, Issues 1–2, January–February 1934, p. 71</ref> and a genealogical essay on [[Maurice Paléologue]] (February 1935).<ref>[[Neagu Djuvara]], ''Între Orient și Occident. Țările române la începutul epocii moderne'', pp. 347, 377. Bucharest: [[Humanitas publishing house|Humanitas]], 1995. {{ISBN|973-28-0523-4}}</ref>
Gane also held conferences and, between 1929 and 1937, a series of [[Romanian Radio Broadcasting Company|Radio Bucharest]] lectures on historical, cultural and literary themes, including the first trial of [[Mihail Kogălniceanu]], [[Dimitrie Cantemir]], and the novels of [[Stefan Zweig]].<ref name="simion"/> Other such lectures focused on details from the family life of [[Mihnea Turcitul]], or detailed theories about the meaning of the ancestral ballad ''[[Miorița]]''.<ref name="ggl22–23">[[Gheorghe Gh. Longinescu]], "Cu casca la ureche. IV", in ''Natura. Revistă pentru Răspândirea Științei'', Vol. 19, Issue 4, April 1930, pp. 22–23</ref> In the latter case, Gane argued that folk poetry had recorded the mutual enmity between Moldavia and [[Wallachia]], including their territorial conflicts over [[Putna County]]. This allowed him to date ''Miorița'' back to the 1400s or earlier.<ref name="ggl22–23"/> He also contributed to [[Ion Gigurtu]]'s ''Libertatea'', where he published a study on the formation of Romania's political parties (January 1934)<ref>"Cărți și reviste. O revistă de specialitate care se afirmă", in ''Observatorul. Revistă de Cultură Generală'', Vol. VII, Issues 1–2, January–February 1934, p. 71</ref> and a genealogical essay on [[Maurice Paléologue]] (February 1935).<ref>[[Neagu Djuvara]], ''Între Orient și Occident. Țările române la începutul epocii moderne'', pp. 347, 377. Bucharest: [[Humanitas publishing house|Humanitas]], 1995. {{ISBN|973-28-0523-4}}</ref>


Before 1934, Gane lived on Enei Street, after which he moved to a home on Calea Griviței, near [[Bucharest North railway station|Gara de Nord]].<ref>Gorovei, pp. 230, 232</ref> He joined the [[Romanian Writers' Society]] that year,<ref name="cioabă"/><ref name="simion"/> and, from June, began issuing his research on the female branches of the [[Callimachi family]] as a serial for ''[[Realitatea Ilustrată]]''.<ref>Introductory note to C. Gane, "Doamnele din neamul Callimachilor, I", in ''[[Realitatea Ilustrată]]'', No. 385, June 10, 1934, p. 11</ref> On October 9, 1937,<ref>[[Mircea Streinul]], "Cultură, Oameni, Fapte. Cuiburi de lumină", in ''[[Buna Vestire]]'', October 8, 1937, p. 2</ref> Gane began putting out the Bucharest-based ''Sânziana'', a literary newspaper. During this time, he also published a historical column in the newspaper ''[[Cuvântul]]''.<ref name="ștg235">Gorovei, p. 235</ref> Politically, Gane gravitated toward the far-right, and joined the [[Iron Guard]] in 1937—his recruitment as an intellectual "committed to the Guardist line of thought" was celebrated in January 1938 by colleague [[Mircea Streinul]].<ref>[[Mircea Streinul]], "Cultură, Oameni, Fapte. Cartea și publicațiile legionare", in ''[[Buna Vestire]]'', January 1, 1938, p. 2</ref> Another Guardist author, Mihail Cosma, gave a positive review to ''Sânziana'' as a "Romanian gazette written by Romanian Christian journalists", contrasting it to the "[[History of the Jews in Romania|Judeo-Romanian]] press [which] holds all politicians in permanent terror, constraining their activity as political thinkers and their political behavior". Cosma noted ''Sânziana'' for Gane's own contributions as a historical columnists, as well as for articles from guest writer [[Mihail Polihroniade]] and Nicolae Totu.<ref>Mihail Cosma, "''Sânziana''", in ''[[Buna Vestire]]'', November 7, 1937, p. 1</ref>
Before 1934, Gane lived on Enei Street, after which he moved to a home on Calea Griviței, near [[Bucharest North railway station|Gara de Nord]].<ref>Gorovei, pp. 230, 232</ref> He joined the [[Romanian Writers' Society]] that year,<ref name="cioabă"/><ref name="simion"/> and, from June, began issuing his research on the female branches of the [[Callimachi family]] as a serial for ''[[Realitatea Ilustrată]]''.<ref>Introductory note to C. Gane, "Doamnele din neamul Callimachilor, I", in ''[[Realitatea Ilustrată]]'', No. 385, June 10, 1934, p. 11</ref> On October 9, 1937,<ref>[[Mircea Streinul]], "Cultură, Oameni, Fapte. Cuiburi de lumină", in ''[[Buna Vestire]]'', October 8, 1937, p. 2</ref> Gane began putting out the Bucharest-based ''Sânziana'', a literary newspaper. In part, this enterprise reflected his genealogical preoccupation, putting out portions of Father Vasile Grigorescu's memoir of life in Fălticeni, some of which spoke about the Gane family.<ref>G. Ursu, "Un profesor al lui Ion Creangă la Folticeni: Părintele Vasile Grigorescu Catihetul", in ''[[Convorbiri Literare]]'', Vol. LXXV, Issues 5–6, May–June 1942, p. 327</ref> During this time, Gane also published a historical column in the newspaper ''[[Cuvântul]]''.<ref name="ștg235">Gorovei, p. 235</ref> Politically, he gravitated toward the far-right, and joined the [[Iron Guard]] in 1937—his recruitment as an intellectual "committed to the Guardist line of thought" was celebrated in January 1938 by colleague [[Mircea Streinul]].<ref>[[Mircea Streinul]], "Cultură, Oameni, Fapte. Cartea și publicațiile legionare", in ''[[Buna Vestire]]'', January 1, 1938, p. 2</ref> Another Guardist author, Mihail Cosma, gave a positive review to ''Sânziana'' as a "Romanian gazette written by Romanian Christian journalists", contrasting it to the "[[History of the Jews in Romania|Judeo-Romanian]] press [which] holds all politicians in permanent terror, constraining their activity as political thinkers and their political behavior". Cosma noted ''Sânziana'' for Gane's own contributions as a historical columnist, as well as for articles from guest writers [[Mihail Polihroniade]] and Nicolae Totu.<ref>Mihail Cosma, "''Sânziana''", in ''[[Buna Vestire]]'', November 7, 1937, p. 1</ref>


Gane then allegedly served on the Iron Guard's supervisory council, or "Senate".<ref name="dobre280">Florica Dobre, Florian Banu, Camelia Ivan Duică, Theodor Bărbulescu, Liviu Țăranu (eds.), ''Securitatea: structuri-cadre; obiective și metode. Vol. I (1948–1967)'', p. 280. Bucharest: [[Editura enciclopedică]], 2006. {{ISBN|973-45-0541-6}}</ref> Such associations with revolutionary fascism to made him a target for repression by [[King of Romania|King]] [[Carol II of Romania|Carol II]] and his [[National Renaissance Front]]. This regime prevented political suspects from working and, according to the diaries of [[Victor Slăvescu]], Gane "had no means to support himself";<ref name="lb139">Boia, p. 139</ref> ''Sânziana'' was banned in early 1938.<ref name="ștg235"/> When banks refused to loan Gane any money, Slăvescu offered him gifts, which Gane promised to repay with books from his own collection.<ref name="lb139"/> By September 1939, civil war had erupted between the Front and the Guard. Gane was arrested alongside many other Guardists, and held in confinement at [[Miercurea Ciuc]],<ref name="ștg235"/> but was soon released following pleas from [[Petre P. Panaitescu]] and [[Radu R. Rosetti]].<ref name="lb139"/> In mid 1940, the Guard reached an understanding with the Front: on June 23, the two groups merged into a "Party of the Nation", with Guard leader [[Horia Sima]] voicing his devotion toward Carol. Gane, Panaitescu and [[Nicolae Petrașcu (Iron Guard)|Nicolae Petrașcu]] were among the first to sign up to the new platform.<ref>"Ultima oră. O chemare și cele dintâi adeziuni", in ''[[Glasul Bucovinei]]'', June 25, 1940, p. 4; "Urdareanu vezérkari főnöke beszéde", in ''Keleti Ujság'', June 25, 1940, p. 1</ref>
Gane then allegedly served on the Iron Guard's supervisory council, or "Senate".<ref name="dobre280">Florica Dobre, Florian Banu, Camelia Ivan Duică, Theodor Bărbulescu, Liviu Țăranu (eds.), ''Securitatea: structuri-cadre; obiective și metode. Vol. I (1948–1967)'', p. 280. Bucharest: [[Editura enciclopedică]], 2006. {{ISBN|973-45-0541-6}}</ref> On February 15, 1938, in [[Bucureștii Noi]], he attended the wedding between Guardist painter [[Alexandru Bassarab]] and schoolteacher Elena Cantaragiu; other guests included Guard leader [[Corneliu Zelea Codreanu]], alongside Polihroniade, [[Haig Acterian]], [[Ion Zelea Codreanu]], and [[Mircea Eliade]].<ref>"Ultima Oră. Căsătoria pictorului Alexandru Bassarab", in ''[[Buna Vestire]]'', February 16, 1938, p. 6</ref> Such associations with revolutionary fascism to made him a target for repression by [[King of Romania|King]] [[Carol II of Romania|Carol II]] and his [[National Renaissance Front]]. This regime prevented political suspects from working and, according to the diaries of [[Victor Slăvescu]], Gane "had no means to support himself";<ref name="lb139">Boia, p. 139</ref> ''Sânziana'' was banned in early 1938.<ref name="ștg235"/> When banks refused to loan Gane any money, Slăvescu offered him gifts, which Gane promised to repay with books from his own collection.<ref name="lb139"/> By September 1939, alongside World War II, civil war had erupted between the Front and the Guard. Gane was arrested alongside many other Guardists, and held in confinement at [[Miercurea Ciuc]],<ref name="ștg235"/> but was soon released following pleas from [[Petre P. Panaitescu]] and [[Radu R. Rosetti]].<ref name="lb139"/> Later that month, he was traveling around Romania with [[Carol Victor, Hereditary Prince of Albania|Carol Victor]], the nominal [[Principality of Albania|Prince of Albania]]. They visited Lahovary's daughter, [[Marthe Bibesco]], at her villa in [[Comarnic]]; she described Gane as a "typical Bucharester from the year 1900, influenced by [[1890s in Western fashion|Parisian fashion of the 1890s]]."<ref name="bibescu97"/>


In 1940–1941, after Carol relinquished power, the Iron Guard took over government and established the "[[National Legionary State]]". Promoted in that interval, Gane returned to radio journalism, producing propaganda for the Guard's social service, ''Ajutorul Legionar''.<ref>Florin Müller, "Mișcarea legionară, noi perspective în cercetare", in ''Revista Istorică'', Vol. XXII, Issues 1–2, 2011, p. 29</ref> In late October 1940, he announced that he was going on an extended study tour of the [[4th of August Regime|Kingdom of Greece]].<ref>"Scriitorul Const. Gane la Atena", in ''[[Curentul]]'', October 25, 1940, p. 3</ref> On November 1,<ref>"D. D. Gane ministru la Atena", in ''[[Curentul]]'', November 3, 1940, p. 3</ref> [[Prime Minister of Romania|Prime Minister]] [[Ion Antonescu]] appointed him as the ambassador to Greece; according to Rădulescu, he might have been chosen for that office due to his Greek lineage.<ref name="msr213"/> Nonetheless, while in [[Athens]], Gane advocated on behalf of the minority [[Aromanians]].<ref name="cioabă"/><ref name="simion"/><ref>Deac, p. 304</ref> He remained in the area throughout the [[Greco-Italian War]] and during the [[German invasion of Greece]], being finally recalled on June 15, 1941.<ref>"Ultima oră. Misiunea dlui N. {{sic}} Gane, ministrul României la Atena încetează", in ''Țara'', Vol. I, Issue 44, June 1941, p. 8</ref> Returning to Romania, he was briefly involved in the cultural life of [[Transnistria Governorate]]—carved out [[Soviet Ukraine]] by Romania in the wake of [[Operation Barbarossa]]. In February 1942, as a speaker of Russian, he was ordered to assist Ion Radu Mircea with collecting and translating historical documents stored in [[Odessa]], but failed to show up for this assignment.<ref>Corneliu-Mihail Lungu, Maricica Ifrim, Ana-Felicia Diaconu (eds.), ''Aurelian Sacerdoțeanu. Corespondență (1928–1974)'', pp. 82, 84. Bucharest: [[National Archives of Romania]], 2004. {{ISBN|973-8308-18-6}}</ref> Staying in Romania for the rest of World War II, Gane focused his biographical research on the Mavrodin boyars of [[Teleorman County]], with a topical volume published in 1942.<ref>Steluța Chefani-Pătrașcu, ''Moșieri teleormăneni (1864–1949). Mărire și decădere (Publicațiile Muzeului Județean Teleorman, VI)'', pp. 45–46. Bucharest: Renaissance, 2011. {{ISBN|978-606-637-009-7}}</ref>
In mid-1940, the Guard reached an understanding with the Front: on June 23, the two groups merged into a "Party of the Nation", with Guard leader [[Horia Sima]] voicing his devotion toward Carol. Gane, Panaitescu and [[Nicolae Petrașcu (Iron Guard)|Nicolae Petrașcu]] were among the first to sign up to the new platform.<ref>"Ultima oră. O chemare și cele dintâi adeziuni", in ''[[Glasul Bucovinei]]'', June 25, 1940, p. 4; "Urdareanu vezérkari főnöke beszéde", in ''Keleti Ujság'', June 25, 1940, p. 1</ref> In 1940–1941, after Carol relinquished power, the Iron Guard took over government and established the "[[National Legionary State]]". Promoted in that interval, Gane returned to radio journalism, producing propaganda for the Guard's social service, ''Ajutorul Legionar''.<ref>Florin Müller, "Mișcarea legionară, noi perspective în cercetare", in ''Revista Istorică'', Vol. XXII, Issues 1–2, 2011, p. 29</ref> In late October 1940, he announced that he was going on an extended study tour of the [[4th of August Regime|Kingdom of Greece]].<ref>"Scriitorul Const. Gane la Atena", in ''[[Curentul]]'', October 25, 1940, p. 3</ref> On November 1,<ref>"D. D. Gane ministru la Atena", in ''[[Curentul]]'', November 3, 1940, p. 3</ref> [[Prime Minister of Romania|Prime Minister]] [[Ion Antonescu]] appointed him as the ambassador to Greece. He was still in Bucharest on November 11, when he attended the funeral service of two policemen and Guardist affiliates, Eugen Necrelescu and Aron Valeriu, held at [[Sfântul Ilie Gorgani Church]].<ref>"Rămășițele pământești ale legionarilor Eugen Necrelescu și Aron Valeriu au fost depuse in biserica Sf. Ilie Gorgani", in ''[[Universul]]'', November 12, 1940, p. 3</ref>
According to Rădulescu, Gane might have been chosen for the diplomatic mission due to his Greek lineage;<ref name="msr213"/> nonetheless, while in [[Athens]], he advocated on behalf of the minority [[Aromanians]].<ref name="cioabă"/><ref name="simion"/><ref>Deac, p. 304</ref> He remained in the area throughout the [[Greco-Italian War]] and during the [[German invasion of Greece]], being finally recalled on June 15, 1941.<ref>"Ultima oră. Misiunea dlui N. {{sic}} Gane, ministrul României la Atena încetează", in ''Țara'', Vol. I, Issue 44, June 1941, p. 8</ref> Returning to Romania, he was briefly involved in the cultural life of the [[Transnistria Governorate]]—carved out from [[Soviet Ukraine]] by Romania in the wake of [[Operation Barbarossa]]. In February 1942, as a speaker of Russian, he was ordered to assist Ion Radu Mircea with collecting and translating historical documents stored in [[Odesa]], but failed to show up for this assignment.<ref>Corneliu-Mihail Lungu, Maricica Ifrim, Ana-Felicia Diaconu (eds.), ''Aurelian Sacerdoțeanu. Corespondență (1928–1974)'', pp. 82, 84. Bucharest: [[National Archives of Romania]], 2004. {{ISBN|973-8308-18-6}}</ref> Staying in Romania for the rest of World War II, Gane focused his biographical research on the Mavrodin boyars of [[Teleorman County]], with a topical volume published in 1942.<ref>Steluța Chefani-Pătrașcu, ''Moșieri teleormăneni (1864–1949). Mărire și decădere (Publicațiile Muzeului Județean Teleorman, VI)'', pp. 45–46. Bucharest: Renaissance, 2011. {{ISBN|978-606-637-009-7}}</ref>


===Communist repression and death===
===Communist repression and death===
Gane also put out a 1943 sequel to ''Trecute vieți'', titled ''Amărâte și vesele vieți de jupânese și cucoane'' ("Bittersweet Lives of Dames and Boyaresses"). A historical novel, ''Rădăcini'' ("Roots"), was published in 1947, and remains his final work.<ref name="simion"/> In early 1944, he was putting out the specialized magazine ''Arhiva Genealogică Română'', which he described as the continuation of works undertaken by [[Sever Zotta]],<ref>Al. Andronic, "Revista publicațiilor periodice. ''Arhiva Genealogică Română''", in ''Cercetări Istorice'', Vol. XIX, 1946, pp. 240–241</ref> and lecturing on behalf of the [[YMCA]] at the [[Romanian Atheneum|Bucharest Atheneum]].<ref>"Carnetul zilei. Artistice cultuale. Șezători literare", in ''[[Curentul]]'', January 11, 1944, p. 2</ref> Shortly after [[1944 Romanian coup d'état|Romania proclaimed an armistice with Soviet Russia]], he was again arrested, then sent to a concentration camp in [[Caracal, Romania|Caracal]], sharing his cell with Panaitescu and the missionary priest Ilarion Felea. According to Felea, the conditions were generally harsh, and food was scarce.<ref>Cristinel Ioja, "Ilarion V. Felea – preotul, teologul, mărturisitorul – după ''Jurnalul autobiografic''", in ''Teologia'', Vol. XII, Issue 1, 2008, pp. 55–56</ref> In 1946, a number of his books were formally banned through an order issued by Propaganda Minister [[Petre Constantinescu-Iași]].<ref>Leonard Ciocan, "Revista ''Lupta de Clasă'' și problematica istoriografiei staliniste", in ''Studia Universitatis Cibiniensis. Series Historica'', Vol. II, 2005, p. 302</ref> Gane was released from camp by 1948, but singled out for repression by the [[Communist Romania|communist regime]]. Agents of the [[Securitate]] identified him as a figure on the far-right of [[Romanian anti-communist resistance movement|anti-communist resistance]], reporting that Gane was acting as an adviser to Petrașcu.<ref name="dobre280"/>
Gane also put out a 1943 sequel to ''Trecute vieți'', titled ''Amărâte și vesele vieți de jupânese și cucoane'' ("Bittersweet Lives of Dames and Boyaresses"). A historical novel, ''Rădăcini'' ("Roots"), was published in 1947, and remains his final work.<ref name="simion"/> In early 1944, he was putting out the specialized magazine ''Arhiva Genealogică Română'', which he described as the continuation of works undertaken by [[Sever Zotta]],<ref>Al. Andronic, "Revista publicațiilor periodice. ''Arhiva Genealogică Română''", in ''Cercetări Istorice'', Vol. XIX, 1946, pp. 240–241</ref> and lecturing on behalf of the [[YMCA]] at the [[Romanian Atheneum|Bucharest Atheneum]].<ref>"Carnetul zilei. Artistice cultuale. Șezători literare", in ''[[Curentul]]'', January 11, 1944, p. 2</ref> Shortly after [[1944 Romanian coup d'état|Romania proclaimed an armistice with Soviet Russia]], he was again arrested, then sent to a concentration camp in [[Caracal, Romania|Caracal]], sharing his cell with Panaitescu and the missionary priest Ilarion Felea. According to Felea, the conditions were generally harsh, and food was scarce.<ref>Cristinel Ioja, "Ilarion V. Felea – preotul, teologul, mărturisitorul – după ''Jurnalul autobiografic''", in ''Teologia'', Vol. XII, Issue 1, 2008, pp. 55–56</ref> In 1946, a number of his books were formally banned through an order issued by Propaganda Minister [[Petre Constantinescu-Iași]].<ref>Leonard Ciocan, "Revista ''Lupta de Clasă'' și problematica istoriografiei staliniste", in ''Studia Universitatis Cibiniensis. Series Historica'', Vol. II, 2005, p. 302</ref> Gane was released from camp by 1948, but singled out for repression by the [[Communist Romania|communist regime]]. Agents of the [[Securitate]] identified him as a figure on the far-right of [[Romanian anti-communist resistance movement|anti-communist resistance]], reporting that Gane was acting as an adviser to Petrașcu.<ref name="dobre280"/>


Gane was re-arrested in December 1948, as part of a clampdown,<ref name="dobre280"/> and sentenced in 1949.<ref name="simion"/> He was dispatched to [[Aiud prison]] in [[Cluj Region]], where he was subjected to mistreatment and pushed to exhaustion. Though he reportedly maintained his humor and was physically strong, his refusal to undergo [[Re-education in Communist Romania|re-education]] made him a target for special abuse: he was sent into solitary confinement in an unheated cell, and made to stand on his feet throughout the working day. He complained of exhaustion and told his jailer that he was on the brink of dying; they ultimately released him after other prisoners proceeded to bang on their cell doors and demand that Gane be spared.<ref name="cioabă"/> The Securitate promised him treatment for his medical conditions, if he agreed to write articles praising the regime—something which Gane refused to do.<ref>Nicolae Ivan, "Sinuciderile în închisorile comuniste din România", in ''Memoria. Revista Gândirii Arestate'', Issue 38, 2002, p. 84</ref> While he was still recovering in 1962, the authorities reportedly issued papers allowing his release from prison.<ref name="cioabă"/>
Gane was re-arrested in December 1948, as part of a clampdown,<ref name="dobre280"/> and sentenced in 1949.<ref name="simion"/> He was dispatched to [[Aiud Prison]] in [[Cluj Region]], where he was subjected to mistreatment and pushed to exhaustion. Though he reportedly maintained his humor and was physically strong, his refusal to undergo [[Re-education in Communist Romania|re-education]] made him a target for special abuse: he was sent into solitary confinement in an unheated cell, and made to stand on his feet throughout the working day. He complained of exhaustion and told his jailer that he was on the brink of dying; they ultimately released him after other prisoners proceeded to bang on their cell doors and demand that Gane be spared.<ref name="cioabă"/> The Securitate promised him treatment for his medical conditions, if he agreed to write articles praising the regime—something which Gane refused to do.<ref>Nicolae Ivan, "Sinuciderile în închisorile comuniste din România", in ''Memoria. Revista Gândirii Arestate'', Issue 38, 2002, p. 84</ref> While he was still recovering in 1962, the authorities reportedly issued papers allowing his release from prison.<ref name="cioabă"/>


Gane died in Aiud before this could happen, and was buried in an unmarked grave.<ref name="cioabă"/><ref name="trecut">{{in lang|ro}} Ioan Milică, [http://www.ziaruldeiasi.ro/stiri/trecut-au-vietile--97534.html "Trecut-au viețile…"], in ''[[Ziarul de Iași]]'', June 4, 2015</ref><ref name="ștg225">Gorovei, p. 225</ref> His death is commonly believed to have occurred in April 1962, but the Gane family records the date as May 13.<ref name="ștg225"/> In 1969, a relative liberalization allowed mentions of the deceased writer, and his nephew, Gheorghe Gane, Jr (1925–2008), published a brief bio in ''Clopotul'' of Botoșani. He also kept his uncle's genealogical archive in a Bucharest garage, before emigrating to [[West Germany]]; some of these papers were then preserved by genealogist and family friend Ștefan C. Gorovei.<ref>Gorovei, pp. 225–226</ref> Nephew Ștefan Radu also emigrated in 1974, spending the 1980s as a prominent critic of [[Systematization (Romania)|urban planning in Communist Romania]].<ref>Hariton, p. 31</ref>
Gane died in Aiud before this could happen, and was buried in an unmarked grave.<ref name="cioabă"/><ref name="trecut">{{in lang|ro}} Ioan Milică, [http://www.ziaruldeiasi.ro/stiri/trecut-au-vietile--97534.html "Trecut-au viețile…"], in ''[[Ziarul de Iași]]'', June 4, 2015</ref><ref name="ștg225">Gorovei, p. 225</ref> His death is commonly believed to have occurred in April 1962, but the Gane family records the date as May 13.<ref name="ștg225"/> In 1969, a relative liberalization allowed mentions of the deceased writer, and his nephew, Gheorghe Gane, Jr (1925–2008), published a brief bio in ''Clopotul'' of Botoșani. He also kept his uncle's genealogical archive in a Bucharest garage, before emigrating to [[West Germany]]; some of these papers were then preserved by genealogist and family friend Ștefan C. Gorovei.<ref>Gorovei, pp. 225–226</ref> Nephew Ștefan Radu also emigrated in 1974, spending the 1980s as a prominent critic of [[Systematization (Romania)|urban planning in Communist Romania]].<ref>Hariton, p. 31</ref>
Line 57: Line 59:
Gane's debut was as a humorist—a talented one, according to fellow writer-historian [[Nicolae Iorga]].<ref name="niilr184"/> The war memoirs were noted for their sincerity and patriotic emphasis. His first book featured a detailed description of his [[1899–1923 cholera pandemic|bout with cholera]], which he contracted while fighting in [[Kingdom of Bulgaria|Bulgaria]].<ref name="simion"/> It was among the first literary records of the [[Second Balkan War]] in Romania—alongside works by Iorga, [[Al. Lascarov-Moldovanu]], and [[Haralamb Lecca]];<ref>Iorga (1934), p. 248</ref> as well as one of the period books giving Romanian impressions of Bulgaria. As such, Gane is highly critical of Bulgarian society, describing the barren landscape as fundamentally inferior to the corresponding Romanian bank of the [[Danube]].<ref>Deac, pp. 299, 302, 311–312</ref> On its publication, ''Amintirile unui fost holeric'' was embraced by novelist [[Mihail Sadoveanu]] as an accurate record for the "sad and bitter reality" of the 1913 expedition.<ref name="potra"/> Overall, it stands out for its defense of the campaign, describing the masses of soldiers as overall enthusiastic about going to war.<ref>Andreea-Mihaela Creangă, "Războaiele balcanice ca spectacol mediatic: relatarea jurnalistică", in ''Analele Banatului. Arheologie–Istorie'', Vol. XXIII, 2015, p. 415</ref> As Gane argues, Romania "restored peace" and earned Europe's respect; this contrasts pronouncements by other veterans, including V. Dragoșescu—who claimed that the campaign could only hurt Romania in the long run.<ref>Deac, p. 305</ref> ''Prin viroage și coclauri'' is a first-hand source on life during [[trench warfare]], detailing the parties and superstitions of soldiers reduced to that lifestyle.<ref name="bmărm"/> ''Întâmplarea cea mare'' is a more subdued travel account where the author digresses into meditations on Romanian and foreign history. The artifacts of ancient Egypt and especially Greece lead him to literary and mythological reflections; he also describes these countries' present-day realities, sometimes in a humorous tone.<ref name="simion"/>
Gane's debut was as a humorist—a talented one, according to fellow writer-historian [[Nicolae Iorga]].<ref name="niilr184"/> The war memoirs were noted for their sincerity and patriotic emphasis. His first book featured a detailed description of his [[1899–1923 cholera pandemic|bout with cholera]], which he contracted while fighting in [[Kingdom of Bulgaria|Bulgaria]].<ref name="simion"/> It was among the first literary records of the [[Second Balkan War]] in Romania—alongside works by Iorga, [[Al. Lascarov-Moldovanu]], and [[Haralamb Lecca]];<ref>Iorga (1934), p. 248</ref> as well as one of the period books giving Romanian impressions of Bulgaria. As such, Gane is highly critical of Bulgarian society, describing the barren landscape as fundamentally inferior to the corresponding Romanian bank of the [[Danube]].<ref>Deac, pp. 299, 302, 311–312</ref> On its publication, ''Amintirile unui fost holeric'' was embraced by novelist [[Mihail Sadoveanu]] as an accurate record for the "sad and bitter reality" of the 1913 expedition.<ref name="potra"/> Overall, it stands out for its defense of the campaign, describing the masses of soldiers as overall enthusiastic about going to war.<ref>Andreea-Mihaela Creangă, "Războaiele balcanice ca spectacol mediatic: relatarea jurnalistică", in ''Analele Banatului. Arheologie–Istorie'', Vol. XXIII, 2015, p. 415</ref> As Gane argues, Romania "restored peace" and earned Europe's respect; this contrasts pronouncements by other veterans, including V. Dragoșescu—who claimed that the campaign could only hurt Romania in the long run.<ref>Deac, p. 305</ref> ''Prin viroage și coclauri'' is a first-hand source on life during [[trench warfare]], detailing the parties and superstitions of soldiers reduced to that lifestyle.<ref name="bmărm"/> ''Întâmplarea cea mare'' is a more subdued travel account where the author digresses into meditations on Romanian and foreign history. The artifacts of ancient Egypt and especially Greece lead him to literary and mythological reflections; he also describes these countries' present-day realities, sometimes in a humorous tone.<ref name="simion"/>


When writing about Romanian history, Gane's historic and literary focuses combined to produce evocative social and political portraits. In 1947, literary critic [[Perpessicius]] noted that Gane struck a "singular note in our historical literature", moving between the "romanticized document" and the novel itself—in both sets of works, the narrator shows up as a "discreet" participant, with clues and musings.<ref>Perpessicius, pp. 94–95</ref> ''Pe aripa vremei'' traces his own family's genealogical tree up to the [[foundation of Moldavia]], while ''Acum o sută de ani'' recounts the main events that occurred in the [[Danubian Principalities]] a century earlier (1834–1835).<ref name="simion"/> His interest in the human character was explored in ''Farmece'', an account of [[Despot Vodă]]; and in ''Dincolo de zbuciumul veacului'', which selects grandiose and tragic figures from the turbulent [[Romania in the Middle Ages|Middle Ages]].<ref name="simion"/> A [[family saga]] centered on the estate of [[Corni, Galați|Măcișeni]], ''Rădăcini'' did not have much impact,<ref name="simion"/> although it was favorably reviewed by Perpessicius. The latter praised Gane's talent for inventing emblematic characters to condense and highlight social history, though he suggested that some notes "sounded off-key".<ref>Perpessicius, pp. 95–96</ref> Gane's one play, ''Phrynea'', remains in manuscript form.<ref name="simion"/>
When writing about Romanian history, Gane's historic and literary focuses combined to produce evocative social and political portraits. In 1947, literary critic [[Perpessicius]] asserted that Gane struck a "singular note in our historical literature", moving between the "romanticized document" and the novel itself—in both sets of works, the narrator shows up as a "discreet" participant, with clues and musings.<ref>Perpessicius, pp. 94–95</ref> ''Pe aripa vremei'' traces his own family's genealogical tree up to the [[foundation of Moldavia]], while ''Acum o sută de ani'' recounts the main events that occurred in the [[Danubian Principalities]] a century earlier (1834–1835).<ref name="simion"/> His interest in the human character was explored in ''Farmece'', an account of [[Despot Vodă]]; and in ''Dincolo de zbuciumul veacului'', which selects grandiose and tragic figures from the turbulent [[Romania in the Middle Ages|Middle Ages]].<ref name="simion"/> A [[family saga]] centered on the estate of [[Corni, Galați|Măcișeni]], ''Rădăcini'' did not have much impact,<ref name="simion"/> although it was favorably reviewed by Perpessicius. The latter praised Gane's talent for inventing emblematic characters to condense and highlight social history, though he suggested that some notes "sounded off-key".<ref>Perpessicius, pp. 95–96</ref> Gane's one play, ''Phrynea'', remains in manuscript form.<ref name="simion"/>
Gane's historical accounts suffer from minute genealogies, an excess of documentary detail, polemical interventions and confusing or incoherent passages.<ref name="simion"/> One enduring and poorly reviewed trait was Gane's willingness to connect his family with the crucial events of Moldavia's past. In 1939, the literary scholar [[George Călinescu]] described Gane as the author of "corporate literature", who outlined a defense of the aristocracy and included himself in it, "seeking to prove his belonging to that caste".<ref>"Revista revistelor: Românești. ''Jurnalul Literar'', 2 Aprilie 1939 — Anul I, Nr. 14", in ''[[Revista Fundațiilor Regale]]'', Vol. VI, Issue 5, May 1939, p. 479</ref> Călinescu openly ridiculed Gane for passing trivia about his own family into his works. Gane responded that there was nothing commonplace about his family.<ref name="slmesc"/> The writings did earn praise from various professional historians, including Iorga<ref name="trecut"/> and, later, [[Lucian Boia]]; the latter sees Gane as "an 'amateur' historian, but quite professional with the amplitude of his documentation and his unfaltering narration".<ref>Boia, pp. 138–139</ref> Likewise, Paul Cernovodeanu describes Gane as a "publicist with a passion for history and genealogy", but also as an "expert" and "researcher".<ref>Cernovodeanu (2002), pp. 84–85</ref>
Gane's historical accounts suffer from minute genealogies, an excess of documentary detail, polemical interventions and confusing or incoherent passages.<ref name="simion"/> One enduring and poorly reviewed trait was Gane's willingness to connect his family with the crucial events of Moldavia's past. In 1939, the literary scholar [[George Călinescu]] described Gane as the author of "corporate literature", who outlined a defense of the aristocracy and included himself in it, "seeking to prove his belonging to that caste".<ref>"Revista revistelor: Românești. ''Jurnalul Literar'', 2 Aprilie 1939 — Anul I, Nr. 14", in ''[[Revista Fundațiilor Regale]]'', Vol. VI, Issue 5, May 1939, p. 479</ref> Călinescu openly ridiculed Gane for passing trivia about his own family into his works. Gane responded that there was nothing commonplace about his family.<ref name="slmesc"/> The writings did earn praise from various professional historians, including Iorga<ref name="trecut"/> and, later, [[Lucian Boia]]; the latter sees Gane as "an 'amateur' historian, but quite professional with the amplitude of his documentation and his unfaltering narration".<ref>Boia, pp. 138–139</ref> Likewise, Paul Cernovodeanu describes Gane as a "publicist with a passion for history and genealogy", but also as an "expert" and "researcher".<ref>Cernovodeanu (2002), pp. 84–85</ref>
Line 64: Line 66:


===Women's historian===
===Women's historian===
Gane's enduring masterpiece is ''Trecute vieți de doamne și domnițe'', volume I of which was granted a prize by the Romanian Academy. The book features a vast array of noble ladies from the time of the first [[voievod]]es until the [[union of the Principalities]], against the backdrop of chaotic historical events. Among the more memorable figures are [[Doamna Chiajna]] and [[Doamna Elisabeta Movilă|Elisabeta Movilă]], and the tragic end of [[Domnița Ruxandra]] has drawn praise.<ref name="simion"/> As noted by critics, the subjects are unusual and captivating, revealed in stories full of color, recounted in a language of archaic vigor.<ref name="simion"/><ref name="trecut"/> In 1933, theologian and journalist Grigore T. Marcu saluted Gane's "exceptional talent for storytelling, his voice seeped into the dusty chronicles of our nation", producing "a lively fresco from the lives of princely ladies and children".<ref>Grigore T. Marcu, "Vitrina cărții. Cronica literară. C. Gane—''Trecute vieți de doamne și domnițe''—vol. I ed. II", in ''Viața Ilustrată'', Vol. II, Issue 1, January 1935, pp. 23–24</ref> Some 70 years later, writer [[Gheorghe Grigurcu]] revisited ''Trecute vieți'' as "one of the essential books of my childhood [...], with its rich literary savor pulsating within the arteries of complicated historical reconstructions".<ref>{{in lang|ro}} [[Gheorghe Grigurcu]], [https://web.archive.org/web/20170118053929/http://www.romlit.ro/o_carte_somptuoas_ii "O carte somptuoasă (II)"], in ''[[România Literară]]'', Issue 22/2008</ref> According to literary critic Ioan Milică, Gane reused classical storytelling formulas recalling [[Ion Budai-Deleanu]] and [[Ion Creangă]] in creating portrait-caricatures—for instance, that of the sailor-prince [[Nicholas Mavrogenes]].<ref name="trecut"/> Love stories, abductions and releases, spectacular executions (such as those of [[Constantin Brâncoveanu]] and his sons), rises and falls succeed one another in a steady rhythm that recreates the atmosphere of the periods it depicts.<ref name="simion"/>
Gane's enduring masterpiece is ''Trecute vieți de doamne și domnițe'', volume I of which was granted a prize by the Romanian Academy. The book features a vast array of noble ladies from the time of the first [[voievod]]es until the [[union of the Principalities]], against the backdrop of chaotic historical events. Among the more memorable figures are [[Doamna Chiajna]] and [[Doamna Elisabeta Movilă|Elisabeta Movilă]], and the tragic end of [[Domnița Ruxandra]] has drawn praise.<ref name="simion"/> As noted by critics, the subjects are unusual and captivating, revealed in stories full of color, recounted in a language of archaic vigor.<ref name="simion"/><ref name="trecut"/> In 1933, theologian and journalist Grigore T. Marcu saluted Gane's "exceptional talent for storytelling, his voice seeped into the dusty chronicles of our nation", producing "a lively fresco from the lives of princely ladies and children".<ref>Grigore T. Marcu, "Vitrina cărții. Cronica literară. C. Gane—''Trecute vieți de doamne și domnițe''—vol. I ed. II", in ''Viața Ilustrată'', Vol. II, Issue 1, January 1935, pp. 23–24</ref> Some 70 years later, writer [[Gheorghe Grigurcu]] revisited ''Trecute vieți'' as "one of the essential books of my childhood [...], with its rich literary savor pulsating within the arteries of complicated historical reconstructions".<ref>{{in lang|ro}} [[Gheorghe Grigurcu]], [https://web.archive.org/web/20170118053929/http://www.romlit.ro/o_carte_somptuoas_ii "O carte somptuoasă (II)"], in ''[[România Literară]]'', Issue 22/2008</ref> According to literary critic Ioan Milică, Gane reused classical storytelling formulas recalling [[Ion Budai-Deleanu]] and [[Ion Creangă (writer)|Ion Creangă]] in creating portrait-caricatures—for instance, that of the sailor-prince [[Nicholas Mavrogenes]].<ref name="trecut"/> Love stories, abductions and releases, spectacular executions (such as those of [[Constantin Brâncoveanu]] and his sons), rises and falls succeed one another in a steady rhythm that recreates the atmosphere of the periods it depicts.<ref name="simion"/>


Scholar Constanța Vintilă-Ghițulescu views Gane's study as a "landmark" in Romanian [[women's history]], but also cautions that it belongs to the "tiny biographical" genre and often switches focus to the male protagonists.<ref>Constanța Vintilă-Ghițulescu, "Evul mediu românesc și istoria femeii (secolele XVII–XVIII)", in Ionela Băluță, Ioana Cîrstocea (eds.), ''Direcții și teme de cercetare în studiile de gen din România. Atelier Colegiul Noua Europă, București, 5 iulie 2002'', p. 29. Bucharest: New Europe College, 2003. {{ISBN|973-85697-5-3}}</ref> In 2009, medievalist Ioan Marian Țiplic noted that ''Trecute vieți'' remained "the sole work of synthesis focusing on medieval women in all Romanian-language historiography, and even this one folds on analyzing matrimonial links and the role of women [in establishing] such links."<ref>Ioan Marian Țiplic, "Arheologia secolului XX. Naționalism, Marxism și Feminism", in ''Transilvania'', Issue 7/2009, p. 11</ref> As noted by historian Radu Mârza, "many of [Gane's] assessments", including some of his claims about [[Michael the Brave]], [[Doamna Stanca]], and [[Nicolae Pătrașcu]], are flawed, "bookish rather than scholarly."<ref>Mârza, pp. 73, 74</ref> Similarly, Slavist Emil Turdeanu writes that Gane's depiction of Ruxandra's marriage to [[Tymofiy Khmelnytsky]] is "not only shaky, but also counterfactual."<ref>Emil Turdeanu, "Manuscrisele robite de cazaci (III)", in ''[[Magazin Istoric]]'', September 1993, p. 44</ref> Among Gane's contemporaries, genealogists Gheorghe G. Bezviconi and George D. Florescu both criticized the writer for his over-enthusiasm and carelessness; Bezviconi dismissed ''Trecute vieți'' as a "romanticized biography".<ref>Gheorghe G. Bezviconi, "Oameni și fapte. O biografie romanțată", in ''Din Trecutul Nostru'', Vol. VII, August–September 1939, p. 100</ref> Some passages of ''Trecute vieți'' also reflect Gane's polemics against [[Catholic Church in Romania|Romanian Catholicism]], from an [[Romanian Orthodox Church|Orthodox]] position. This prompted Catholic writer Mariu Theodorian-Carada to publish "[[corrigenda]]" claiming to expose Gane's "mistaken, sometimes unfair" views on the subject.<ref>"Bibliografie. ''Corrigenda'', de M. Theodorian–Carada", in ''Vestitorul'', Vol. 9, Issues 17–18, September 1933, p. 16</ref> According to Mârza, Gane's book is overall "seriously researched", but "is not scientific in nature, being rather a popularizing work".<ref>Mârza, p. 73</ref>
Scholar Constanța Vintilă-Ghițulescu views Gane's study as a "landmark" in Romanian [[women's history]], but also cautions that it belongs to the "tiny biographical" genre and often switches focus to the male protagonists.<ref>Constanța Vintilă-Ghițulescu, "Evul mediu românesc și istoria femeii (secolele XVII–XVIII)", in Ionela Băluță, Ioana Cîrstocea (eds.), ''Direcții și teme de cercetare în studiile de gen din România. Atelier Colegiul Noua Europă, București, 5 iulie 2002'', p. 29. Bucharest: New Europe College, 2003. {{ISBN|973-85697-5-3}}</ref> In 2009, medievalist Ioan Marian Țiplic noted that ''Trecute vieți'' remained "the sole work of synthesis focusing on medieval women in all Romanian-language historiography, and even this one folds on analyzing matrimonial links and the role of women [in establishing] such links."<ref>Ioan Marian Țiplic, "Arheologia secolului XX. Naționalism, Marxism și Feminism", in ''Transilvania'', Issue 7/2009, p. 11</ref> As noted by historian Radu Mârza, "many of [Gane's] assessments", including some of his claims about [[Michael the Brave]], [[Doamna Stanca]], and [[Nicolae Pătrașcu]], are flawed, "bookish rather than scholarly."<ref>Mârza, pp. 73, 74</ref> Similarly, Slavist Emil Turdeanu writes that Gane's depiction of Ruxandra's marriage to [[Tymofiy Khmelnytsky]] is "not only shaky, but also counterfactual."<ref>Emil Turdeanu, "Manuscrisele robite de cazaci (III)", in ''[[Magazin Istoric]]'', September 1993, p. 44</ref> Among Gane's contemporaries, genealogists Gheorghe G. Bezviconi and George D. Florescu both criticized the writer for his over-enthusiasm and carelessness; Bezviconi dismissed ''Trecute vieți'' as a "romanticized biography".<ref>Gheorghe G. Bezviconi, "Oameni și fapte. O biografie romanțată", in ''Din Trecutul Nostru'', Vol. VII, August–September 1939, p. 100</ref> Some passages of ''Trecute vieți'' also reflect Gane's polemics against [[Catholic Church in Romania|Romanian Catholicism]], from an [[Romanian Orthodox Church|Orthodox]] position. This prompted Catholic writer Mariu Theodorian-Carada to publish "[[corrigenda]]" claiming to expose Gane's "mistaken, sometimes unfair" views on the subject.<ref>"Bibliografie. ''Corrigenda'', de M. Theodorian–Carada", in ''Vestitorul'', Vol. 9, Issues 17–18, September 1933, p. 16</ref> According to Mârza, Gane's book is overall "seriously researched", but "is not scientific in nature, being rather a popularizing work".<ref>Mârza, p. 73</ref>


The final installments of ''Trecute vieți'' were panned by Iorga, who noted that their "pioneering notices" were unveiled in the form of "light anecdote about serious people".<ref name="nitrec">[[Nicolae Iorga]], "Dări de seamă. C. Gane, ''Trecute vieți de Domni {{sic}} și Domnițe''", in ''Revista Istorică'', Vol. XXVII, Issues 1–12, January–December 1941, pp. 165–166</ref> Sections of these books drew heavily on new archival material, including the letters of Maria Moruzi Comnen.<ref>Svetlana Suveică, Petre Guran, "Familia Krupenski și elita istorică a Basarabiei", in Mircea Ciubotaru, Lucian-Valeriu Lefter (eds.), ''Mihai Dim. Sturdza la 80 de ani. Omagiu'', p. 339. Iași: [[Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Press]], 2014. {{ISBN|978-606-714-055-2}}</ref> The author also had interviews with [[Marthe Bibesco]], who provided details about the mental illness plaguing [[Zoe Brâncoveanu]], and leading to her divorce from Prince [[Gheorghe Bibescu]].<ref>Strihan, pp. 68–69</ref> As part of his research, Gane found and published portraits of Smaranda Vogoride, Princess-consort to [[Mihail Sturdza]],<ref>Sorin Iftimi, "O ''addenda'' la portretistica lui Nicolo Livaditi (1830–1858)", in ''Cercetări Istorice'', Vol. XXXII, 2013, pp. 303, 314</ref> and of Lady [[Marițica Bibescu|Marițica Văcărescu-Bibescu]].<ref name="nitrec"/> Nevertheless, Gane's research of the 19th century continued to feature questionable material. As noted by historian Pavel Strihan, Gane credited urban legends about Prince Bibescu and Marițica, and gave a-historical explanations for their legal conflict with the [[Sfatul boieresc|Wallachian Ordinary Assembly]].<ref>Strihan, pp. 69, 70</ref> As literary accomplishments, these final works were criticized by Iorga. He was puzzled by Gane's decision to include a rhyming preface ("curious verse, which we can do without"), as well as for adding "quite doubtful" explanations for the reader, which omitted a number of bibliographic sources.<ref name="nitrec"/> As argued by reviewer [[Sorin Lavric]], ''Amărâte și vesele vieți'' is a counterweight to the main volumes, indirectly showing the relative emancipation of women under the ''[[Regulamentul Organic]]'' regime, but also the "baseness" of life in the post-aristocratic age.<ref name="slmesc"/> It also has a noted regionalist bias: there are 11 entries from Moldavia, 4 from Wallachia and one Englishwoman ([[Maria Rosetti]]).<ref name="msr213"/>
The final installments of ''Trecute vieți'' were panned by Iorga, who noted that their "pioneering notices" were unveiled in the form of "light anecdote about serious people".<ref name="nitrec">[[Nicolae Iorga]], "Dări de seamă. C. Gane, ''Trecute vieți de Domni {{sic}} și Domnițe''", in ''Revista Istorică'', Vol. XXVII, Issues 1–12, January–December 1941, pp. 165–166</ref> Sections of these books drew heavily on new archival material, including the letters of Maria Moruzi Comnen.<ref>Svetlana Suveică, Petre Guran, "Familia Krupenski și elita istorică a Basarabiei", in Mircea Ciubotaru, Lucian-Valeriu Lefter (eds.), ''Mihai Dim. Sturdza la 80 de ani. Omagiu'', p. 339. Iași: [[Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Press]], 2014. {{ISBN|978-606-714-055-2}}</ref> The author also had interviews with [[Marthe Bibesco]], who provided details about the mental illness plaguing [[Zoe Brâncoveanu]], and leading to her divorce from Prince [[Gheorghe Bibescu]].<ref>Strihan, pp. 68–69</ref> As part of his research, Gane found and published portraits of Smaranda Vogoride, Princess-consort to [[Mihail Sturdza]],<ref>Sorin Iftimi, "O ''addenda'' la portretistica lui Nicolo Livaditi (1830–1858)", in ''Cercetări Istorice'', Vol. XXXII, 2013, pp. 303, 314</ref> and of Lady [[Marițica Bibescu|Marițica Văcărescu-Bibescu]];<ref name="nitrec"/> he also helped record the life of Safta Costache Talpan.<ref>Monu, p. 7</ref> Nevertheless, Gane's research of the 19th century continued to feature questionable material. As noted by historian Pavel Strihan, Gane credited urban legends about Prince Bibescu and Marițica, and gave a-historical explanations for their legal conflict with the [[Sfatul boieresc|Wallachian Ordinary Assembly]].<ref>Strihan, pp. 69, 70</ref> As literary accomplishments, these final works were criticized by Iorga. He was puzzled by Gane's decision to include a rhyming preface ("curious verse, which we can do without"), as well as for adding "quite doubtful" explanations for the reader, which omitted a number of bibliographic sources.<ref name="nitrec"/> As argued by reviewer [[Sorin Lavric]], ''Amărâte și vesele vieți'' is a counterweight to the main volumes, indirectly showing the relative emancipation of women under the ''[[Regulamentul Organic]]'' regime, but also the "baseness" of life in the post-aristocratic age.<ref name="slmesc"/> It also has a noted regionalist bias: there are 11 entries from Moldavia, 4 from Wallachia and one Englishwoman ([[Maria Rosetti]]).<ref name="msr213"/>


==Notes==
==Notes==
Line 74: Line 76:


==References==
==References==
{{columns-list|colwidth=30em|
*[[Lucian Boia]], ''Capcanele istoriei. Elita intelectuală românească între 1930 și 1950''. Bucharest: [[Humanitas publishing house|Humanitas]], 2012. {{ISBN|978-973-50-3533-4}}
*[[Lucian Boia]], ''Capcanele istoriei. Elita intelectuală românească între 1930 și 1950''. Bucharest: [[Humanitas publishing house|Humanitas]], 2012. {{ISBN|978-973-50-3533-4}}
*Paul Cernovodeanu, "Un conte aventurier și o falsă prințesă", in ''[[Magazin Istoric]]'', July 2002, pp.&nbsp;83–86.
*Paul Cernovodeanu, "Un conte aventurier și o falsă prințesă", in ''[[Magazin Istoric]]'', July 2002, pp.&nbsp;83–86.
Line 84: Line 87:
**"Dări de seamă. C. Gane, ''P. P. Carp și locul său în istoria politică a țerii'', I", in ''Revista Istorică'', Vol. XXII, Issues 10–12, October–December 1936, pp.&nbsp;352–355.
**"Dări de seamă. C. Gane, ''P. P. Carp și locul său în istoria politică a țerii'', I", in ''Revista Istorică'', Vol. XXII, Issues 10–12, October–December 1936, pp.&nbsp;352–355.
*Radu Mârza, "Implicarea familiei în diplomație la Mihai Viteazul: practica trimiterii familiei proprii ca ostatică la partenerii politici", in ''Revista Bistriței'', Vol. XII–XIII, 1999, pp.&nbsp;73–83.
*Radu Mârza, "Implicarea familiei în diplomație la Mihai Viteazul: practica trimiterii familiei proprii ca ostatică la partenerii politici", in ''Revista Bistriței'', Vol. XII–XIII, 1999, pp.&nbsp;73–83.
*Elena Monu, ''Familia Costache. Istorie și genealogie''. Bârlad: Editura Sfera, 2011. {{ISBN|978-606-573-162-2}}
*[[Perpessicius]], "Comentarii critice. Mențiuni critice. Cronica romanelor. Cezar Petrescu: ''Tapirul''—Dan Petrașincu: ''Timpuri împlinite''—C. Gane: ''Rădăcini. Romanul Măcișenilor''", in ''[[Revista Fundațiilor Regale]]'', Vol. XIV, Issues 10–11, October–November 1947, pp.&nbsp;82–96.
*[[Perpessicius]], "Comentarii critice. Mențiuni critice. Cronica romanelor. Cezar Petrescu: ''Tapirul''—Dan Petrașincu: ''Timpuri împlinite''—C. Gane: ''Rădăcini. Romanul Măcișenilor''", in ''[[Revista Fundațiilor Regale]]'', Vol. XIV, Issues 10–11, October–November 1947, pp.&nbsp;82–96.
*Mihai Sorin Rădulescu, "Cartea de istorie. ''L'Histoire des femmes'', o reeditare binevenită", in ''[[Viața Românească]]'', Issues 8–9/2008, pp.&nbsp;211–213.
*Mihai Sorin Rădulescu, "Cartea de istorie. ''L'Histoire des femmes'', o reeditare binevenită", in ''[[Viața Românească]]'', Issues 8–9/2008, pp.&nbsp;211–213.
*Pavel Strihan, "Un divorț domnesc", in ''Magazin Istoric'', June 1969, pp.&nbsp;68–71.
*Pavel Strihan, "Un divorț domnesc", in ''Magazin Istoric'', June 1969, pp.&nbsp;68–71.
}}

{{authority control}}
{{authority control}}


Line 99: Line 103:
[[Category:Romanian literary historians]]
[[Category:Romanian literary historians]]
[[Category:Oral historians]]
[[Category:Oral historians]]
[[Category:20th-century memoirists]]
[[Category:20th-century Romanian memoirists]]
[[Category:Romanian memoirists]]
[[Category:20th-century Romanian male writers]]
[[Category:Romanian travel writers]]
[[Category:Romanian travel writers]]
[[Category:Romanian historical novelists]]
[[Category:Romanian historical novelists]]
Line 130: Line 134:
[[Category:Romanian people who died in prison custody]]
[[Category:Romanian people who died in prison custody]]
[[Category:Censorship in Romania]]
[[Category:Censorship in Romania]]
[[Category:A. T. Laurian National College alumni]]

Revision as of 22:57, 14 August 2024

Constantin Gane
Gane as a youth, c.1910
Gane as a youth, c.1910
Born(1885-03-27)March 27, 1885
Botoșani, Kingdom of Romania
DiedMay 13, 1962(1962-05-13) (aged 77)
Aiud Prison, Cluj Region, Romanian People's Republic
Occupation
  • Lawyer
  • journalist
  • diplomat
  • politician
Period1914–1947
Genre

Constantin Gane (March 27, 1885 – May 13, 1962) was a Romanian novelist, amateur historian, biographer and memoirist. Born into the boyar aristocracy of Western Moldavia, he worked as a lawyer in Bucharest, achieving literary notoriety with his recollections from the Second Balkan War and the Romanian front of World War I. By the 1930s, he was primarily a writer on historical and genealogical topics, famous for his contribution to women's history. An apologist for Romanian conservatism and Junimism, Gane also completed in 1936 a biography of Petre P. Carp. He was editor at Convorbiri Literare and a columnist for Cuvântul, also putting out his own literary newspaper, Sânziana.

The late 1930s attracted Gane into fascist politics, leading him to join the Iron Guard. This in turn led to his marginalization and internment by the National Renaissance Front government, but he was allowed his freedom in 1940, when he and other Guardists joined the Front itself (restyled as "Party of the Nation"). Returning to prominence in 1940–1941, when the Guard produced its National Legionary State, Gane served as Romanian ambassador to the Kingdom of Greece. He retired from politics for the remainder of World War II, and resumed his work in literature. Again repressed following the establishment of a Romanian communist regime, he spent 13 years in confinement, ultimately dying at Aiud Prison in 1962. His work was banned by communist censors, then selectively recovered from 1969. It was revisited and republished in the post-communist decades, although interest in it remained marginal.

Biography

Youth and writing debut

Born in Botoșani, Constantin was the son of Ștefan ("Ștefănică") Gane,[1] and had an elder brother, Gheorghe or "Georges" (1883 or 1884 – August 1941), who trained as an engineer.[2] The writer repeatedly claimed multiple descent from an old boyar family of Moldavia, the Gănești. According to genealogist Mihai Sorin Rădulescu, his only proven link to this clan was through his paternal grandmother.[3] Through this connection, the family were related to Postelnic Matei Gane and writer-politician Nicolae Gane,[4] and also, more distantly, to ethnographer Arthur Gorovei. The latter lived in Nicolae Gane's house at Fălticeni and assisted Constantin with genealogical research.[5] Ștefan Gane was originally named "Gani". He also descended from boyardom, but had more recent Greek Romanian ancestry, traceable to the Phanariote period.[3] In the 1860s, he had attended the Französisches Gymnasium in Berlin.[6] As a minor Junimist (known to have been active in that movement's "small game" section, the caracudă), he had met and befriended the peasant raconteur Ion Creangă.[7]

The writer's mother was Constanța née Canano, one of the last surviving members from a Moldavian family of notables.[8] Constantin later claimed that she was a descendant of Byzantine aristocracy, a theory dismissed as self-aggrandizing by Rădulescu.[9] He also believed that the Cananos had more distant Italian roots, against authors which suggest they were "Levantines". Genealogist Mihai Gicoveanu proposes that his take may be correct, linking Gane to another Canano family, attested at Ferrara in the 11th century; the Moldavian Cananos' patriarch was a Căminar Constantin, active in the late 17th century—though Gane claimed to have traced his maternal descent to Postelnic Constantin Ciobanul, attested around 1560.[10] The family was attested as belonging to the rightful peerage in January 1742, following reviews by a boyar commission which included Ion Neculce.[11] Historian Paul Cernovodeanu views the Cananos as Phanariotes—and, more specifically, as one of the 36 second-rate Phanariote boyar clans (directly below those of the Hospodars).[12]

According to his own recollections, Constantin grew up passionate about storytelling, picking up accounts from the family cook, a senior Romani man (and former slave), and from his maternal grandmother, who was a Napoleon enthusiast.[13] After mediocre and unruly beginnings in school, he improved himself to take first prizes, being largely motivated by books which were offered to the highest ranking graduate.[14] He completed A. T. Laurian High School in 1903 and went on to study law in Germany, obtaining a doctorate from the University of Rostock in 1910.[15][16] After returning home, he worked as a lawyer for some fifteen years, both in his native town and in the national capital Bucharest.[16] In the early 1910s, his prose was hosted in Viața Romînească magazine.[17]

At some point before 1915, Gane was secretary to Conservative Party politician Ioan Lahovary.[18] In 1913, he took part as a volunteer[16] in the Second Balkan War, destroying his literary notebooks before his departure for the front.[13] From 1916,[16] he also fought in the campaigns of World War I, part of the 8th Chasseurs Regiment stationed at Mănăstirea Cașin.[19] His combat experience was recorded in Amintirile unui fost holeric ("The Recollection of a Former Cholera Patient", 1914; Romanian Academy prize) and Prin viroage și coclauri ("Through Ravines and Boondocks", 1922). This was followed in 1923 by a family history, Pe aripa vremei ("On the Wing of Time").[16] Constantin's brother Gheorghe married the Bessarabian belle Elena Morariu-Andreevici. She was the niece of Silvestru Morariu Andrievici, Bishop of Bukovina, and the great-granddaughter of poet Constantin Stamati.[20] This made Constantin the paternal uncle of an architect, Ștefan Radu Gane (1923–1988).[21]

Coat of arms used by Gane and his family

In adulthood, Gane remained passionate about history, traveling domestically and abroad, rifling through archives and libraries, visiting museums and artistic monuments and researching oral tradition.[16] He published prose (especially of a historical character), articles, notes and reviews, correspondence, travel accounts, plays and novel fragments in Epoca, Universul Literar, Curentul, Cele Trei Crișuri, Politica, Revista Fundațiilor Regale, Luceafărul and Flacăra, and Convorbiri Literare,[16] serving for a while in 1926 as the latter's editor.[22] He returned in 1927 with the notes of Întâmplarea cea mare ("Major Occurrence"), followed by a series of historical novels and tracts: Trecute vieți de doamne și domnițe ("Bygone Lives of Queens and Princesses", 3 volumes, 1932–1939); Farmece ("Charms", 1933); Acum o sută de ani ("One Hundred Years Ago", 2 volumes, 1935); P. P. Carp și locul său în istoria politică a țării ("P. P. Carp and His Place in the Country's Political History", 2 volumes, 1936); Domnița Alexandrina Ghica și contele D'Antraigues ("Princess Alexandrina Ghica and the Count D'Antraigues", 1937); Dincolo de zbuciumul veacului ("Beyond the Fretting of an Era", 1939).[16]

Far-right engagement an ambassadorship

Gane also held conferences and, between 1929 and 1937, a series of Radio Bucharest lectures on historical, cultural and literary themes, including the first trial of Mihail Kogălniceanu, Dimitrie Cantemir, and the novels of Stefan Zweig.[16] Other such lectures focused on details from the family life of Mihnea Turcitul, or detailed theories about the meaning of the ancestral ballad Miorița.[23] In the latter case, Gane argued that folk poetry had recorded the mutual enmity between Moldavia and Wallachia, including their territorial conflicts over Putna County. This allowed him to date Miorița back to the 1400s or earlier.[23] He also contributed to Ion Gigurtu's Libertatea, where he published a study on the formation of Romania's political parties (January 1934)[24] and a genealogical essay on Maurice Paléologue (February 1935).[25]

Before 1934, Gane lived on Enei Street, after which he moved to a home on Calea Griviței, near Gara de Nord.[26] He joined the Romanian Writers' Society that year,[15][16] and, from June, began issuing his research on the female branches of the Callimachi family as a serial for Realitatea Ilustrată.[27] On October 9, 1937,[28] Gane began putting out the Bucharest-based Sânziana, a literary newspaper. In part, this enterprise reflected his genealogical preoccupation, putting out portions of Father Vasile Grigorescu's memoir of life in Fălticeni, some of which spoke about the Gane family.[29] During this time, Gane also published a historical column in the newspaper Cuvântul.[30] Politically, he gravitated toward the far-right, and joined the Iron Guard in 1937—his recruitment as an intellectual "committed to the Guardist line of thought" was celebrated in January 1938 by colleague Mircea Streinul.[31] Another Guardist author, Mihail Cosma, gave a positive review to Sânziana as a "Romanian gazette written by Romanian Christian journalists", contrasting it to the "Judeo-Romanian press [which] holds all politicians in permanent terror, constraining their activity as political thinkers and their political behavior". Cosma noted Sânziana for Gane's own contributions as a historical columnist, as well as for articles from guest writers Mihail Polihroniade and Nicolae Totu.[32]

Gane then allegedly served on the Iron Guard's supervisory council, or "Senate".[33] On February 15, 1938, in Bucureștii Noi, he attended the wedding between Guardist painter Alexandru Bassarab and schoolteacher Elena Cantaragiu; other guests included Guard leader Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, alongside Polihroniade, Haig Acterian, Ion Zelea Codreanu, and Mircea Eliade.[34] Such associations with revolutionary fascism to made him a target for repression by King Carol II and his National Renaissance Front. This regime prevented political suspects from working and, according to the diaries of Victor Slăvescu, Gane "had no means to support himself";[35] Sânziana was banned in early 1938.[30] When banks refused to loan Gane any money, Slăvescu offered him gifts, which Gane promised to repay with books from his own collection.[35] By September 1939, alongside World War II, civil war had erupted between the Front and the Guard. Gane was arrested alongside many other Guardists, and held in confinement at Miercurea Ciuc,[30] but was soon released following pleas from Petre P. Panaitescu and Radu R. Rosetti.[35] Later that month, he was traveling around Romania with Carol Victor, the nominal Prince of Albania. They visited Lahovary's daughter, Marthe Bibesco, at her villa in Comarnic; she described Gane as a "typical Bucharester from the year 1900, influenced by Parisian fashion of the 1890s."[18]

In mid-1940, the Guard reached an understanding with the Front: on June 23, the two groups merged into a "Party of the Nation", with Guard leader Horia Sima voicing his devotion toward Carol. Gane, Panaitescu and Nicolae Petrașcu were among the first to sign up to the new platform.[36] In 1940–1941, after Carol relinquished power, the Iron Guard took over government and established the "National Legionary State". Promoted in that interval, Gane returned to radio journalism, producing propaganda for the Guard's social service, Ajutorul Legionar.[37] In late October 1940, he announced that he was going on an extended study tour of the Kingdom of Greece.[38] On November 1,[39] Prime Minister Ion Antonescu appointed him as the ambassador to Greece. He was still in Bucharest on November 11, when he attended the funeral service of two policemen and Guardist affiliates, Eugen Necrelescu and Aron Valeriu, held at Sfântul Ilie Gorgani Church.[40]

According to Rădulescu, Gane might have been chosen for the diplomatic mission due to his Greek lineage;[9] nonetheless, while in Athens, he advocated on behalf of the minority Aromanians.[15][16][41] He remained in the area throughout the Greco-Italian War and during the German invasion of Greece, being finally recalled on June 15, 1941.[42] Returning to Romania, he was briefly involved in the cultural life of the Transnistria Governorate—carved out from Soviet Ukraine by Romania in the wake of Operation Barbarossa. In February 1942, as a speaker of Russian, he was ordered to assist Ion Radu Mircea with collecting and translating historical documents stored in Odesa, but failed to show up for this assignment.[43] Staying in Romania for the rest of World War II, Gane focused his biographical research on the Mavrodin boyars of Teleorman County, with a topical volume published in 1942.[44]

Communist repression and death

Gane also put out a 1943 sequel to Trecute vieți, titled Amărâte și vesele vieți de jupânese și cucoane ("Bittersweet Lives of Dames and Boyaresses"). A historical novel, Rădăcini ("Roots"), was published in 1947, and remains his final work.[16] In early 1944, he was putting out the specialized magazine Arhiva Genealogică Română, which he described as the continuation of works undertaken by Sever Zotta,[45] and lecturing on behalf of the YMCA at the Bucharest Atheneum.[46] Shortly after Romania proclaimed an armistice with Soviet Russia, he was again arrested, then sent to a concentration camp in Caracal, sharing his cell with Panaitescu and the missionary priest Ilarion Felea. According to Felea, the conditions were generally harsh, and food was scarce.[47] In 1946, a number of his books were formally banned through an order issued by Propaganda Minister Petre Constantinescu-Iași.[48] Gane was released from camp by 1948, but singled out for repression by the communist regime. Agents of the Securitate identified him as a figure on the far-right of anti-communist resistance, reporting that Gane was acting as an adviser to Petrașcu.[33]

Gane was re-arrested in December 1948, as part of a clampdown,[33] and sentenced in 1949.[16] He was dispatched to Aiud Prison in Cluj Region, where he was subjected to mistreatment and pushed to exhaustion. Though he reportedly maintained his humor and was physically strong, his refusal to undergo re-education made him a target for special abuse: he was sent into solitary confinement in an unheated cell, and made to stand on his feet throughout the working day. He complained of exhaustion and told his jailer that he was on the brink of dying; they ultimately released him after other prisoners proceeded to bang on their cell doors and demand that Gane be spared.[15] The Securitate promised him treatment for his medical conditions, if he agreed to write articles praising the regime—something which Gane refused to do.[49] While he was still recovering in 1962, the authorities reportedly issued papers allowing his release from prison.[15]

Gane died in Aiud before this could happen, and was buried in an unmarked grave.[15][50][51] His death is commonly believed to have occurred in April 1962, but the Gane family records the date as May 13.[51] In 1969, a relative liberalization allowed mentions of the deceased writer, and his nephew, Gheorghe Gane, Jr (1925–2008), published a brief bio in Clopotul of Botoșani. He also kept his uncle's genealogical archive in a Bucharest garage, before emigrating to West Germany; some of these papers were then preserved by genealogist and family friend Ștefan C. Gorovei.[52] Nephew Ștefan Radu also emigrated in 1974, spending the 1980s as a prominent critic of urban planning in Communist Romania.[53]

Trecute vieți de doamne și domnițe was reissued by Editura Junimea in 1971–1973, albeit touched by communist censorship.[50] He was still offered praise in some contexts, including by Luceafărul journalist Artur Silvestri, who wrote that Gane and his contemporary Radu Rosetti had retold historical events with an "outstanding epic vein."[54] Historian George Potra observed in 1980 that Gane had not been mentioned in reference works, despite being a "valuable author".[55] Such treatment was ended by the Romanian Revolution of 1989, which allowed Gane's work to be fully revisited. A Constantin Gane Street was consecrated in Botoșani,[51] while, in 2006, Amărâte și vesele vieți went through a reprint at Gheorghe Marin Speteanu publishers of Bucharest. Although this was largely a Speteanu family project, and therefore "not first-rate", Rădulescu expressed hopes that it would resurrect interest in Gane's work.[56] Nevertheless, as Gorovei argues, by 2011 Gane was still "entirely outside the scope of public attention."[51] Humanitas published an unabridged edition of Trecute vieți in 2014.[50] This was followed in 2016 by a reprint of Amărâte și vesele vieți, at Editura Corint.[57]

Work

Novelist and biographer

Gane's debut was as a humorist—a talented one, according to fellow writer-historian Nicolae Iorga.[17] The war memoirs were noted for their sincerity and patriotic emphasis. His first book featured a detailed description of his bout with cholera, which he contracted while fighting in Bulgaria.[16] It was among the first literary records of the Second Balkan War in Romania—alongside works by Iorga, Al. Lascarov-Moldovanu, and Haralamb Lecca;[58] as well as one of the period books giving Romanian impressions of Bulgaria. As such, Gane is highly critical of Bulgarian society, describing the barren landscape as fundamentally inferior to the corresponding Romanian bank of the Danube.[59] On its publication, Amintirile unui fost holeric was embraced by novelist Mihail Sadoveanu as an accurate record for the "sad and bitter reality" of the 1913 expedition.[55] Overall, it stands out for its defense of the campaign, describing the masses of soldiers as overall enthusiastic about going to war.[60] As Gane argues, Romania "restored peace" and earned Europe's respect; this contrasts pronouncements by other veterans, including V. Dragoșescu—who claimed that the campaign could only hurt Romania in the long run.[61] Prin viroage și coclauri is a first-hand source on life during trench warfare, detailing the parties and superstitions of soldiers reduced to that lifestyle.[19] Întâmplarea cea mare is a more subdued travel account where the author digresses into meditations on Romanian and foreign history. The artifacts of ancient Egypt and especially Greece lead him to literary and mythological reflections; he also describes these countries' present-day realities, sometimes in a humorous tone.[16]

When writing about Romanian history, Gane's historic and literary focuses combined to produce evocative social and political portraits. In 1947, literary critic Perpessicius asserted that Gane struck a "singular note in our historical literature", moving between the "romanticized document" and the novel itself—in both sets of works, the narrator shows up as a "discreet" participant, with clues and musings.[62] Pe aripa vremei traces his own family's genealogical tree up to the foundation of Moldavia, while Acum o sută de ani recounts the main events that occurred in the Danubian Principalities a century earlier (1834–1835).[16] His interest in the human character was explored in Farmece, an account of Despot Vodă; and in Dincolo de zbuciumul veacului, which selects grandiose and tragic figures from the turbulent Middle Ages.[16] A family saga centered on the estate of Măcișeni, Rădăcini did not have much impact,[16] although it was favorably reviewed by Perpessicius. The latter praised Gane's talent for inventing emblematic characters to condense and highlight social history, though he suggested that some notes "sounded off-key".[63] Gane's one play, Phrynea, remains in manuscript form.[16]

Gane's historical accounts suffer from minute genealogies, an excess of documentary detail, polemical interventions and confusing or incoherent passages.[16] One enduring and poorly reviewed trait was Gane's willingness to connect his family with the crucial events of Moldavia's past. In 1939, the literary scholar George Călinescu described Gane as the author of "corporate literature", who outlined a defense of the aristocracy and included himself in it, "seeking to prove his belonging to that caste".[64] Călinescu openly ridiculed Gane for passing trivia about his own family into his works. Gane responded that there was nothing commonplace about his family.[57] The writings did earn praise from various professional historians, including Iorga[50] and, later, Lucian Boia; the latter sees Gane as "an 'amateur' historian, but quite professional with the amplitude of his documentation and his unfaltering narration".[65] Likewise, Paul Cernovodeanu describes Gane as a "publicist with a passion for history and genealogy", but also as an "expert" and "researcher".[66]

Gane's 1936 homage to Petre P. Carp is noted for its "hagiographic" defense of the statesman, including against assessments that Carp was wrong not to nationalize the oil industry;[67] some of the chapters, such as the one devoted to Junimea society, are of documentary interest.[16] The book, and especially its opening chapter, highlighted a clash of conservative visions between Iorga and Gane. In his response, Iorga advised Gane to refrain from writing political history, for which he was unqualified. Iorga substantiated this allegation by listing errors supposedly found in Gane's chapter, including the "calumny" regarding Alexandru Ioan Cuza's involvement in a conspiracy against Barbu Catargiu.[68] Iorga also notes Gane's obstinacy in denying evidence about Carp's lowly origin and for "exaggerating" his political role, but also praises him for rediscovering Carp's first published essays.[69] Controversy surrounds other such contributions to the biographical genre. Perpessicius views Gane's work on the Count d'Antraigues as a "most important" contribution, commending Gane for his research into the Dijon city archives.[70] However, later reviewers have argued that the book is in large part an unwitting hoax. Cernovodeanu criticizes Gane for basing his entire book on a "romantic" theory, which identified "Princess Alexandrina Ghica" with a daughter of Grigore III; according to Cernovodeanu, the "Princess" was actually an impostor, and d'Antraigues her enabler.[71]

Women's historian

Gane's enduring masterpiece is Trecute vieți de doamne și domnițe, volume I of which was granted a prize by the Romanian Academy. The book features a vast array of noble ladies from the time of the first voievodes until the union of the Principalities, against the backdrop of chaotic historical events. Among the more memorable figures are Doamna Chiajna and Elisabeta Movilă, and the tragic end of Domnița Ruxandra has drawn praise.[16] As noted by critics, the subjects are unusual and captivating, revealed in stories full of color, recounted in a language of archaic vigor.[16][50] In 1933, theologian and journalist Grigore T. Marcu saluted Gane's "exceptional talent for storytelling, his voice seeped into the dusty chronicles of our nation", producing "a lively fresco from the lives of princely ladies and children".[72] Some 70 years later, writer Gheorghe Grigurcu revisited Trecute vieți as "one of the essential books of my childhood [...], with its rich literary savor pulsating within the arteries of complicated historical reconstructions".[73] According to literary critic Ioan Milică, Gane reused classical storytelling formulas recalling Ion Budai-Deleanu and Ion Creangă in creating portrait-caricatures—for instance, that of the sailor-prince Nicholas Mavrogenes.[50] Love stories, abductions and releases, spectacular executions (such as those of Constantin Brâncoveanu and his sons), rises and falls succeed one another in a steady rhythm that recreates the atmosphere of the periods it depicts.[16]

Scholar Constanța Vintilă-Ghițulescu views Gane's study as a "landmark" in Romanian women's history, but also cautions that it belongs to the "tiny biographical" genre and often switches focus to the male protagonists.[74] In 2009, medievalist Ioan Marian Țiplic noted that Trecute vieți remained "the sole work of synthesis focusing on medieval women in all Romanian-language historiography, and even this one folds on analyzing matrimonial links and the role of women [in establishing] such links."[75] As noted by historian Radu Mârza, "many of [Gane's] assessments", including some of his claims about Michael the Brave, Doamna Stanca, and Nicolae Pătrașcu, are flawed, "bookish rather than scholarly."[76] Similarly, Slavist Emil Turdeanu writes that Gane's depiction of Ruxandra's marriage to Tymofiy Khmelnytsky is "not only shaky, but also counterfactual."[77] Among Gane's contemporaries, genealogists Gheorghe G. Bezviconi and George D. Florescu both criticized the writer for his over-enthusiasm and carelessness; Bezviconi dismissed Trecute vieți as a "romanticized biography".[78] Some passages of Trecute vieți also reflect Gane's polemics against Romanian Catholicism, from an Orthodox position. This prompted Catholic writer Mariu Theodorian-Carada to publish "corrigenda" claiming to expose Gane's "mistaken, sometimes unfair" views on the subject.[79] According to Mârza, Gane's book is overall "seriously researched", but "is not scientific in nature, being rather a popularizing work".[80]

The final installments of Trecute vieți were panned by Iorga, who noted that their "pioneering notices" were unveiled in the form of "light anecdote about serious people".[81] Sections of these books drew heavily on new archival material, including the letters of Maria Moruzi Comnen.[82] The author also had interviews with Marthe Bibesco, who provided details about the mental illness plaguing Zoe Brâncoveanu, and leading to her divorce from Prince Gheorghe Bibescu.[83] As part of his research, Gane found and published portraits of Smaranda Vogoride, Princess-consort to Mihail Sturdza,[84] and of Lady Marițica Văcărescu-Bibescu;[81] he also helped record the life of Safta Costache Talpan.[85] Nevertheless, Gane's research of the 19th century continued to feature questionable material. As noted by historian Pavel Strihan, Gane credited urban legends about Prince Bibescu and Marițica, and gave a-historical explanations for their legal conflict with the Wallachian Ordinary Assembly.[86] As literary accomplishments, these final works were criticized by Iorga. He was puzzled by Gane's decision to include a rhyming preface ("curious verse, which we can do without"), as well as for adding "quite doubtful" explanations for the reader, which omitted a number of bibliographic sources.[81] As argued by reviewer Sorin Lavric, Amărâte și vesele vieți is a counterweight to the main volumes, indirectly showing the relative emancipation of women under the Regulamentul Organic regime, but also the "baseness" of life in the post-aristocratic age.[57] It also has a noted regionalist bias: there are 11 entries from Moldavia, 4 from Wallachia and one Englishwoman (Maria Rosetti).[9]

Notes

  1. ^ Iorga (1934), p. 184; Monu, p. 207; Rădulescu, pp. 212–213
  2. ^ "Ultima oră", in Universul, August 20, 1941, p. 9
  3. ^ a b Rădulescu, pp. 212–213
  4. ^ G. Ursu, "Părinții lui Nicu Gane", in Preocupări Literare, Issue 1/1942, pp. 3–8. See also Gorovei, pp. 227–230
  5. ^ Gorovei, p. 228
  6. ^ Monu, p. 207
  7. ^ C. Săteanu, "Câte ceva despre Ion Creangă", in Adevărul, December 31, 1935, p. 3
  8. ^ Gorovei, p. 232; Rădulescu, pp. 212–213
  9. ^ a b c Rădulescu, p. 213
  10. ^ Mihai Gicoveanu, "Jitnicerul Gheorghe Canano și familia sa", in Acta Moldaviae Septentrionalis, Vol. XVIII, 2019, pp. 203–204
  11. ^ Mihai-Bogdan Atanasiu, Din lumea cronicarului Ion Neculce. Studiu prosopografic, pp. 96–97. Iași: Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, 2015. ISBN 978-606-714-193-1
  12. ^ Paul Cernovodeanu, "Mobility and Traditionalism: The Evolution of the Boyar Class in the Romanian Principalities in the 18th Century", in Revue des Études Sud-Est Européennes, Vol. XXIV, Issue 3, July–September 1986, p. 251
  13. ^ a b Gane, p. 4
  14. ^ Gane, p. 8
  15. ^ a b c d e f Cristina Cioabă, "Chipuri ale jertfei", in Cuvântul Care Zidește. Foaia Duminicală a Parohiei Șerban Vodă, Vol. VII, Issue 13, March 2017, p. 4
  16. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x Eugen Simion (ed.), Dicționarul general al literaturii Române, Vol. 6, pp. 243–244. Bucharest: Editura Univers Enciclopedic, 2007. ISBN 973-637-070-4
  17. ^ a b Iorga (1934), p. 184
  18. ^ a b Marthe Bibesco, Jurnal politic 1939–1941, p. 97. Bucharest: Editura Politică, 1979
  19. ^ a b Bianca Mărmureanu, "Viața de front a combatanților din Armata Română în anul 1917. Activități în afara confruntării cu inamicul", in Archiva Moldaviae, Vol. III, 2011, pp. 133–135
  20. ^ Gorovei, p. 225. See also Hariton, p. 30
  21. ^ Hariton, p. 30
  22. ^ "Cărți, reviste, ziare. Convorbiri literare", in Societatea de Mâine, Issue 17/1926, p. 324
  23. ^ a b Gheorghe Gh. Longinescu, "Cu casca la ureche. IV", in Natura. Revistă pentru Răspândirea Științei, Vol. 19, Issue 4, April 1930, pp. 22–23
  24. ^ "Cărți și reviste. O revistă de specialitate care se afirmă", in Observatorul. Revistă de Cultură Generală, Vol. VII, Issues 1–2, January–February 1934, p. 71
  25. ^ Neagu Djuvara, Între Orient și Occident. Țările române la începutul epocii moderne, pp. 347, 377. Bucharest: Humanitas, 1995. ISBN 973-28-0523-4
  26. ^ Gorovei, pp. 230, 232
  27. ^ Introductory note to C. Gane, "Doamnele din neamul Callimachilor, I", in Realitatea Ilustrată, No. 385, June 10, 1934, p. 11
  28. ^ Mircea Streinul, "Cultură, Oameni, Fapte. Cuiburi de lumină", in Buna Vestire, October 8, 1937, p. 2
  29. ^ G. Ursu, "Un profesor al lui Ion Creangă la Folticeni: Părintele Vasile Grigorescu Catihetul", in Convorbiri Literare, Vol. LXXV, Issues 5–6, May–June 1942, p. 327
  30. ^ a b c Gorovei, p. 235
  31. ^ Mircea Streinul, "Cultură, Oameni, Fapte. Cartea și publicațiile legionare", in Buna Vestire, January 1, 1938, p. 2
  32. ^ Mihail Cosma, "Sânziana", in Buna Vestire, November 7, 1937, p. 1
  33. ^ a b c Florica Dobre, Florian Banu, Camelia Ivan Duică, Theodor Bărbulescu, Liviu Țăranu (eds.), Securitatea: structuri-cadre; obiective și metode. Vol. I (1948–1967), p. 280. Bucharest: Editura enciclopedică, 2006. ISBN 973-45-0541-6
  34. ^ "Ultima Oră. Căsătoria pictorului Alexandru Bassarab", in Buna Vestire, February 16, 1938, p. 6
  35. ^ a b c Boia, p. 139
  36. ^ "Ultima oră. O chemare și cele dintâi adeziuni", in Glasul Bucovinei, June 25, 1940, p. 4; "Urdareanu vezérkari főnöke beszéde", in Keleti Ujság, June 25, 1940, p. 1
  37. ^ Florin Müller, "Mișcarea legionară, noi perspective în cercetare", in Revista Istorică, Vol. XXII, Issues 1–2, 2011, p. 29
  38. ^ "Scriitorul Const. Gane la Atena", in Curentul, October 25, 1940, p. 3
  39. ^ "D. D. Gane ministru la Atena", in Curentul, November 3, 1940, p. 3
  40. ^ "Rămășițele pământești ale legionarilor Eugen Necrelescu și Aron Valeriu au fost depuse in biserica Sf. Ilie Gorgani", in Universul, November 12, 1940, p. 3
  41. ^ Deac, p. 304
  42. ^ "Ultima oră. Misiunea dlui N. [sic] Gane, ministrul României la Atena încetează", in Țara, Vol. I, Issue 44, June 1941, p. 8
  43. ^ Corneliu-Mihail Lungu, Maricica Ifrim, Ana-Felicia Diaconu (eds.), Aurelian Sacerdoțeanu. Corespondență (1928–1974), pp. 82, 84. Bucharest: National Archives of Romania, 2004. ISBN 973-8308-18-6
  44. ^ Steluța Chefani-Pătrașcu, Moșieri teleormăneni (1864–1949). Mărire și decădere (Publicațiile Muzeului Județean Teleorman, VI), pp. 45–46. Bucharest: Renaissance, 2011. ISBN 978-606-637-009-7
  45. ^ Al. Andronic, "Revista publicațiilor periodice. Arhiva Genealogică Română", in Cercetări Istorice, Vol. XIX, 1946, pp. 240–241
  46. ^ "Carnetul zilei. Artistice cultuale. Șezători literare", in Curentul, January 11, 1944, p. 2
  47. ^ Cristinel Ioja, "Ilarion V. Felea – preotul, teologul, mărturisitorul – după Jurnalul autobiografic", in Teologia, Vol. XII, Issue 1, 2008, pp. 55–56
  48. ^ Leonard Ciocan, "Revista Lupta de Clasă și problematica istoriografiei staliniste", in Studia Universitatis Cibiniensis. Series Historica, Vol. II, 2005, p. 302
  49. ^ Nicolae Ivan, "Sinuciderile în închisorile comuniste din România", in Memoria. Revista Gândirii Arestate, Issue 38, 2002, p. 84
  50. ^ a b c d e f (in Romanian) Ioan Milică, "Trecut-au viețile…", in Ziarul de Iași, June 4, 2015
  51. ^ a b c d Gorovei, p. 225
  52. ^ Gorovei, pp. 225–226
  53. ^ Hariton, p. 31
  54. ^ Artur Silvestri, "Un scriitor de altădată: Radu Rosetti", in Luceafărul, Vol. XIX, Issue 7, February 1976, p. 2
  55. ^ a b George Potra, "Corespondență. Alte scrisori", in Amfiteatru, Vol. XV, Issue 11, November 1980, p. 12
  56. ^ Rădulescu, pp. 211–212
  57. ^ a b c (in Romanian) Sorin Lavric, "Vieți meschine", in România Literară, Issue 48/2016
  58. ^ Iorga (1934), p. 248
  59. ^ Deac, pp. 299, 302, 311–312
  60. ^ Andreea-Mihaela Creangă, "Războaiele balcanice ca spectacol mediatic: relatarea jurnalistică", in Analele Banatului. Arheologie–Istorie, Vol. XXIII, 2015, p. 415
  61. ^ Deac, p. 305
  62. ^ Perpessicius, pp. 94–95
  63. ^ Perpessicius, pp. 95–96
  64. ^ "Revista revistelor: Românești. Jurnalul Literar, 2 Aprilie 1939 — Anul I, Nr. 14", in Revista Fundațiilor Regale, Vol. VI, Issue 5, May 1939, p. 479
  65. ^ Boia, pp. 138–139
  66. ^ Cernovodeanu (2002), pp. 84–85
  67. ^ Z. Ornea, Junimea și junimismul, Vol. I, pp. 246, 305. Bucharest: Editura Minerva, 1998. ISBN 973-21-0562-3
  68. ^ Iorga (1936), p. 352
  69. ^ Iorga (1936), pp. 352–355
  70. ^ Perpessicius, p. 95
  71. ^ Cernovodeanu (2002), pp. 85–86
  72. ^ Grigore T. Marcu, "Vitrina cărții. Cronica literară. C. Gane—Trecute vieți de doamne și domnițe—vol. I ed. II", in Viața Ilustrată, Vol. II, Issue 1, January 1935, pp. 23–24
  73. ^ (in Romanian) Gheorghe Grigurcu, "O carte somptuoasă (II)", in România Literară, Issue 22/2008
  74. ^ Constanța Vintilă-Ghițulescu, "Evul mediu românesc și istoria femeii (secolele XVII–XVIII)", in Ionela Băluță, Ioana Cîrstocea (eds.), Direcții și teme de cercetare în studiile de gen din România. Atelier Colegiul Noua Europă, București, 5 iulie 2002, p. 29. Bucharest: New Europe College, 2003. ISBN 973-85697-5-3
  75. ^ Ioan Marian Țiplic, "Arheologia secolului XX. Naționalism, Marxism și Feminism", in Transilvania, Issue 7/2009, p. 11
  76. ^ Mârza, pp. 73, 74
  77. ^ Emil Turdeanu, "Manuscrisele robite de cazaci (III)", in Magazin Istoric, September 1993, p. 44
  78. ^ Gheorghe G. Bezviconi, "Oameni și fapte. O biografie romanțată", in Din Trecutul Nostru, Vol. VII, August–September 1939, p. 100
  79. ^ "Bibliografie. Corrigenda, de M. Theodorian–Carada", in Vestitorul, Vol. 9, Issues 17–18, September 1933, p. 16
  80. ^ Mârza, p. 73
  81. ^ a b c Nicolae Iorga, "Dări de seamă. C. Gane, Trecute vieți de Domni [sic] și Domnițe", in Revista Istorică, Vol. XXVII, Issues 1–12, January–December 1941, pp. 165–166
  82. ^ Svetlana Suveică, Petre Guran, "Familia Krupenski și elita istorică a Basarabiei", in Mircea Ciubotaru, Lucian-Valeriu Lefter (eds.), Mihai Dim. Sturdza la 80 de ani. Omagiu, p. 339. Iași: Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Press, 2014. ISBN 978-606-714-055-2
  83. ^ Strihan, pp. 68–69
  84. ^ Sorin Iftimi, "O addenda la portretistica lui Nicolo Livaditi (1830–1858)", in Cercetări Istorice, Vol. XXXII, 2013, pp. 303, 314
  85. ^ Monu, p. 7
  86. ^ Strihan, pp. 69, 70

References

  • Lucian Boia, Capcanele istoriei. Elita intelectuală românească între 1930 și 1950. Bucharest: Humanitas, 2012. ISBN 978-973-50-3533-4
  • Paul Cernovodeanu, "Un conte aventurier și o falsă prințesă", in Magazin Istoric, July 2002, pp. 83–86.
  • Raluca-Simona Deac, "Representations of Identity, Self, and Otherness in the Romanian Memoirs of the Balkan Wars (1912–1913)", in Philobiblion. Transylvanian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research in Humanities, Vol. XVIII, Issue 2, July–December 2013, pp. 297–314.
  • C. Gane, "Vorbe în vânt", in Universul Literar, Issue 6/1940, pp. 4, 8.
  • Ștefan C. Gorovei, "Dialog epistolar Artur Gorovei–Constantin Gane", in Acta Moldaviae Septentrionalis, Vol. X, 2011, pp. 225–236.
  • Dinu Mihail Hariton, "Evenimente, semnale, recenzii, evocări. Arhitect Ștefan Radu Gane", in Arhitectura, Issues 1–6/1990, pp. 30–31.
  • Nicolae Iorga,
    • Istoria literaturii românești contemporane. II: În căutarea fondului (1890–1934). Bucharest: Editura Adevĕrul, 1934.
    • "Dări de seamă. C. Gane, P. P. Carp și locul său în istoria politică a țerii, I", in Revista Istorică, Vol. XXII, Issues 10–12, October–December 1936, pp. 352–355.
  • Radu Mârza, "Implicarea familiei în diplomație la Mihai Viteazul: practica trimiterii familiei proprii ca ostatică la partenerii politici", in Revista Bistriței, Vol. XII–XIII, 1999, pp. 73–83.
  • Elena Monu, Familia Costache. Istorie și genealogie. Bârlad: Editura Sfera, 2011. ISBN 978-606-573-162-2
  • Perpessicius, "Comentarii critice. Mențiuni critice. Cronica romanelor. Cezar Petrescu: Tapirul—Dan Petrașincu: Timpuri împlinite—C. Gane: Rădăcini. Romanul Măcișenilor", in Revista Fundațiilor Regale, Vol. XIV, Issues 10–11, October–November 1947, pp. 82–96.
  • Mihai Sorin Rădulescu, "Cartea de istorie. L'Histoire des femmes, o reeditare binevenită", in Viața Românească, Issues 8–9/2008, pp. 211–213.
  • Pavel Strihan, "Un divorț domnesc", in Magazin Istoric, June 1969, pp. 68–71.