Jump to content

The Handmaid's Tale (film): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
added year
m →‎Plot: ambiguity and pucuation cleanup
(46 intermediate revisions by 38 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|1990 film by Volker Schlöndorff}}
{{Short description|1990 film by Volker Schlöndorff}}
{{Other uses|The Handmaid's Tale (disambiguation)}}
{{lead too short|date=June 2019}}
{{Infobox film
{{Infobox film
| name = The Handmaid's Tale
| name = The Handmaid's Tale
Line 24: Line 24:
| country = United States<br>West Germany
| country = United States<br>West Germany
| language = English
| language = English
| budget = $13,000,000
| budget =
| gross = $4,960,385<ref>{{cite web|work=[[Box Office Mojo]]|title=The Handmaid's Tale|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=handmaidstale.htm}}</ref>
| gross = $4,960,385<ref>{{cite web|work=[[Box Office Mojo]]|title=The Handmaid's Tale|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=handmaidstale.htm}}</ref>
}}
}}


'''''The Handmaid's Tale''''' is a 1990 [[dystopian fiction|dystopian film]] adapted from [[Canadian author]] [[Margaret Atwood]]'s 1985 [[The Handmaid's Tale|novel of the same name]]. Directed by [[Volker Schlöndorff]], the film stars [[Natasha Richardson]] (Offred), [[Faye Dunaway]] (Serena Joy), [[Robert Duvall]] (The Commander), [[Aidan Quinn]] (Nick), and [[Elizabeth McGovern]] (Moira).<ref name=NYT>{{cite web|work=[[The New York Times]]|date=March 7, 1990|title=Review/Film; 'Handmaid's Tale,' Adapted From Atwood Novel|author=Maslin, Janet|authorlink=Janet Maslin|url=https://www.nytimes.com/books/00/09/03/specials/atwood-film.html}}</ref> The screenplay was written by playwright [[Harold Pinter]].<ref name=NYT/> The original music score was composed by [[Ryuichi Sakamoto]]. The film was entered into the [[40th Berlin International Film Festival]].<ref name="Berlinale">{{cite web |url=http://www.berlinale.de/en/archiv/jahresarchive/1990/02_programm_1990/02_Programm_1990.html |title=Berlinale: 1990 Programme |accessdate=2011-03-19 |work=berlinale.de}}</ref> It is the first filmed adaptation of the novel, succeeded by the [[Hulu]] [[The Handmaid's Tale (TV series)|television series]] which began streaming in 2016.
'''''The Handmaid's Tale''''' is a 1990 [[dystopian fiction|dystopian film]] adapted from [[Canadian author]] [[Margaret Atwood]]'s 1985 [[The Handmaid's Tale|novel of the same name]]. Directed by [[Volker Schlöndorff]], the film stars [[Natasha Richardson]] (Offred), [[Faye Dunaway]] (Serena Joy), [[Robert Duvall]] (The Commander), [[Aidan Quinn]] (Nick), and [[Elizabeth McGovern]] (Moira).<ref name=NYT>{{cite web|work=[[The New York Times]]|date=March 7, 1990|title=Review/Film; 'Handmaid's Tale,' Adapted From Atwood Novel|author=Maslin, Janet|author-link=Janet Maslin|url=https://www.nytimes.com/books/00/09/03/specials/atwood-film.html}}</ref> The screenplay was written by playwright [[Harold Pinter]].<ref name=NYT/> The original music score was composed by [[Ryuichi Sakamoto]]. The film was entered into the [[40th Berlin International Film Festival]].<ref name="Berlinale">{{cite web |url=http://www.berlinale.de/en/archiv/jahresarchive/1990/02_programm_1990/02_Programm_1990.html |title=Berlinale: 1990 Programme |access-date=2011-03-19 |work=berlinale.de}}</ref> It is the first filmed adaptation of the novel, succeeded by the [[Hulu]] [[The Handmaid's Tale (TV series)|television series]] which began streaming in 2017.

The film adaptation of ''The Handmaid's Tale'' faced numerous challenges in its development, with screenwriter Harold Pinter expressing dissatisfaction with the final product due to significant alterations from his original script. Pinter had contributed only part of the screenplay and ultimately gave the director and author carte blanche to make changes. He tried to have his name removed from the credits but was unsuccessful.

The film's reception was mixed, with an approval rating of 30% on Rotten Tomatoes, and critics expressing uncertainty about the movie's message and themes.


==Plot==
==Plot==
In the near future, war rages across the Republic of Gilead —formerly the United States of America— and pollution has rendered 99% of the population sterile. Kate is a woman who attempts to emigrate to Canada with her husband and daughter. As they take a dirt road, the Gilead Border Guard orders them to turn back or they will open fire. Kate's husband uses an automatic rifle to draw the fire, telling Kate to run, but he is shot. Kate is captured, while their daughter wanders off into the back country, confused and unaccompanied. The authorities take Kate to a training facility with several other women, where she and her companions receive training to become Handmaids —concubines for one of the privileged but barren couples who run the country's religious fundamentalist regime. Although she resists being indoctrinated into the cult of the Handmaids, which mixes [[Old Testament]] orthodoxy with scripted group chanting and ritualized violence, Kate is soon assigned to the home of "the Commander" (Fred) and of his cold, inflexible wife, Serena Joy. There she is named "Offred" "of Fred".
In the near future, war rages across the Republic of Gilead (formerly the United States of America) and pollution has rendered 99% of the population sterile. Kate is a woman who attempts to emigrate to Canada with her husband Luke and daughter Jill. As they attempt to cross the border by foot on a dirt road, the Gilead Border Guard orders them to turn back or they will open fire. Luke draws their fire, telling Kate to run, and is shot. Kate is captured, while Jill wanders off into the back country, confused and unaccompanied. The authorities take Kate to a training facility with several other women, where the women are trained to become Handmaids, who are concubines for the privileged but barren couples who run the country's religious fundamentalist regime. Although she resists indoctrination into the cult of the Handmaids, which mixes [[Old Testament]] orthodoxy with scripted group chanting and ritualized violence, Kate is soon assigned to the home of "the Commander" (Fred) and his cold, inflexible wife, Serena Joy. There she is named "Offred" ("of Fred").


Her role as the Commander's latest concubine is emotionless. She lies between Serena Joy's legs while being raped by the Commander in the collective hope that she will bear them a child. Kate continually longs for her earlier life, but she is haunted by nightmares of her husband's death and of her daughter's disappearance. A doctor tells her that many of Gilead's male leaders are as sterile as their wives. Serena Joy desperately wants a baby, so she persuades Kate to risk the punishment for fornication —death by hanging— in order to be fertilized by another man who may make her pregnant, and consequently, spare her life. In exchange for Kate agreeing to this, Serena Joy provides information to Kate that her daughter is alive, and shows as proof a recent photograph of her living in the household of another Commander. However, Kate is told she can never see her daughter. The Commander also tries to get closer to Kate, in the sense that he feels if she enjoyed herself more she would become a better handmaid. The Commander knows Kate's background as a librarian. He gets her hard-to-obtain items and allows her access to his private library. However, during a night out, the Commander has sex with Kate in an unauthorized manner. The other man selected by Serena Joy turns out to be Nick, the Commander's sympathetic chauffeur. Kate grows attached to Nick and eventually becomes pregnant with his child.
Her role as the Fred's latest concubine is emotionless, as she lies between Serena Joy's legs while the Commander rapes her, the couple hoping that she will bear them a child. Kate continually longs for her earlier life, but nightmares of her husband's death and her daughter's disappearance haunt her. A doctor explains that many of Gilead's male leaders are as sterile as their wives. Desperately wanting a baby, Serena Joy persuades Kate to risk the punishment for fornication (death by hanging) in order to be fertilized by another man who may impregnate her and consequently spare her life. When Kate agrees to this, Serena Joy informs Kate that her daughter Jill is alive, and provides a recent photograph of her living in another commander's household, but tells Kate she can never see her daughter. Fred also tries to get closer to Kate, sensing that if she enjoyed herself more she would become a better handmaid. Exploiting Kate's background as a librarian, he gets her hard-to-obtain items and allows her into his private library. However, during a night out, Fred has sex with Kate in an unauthorized manner. The other man selected by Serena Joy turns out to be Nick, Fred's sympathetic chauffeur. Kate grows attached to Nick and eventually becomes pregnant with his child.


Kate ultimately kills the Commander, and a police unit then arrives to take her away. She thinks that the policemen are members of the Eyes, the government's secret police. However, it turns out that they are soldiers from the resistance movement (Mayday), of which Nick is also a part. Kate then flees with them, parting from Nick in an emotional scene.
Kate ultimately kills Fred, and a police unit then arrives to take her away. Believing the policemen are members of the Eyes, the government's secret police, she realizes that they are soldiers from the resistance movement (Mayday), of which Nick is also a part. Kate then flees with them, parting from Nick in an emotional scene.


Kate is now free once again and wearing non-uniform clothes, but facing an uncertain future. She is living by herself, pregnant in a trailer while receiving intelligence reports from the rebels. She wonders if she will be reunited with Nick, but expresses hope that will happen, and resolves with the rebels' help she will find her daughter.
Now free once again and wearing non-uniform clothes, but facing an uncertain future, a pregnant Kate is living by herself in a trailer while receiving intelligence reports from the rebels. Wondering if and hoping that she and Nick will be reunited, she resolves, with the rebels' help, to find her daughter.


==Cast==
==Cast==
* [[Natasha Richardson]] as Kate/Offred
* [[Natasha Richardson]] as Kate / Offred
* [[Robert Duvall]] as The Commander
* [[Robert Duvall]] as Fred Waterford, The Commander
* [[Faye Dunaway]] as Serena Joy
* [[Faye Dunaway]] as Serena Joy
* [[Elizabeth McGovern]] as Moira
* [[Elizabeth McGovern]] as Moira
Line 58: Line 62:
===Writing===
===Writing===
[[File:Gilead-Flag.gif|thumb|Flag of the Republic of Gilead as shown in the film]]
[[File:Gilead-Flag.gif|thumb|Flag of the Republic of Gilead as shown in the film]]
According to Steven H. Gale, in his book ''Sharp Cut'', "the final cut of ''The Handmaid's Tale'' is less a result of Pinter's script than any of his other films. He contributed only part of the screenplay: reportedly he 'abandoned writing the screenplay from exhaustion.' … Although he tried to have his name removed from the credits because he was so displeased with the movie (in 1994 he told me that this was due to the great divergences from his script that occur in the movie), … his name remains as screenwriter".<ref name="gale">{{cite book|last=Gale|first=Steven H.|title=Sharp Cut: Harold Pinter's Screenplays and the Artistic Process|publisher=Lexington, KY: The UP of Kentucky|year=2003|ISBN=978-0-8131-2244-1|pages=[https://archive.org/details/sharpcutharoldpi0000gale/page/318 318–319]|url=https://archive.org/details/sharpcutharoldpi0000gale/page/318}}</ref>
According to Steven H. Gale, in his book ''Sharp Cut'', "the final cut of ''The Handmaid's Tale'' is less a result of Pinter's script than any of his other films. He contributed only part of the screenplay: reportedly he 'abandoned writing the screenplay from exhaustion.' … Although he tried to have his name removed from the credits because he was so displeased with the movie (in 1994 he told me that this was due to the great divergences from his script that occur in the movie), … his name remains as screenwriter".<ref name="gale">{{cite book|last=Gale|first=Steven H.|title=Sharp Cut: Harold Pinter's Screenplays and the Artistic Process|publisher=Lexington, KY: The UP of Kentucky|year=2003|isbn=978-0-8131-2244-1|pages=[https://archive.org/details/sharpcutharoldpi0000gale/page/318 318–319]|url=https://archive.org/details/sharpcutharoldpi0000gale/page/318}}</ref>


Gale observes further that "while the film was being shot, director [[Volker Schlöndorff]]", who had replaced the original director [[Karel Reisz]], "called Pinter and asked for some changes in the script"; however, "Pinter recall[ed] being very tired at the time, and he suggested that Schlöndorff contact Atwood about the rewrites. He essentially gave the director and author ''[[wikt:carte blanche|carte blanche]]'' to accept whatever changes that she wanted to institute, for, as he reasoned, 'I didn't think an author would want to fuck up her own work.' … As it turned out, not only did Atwood make changes, but so did many others who were involved in the shoot".<ref name="gale"/> Gale points out that Pinter told his biographer [[Michael Billington (critic)|Michael Billington]] that
Gale observes further that "while the film was being shot, director [[Volker Schlöndorff]]", who had replaced the original director [[Karel Reisz]], "called Pinter and asked for some changes in the script"; however, "Pinter recall[ed] being very tired at the time, and he suggested that Schlöndorff contact Atwood about the rewrites. He essentially gave the director and author ''[[wikt:carte blanche|carte blanche]]'' to accept whatever changes that she wanted to institute, for, as he reasoned, 'I didn't think an author would want to fuck up her own work.' … As it turned out, not only did Atwood make changes, but so did many others who were involved in the shoot".<ref name="gale"/> Gale points out that Pinter told his biographer [[Michael Billington (critic)|Michael Billington]] that
Line 67: Line 71:


====Pinter's screenplay====
====Pinter's screenplay====
Christopher C. Hudgins discusses further details about why "Pinter elected not to publish three of his completed filmscripts, ''The Handmaid's Tale'', ''[[The Remains of the Day (film)|The Remains of the Day]]'' and ''[[Lolita (1997 film)|Lolita]]''," all of which Hudgins considers "masterful filmscripts" of "demonstrable superiority to the shooting scripts that were eventually used to make the films"; fortunately ("We can thank our various lucky stars"), he says, "these Pinter filmscripts are now available not only in private collections but also in the [[The Harold Pinter Archive in the British Library|Pinter Archive at the British Library]]"; in this essay, which he first presented as a paper at the 10th Europe Theatre Prize symposium, Pinter: Passion, Poetry, Politics, held in Turin, Italy, in March 2006, Hudgins "examin[es] all three unpublished filmscripts in conjunction with one another" and "provides several interesting insights about Pinter's adaptation process".<ref>Hudgins, 132</ref>
Christopher C. Hudgins discusses further details about why "Pinter elected not to publish three of his completed filmscripts, ''The Handmaid's Tale'', ''[[The Remains of the Day (film)|The Remains of the Day]]'' and ''[[Lolita (1997 film)|Lolita]]''," all of which Hudgins considers "masterful filmscripts" of "demonstrable superiority to the shooting scripts that were eventually used to make the films"; fortunately ("We can thank our various lucky stars"), he says, "these Pinter filmscripts are now available not only in private collections but also in the [[The Harold Pinter Archive in the British Library|Pinter Archive at the British Library]]." In this essay, which he first presented as a paper at the 10th Europe Theatre Prize symposium, Pinter: Passion, Poetry, Politics, held in Turin, Italy, in March 2006, Hudgins "examin[es] all three unpublished filmscripts in conjunction with one another" and "provides several interesting insights about Pinter's adaptation process".<ref>Hudgins, 132</ref>


====Richardson's views====
====Richardson's views====
Line 74: Line 78:
<blockquote>Richardson recognized early on the difficulties in making a film out of a book which was "so much a one-woman interior monologue" and with the challenge of playing a woman unable to convey her feelings to the world about her, but who must make them evident to the audience watching the movie. … She thought the passages of [[voice-over]] narration in the original screenplay would solve the problem, but then Pinter changed his mind and Richardson felt she had been cast adrift. … "Harold Pinter has something specific against voice-overs," she said angrily 19 years ago. "Speaking as a member of an audience, I've seen voice-over and narration work very well in films a number of times, and I think it would have been helpful had it been there for The Handmaid's Tale. After all it's HER story."</blockquote>
<blockquote>Richardson recognized early on the difficulties in making a film out of a book which was "so much a one-woman interior monologue" and with the challenge of playing a woman unable to convey her feelings to the world about her, but who must make them evident to the audience watching the movie. … She thought the passages of [[voice-over]] narration in the original screenplay would solve the problem, but then Pinter changed his mind and Richardson felt she had been cast adrift. … "Harold Pinter has something specific against voice-overs," she said angrily 19 years ago. "Speaking as a member of an audience, I've seen voice-over and narration work very well in films a number of times, and I think it would have been helpful had it been there for The Handmaid's Tale. After all it's HER story."</blockquote>


Portman concludes that "In the end director Volker Schlöndorff sided with Richardson"; Portman does not acknowledge Pinter's already-quoted account that he gave both Schlöndorff and Atwood ''carte blanche'' to make whatever changes they wanted to his script because he was too "exhausted" from the experience to work further on it; in 1990, when she reportedly made her comments quoted by Portman, Richardson herself may not have known that.<ref name=Gale318>Referring to Pinter's screenplay for the film of [[John Fowles]]'s novel ''[[The French Lieutenant's Woman (film)|The French Lieutenant's Woman]]'', Gale observes: "Although in other films he has used a [[voice-over]] narrator, the obvious choice for retaining the Fowles touch, Pinter is on record as not being fond of the device, and he wanted to avoid it here if possible" (''Sharp Cut'' 239); in relation to his screenplay for ''[[Lolita (1997 film)|Lolita]]'', "Despite the director's wanting him to use a good bit of that narrative as voice-over in the film, Pinter insist[ed] that he would never use it in a description of action … [and, Gale describes] how he put his opinion into practice" (358). Gale discusses the use of voice-over in or relating to other screenplays by Pinter, including those that he wrote for ''[[Accident (1967 film)|Accident]]'', ''[[The Comfort of Strangers (film)|The Comfort of Strangers]]'' (in which Richardson also stars), ''[[The Go-Between (1971 film)|The Go-Between]]'', ''[[The Last Tycoon (1976 film)|The Last Tycoon]]'', ''[[The Remains of the Day (film)#Background and production notes|The Remains of the Day]]'' and ''[[The Trial (1993 film)|The Trial]]'' (198–99, 234, 327, 353-54, 341, 367), as well as the voice overs that he did write for his script of ''The Handmaid's Tale'':<blockquote>The novel does not include the murder of the Commander, and Kate's fate is left completely unresolved—the van waits in the driveway, "and so I step up, into the darkness within; or else the light" ([Atwood, ''The Handmaid's Tale'' (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1986)] 295). The escape to Canada and the reappearance of the child and Nick are Pinter's inventions for the movie version. As shot, there is a voice-over in which Kate explains (accompanied by light symphonic music that contrasts with that of the opening scene) that she is now safe in the mountains held by the rebels. Bolstered by occasional messages from Nick, she awaits the birth of her baby while she dreams about Jill, whom she feels she is going to find eventually. (Gale, ''Sharp Cut'' 318)</blockquote></ref>
Portman concludes that "In the end director Volker Schlöndorff sided with Richardson". Portman does not acknowledge Pinter's already-quoted account that he gave both Schlöndorff and Atwood ''carte blanche'' to make whatever changes they wanted to his script because he was too "exhausted" from the experience to work further on it. In 1990, when she reportedly made her comments quoted by Portman, Richardson herself may not have known that.<ref name=Gale318>Referring to Pinter's screenplay for the film of [[John Fowles]]'s novel ''[[The French Lieutenant's Woman (film)|The French Lieutenant's Woman]]'', Gale observes: "Although in other films he has used a [[voice-over]] narrator, the obvious choice for retaining the Fowles touch, Pinter is on record as not being fond of the device, and he wanted to avoid it here if possible" (''Sharp Cut'' 239); in relation to his screenplay for ''[[Lolita (1997 film)|Lolita]]'', "Despite the director's wanting him to use a good bit of that narrative as voice-over in the film, Pinter insist[ed] that he would never use it in a description of action … [and, Gale describes] how he put his opinion into practice" (358). Gale discusses the use of voice-over in or relating to other screenplays by Pinter, including those that he wrote for ''[[Accident (1967 film)|Accident]]'', ''[[The Comfort of Strangers (film)|The Comfort of Strangers]]'' (in which Richardson also stars), ''[[The Go-Between (1971 film)|The Go-Between]]'', ''[[The Last Tycoon (1976 film)|The Last Tycoon]]'', ''[[The Remains of the Day (film)#Background and production notes|The Remains of the Day]]'' and ''[[The Trial (1993 film)|The Trial]]'' (198–99, 234, 327, 353–54, 341, 367), as well as the voice overs that he did write for his script of ''The Handmaid's Tale'':<blockquote>The novel does not include the murder of the Commander, and Kate's fate is left completely unresolved—the van waits in the driveway, "and so I step up, into the darkness within; or else the light" ([Atwood, ''The Handmaid's Tale'' (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1986)] 295). The escape to Canada and the reappearance of the child and Nick are Pinter's inventions for the movie version. As shot, there is a voice-over in which Kate explains (accompanied by light symphonic music that contrasts with that of the opening scene) that she is now safe in the mountains held by the rebels. Bolstered by occasional messages from Nick, she awaits the birth of her baby while she dreams about Jill, whom she feels she is going to find eventually. (Gale, ''Sharp Cut'' 318)</blockquote></ref>


===Filming locations===
===Filming locations===
The scene where the hanging occurred was filmed in front of [[Duke Chapel]] on the campus of [[Duke University]] in [[Durham, North Carolina]].<ref name=Dukemins>[http://academiccouncil.duke.edu/minutes/archive/1995-1996/april-18/ "April 18: Minutes of the Academic Council], ''Academic Council Archive'', Duke University, 18 Apr. 1996, Web, 9 May 2009.</ref> Several scenes were filmed at [[Saint Mary's School (Raleigh, North Carolina)|Saint Mary's School]] in Raleigh, North Carolina.
The scene where the hanging occurred was filmed in front of [[Duke Chapel]] on the campus of [[Duke University]] in [[Durham, North Carolina]].<ref name=Dukemins>[http://academiccouncil.duke.edu/minutes/archive/1995-1996/april-18/ "April 18: Minutes of the Academic Council] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100610053727/http://academiccouncil.duke.edu/minutes/archive/1995-1996/april-18/ |date=2010-06-10 }}, ''Academic Council Archive'', Duke University, 18 Apr. 1996, Web, 9 May 2009.</ref> Several scenes were filmed at [[Saint Mary's School (Raleigh, North Carolina)|Saint Mary's School]] in Raleigh, North Carolina. ('The Staircase' was used for this film and the Patterson house as a location)


== Reception ==
== Reception ==
[[Rotten Tomatoes]] reports that 6 of the 19 counted critics gave the film a positive review; the average rating was 4.79/10 and an approval rating of 32%.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/handmaids_tale/|title=The Handmaid's Tale (1990)|work=[[Rotten Tomatoes]]|accessdate=2017-09-17}}</ref> [[Roger Ebert]] gave the film two out of four stars and wrote that he was "not sure exactly what the movie is saying" and that by "the end of the movie we are conscious of large themes and deep thoughts, and of good intentions drifting out of focus."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-handmaids-tale-1990|title=The Handmaid's Tale|last=Ebert|first=Roger|date=1990-03-16|accessdate=2017-09-17}}</ref> [[Owen Gleiberman]], writing for ''[[Entertainment Weekly]]'', gave the film a "C-" grade and commented that "visually, it's quite striking", but that it is "paranoid poppycock — just like the book".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://ew.com/article/1990/03/09/handmaids-tale-2/|title=The Handmaid's Tale|last=Gleiberman|first=Owen|work=[[Entertainment Weekly]]|date=1990-03-09|accessdate=2017-09-17}}</ref> [[John Simon (critic)|John Simon]] of the ''[[National Review]]'' called ''The Handmaid's Tale'' "inept and annoying".<ref>{{cite book |title=John Simon on Film: Criticism 1982-2001|last1=Simon|first1=John |publisher=Applause Books |year=2005 |page=255}}</ref>
[[Rotten Tomatoes]] reports that 7 of the 23 counted critics gave the film a positive review; the average rating was 4.9/10 and an approval rating of 30%.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/handmaids_tale/|title=The Handmaid's Tale (1990)|work=[[Rotten Tomatoes]]|access-date=2023-05-10}}</ref> [[Roger Ebert]] gave the film two out of four stars and wrote that he was "not sure exactly what the movie is saying" and that by "the end of the movie we are conscious of large themes and deep thoughts, and of good intentions drifting out of focus."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-handmaids-tale-1990|title=The Handmaid's Tale|last=Ebert|first=Roger|date=1990-03-16|access-date=2017-09-17}}</ref> [[Owen Gleiberman]], writing for ''[[Entertainment Weekly]]'', gave the film a "C−" grade and commented that "visually, it's quite striking", but that it is "paranoid poppycock — just like the book".<ref>{{cite magazine|url=http://ew.com/article/1990/03/09/handmaids-tale-2/|title=The Handmaid's Tale|last=Gleiberman|first=Owen|magazine=[[Entertainment Weekly]]|date=1990-03-09|access-date=2017-09-17}}</ref> [[John Simon (critic)|John Simon]] of the ''[[National Review]]'' called ''The Handmaid's Tale'' "inept and annoying".<ref>{{cite book |title=John Simon on Film: Criticism 1982-2001|last1=Simon|first1=John |publisher=Applause Books |year=2005 |page=255}}</ref>


==References==
==References==
Line 87: Line 91:
==Works cited==
==Works cited==
{{refbegin|indent=yes}}
{{refbegin|indent=yes}}
:[[Michael Billington (critic)|Billington, Michael]]. ''Harold Pinter''. London: Faber and Faber, 2007. {{ISBN|978-0-571-23476-9}} (13). Updated 2nd ed. of ''The Life and Work of Harold Pinter''. 1996. London: Faber and Faber, 1997. {{ISBN|0-571-17103-6}} (10). Print.
*[[Michael Billington (critic)|Billington, Michael]]. ''Harold Pinter''. London: Faber and Faber, 2007. {{ISBN|978-0-571-23476-9}} (13). Updated 2nd ed. of ''The Life and Work of Harold Pinter''. 1996. London: Faber and Faber, 1997. {{ISBN|0-571-17103-6}} (10). Print.
*Gale, Steven H. ''Sharp Cut: Harold Pinter's Screenplays and the Artistic Process''. Lexington, KY: The UP of Kentucky, 2003. {{ISBN|0-8131-2244-9}} (10). {{ISBN|978-0-8131-2244-1}} (13). Print.

:Gale, Steven H. ''Sharp Cut: Harold Pinter's Screenplays and the Artistic Process''. Lexington, KY: The UP of Kentucky, 2003. {{ISBN|0-8131-2244-9}} (10). {{ISBN|978-0-8131-2244-1}} (13). Print.
*–––, ed. ''The Films of Harold Pinter''. Albany: SUNY P, 2001. {{ISBN|0-7914-4932-7}}. {{ISBN|978-0-7914-4932-5}}. Print. [A collection of essays; does not include an essay on ''The Handmaid's Tale''; mentions it on 1, 2, 84n3, 125.]
*Hudgins, Christopher C. "Three Unpublished Harold Pinter Filmscripts: ''The Handmaid's Tale'', ''The Remains of the Day'', ''Lolita''." ''The Pinter Review: Nobel Prize / Europe Theatre Prize Volume: 2005–2008''. Ed. Francis Gillen with Steven H. Gale. Tampa: U of Tampa P, 2008. 132–39. {{ISBN|978-1-879852-19-8}} (hardcover). {{ISBN|978-1-879852-20-4}} (softcover). {{ISSN|0895-9706}}. Print.<!--The ISBN and ISSN nos. are verified; they are printed in the physical copies of these books. The nos. may not yet be entered in the WorldCat database or others.-->

*Johnson, Brian D. "Uphill Battle: Handmaid's Hard Times." ''[[Maclean's]]'' 26 Feb. 1990.<!--Needs page numbers of publication of article in magazine.--> Print.
:–––, ed. ''The Films of Harold Pinter''. Albany: SUNY P, 2001. {{ISBN|0-7914-4932-7}}. {{ISBN|978-0-7914-4932-5}}. Print. [A collection of essays; does not include an essay on ''The Handmaid's Tale''; mentions it on 1, 2, 84n3, 125.]
*Portman, Jamie (CanWest News Service). [http://www.canada.com/tale+handmaid+Natasha+Richardson+outspoken+career/1402759/story.html "Not the Tale of a Handmaid: Natasha Richardson Has Led an Outspoken Career"]. ''Canada.com''. [[CanWest News Service]], 18 Mar. 2009. [[World Wide Web|Web]]. 24 Mar. 2009.

:Hudgins, Christopher C. "Three Unpublished Harold Pinter Filmscripts: ''The Handmaid's Tale'', ''The Remains of the Day'', ''Lolita''." ''The Pinter Review: Nobel Prize / Europe Theatre Prize Volume: 2005–2008''. Ed. Francis Gillen with Steven H. Gale. Tampa: U of Tampa P, 2008. 132–39. {{ISBN|978-1-879852-19-8}} (hardcover). {{ISBN|978-1-879852-20-4}} (softcover). {{ISSN|0895-9706}}. Print.<!--The ISBN and ISSN nos. are verified; they are printed in the physical copies of these books. The nos. may not yet be entered in the WorldCat database or others.-->

:Johnson, Brian D. "Uphill Battle: Handmaid's Hard Times." ''[[Maclean's]]'' 26 Feb. 1990.<!--Needs page numbers of publication of article in magazine.--> Print.

:Portman, Jamie (CanWest News Service). [http://www.canada.com/tale+handmaid+Natasha+Richardson+outspoken+career/1402759/story.html "Not the Tale of a Handmaid: Natasha Richardson Has Led an Outspoken Career"]. ''Canada.com''. [[CanWest News Service]], 18 Mar. 2009. [[World Wide Web|Web]]. 24 Mar. 2009.
{{Refend}}
{{Refend}}


Line 104: Line 103:
* {{Amg title|21379|The Handmaid's Tale}}
* {{Amg title|21379|The Handmaid's Tale}}
* {{rotten-tomatoes|handmaids_tale|The Handmaid's Tale}}
* {{rotten-tomatoes|handmaids_tale|The Handmaid's Tale}}
* {{cite journal|journal=[[The Atlantic]]|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2015/03/the-forgotten-handmaids-tale/388514/|title=The Forgotten Handmaid's Tale|last=Gilbert|first=Sophie|date=24 March 2015|accessdate=24 March 2015}}
* {{cite journal|journal=[[The Atlantic]]|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2015/03/the-forgotten-handmaids-tale/388514/|title=The Forgotten Handmaid's Tale|last=Gilbert|first=Sophie|date=24 March 2015|access-date=24 March 2015}}


{{Volker Schlöndorff}}
{{Volker Schlöndorff}}
Line 111: Line 110:
{{The Handmaid's Tale}}
{{The Handmaid's Tale}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Handmaids Tale, The}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Handmaids Tale, The (film)}}
[[Category:1990 films]]
[[Category:1990 films]]
[[Category:1990 independent films]]
[[Category:1990 independent films]]
[[Category:1990 LGBT-related films]]
[[Category:1990 LGBT-related films]]
[[Category:1990 science fiction films]]
[[Category:1990 science fiction films]]
[[Category:1990s dystopian films]]
[[Category:1990s feminist films]]
[[Category:1990s romantic thriller films]]
[[Category:American dystopian films]]
[[Category:American independent films]]
[[Category:American independent films]]
[[Category:American LGBT-related films]]
[[Category:American LGBT-related films]]
[[Category:American post-apocalyptic films]]
[[Category:American romantic thriller films]]
[[Category:American romantic thriller films]]
[[Category:American science fiction films]]
[[Category:American science fiction thriller films]]
[[Category:American films]]
[[Category:Dystopian films]]
[[Category:English-language films]]
[[Category:1990s feminist films]]
[[Category:Films about surrogacy]]
[[Category:Films about surrogacy]]
[[Category:Films about totalitarianism]]
[[Category:Films about totalitarianism]]
Line 130: Line 130:
[[Category:Films based on works by Margaret Atwood]]
[[Category:Films based on works by Margaret Atwood]]
[[Category:Films directed by Volker Schlöndorff]]
[[Category:Films directed by Volker Schlöndorff]]
[[Category:Films scored by Ryuichi Sakamoto]]
[[Category:Films set in North America]]
[[Category:Films set in North America]]
[[Category:Films set in fictional countries]]
[[Category:Films shot in North Carolina]]
[[Category:Films shot in North Carolina]]
[[Category:Post-apocalyptic films]]
[[Category:Films with screenplays by Harold Pinter]]
[[Category:Films with screenplays by Harold Pinter]]
[[Category:1990s romantic thriller films]]
[[Category:The Handmaid's Tale]]
[[Category:The Handmaid's Tale]]
[[Category:1990s English-language films]]
[[Category:1990s American films]]
[[Category:American pregnancy films]]
[[Category:English-language independent films]]

[[ja:侍女の物語#映画]]

Revision as of 05:12, 3 August 2024

The Handmaid's Tale
Theatrical release poster
Directed byVolker Schlöndorff
Screenplay byHarold Pinter
Based onThe Handmaid's Tale
by Margaret Atwood
Produced byDaniel Wilson
Starring
CinematographyIgor Luther
Edited byDavid Ray
Music byRyuichi Sakamoto
Distributed byCinecom Pictures
Release dates
  • February 15, 1990 (1990-02-15) (West Germany)
  • March 9, 1990 (1990-03-09) (U.S.)
Running time
109 minutes
CountriesUnited States
West Germany
LanguageEnglish
Box office$4,960,385[1]

The Handmaid's Tale is a 1990 dystopian film adapted from Canadian author Margaret Atwood's 1985 novel of the same name. Directed by Volker Schlöndorff, the film stars Natasha Richardson (Offred), Faye Dunaway (Serena Joy), Robert Duvall (The Commander), Aidan Quinn (Nick), and Elizabeth McGovern (Moira).[2] The screenplay was written by playwright Harold Pinter.[2] The original music score was composed by Ryuichi Sakamoto. The film was entered into the 40th Berlin International Film Festival.[3] It is the first filmed adaptation of the novel, succeeded by the Hulu television series which began streaming in 2017.

The film adaptation of The Handmaid's Tale faced numerous challenges in its development, with screenwriter Harold Pinter expressing dissatisfaction with the final product due to significant alterations from his original script. Pinter had contributed only part of the screenplay and ultimately gave the director and author carte blanche to make changes. He tried to have his name removed from the credits but was unsuccessful.

The film's reception was mixed, with an approval rating of 30% on Rotten Tomatoes, and critics expressing uncertainty about the movie's message and themes.

Plot

In the near future, war rages across the Republic of Gilead (formerly the United States of America) and pollution has rendered 99% of the population sterile. Kate is a woman who attempts to emigrate to Canada with her husband Luke and daughter Jill. As they attempt to cross the border by foot on a dirt road, the Gilead Border Guard orders them to turn back or they will open fire. Luke draws their fire, telling Kate to run, and is shot. Kate is captured, while Jill wanders off into the back country, confused and unaccompanied. The authorities take Kate to a training facility with several other women, where the women are trained to become Handmaids, who are concubines for the privileged but barren couples who run the country's religious fundamentalist regime. Although she resists indoctrination into the cult of the Handmaids, which mixes Old Testament orthodoxy with scripted group chanting and ritualized violence, Kate is soon assigned to the home of "the Commander" (Fred) and his cold, inflexible wife, Serena Joy. There she is named "Offred" ("of Fred").

Her role as the Fred's latest concubine is emotionless, as she lies between Serena Joy's legs while the Commander rapes her, the couple hoping that she will bear them a child. Kate continually longs for her earlier life, but nightmares of her husband's death and her daughter's disappearance haunt her. A doctor explains that many of Gilead's male leaders are as sterile as their wives. Desperately wanting a baby, Serena Joy persuades Kate to risk the punishment for fornication (death by hanging) in order to be fertilized by another man who may impregnate her and consequently spare her life. When Kate agrees to this, Serena Joy informs Kate that her daughter Jill is alive, and provides a recent photograph of her living in another commander's household, but tells Kate she can never see her daughter. Fred also tries to get closer to Kate, sensing that if she enjoyed herself more she would become a better handmaid. Exploiting Kate's background as a librarian, he gets her hard-to-obtain items and allows her into his private library. However, during a night out, Fred has sex with Kate in an unauthorized manner. The other man selected by Serena Joy turns out to be Nick, Fred's sympathetic chauffeur. Kate grows attached to Nick and eventually becomes pregnant with his child.

Kate ultimately kills Fred, and a police unit then arrives to take her away. Believing the policemen are members of the Eyes, the government's secret police, she realizes that they are soldiers from the resistance movement (Mayday), of which Nick is also a part. Kate then flees with them, parting from Nick in an emotional scene.

Now free once again and wearing non-uniform clothes, but facing an uncertain future, a pregnant Kate is living by herself in a trailer while receiving intelligence reports from the rebels. Wondering if — and hoping that — she and Nick will be reunited, she resolves, with the rebels' help, to find her daughter.

Cast

Development

Writing

Flag of the Republic of Gilead as shown in the film

According to Steven H. Gale, in his book Sharp Cut, "the final cut of The Handmaid's Tale is less a result of Pinter's script than any of his other films. He contributed only part of the screenplay: reportedly he 'abandoned writing the screenplay from exhaustion.' … Although he tried to have his name removed from the credits because he was so displeased with the movie (in 1994 he told me that this was due to the great divergences from his script that occur in the movie), … his name remains as screenwriter".[4]

Gale observes further that "while the film was being shot, director Volker Schlöndorff", who had replaced the original director Karel Reisz, "called Pinter and asked for some changes in the script"; however, "Pinter recall[ed] being very tired at the time, and he suggested that Schlöndorff contact Atwood about the rewrites. He essentially gave the director and author carte blanche to accept whatever changes that she wanted to institute, for, as he reasoned, 'I didn't think an author would want to fuck up her own work.' … As it turned out, not only did Atwood make changes, but so did many others who were involved in the shoot".[4] Gale points out that Pinter told his biographer Michael Billington that

It became … a hotchpotch. The whole thing fell between several shoots. I worked with Karel Reisz on it for about a year. There are big public scenes in the story and Karel wanted to do them with thousands of people. The film company wouldn't sanction that so he withdrew. At which point, Volker Schlöndorff came into it as director. He wanted to work with me on the script, but I said I was absolutely exhausted. I more or less said, 'Do what you like. There's the script. Why not go back to the original author if you want to fiddle about?' He did go to the original author. And then the actors came into it. I left my name on the film because there was enough there to warrant it—just about. But it's not mine'.[5][4]

In an essay on Pinter's screenplay for The French Lieutenant's Woman, in The Films of Harold Pinter, Gale discusses Pinter's "dissatisfaction with" the "kind of alteration" that occurs "once the script is tinkered with by others" and "it becomes collaborative to the point that it is not his product any more or that such tinkering for practical purposes removes some of the artistic element";[6] he adds: "Most notably The Handmaid's Tale, which he considered so much altered that he has refused to allow the script to be published, and The Remains of the Day, which he refused to allow his name to be attached to for the same reason …" (84n3).[7]

Pinter's screenplay

Christopher C. Hudgins discusses further details about why "Pinter elected not to publish three of his completed filmscripts, The Handmaid's Tale, The Remains of the Day and Lolita," all of which Hudgins considers "masterful filmscripts" of "demonstrable superiority to the shooting scripts that were eventually used to make the films"; fortunately ("We can thank our various lucky stars"), he says, "these Pinter filmscripts are now available not only in private collections but also in the Pinter Archive at the British Library." In this essay, which he first presented as a paper at the 10th Europe Theatre Prize symposium, Pinter: Passion, Poetry, Politics, held in Turin, Italy, in March 2006, Hudgins "examin[es] all three unpublished filmscripts in conjunction with one another" and "provides several interesting insights about Pinter's adaptation process".[8]

Richardson's views

In a retrospective account written after Natasha Richardson's death, for CanWest News Service, Jamie Portman cites Richardson's view of the difficulties involved with making Atwood's novel into a film script:

Richardson recognized early on the difficulties in making a film out of a book which was "so much a one-woman interior monologue" and with the challenge of playing a woman unable to convey her feelings to the world about her, but who must make them evident to the audience watching the movie. … She thought the passages of voice-over narration in the original screenplay would solve the problem, but then Pinter changed his mind and Richardson felt she had been cast adrift. … "Harold Pinter has something specific against voice-overs," she said angrily 19 years ago. "Speaking as a member of an audience, I've seen voice-over and narration work very well in films a number of times, and I think it would have been helpful had it been there for The Handmaid's Tale. After all it's HER story."

Portman concludes that "In the end director Volker Schlöndorff sided with Richardson". Portman does not acknowledge Pinter's already-quoted account that he gave both Schlöndorff and Atwood carte blanche to make whatever changes they wanted to his script because he was too "exhausted" from the experience to work further on it. In 1990, when she reportedly made her comments quoted by Portman, Richardson herself may not have known that.[9]

Filming locations

The scene where the hanging occurred was filmed in front of Duke Chapel on the campus of Duke University in Durham, North Carolina.[10] Several scenes were filmed at Saint Mary's School in Raleigh, North Carolina. ('The Staircase' was used for this film and the Patterson house as a location)

Reception

Rotten Tomatoes reports that 7 of the 23 counted critics gave the film a positive review; the average rating was 4.9/10 and an approval rating of 30%.[11] Roger Ebert gave the film two out of four stars and wrote that he was "not sure exactly what the movie is saying" and that by "the end of the movie we are conscious of large themes and deep thoughts, and of good intentions drifting out of focus."[12] Owen Gleiberman, writing for Entertainment Weekly, gave the film a "C−" grade and commented that "visually, it's quite striking", but that it is "paranoid poppycock — just like the book".[13] John Simon of the National Review called The Handmaid's Tale "inept and annoying".[14]

References

  1. ^ "The Handmaid's Tale". Box Office Mojo.
  2. ^ a b Maslin, Janet (March 7, 1990). "Review/Film; 'Handmaid's Tale,' Adapted From Atwood Novel". The New York Times.
  3. ^ "Berlinale: 1990 Programme". berlinale.de. Retrieved 2011-03-19.
  4. ^ a b c Gale, Steven H. (2003). Sharp Cut: Harold Pinter's Screenplays and the Artistic Process. Lexington, KY: The UP of Kentucky. pp. 318–319. ISBN 978-0-8131-2244-1.
  5. ^ Pinter, as quoted in Harold Pinter, 304
  6. ^ Gale, 73
  7. ^ Cf. "Harold Pinter's Lolita: 'My Sin, My Soul'", by Christopher C. Hudgins: "During our 1994 interview, Pinter told [Steven H.] Gale and me that he had learned his lesson after the revisions imposed on his script for The Handmaid's Tale, which he has decided not to publish. When his script for Remains of the Day was radically revised by the James IvoryIsmail Merchant partnership, he refused to allow his name to be listed in the credits" (Gale, Films 125).
  8. ^ Hudgins, 132
  9. ^ Referring to Pinter's screenplay for the film of John Fowles's novel The French Lieutenant's Woman, Gale observes: "Although in other films he has used a voice-over narrator, the obvious choice for retaining the Fowles touch, Pinter is on record as not being fond of the device, and he wanted to avoid it here if possible" (Sharp Cut 239); in relation to his screenplay for Lolita, "Despite the director's wanting him to use a good bit of that narrative as voice-over in the film, Pinter insist[ed] that he would never use it in a description of action … [and, Gale describes] how he put his opinion into practice" (358). Gale discusses the use of voice-over in or relating to other screenplays by Pinter, including those that he wrote for Accident, The Comfort of Strangers (in which Richardson also stars), The Go-Between, The Last Tycoon, The Remains of the Day and The Trial (198–99, 234, 327, 353–54, 341, 367), as well as the voice overs that he did write for his script of The Handmaid's Tale:

    The novel does not include the murder of the Commander, and Kate's fate is left completely unresolved—the van waits in the driveway, "and so I step up, into the darkness within; or else the light" ([Atwood, The Handmaid's Tale (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1986)] 295). The escape to Canada and the reappearance of the child and Nick are Pinter's inventions for the movie version. As shot, there is a voice-over in which Kate explains (accompanied by light symphonic music that contrasts with that of the opening scene) that she is now safe in the mountains held by the rebels. Bolstered by occasional messages from Nick, she awaits the birth of her baby while she dreams about Jill, whom she feels she is going to find eventually. (Gale, Sharp Cut 318)

  10. ^ "April 18: Minutes of the Academic Council Archived 2010-06-10 at the Wayback Machine, Academic Council Archive, Duke University, 18 Apr. 1996, Web, 9 May 2009.
  11. ^ "The Handmaid's Tale (1990)". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved 2023-05-10.
  12. ^ Ebert, Roger (1990-03-16). "The Handmaid's Tale". Retrieved 2017-09-17.
  13. ^ Gleiberman, Owen (1990-03-09). "The Handmaid's Tale". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved 2017-09-17.
  14. ^ Simon, John (2005). John Simon on Film: Criticism 1982-2001. Applause Books. p. 255.

Works cited