Talk:2020 United States elections: Difference between revisions
→2020 Election: new section |
→Stat for Opening Paragraphs: new section |
||
(32 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{WikiProject United States|importance=high}} |
{{WikiProject United States|importance=high}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{ |
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=ap}} |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | algo = old(365d) | archive = Talk:2020 United States elections/Archive %(counter)d | counter = 1 | maxarchivesize = 150K | archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | minthreadsleft = 8 }} |
{{User:MiszaBot/config | algo = old(365d) | archive = Talk:2020 United States elections/Archive %(counter)d | counter = 1 | maxarchivesize = 150K | archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | minthreadsleft = 8 }} |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 16:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}} |
{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 16:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
House elections map needs fixing |
|||
Red needed for the grey Iowa district as it was called for the Republican [[Special:Contributions/71.169.164.31|71.169.164.31]] ([[User talk:71.169.164.31|talk]]) 11:33, 12 December 2020 (UTC) |
|||
: {{not done}}. Please provide a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] that the district (Iowa 2) has been called. Most sources I've look at haven't called it for the GOP. [[User:Ganbaruby|<span style="color:#960596">◢</span> <b><i style="background-color:#F7E3F7; color:#960596"> Ganbaruby! </i></b>]] <small>([[User talk:Ganbaruby|Say hi!]])</small> 14:15, 12 December 2020 (UTC) |
|||
: '''Comment'''- The seat was certified by state officials for the GOP candidate, but media outlets haven't called them because the Democratic candidate plans to appeal the results to the House of Representatives. [[User:Herbfur|Herbfur]] ([[User talk:Herbfur|talk]]) 18:50, 17 December 2020 (UTC) |
|||
== Net Seat Change for House Elections == |
== Net Seat Change for House Elections == |
||
Line 49: | Line 41: | ||
:No, "deadly attack" means it was an attack that was deadly, which it was to several people, including police officers. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 15:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC) |
:No, "deadly attack" means it was an attack that was deadly, which it was to several people, including police officers. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 15:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC) |
||
::No police officers did not die from the attack.. one was naturl causes the next day. and now foot0age0 is comming out on officers w0ho lied0 about even being injured. not only lied about that but lied about preforming cpr on a woman. It's sad that people will lie to pus0h their own agenda a lot like the company. no one needs their context pushed on the to try to control how people [[Special:Contributions/2607:FB91:1E4F:D75B:90D6:840E:7F16:C405|2607:FB91:1E4F:D75B:90D6:840E:7F16:C405]] ([[User talk:2607:FB91:1E4F:D75B:90D6:840E:7F16:C405|talk]]) 09:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC) |
::No police officers did not die from the attack.. one was naturl causes the next day. and now foot0age0 is comming out on officers w0ho lied0 about even being injured. not only lied about that but lied about preforming cpr on a woman. It's sad that people will lie to pus0h their own agenda a lot like the company. no one needs their context pushed on the to try to control how people [[Special:Contributions/2607:FB91:1E4F:D75B:90D6:840E:7F16:C405|2607:FB91:1E4F:D75B:90D6:840E:7F16:C405]] ([[User talk:2607:FB91:1E4F:D75B:90D6:840E:7F16:C405|talk]]) 09:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC) |
||
:::Yeah this entire site is heavily biased and full of misinformation now. Hilariously all of the articles that are protected and used for context are all heavily biased. I now see why every teacher I had said to not cite this website because even “protected” articles are full of bad data and biased information. I used to support and donate to the site but it seems now they aren’t really a neutral source of information like they claim. [[Special:Contributions/2600:1004:B292:5A8F:D0B2:294:BAB2:FD29|2600:1004:B292:5A8F:D0B2:294:BAB2:FD29]] ([[User talk:2600:1004:B292:5A8F:D0B2:294:BAB2:FD29|talk]]) 17:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:I agree. "Deadly attack" should not be used to describe the riot on Jan.6. There was no plan to attack anyone. The riot only got violent when cops threw teargas into the crowd and the American Patriots threw it back at them. [[Special:Contributions/2601:586:D020:906B:99DC:67B9:F9DC:F04D|2601:586:D020:906B:99DC:67B9:F9DC:F04D]] ([[User talk:2601:586:D020:906B:99DC:67B9:F9DC:F04D|talk]]) 02:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Semi-protected edit request on 11 September 2023 == |
== Semi-protected edit request on 11 September 2023 == |
||
Line 59: | Line 53: | ||
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a [[WP:EDITXY|"change X to Y" format]] and provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> Don't see where in this article we mention that speech. Where do you see it specifically? [[User:Cannolis|Cannolis]] ([[User talk:Cannolis|talk]]) 18:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC) |
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a [[WP:EDITXY|"change X to Y" format]] and provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> Don't see where in this article we mention that speech. Where do you see it specifically? [[User:Cannolis|Cannolis]] ([[User talk:Cannolis|talk]]) 18:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
== 2020 Election == |
|||
⚫ | |||
To those that wrote this, |
|||
"resulted in a deadly attack at the US Capitol" |
|||
- This makes it sound like the people who entered the Capitol were murderers, when in fact, the only one who was killed with the intention to kill, was one of the people who entered the Capitol (yes, she illegally entered). Come on, do better. |
|||
Let me guess, 99.9% of the authors and editors are left leaning? Exactly. [[Special:Contributions/2603:6011:5F39:D89D:9D1F:9790:1D00:D5E7|2603:6011:5F39:D89D:9D1F:9790:1D00:D5E7]] ([[User talk:2603:6011:5F39:D89D:9D1F:9790:1D00:D5E7|talk]]) 23:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> The word deadly is widely used by reliable sources, see the [[January 6 United States Capitol attack#References|references]] on the main article. [[User:Jamedeus|Jamedeus]] ([[User talk:Jamedeus|talk]]) 00:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Stat for Opening Paragraphs == |
|||
Trump became the first defeated incumbent president to have overseen his party lose the presidency and control of both the House and the Senate in just a single, 4-year term of his party controlling the White House since Benjamin Harrison in 1892. [[User:LordofChaos55|LordofChaos55]] ([[User talk:LordofChaos55|talk]]) 16:21, 14 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Biden did not defeat Trump in 2020. The election was stolen and everybody knows it. [[Special:Contributions/66.190.136.141|66.190.136.141]] ([[User talk:66.190.136.141|talk]]) 15:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:21, 14 August 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2020 United States elections article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 January 2021 and 12 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dpe12. Peer reviewers: Strr34, Aah153.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Net Seat Change for House Elections
[edit]Shouldn't the table at the top include the net seat change for House elections? This would improve consistency, as the table already shows the Electoral College vote numbers and the net seat change for Senate elections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LordofChaos55 (talk • contribs) 19:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Added. We had been holding off because there were some uncalled races, but at this point there's just one outstanding race left and we can always change the number once it's decided. Orser67 (talk) 23:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Strange edit
[edit]I tried to undo an edit, and for some reason although the edit had removed 1,141 bytes, undoing it only added 2. It clearly did not undo the edit, but now it's saying I can't undo it because I've already undone it.
curprev 01:55, 19 September 2021 24.59.152.85 talk 191,651 bytes +2 Undid revision 1045139020 by 24.59.152.85 (talk) undo
curprev 01:47, 19 September 2021 24.59.152.85 talk 191,649 bytes −1,141 grammar undo Tags: Visual edit references removed
democrat nominee, not democratic nominee. its a party
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change democratic, to democrat. its not the democratic party. its the democrat party. get the simple grammar right if youre going to publish that 2600:8803:D008:EE00:9C6B:E899:959F:F9F9 (talk) 01:45, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- Not done. Democratic is the proper adjective. Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 02:04, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- And Democrat Party (epithet), well, it's an epithet. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:20, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- It's the party of Democrats therefore it's the "Democrat party" if they wanted to be called the "Democratic Party" they should have called themselves "Democratics." 68.161.87.251 (talk) 21:21, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Bias
[edit]“Deadly Attack” on January 6th makes the false implication that it was rioters that caused the death instead of a police officer shooting a protestor. 50.27.110.27 (talk) 15:17, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- No, "deadly attack" means it was an attack that was deadly, which it was to several people, including police officers. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- No police officers did not die from the attack.. one was naturl causes the next day. and now foot0age0 is comming out on officers w0ho lied0 about even being injured. not only lied about that but lied about preforming cpr on a woman. It's sad that people will lie to pus0h their own agenda a lot like the company. no one needs their context pushed on the to try to control how people 2607:FB91:1E4F:D75B:90D6:840E:7F16:C405 (talk) 09:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- I agree. "Deadly attack" should not be used to describe the riot on Jan.6. There was no plan to attack anyone. The riot only got violent when cops threw teargas into the crowd and the American Patriots threw it back at them. 2601:586:D020:906B:99DC:67B9:F9DC:F04D (talk) 02:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 11 September 2023
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Merlyn78 (talk) 17:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Trump's Election Speech (the one that incited the January 6th Attack on the Capitol) was given on January 6th, 2021. In his speech, he even said he would march with them, immediately after the speech. Wikipedia is, incorrectly, reporting that the speech took place on November 3rd, 2020.
Again, the correct date on which the speech took place on January 6th, 2021.
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Don't see where in this article we mention that speech. Where do you see it specifically? Cannolis (talk) 18:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 7 May 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
To those that wrote this, "resulted in a deadly attack at the US Capitol" - This makes it sound like the people who entered the Capitol were murderers, when in fact, the only one who was killed with the intention to kill, was one of the people who entered the Capitol (yes, she illegally entered). Come on, do better. Let me guess, 99.9% of the authors and editors are left leaning? Exactly. 2603:6011:5F39:D89D:9D1F:9790:1D00:D5E7 (talk) 23:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: The word deadly is widely used by reliable sources, see the references on the main article. Jamedeus (talk) 00:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Stat for Opening Paragraphs
[edit]Trump became the first defeated incumbent president to have overseen his party lose the presidency and control of both the House and the Senate in just a single, 4-year term of his party controlling the White House since Benjamin Harrison in 1892. LordofChaos55 (talk) 16:21, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class Elections and Referendums articles
- WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of High-importance
- WikiProject United States articles