Spendthrift: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Alistair1978 (talk | contribs) m lk (via WP:JWB) |
GreenC bot (talk | contribs) Move 1 url. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#articles.latimes.com |
||
| (29 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Someone who wastefully spends money beyond their means}} |
|||
{{about||the horse|Spendthrift (horse)|the 1936 film|Spendthrift (film)}}{{Other uses|Prodigal (disambiguation)}} |
{{about||the horse|Spendthrift (horse)|the 1936 film|Spendthrift (film)}}{{Other uses|Prodigal (disambiguation)}} |
||
A '''spendthrift''' (also '''profligate''' or '''prodigal''') is someone |
A '''spendthrift''' (also '''profligate''' or '''prodigal''') is someone who is extravagant and recklessly wasteful with money, often to a point where the spending climbs well beyond their means. ''Spendthrift'' derives from an obsolete sense of the word ''thrift'' to mean prosperity rather than frugality,<ref>[http://www.thefreedictionary.com/thrift thefreedictionary.com], "thrift"</ref> so a "spendthrift" is one who has spent their prosperity.<ref>[http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-spe1.htm World Wide Words], "how thrift applied to spend can end up being someone who is not thrifty"</ref> |
||
Historical figures who have been |
Historical figures who have been characterised as spendthrifts include [[George IV of the United Kingdom]],<ref>{{Cite web|date=2019-11-13|title=George IV: Art & Spectacle review – A spendthrift with excellent taste|url=https://www.standard.co.uk/go/london/arts/george-iv-art-and-spectacle-review-queens-gallery-a4285991.html|access-date=2020-06-03|website=Evening Standard|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=The two sides of George IV: is his wretched reputation deserved?|url=https://www.historyextra.com/period/georgian/two-sides-king-george-iv-is-reputation-deserved/|access-date=2020-06-03|website=HistoryExtra|language=en}}</ref> [[King Ludwig II of Bavaria]],<ref>Gerhard Hojer (ed.): ''König Ludwig II.-Museum Herrenchiemsee. Katalog'' (Munich, 1986, p. 137)</ref> and [[Marie Antoinette]] the Queen of France.<ref>[[Antonia Fraser|Fraser, Antonia]] (2001). Marie Antoinette (1st ed.). New York: N.A. Talese/Doubleday. {{ISBN|978-0-385-48948-5}} p. 226</ref> |
||
The term is often used by |
The term is often used by [[news media]] as an adjective applied to governments who are thought to be [[government waste|wasting public money]].<ref>Westmore, Peter (2011). "[http://newsweekly.com.au/article.php?id=4783 Why Portuguese voters punished spendthrift Government]" ''News Weekly'', June 25, 2011, accessed 20 November 2012</ref><ref>"In capitals such as Athens, Madrid and Rome, large portions of the sovereign debt racked up by spendthrift governments are owed to the countries' own banks..." Chu, Henry and Lauren Frayer (2012). "[https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2012-may-19-la-fg-europe-banks-20120519-story.html Europe's governments, banks perilously entwined: Much of the crushing debt that was racked up by the former is owed to the latter]." ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', 19 May 2012, accessed 20 November 2012</ref> |
||
The opposite would be a [[frugality|frugal]] person, who uses money wisely, or more negatively a [[miser]], who lives very cheaply and hoards wealth for its own sake. |
|||
==Etymology== |
==Etymology== |
||
While the pair of words may seem to imply the opposite of its meaning (as if you are thrifty in your spending), it follows the tradition of the earlier word |
While the pair of words may seem to imply the opposite of its meaning (as if you are thrifty in your spending), it follows the tradition of the earlier word ''scattergood'', the first part being an undoing of the second.<ref>Etymology Online: |
||
<br />'''[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/spendthrift Spendthrift]'''<br/> |
<br />'''[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/spendthrift Spendthrift]'''<br/> |
||
''c.1600, from spend + thrift in sense of "savings, profits, wealth." Replaced earlier scattergood (1570s) and spend-all (1550s).''</ref> |
''c.1600, from spend + thrift in sense of "savings, profits, wealth." Replaced earlier scattergood (1570s) and spend-all (1550s).''</ref> |
||
==In artwork== |
==In artwork== |
||
[[File:William Hogarth |
[[File:William Hogarth 018.jpg|thumb|220px|''[[A Rake's Progress]], the prison scene.'']] |
||
[[William Hogarth]]'s ''[[A Rake's Progress]]'' (1732–33) displays in a series of paintings the spiralling fortunes of a wealthy but spendthrift son and [[heir]] who loses his money, and who as a consequence is [[imprisoned]] in the [[Fleet Prison]] and ultimately [[Bethlem Royal Hospital|Bedlam]]. |
[[William Hogarth]]'s ''[[A Rake's Progress]]'' (1732–33) displays in a series of paintings the spiralling fortunes of a wealthy but spendthrift son and [[heir]] who loses his money, and who as a consequence is [[imprisoned]] in the [[Fleet Prison]] and ultimately [[Bethlem Royal Hospital|Bedlam]]. |
||
{{-}} |
|||
==In literature== |
==In literature== |
||
* ''[[The Young Man and the Swallow]]'' (which also has the Victorian title of "The |
* ''[[The Young Man and the Swallow]]'' (which also has the Victorian title of "The Spendthrift and the Swallow") is a fable about a young man who spends all his money on gambling and luxurious living. |
||
* ''[[Inferno (Dante)]]'' briefly describes the fate of the violently profligate. They are doomed to recklessly scramble, while being chased by vicious dogs, through the bracken of the second ring in the seventh circle of Hell, the place reserved for those who do violence against the self. |
|||
==In the Bible== |
|||
In the ''[[Parable of the Prodigal Son]]'', a son asks his father for his inheritance, but then squanders it recklessly as he lives a life of indulgence. With nothing left of his fortune, he is forced to work as a hired hand for a pig farmer. |
|||
==Legal issues== |
==Legal issues== |
||
{{see also|Spendthrift trust}} |
{{see also|Spendthrift trust}} |
||
The modern legal remedy for spendthrifts is usually [[bankruptcy]]. However, during the 19th and 20th centuries, a few jurisdictions, such as the [[U.S. state]]s of [[Oregon]] and [[Massachusetts]], experimented with [[law]]s under which the family of such a person could have him or her legally declared a "spendthrift" by a [[court]] of law |
The modern legal remedy for spendthrifts is usually [[bankruptcy]]. However, during the 19th and 20th centuries, a few jurisdictions, such as the [[U.S. state]]s of [[Oregon]] and [[Massachusetts]], experimented with [[law]]s under which the family of such a person could have him or her legally declared a "spendthrift" by a [[court]] of law and placed under a [[Legal guardian|court-supervised guardianship]]. In turn, spendthrifts were treated as lacking the [[Capacity (law)|capacity]] to enter into binding [[contract]]s.<ref name="Page_2848">{{cite book |last1=Page |first1=William Herbert |title=The Law of Contracts |date=1920 |publisher=W.H. Anderson Co. |location=Cincinnati |pages=2848–2849 |edition=2nd |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9EE9AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA2848 |access-date=July 1, 2023}}</ref><ref>See ORS 126.335 (repealed Or. Stat. 1961, ch. 344, § 109). Oregon's unusual law resulted in a famous [[Conflict of laws in the United States|conflict of laws]] opinion, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13748726432421456993 ''Lilienthal v. Kaufman''], 239 Ore. 1, 395 P.2d 543 (1964).</ref><ref>''Chandler v. Simmons'', 97 Mass. 508, 514 (1867).</ref> Even though such laws made life harder for [[creditor]]s (who now had to bear the burden of verifying up front that any prospective debtor had not been judicially declared a spendthrift), they were thought to be justified by the [[public policy]] of keeping a spendthrift's family from ending up in the [[poorhouse]] or on [[Welfare (financial aid)|welfare]]. As the [[Supreme Court of Oregon]] explained, the purpose of the statute is to protect the spendthrift "against his wasteful and vicious habits which expose him or are likely to expose him or his family to want or suffering or to cause any public authority to be charged for any expense for his support or that of his family".<ref>[https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=169815626413805999 ''Olshen v. Kaufman''], 235 Or. 423, 385 P.2d 161 (1963). This case involved the same defendant and was relied upon by the majority in ''Lilienthal''. Both cases involved joint ventures for the sale of [[binoculars]].</ref> Such laws have since been abolished in favour of bankruptcy, which is more favourable to creditors. |
||
[[Receivership]] is another equitable remedy for a spendthrift, by which a state-court-appointed [[trustee]] or [[lawyer|attorney]] manages and sells the property of the debtor in default on debts. |
[[Receivership]] is another equitable remedy for a spendthrift, by which a state-court-appointed [[trustee]] or [[lawyer|attorney]] manages and sells the property of the debtor in default on debts. |
||
In [[conservatorship]], a [[fiduciary]] handles both the personal affairs and paying the debts of an incapacitated person. |
In [[conservatorship]], a [[fiduciary]] handles both the personal affairs and paying the debts of an incapacitated person. |
||
==References== |
==References== |
||
Latest revision as of 23:31, 13 August 2024
A spendthrift (also profligate or prodigal) is someone who is extravagant and recklessly wasteful with money, often to a point where the spending climbs well beyond their means. Spendthrift derives from an obsolete sense of the word thrift to mean prosperity rather than frugality,[1] so a "spendthrift" is one who has spent their prosperity.[2]
Historical figures who have been characterised as spendthrifts include George IV of the United Kingdom,[3][4] King Ludwig II of Bavaria,[5] and Marie Antoinette the Queen of France.[6]
The term is often used by news media as an adjective applied to governments who are thought to be wasting public money.[7][8]
Etymology
[edit]While the pair of words may seem to imply the opposite of its meaning (as if you are thrifty in your spending), it follows the tradition of the earlier word scattergood, the first part being an undoing of the second.[9]
In artwork
[edit]
William Hogarth's A Rake's Progress (1732–33) displays in a series of paintings the spiralling fortunes of a wealthy but spendthrift son and heir who loses his money, and who as a consequence is imprisoned in the Fleet Prison and ultimately Bedlam.
In literature
[edit]- The Young Man and the Swallow (which also has the Victorian title of "The Spendthrift and the Swallow") is a fable about a young man who spends all his money on gambling and luxurious living.
- Inferno (Dante) briefly describes the fate of the violently profligate. They are doomed to recklessly scramble, while being chased by vicious dogs, through the bracken of the second ring in the seventh circle of Hell, the place reserved for those who do violence against the self.
In the Bible
[edit]In the Parable of the Prodigal Son, a son asks his father for his inheritance, but then squanders it recklessly as he lives a life of indulgence. With nothing left of his fortune, he is forced to work as a hired hand for a pig farmer.
Legal issues
[edit]The modern legal remedy for spendthrifts is usually bankruptcy. However, during the 19th and 20th centuries, a few jurisdictions, such as the U.S. states of Oregon and Massachusetts, experimented with laws under which the family of such a person could have him or her legally declared a "spendthrift" by a court of law and placed under a court-supervised guardianship. In turn, spendthrifts were treated as lacking the capacity to enter into binding contracts.[10][11][12] Even though such laws made life harder for creditors (who now had to bear the burden of verifying up front that any prospective debtor had not been judicially declared a spendthrift), they were thought to be justified by the public policy of keeping a spendthrift's family from ending up in the poorhouse or on welfare. As the Supreme Court of Oregon explained, the purpose of the statute is to protect the spendthrift "against his wasteful and vicious habits which expose him or are likely to expose him or his family to want or suffering or to cause any public authority to be charged for any expense for his support or that of his family".[13] Such laws have since been abolished in favour of bankruptcy, which is more favourable to creditors.
Receivership is another equitable remedy for a spendthrift, by which a state-court-appointed trustee or attorney manages and sells the property of the debtor in default on debts.
In conservatorship, a fiduciary handles both the personal affairs and paying the debts of an incapacitated person.
References
[edit]- ^ thefreedictionary.com, "thrift"
- ^ World Wide Words, "how thrift applied to spend can end up being someone who is not thrifty"
- ^ "George IV: Art & Spectacle review – A spendthrift with excellent taste". Evening Standard. 2019-11-13. Retrieved 2020-06-03.
- ^ "The two sides of George IV: is his wretched reputation deserved?". HistoryExtra. Retrieved 2020-06-03.
- ^ Gerhard Hojer (ed.): König Ludwig II.-Museum Herrenchiemsee. Katalog (Munich, 1986, p. 137)
- ^ Fraser, Antonia (2001). Marie Antoinette (1st ed.). New York: N.A. Talese/Doubleday. ISBN 978-0-385-48948-5 p. 226
- ^ Westmore, Peter (2011). "Why Portuguese voters punished spendthrift Government" News Weekly, June 25, 2011, accessed 20 November 2012
- ^ "In capitals such as Athens, Madrid and Rome, large portions of the sovereign debt racked up by spendthrift governments are owed to the countries' own banks..." Chu, Henry and Lauren Frayer (2012). "Europe's governments, banks perilously entwined: Much of the crushing debt that was racked up by the former is owed to the latter." Los Angeles Times, 19 May 2012, accessed 20 November 2012
- ^ Etymology Online:
Spendthrift
c.1600, from spend + thrift in sense of "savings, profits, wealth." Replaced earlier scattergood (1570s) and spend-all (1550s). - ^ Page, William Herbert (1920). The Law of Contracts (2nd ed.). Cincinnati: W.H. Anderson Co. pp. 2848–2849. Retrieved July 1, 2023.
- ^ See ORS 126.335 (repealed Or. Stat. 1961, ch. 344, § 109). Oregon's unusual law resulted in a famous conflict of laws opinion, Lilienthal v. Kaufman, 239 Ore. 1, 395 P.2d 543 (1964).
- ^ Chandler v. Simmons, 97 Mass. 508, 514 (1867).
- ^ Olshen v. Kaufman, 235 Or. 423, 385 P.2d 161 (1963). This case involved the same defendant and was relied upon by the majority in Lilienthal. Both cases involved joint ventures for the sale of binoculars.
External links
[edit]
Look up spendthrift or profligate in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.