Jump to content

E. Adamson Hoebel: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Footnotes: add category
Clean up
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|American author and teacher (1906–1993)}}
{{political anthropology}}
{{Inline|date=July 2024}}
'''E. Adamson Hoebel''' (1906–1993) was Regents Professor Emeritus of [[anthropology]] at the [[University of Minnesota]]. Having studied under [[Franz Boas]], he held a PhD in anthropology from [[Columbia University]]. There he also attended the seminars of [[Karl N. Llewellyn]], who taught at the [[Columbia Law School]] from 1925–1951. Llewellyn (1893–1962) was the most important figure associated with the American [[Legal Realism]] of the 1920s and 1930s, which held that the law was indeterminate on the basis of statutes and precedents alone and required study of the how disputes are resolved in practice. The "sociological" wing of legal realism championed by Llewellyn held that in American law dispute resolution was strongly influenced by norms such as those in mercantile practice.<ref>[http://www.utexas.edu/law/faculty/bleiter/LllewellynEncyclopedia.pdf "Karl Nickerson Llewellyn (1893–1962)"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060516195045/http://www.utexas.edu/law/faculty/bleiter/LllewellynEncyclopedia.pdf |date=2006-05-16 }} by Brian R. Leiter, 2001, in N. Smelser & P. Baltes (eds.), ''International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences'' (New York: Elsevier Science,) {{ill|Karl Ulrich Meyer|de}}, editor, biographies section, pp. 8999–9001.</ref> Llewellyn and Hoebel (1941)<ref>Llewellyn K., and E. A. Hoebel. 1941. ''The Cheyenne Way: Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence''. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.</ref> went to on to develop a means of determining legal practice from ethnographic description of trouble cases, including mediation and negotiation as well as adjudication. Their "case study method" applied both to social systems with and without formal courts.


'''Edward Adamson Hoebel''' (1906 – 1993) was an American author and teacher. He was a Regents Professor Emeritus of [[anthropology]] at the [[University of Minnesota]].
Hoebel taught anthropology at [[New York University]] from 1929 to 1948, and subsequently at the [[University of Utah]], 1948 to 1954, where he was also dean of the University College (Arts and Sciences). He served as a [[Fulbright Program|Fulbright professor]] in anthropology at [[University of Oxford|Oxford]] and law at [[Catholic University of Leuven (1834–1968)|Catholic University of Leuven]]. He retired in 1972 as Regents' Professor of Anthropology at the University of Minnesota after teaching there for 18 years, 15 of them as head of the department. He served as president of the [[American Ethnological Society]] and the [[American Anthropological Association]].

== Career ==
Having studied under [[Franz Boas]], he held a PhD in anthropology from [[Columbia University]]. There he also attended the seminars of [[Karl N. Llewellyn]], who taught at the [[Columbia Law School]] from 1925 to 1951. Llewellyn (1893–1962) was the most important figure associated with the American [[Legal Realism]] of the 1920s and 1930s, which held that the law was indeterminate on the basis of statutes and precedents alone and required study of the how disputes are resolved in practice. The "sociological" wing of legal realism championed by Llewellyn held that in American law dispute resolution was strongly influenced by norms such as those in mercantile practice.<ref>[http://www.utexas.edu/law/faculty/bleiter/LllewellynEncyclopedia.pdf "Karl Nickerson Llewellyn (1893–1962)"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060516195045/http://www.utexas.edu/law/faculty/bleiter/LllewellynEncyclopedia.pdf |date=2006-05-16 }} by Brian R. Leiter, 2001, in N. Smelser & P. Baltes (eds.), ''International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences'' (New York: Elsevier Science,) {{ill|Karl Ulrich Meyer|de}}, editor, biographies section, pp. 8999–9001.</ref> Llewellyn and Hoebel (1941)<ref>Llewellyn K., and E. A. Hoebel. 1941. ''The Cheyenne Way: Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence''. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.</ref> went to on to develop a means of determining legal practice from ethnographic description of trouble cases, including mediation and negotiation as well as adjudication. Their "case study method" applied both to social systems with and without formal courts.

Hoebel taught anthropology at [[New York University]] from 1929 to 1948, and subsequently at the [[University of Utah]], 1948 to 1954, where he was also dean of the University College (Arts and Sciences). He served as a [[Fulbright Program|Fulbright professor]] in anthropology at [[University of Oxford|Oxford]] and law at the [[Catholic University of Leuven (1834–1968)|Catholic University of Leuven]]. He retired in 1972 as Regents' Professor of Anthropology at the University of Minnesota after teaching there for 18 years, 15 of them as head of the department. He served as president of the [[American Ethnological Society]] and the [[American Anthropological Association]].


Between 1933 and 1949, Hoebel studied the legal systems of the [[Northern Cheyenne]], [[Northern Shoshone]], [[Comanche]], and [[Pueblo people]], and the [[legal system of Pakistan]] in 1961. He was a close friend and colleague of [[Max Gluckman]], founder of the [[Manchester school (anthropology)|Manchester School]] of British [[Social Anthropology]]. Gluckman, also given to a realist orientation to the study of law, used and further developed Llewellyn that Hoebel's "case study method" of analysis of instances of social interaction to infer rules and assumptions used in trouble cases, and the influence of social norms and conflicts outside the law. The behavioral "case study" approach has continued and expanded in later anthropological works such as ''[[Network Analysis and Ethnographic Problems]]'' (2005).
Between 1933 and 1949, Hoebel studied the legal systems of the [[Northern Cheyenne]], [[Northern Shoshone]], [[Comanche]], and [[Pueblo people]], and the [[legal system of Pakistan]] in 1961. He was a close friend and colleague of [[Max Gluckman]], founder of the [[Manchester school (anthropology)|Manchester School]] of British [[Social Anthropology]]. Gluckman, also given to a realist orientation to the study of law, used and further developed Llewellyn that Hoebel's "case study method" of analysis of instances of social interaction to infer rules and assumptions used in trouble cases, and the influence of social norms and conflicts outside the law. The behavioral "case study" approach has continued and expanded in later anthropological works such as ''[[Network Analysis and Ethnographic Problems]]'' (2005).


His books include ''Anthropology: The Study of Man'' (1949), which was a widely used textbook for decades, and ''The Cheyennes: Indians of the Great Plains'' (1961).
His books include ''Anthropology: The Study of Man'' (1949), which was a widely used textbook for decades, and ''The Cheyennes: Indians of the Great Plains'' (1961). The books of which he was a co-author include ''The Cheyenne Way: Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence'' (1941; 1st author, with legal scholar Llewellyn), and ''The Comanches: Lords of the South Plains'' (1952; 2nd author with Texas historian [[Ernest Wallace]]).

The books of which he was a co-author include ''The Cheyenne Way: Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence'' (1941; 1st author, with legal scholar Llewellyn), and ''The Comanches: Lords of the South Plains'' (1952; 2nd author with Texas historian [[Ernest Wallace]]).
In 1954 Hoebel contributed his major book on legal anthropology, ''The Law of Primitive Man: A Study in Comparative Legal Dynamics,'' on broadening the legal realist tradition to include non-Western nations. In doing so, he concluded with a statement about the need for contributions from the comparative legal realism tradition if progress was to be made toward [[World government#The 1950s call for Legal Realism|world governance]]. Eclipsed by the [[Cold War]], even the legal realist concepts of what constitutes law and government have failed to make an impact on political science and the concept of the state in the contemporary period. Hoebel's working definition of what is law<ref>Hoebel 1954:28</ref> is worth citing: "A [[social norm]] is legal if its neglect or infraction is regularly met, in threat or in fact, by the application of physical force by an individual or group possessing the socially recognized privilege of so acting". Because "government without law is limited to the administration of services",<ref>Hoebel 1954:332</ref> one of the implications of the legal realist tradition is that it is not necessarily in the capital city that one must look to define the government of a modern nation but to how the law "will develop its shape in the arena of action," "hammered out as specific issues catalyze action for the trouble case at hand". Hoebel's definition, unlike that of [[neoconservative]] thought and its invocation of [[Leo Strauss#Noble lies and deadly truths|Leo Strauss]] for justification of government deception, is that to be legal, law must be based on social norms, and norms on agreements within communities, rather than the dominance of the few.


Hoebel was elected to the [[American Philosophical Society]] in 1963.<ref>{{Cite web |title=APS Member History |url=https://search.amphilsoc.org/memhist/search?creator=E.+Adamson+Hoebel&title=&subject=&subdiv=&mem=&year=&year-max=&dead=&keyword=&smode=advanced |access-date=2022-11-08 |website=search.amphilsoc.org}}</ref>
In 1954 Hoebel contributed his major book on legal anthropology, ''The Law of Primitive Man: A Study in Comparative Legal Dynamics,'' on broadening the legal realist tradition to include non-Western nations. In doing so, he concluded with a statement about the need for contributions from the comparative legal realism tradition if progress was to be made toward [[World government#The 1950s call for Legal Realism|world governance]]. Eclipsed by the [[cold war]], even the legal realist concepts of what constitutes law and government have failed to make an impact on political science and the concept of the state in the contemporary period. Hoebel's working definition of what is law<ref>Hoebel 1954:28</ref> is worth citing: "A [[social norm]] is legal if its neglect or infraction is regularly met, in threat or in fact, by the application of physical force by an individual or group possessing the socially recognized privilege of so acting." Because "government without law is limited to the administration of services",<ref>Hoebel 1954:332</ref> one of the implications of the legal realist tradition is that it is not necessarily in the capital city that one must look to define the government of a modern nation but to how the law "will develop its shape in the arena of action," "hammered out as specific issues catalyze action for the trouble case at hand." Hoebel's definition, unlike that of [[neoconservative]] thought and its invocation of [[Leo Strauss#Noble lies and deadly truths|Leo Strauss]] for justification of government deception, is that to be legal, law must be based on social norms, and norms on agreements within communities, rather than the dominance of the few.


==References==
==References==
Line 33: Line 39:
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}


==External links==
* {{Internet Archive author |sname= E. Adamson Hoebel|sopt=t}}
{{American Anthropological Association presidents|state=uncollapsed}}
{{American Anthropological Association presidents|state=uncollapsed}}


Line 38: Line 46:


{{DEFAULTSORT:Hoebel, E. Adamson}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Hoebel, E. Adamson}}
[[Category:Ethnographers]]
[[Category:American ethnographers]]
[[Category:Columbia University alumni]]
[[Category:Columbia Graduate School of Arts and Sciences alumni]]
[[Category:American anthropologists]]
[[Category:New York University faculty]]
[[Category:New York University faculty]]
[[Category:University of Minnesota faculty]]
[[Category:University of Minnesota faculty]]
Line 47: Line 54:
[[Category:1993 deaths]]
[[Category:1993 deaths]]
[[Category:Presidents of the American Anthropological Association]]
[[Category:Presidents of the American Anthropological Association]]
[[Category:20th-century anthropologists]]
[[Category:20th-century American anthropologists]]
[[Category:Members of the American Philosophical Society]]

Latest revision as of 02:47, 17 July 2024

Edward Adamson Hoebel (1906 – 1993) was an American author and teacher. He was a Regents Professor Emeritus of anthropology at the University of Minnesota.

Career

[edit]

Having studied under Franz Boas, he held a PhD in anthropology from Columbia University. There he also attended the seminars of Karl N. Llewellyn, who taught at the Columbia Law School from 1925 to 1951. Llewellyn (1893–1962) was the most important figure associated with the American Legal Realism of the 1920s and 1930s, which held that the law was indeterminate on the basis of statutes and precedents alone and required study of the how disputes are resolved in practice. The "sociological" wing of legal realism championed by Llewellyn held that in American law dispute resolution was strongly influenced by norms such as those in mercantile practice.[1] Llewellyn and Hoebel (1941)[2] went to on to develop a means of determining legal practice from ethnographic description of trouble cases, including mediation and negotiation as well as adjudication. Their "case study method" applied both to social systems with and without formal courts.

Hoebel taught anthropology at New York University from 1929 to 1948, and subsequently at the University of Utah, 1948 to 1954, where he was also dean of the University College (Arts and Sciences). He served as a Fulbright professor in anthropology at Oxford and law at the Catholic University of Leuven. He retired in 1972 as Regents' Professor of Anthropology at the University of Minnesota after teaching there for 18 years, 15 of them as head of the department. He served as president of the American Ethnological Society and the American Anthropological Association.

Between 1933 and 1949, Hoebel studied the legal systems of the Northern Cheyenne, Northern Shoshone, Comanche, and Pueblo people, and the legal system of Pakistan in 1961. He was a close friend and colleague of Max Gluckman, founder of the Manchester School of British Social Anthropology. Gluckman, also given to a realist orientation to the study of law, used and further developed Llewellyn that Hoebel's "case study method" of analysis of instances of social interaction to infer rules and assumptions used in trouble cases, and the influence of social norms and conflicts outside the law. The behavioral "case study" approach has continued and expanded in later anthropological works such as Network Analysis and Ethnographic Problems (2005).

His books include Anthropology: The Study of Man (1949), which was a widely used textbook for decades, and The Cheyennes: Indians of the Great Plains (1961). The books of which he was a co-author include The Cheyenne Way: Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence (1941; 1st author, with legal scholar Llewellyn), and The Comanches: Lords of the South Plains (1952; 2nd author with Texas historian Ernest Wallace).

In 1954 Hoebel contributed his major book on legal anthropology, The Law of Primitive Man: A Study in Comparative Legal Dynamics, on broadening the legal realist tradition to include non-Western nations. In doing so, he concluded with a statement about the need for contributions from the comparative legal realism tradition if progress was to be made toward world governance. Eclipsed by the Cold War, even the legal realist concepts of what constitutes law and government have failed to make an impact on political science and the concept of the state in the contemporary period. Hoebel's working definition of what is law[3] is worth citing: "A social norm is legal if its neglect or infraction is regularly met, in threat or in fact, by the application of physical force by an individual or group possessing the socially recognized privilege of so acting". Because "government without law is limited to the administration of services",[4] one of the implications of the legal realist tradition is that it is not necessarily in the capital city that one must look to define the government of a modern nation but to how the law "will develop its shape in the arena of action," "hammered out as specific issues catalyze action for the trouble case at hand". Hoebel's definition, unlike that of neoconservative thought and its invocation of Leo Strauss for justification of government deception, is that to be legal, law must be based on social norms, and norms on agreements within communities, rather than the dominance of the few.

Hoebel was elected to the American Philosophical Society in 1963.[5]

References

[edit]
  • Hoebel, Adamson E. (1954). The Law of Primitive Man. Harvard, Massachusetts: Atheneum.
  • Hoebel, Adamson E. (1978). The Cheyennes. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Group/Thomson Learning.
  • E. Adamson Hoebel Papers 1925–1983

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. ^ "Karl Nickerson Llewellyn (1893–1962)" Archived 2006-05-16 at the Wayback Machine by Brian R. Leiter, 2001, in N. Smelser & P. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (New York: Elsevier Science,) Karl Ulrich Meyer [de], editor, biographies section, pp. 8999–9001.
  2. ^ Llewellyn K., and E. A. Hoebel. 1941. The Cheyenne Way: Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
  3. ^ Hoebel 1954:28
  4. ^ Hoebel 1954:332
  5. ^ "APS Member History". search.amphilsoc.org. Retrieved 2022-11-08.
[edit]