Lucio Russo: Difference between revisions
JRB-Europe (talk | contribs) →Works: Russo mentions 144 BC as the endpoint of science in Alexandria. Also most of the main places mentioned in the book. |
m Add a few commas |
||
| (33 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Italian physicist, mathematician and historian of science}} |
|||
{{About||the New York State Assemblyman|Lucio Russo (politician)}} |
{{About||the New York State Assemblyman|Lucio Russo (politician)}} |
||
{{Infobox scientist |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| honorific_prefix = |
|||
| name = |
|||
| honorific_suffix = |
|||
| native_name = |
|||
| native_name_lang = |
|||
| image = File:LucioRusso-2.jpg |
|||
| image_size = 200px |
|||
| caption = Lucio Russo in 2014 |
|||
| birth_date = {{birth date and age|1944|11|22|df=y}} |
|||
| birth_place = [[Venice]] |
|||
| death_date = <!--{{death date and age|YYYY|MM|DD|1944|11|22|df=y}} --> |
|||
| death_place = |
|||
| death_cause = |
|||
| resting_place = |
|||
| resting_place_coordinates = <!--{{coord|LAT|LONG|type:landmark|display=inline,title}}--> |
|||
| other_names = |
|||
| residence = |
|||
| citizenship = |
|||
| nationality = Italian |
|||
| fields = [[Physics]] <br/> [[Mathematics]] <br/> [[History of science]] |
|||
| workplaces = [[University of Rome Tor Vergata]] |
|||
| patrons = |
|||
| education = |
|||
| alma_mater = |
|||
| thesis_title = <!--(or | thesis1_title = and | thesis2_title = )--> |
|||
| thesis_url = <!--(or | thesis1_url = and | thesis2_url = )--> |
|||
| thesis_year = <!--(or | thesis1_year = and | thesis2_year = )--> |
|||
| doctoral_advisor = <!--(or | doctoral_advisors = )--> |
|||
| academic_advisors = |
|||
| doctoral_students = |
|||
| notable_students = |
|||
| known_for = |
|||
| influences = |
|||
| influenced = |
|||
| awards = |
|||
| spouse = <!--(or | spouses = )--> |
|||
| partner = <!--(or | partners = )--> |
|||
| children = |
|||
| signature = <!--(filename only)--> |
|||
| signature_alt = |
|||
| website = <!--{{URL|www.example.com}}--> |
|||
| footnotes = |
|||
}} |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | In the history of science, he has reconstructed some contributions of the [[Hellenistic period|Hellenistic]] astronomer [[Hipparchus]], through the analysis of his surviving works, and the proof of [[heliocentrism]] attributed by [[Plutarch]] to [[Seleucus of Seleucia]] and studied the history of theories of [[tide]]s, from the Hellenistic to modern age. |
||
Among his main areas of interest are [[Gibbs measure]] of the [[Ising model]], [[percolation theory]],<ref>Geoffrey R. Grimmett, "The Work of Lucio Russo on Percolation","[[Mathematics and Mechanics of Complex Systems]]", vol. 4, N° 3–4, pp. 199–211 http://msp.org/memocs/2016/4-3/p02.xhtml</ref> and finite [[Bernoulli distribution|Bernoulli]] schemes, within which he proved an approximate version of the classical [[Kolmogorov's zero–one law]].<ref>M. Talegrand "On Russo's approximate zero-one law", "[[Annals of Probability]]", 22, (1994), 1576–1587</ref> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | In the history of science, he has reconstructed some contributions of the [[Hellenistic period|Hellenistic]] astronomer [[Hipparchus]], through the analysis of his surviving works, and the proof of [[heliocentrism]] attributed by [[Plutarch]] to [[Seleucus of Seleucia]] and studied the history of theories of [[tide]]s,<ref>Lucio Russo, ''Flussi e riflussi: indagine sull'origine di una teoria scientifica'', Milan, Feltrinelli, 2003, {{ISBN|88-07-10349-4}}.</ref> from the Hellenistic to modern age. |
||
| ⚫ | In ''L |
||
| ⚫ | |||
=== ''The Forgotten Revolution'' === |
|||
In ''The Forgotten Revolution: How Science Was Born in 300 BC and Why It Had to Be Reborn'' (Italian: ''La rivoluzione dimenticata''), Russo promotes the belief that Hellenistic science in the period 320–144 BC reached heights not achieved by [[Classical age]] science, and proposes that it went further than ordinarily thought, in multiple fields not normally associated with ancient science. |
|||
According to Russo, Hellenistic scientists were not simply forerunners, but actually achieved scientific results of high importance, in the fields of "mathematics, solid and fluid mechanics, optics, astronomy, anatomy, physiology, scientific medicine",<ref name="graffi">Graffi, Sandro, review of ''La rivoluzione dimenticata'', ''Notices Amer. Math. Soc.'', vol. 45, no. 5, May 1998.[https://www.ams.org/notices/199805/review-graffi.pdf]</ref> even psychoanalysis. They may have even discovered the [[inverse square law]] of [[gravitation]] (Russo's argument on this point hinges on well-established, but seldom discussed, evidence). Hellenistic scientists, among them [[Euclid]], [[Archimedes]], [[Eratosthenes]], developed an axiomatic and deductive way of argumentation. When this way of argumentation was dropped, the ability to understand the results were lost as well. Thus, Russo conjectures that the definitions of elementary geometric objects were introduced in Euclid's ''[[Euclid's Elements|Elements]]'' by [[Heron of Alexandria]], 400 years after the work was completed.<ref name="graffi" /> More concretely, Russo shows how the theory of tides must have been well-developed in Antiquity, because several pre-Newtonian sources relay various complementary parts of the theory without grasping their import or justification (getting the empirical facts wrong but the theory right). |
|||
Hellenistic science was focused on the city of [[Alexandria]]. The emerging scientific revolution in Alexandria was ended when [[Ptolemy VIII Physcon]] came to power. He engaged in mass purges and expulsions of all intellectuals. Other centers of Hellenistic science mentioned in Russo's book were [[Antioch]], [[Pergamon]], [[Cyzicus]], [[Rhodes]], [[Syracuse, Sicily|Syracuse]] and [[Massilia]]. |
|||
| ⚫ | He also concludes that the 17th-century scientific revolution in Europe was due in large part to the recovery of Hellenistic science.<ref>Lucio Russo, ''The Forgotten Revolution: How Science Was Born in 300 BC and Why It Had to Be Reborn'', Berlin, Springer, 2004, {{ISBN|978-3-540-20396-4}}.</ref> ''The Forgotten Revolution'' has received mixed reviews, praising Russo's enthusiasm but noting that his conclusions outreach his sources.<ref>Michael Rowan-Robinson, "[https://physicsworld.com/a/praising-alexandrians-to-excess/ Praising Alexandrians to excess]." Review of ''The Forgotten Revolution'', ''[[Physics World]]'' vol. 17, no. 4 (April 2004).</ref><ref>Gary B. Magee, Review of ''The Forgotten Revolution'', ''Economic Record,'' 80 (2004): 475–476.[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2004.00203.x/abstract]</ref><ref>Samuel S. Kutler, ''Read This!'' The Mathematical Association of America Online book review column (20 September 2004).[https://www.maa.org/press/maa-reviews/the-forgotten-revolution-how-science-was-born-in-300-bc-and-why-it-had-to-be-reborn]</ref><ref>Mott Greene, "[http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v430/n7000/full/430614a.html The birth of modern science?]" Review of ''The Forgotten Revolution'', ''Nature'' '''430''' (5 August 2004): 614.</ref> |
||
=== ''L'America dimenticata'' === |
|||
| ⚫ | In ''L'America dimenticata'', Russo suggests that the Americas [[Pre-Columbian trans-oceanic contact theories|were known to some European civilizations]] in ancient times, probably discovered by the [[Theory of Phoenician discovery of the Americas|Phoenicians]] or the [[Carthaginians]], but that the knowledge was lost under Roman expansion in the second century BC.<ref>Lucio Russo, ''L' America dimenticata. I rapporti tra le civiltà e un errore di Tolomeo. Seconda edizione con postfazione di obiezioni e risposte'', Milan, Mondadori, 2013, {{ISBN|978-88-6184-320-2}} [https://www.amazon.it/LAmerica-dimenticata-rapporti-civilt%C3%A0-Tolomeo/dp/8861843085]</ref> |
||
Russo notes paintings dating to the [[Rome|Roman]] period and representing American fruits (''[[Ananas]]''), and small [[Mesoamerican]] toys representing wheeled trucks, when the wheel had not been invented nor used in pre-Columbian times. |
|||
With the collapse of the Hellenistic world under the attacks of the Romans around the middle of the 2nd century BC (specifically, the destruction of [[Corinth]] and [[Carthage]] in 146 BC and the expulsion of the scientific elite from [[Alexandria]] in 145 BC), these geographic notions were lost. Later [[Ptolemy]] incorrectly identified the Blessed Islands with the [[Canary Islands|Canaries]] and since it was known that the Blessed Islands were at the antipodes relative to the eastern part of China, Ptolemy made ends meet by erroneously enlarging the longitude of all known places, and shrinking the width of a degree of longitude (500 instead of 700 stadia). |
|||
With this correction, Lucio Russo manages{{citation needed|date=April 2021}} to pinpoint the position of the mythical [[Thule]], reached in the 4th century BC by explorer [[Pytheas]], on the coast of [[Greenland]]. In addition, he sheds a new light on an obscure sentence of [[Pliny the elder|Pliny]] according to which Hipparchus would have enlarged the [[ecumene]] (the known world) by 26,000 [[Stadion (unit)|stadia]].<ref>Plinio, Naturalis Historia, II, 247</ref> |
|||
== See also == |
== See also == |
||
| Line 17: | Line 80: | ||
{{reflist}} |
{{reflist}} |
||
| ⚫ | |||
* ''Flussi e riflussi: indagine sull'origine di una teoria scientifica'' (2003) |
|||
== External links == |
== External links == |
||
| Line 25: | Line 85: | ||
{{wikiquote}} |
{{wikiquote}} |
||
| ⚫ | |||
{{Authority control}} |
{{Authority control}} |
||
| Line 30: | Line 91: | ||
[[Category:1944 births]] |
[[Category:1944 births]] |
||
[[Category:Living people]] |
[[Category:Living people]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Scientists from Venice]] |
||
[[Category:Italian historians]] |
[[Category:20th-century Italian historians]] |
||
[[Category:Italian physicists]] |
[[Category:20th-century Italian physicists]] |
||
[[Category:20th-century Italian mathematicians]] |
[[Category:20th-century Italian mathematicians]] |
||
[[Category:21st-century Italian mathematicians]] |
[[Category:21st-century Italian mathematicians]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Italian historians of science]] |
||
[[Category:University of Rome Tor Vergata |
[[Category:Academic staff of the University of Rome Tor Vergata]] |
||
Latest revision as of 17:26, 17 June 2024
Lucio Russo | |
|---|---|
 Lucio Russo in 2014 | |
| Born | 22 November 1944 |
| Nationality | Italian |
| Scientific career | |
| Fields | Physics Mathematics History of science |
| Institutions | University of Rome Tor Vergata |
Lucio Russo (born 22 November 1944) is an Italian physicist, mathematician and historian of science. Born in Venice, he teaches at the Mathematics Department of the University of Rome Tor Vergata.
Among his main areas of interest are Gibbs measure of the Ising model, percolation theory,[1] and finite Bernoulli schemes, within which he proved an approximate version of the classical Kolmogorov's zero–one law.[2]
In the history of science, he has reconstructed some contributions of the Hellenistic astronomer Hipparchus, through the analysis of his surviving works, and the proof of heliocentrism attributed by Plutarch to Seleucus of Seleucia and studied the history of theories of tides,[3] from the Hellenistic to modern age.
Books
[edit]The Forgotten Revolution
[edit]In The Forgotten Revolution: How Science Was Born in 300 BC and Why It Had to Be Reborn (Italian: La rivoluzione dimenticata), Russo promotes the belief that Hellenistic science in the period 320–144 BC reached heights not achieved by Classical age science, and proposes that it went further than ordinarily thought, in multiple fields not normally associated with ancient science.
According to Russo, Hellenistic scientists were not simply forerunners, but actually achieved scientific results of high importance, in the fields of "mathematics, solid and fluid mechanics, optics, astronomy, anatomy, physiology, scientific medicine",[4] even psychoanalysis. They may have even discovered the inverse square law of gravitation (Russo's argument on this point hinges on well-established, but seldom discussed, evidence). Hellenistic scientists, among them Euclid, Archimedes, Eratosthenes, developed an axiomatic and deductive way of argumentation. When this way of argumentation was dropped, the ability to understand the results were lost as well. Thus, Russo conjectures that the definitions of elementary geometric objects were introduced in Euclid's Elements by Heron of Alexandria, 400 years after the work was completed.[4] More concretely, Russo shows how the theory of tides must have been well-developed in Antiquity, because several pre-Newtonian sources relay various complementary parts of the theory without grasping their import or justification (getting the empirical facts wrong but the theory right).
Hellenistic science was focused on the city of Alexandria. The emerging scientific revolution in Alexandria was ended when Ptolemy VIII Physcon came to power. He engaged in mass purges and expulsions of all intellectuals. Other centers of Hellenistic science mentioned in Russo's book were Antioch, Pergamon, Cyzicus, Rhodes, Syracuse and Massilia.
He also concludes that the 17th-century scientific revolution in Europe was due in large part to the recovery of Hellenistic science.[5] The Forgotten Revolution has received mixed reviews, praising Russo's enthusiasm but noting that his conclusions outreach his sources.[6][7][8][9]
L'America dimenticata
[edit]In L'America dimenticata, Russo suggests that the Americas were known to some European civilizations in ancient times, probably discovered by the Phoenicians or the Carthaginians, but that the knowledge was lost under Roman expansion in the second century BC.[10]
Russo notes paintings dating to the Roman period and representing American fruits (Ananas), and small Mesoamerican toys representing wheeled trucks, when the wheel had not been invented nor used in pre-Columbian times.
With the collapse of the Hellenistic world under the attacks of the Romans around the middle of the 2nd century BC (specifically, the destruction of Corinth and Carthage in 146 BC and the expulsion of the scientific elite from Alexandria in 145 BC), these geographic notions were lost. Later Ptolemy incorrectly identified the Blessed Islands with the Canaries and since it was known that the Blessed Islands were at the antipodes relative to the eastern part of China, Ptolemy made ends meet by erroneously enlarging the longitude of all known places, and shrinking the width of a degree of longitude (500 instead of 700 stadia).
With this correction, Lucio Russo manages[citation needed] to pinpoint the position of the mythical Thule, reached in the 4th century BC by explorer Pytheas, on the coast of Greenland. In addition, he sheds a new light on an obscure sentence of Pliny according to which Hipparchus would have enlarged the ecumene (the known world) by 26,000 stadia.[11]
See also
[edit]- Antikythera mechanism, a Hellenistic astronomical computer, which, according to Russo, is a proof of the high level of knowledge in science and technology reached during Hellenism
References
[edit]- ^ Geoffrey R. Grimmett, "The Work of Lucio Russo on Percolation","Mathematics and Mechanics of Complex Systems", vol. 4, N° 3–4, pp. 199–211 http://msp.org/memocs/2016/4-3/p02.xhtml
- ^ M. Talegrand "On Russo's approximate zero-one law", "Annals of Probability", 22, (1994), 1576–1587
- ^ Lucio Russo, Flussi e riflussi: indagine sull'origine di una teoria scientifica, Milan, Feltrinelli, 2003, ISBN 88-07-10349-4.
- ^ a b Graffi, Sandro, review of La rivoluzione dimenticata, Notices Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 45, no. 5, May 1998.[1]
- ^ Lucio Russo, The Forgotten Revolution: How Science Was Born in 300 BC and Why It Had to Be Reborn, Berlin, Springer, 2004, ISBN 978-3-540-20396-4.
- ^ Michael Rowan-Robinson, "Praising Alexandrians to excess." Review of The Forgotten Revolution, Physics World vol. 17, no. 4 (April 2004).
- ^ Gary B. Magee, Review of The Forgotten Revolution, Economic Record, 80 (2004): 475–476.[2]
- ^ Samuel S. Kutler, Read This! The Mathematical Association of America Online book review column (20 September 2004).[3]
- ^ Mott Greene, "The birth of modern science?" Review of The Forgotten Revolution, Nature 430 (5 August 2004): 614.
- ^ Lucio Russo, L' America dimenticata. I rapporti tra le civiltà e un errore di Tolomeo. Seconda edizione con postfazione di obiezioni e risposte, Milan, Mondadori, 2013, ISBN 978-88-6184-320-2 [4]
- ^ Plinio, Naturalis Historia, II, 247
External links
[edit]
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Academics | |
| People | |
| Other | |
