Jump to content

Peter Coffey: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m →‎Life: task, replaced: Irish ecclesiastical Record → Irish Ecclesiastical Record
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
{{Infobox philosopher
{{Infobox philosopher
| name = Peter Coffey
| name = Peter Coffey
| image = Peter Coffey (1876–1943).png
| birth_date = {{birth date|df=y|1876|4|9}}
| birth_date = {{birth date|df=y|1876|4|9}}
| birth_place = Rathrone, Ireland
| birth_place = Rathrone,<ref name="BrownCollinson2012">{{cite book|author1=Stuart Brown|author2=Diane Collinson|author3=Robert Wilkinson|title=Biographical Dictionary of Twentieth-Century Philosophers|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UZQqBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA150|date=10 September 2012|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-134-92796-8|page=150}}</ref> [[Enfield, County Meath|Enfield]], Ireland
| death_date = {{death date and age|df=y|1943|1|7|1876|4|9}}
| death_date = {{death date and age|df=y|1943|1|7|1876|4|9}}
| death_place = [[Maynooth]], Ireland
| death_place = [[Maynooth]], Ireland
| education = [[Maynooth College]]<br />[[Catholic University of Leuven (1834–1968)|University of Louvain]]<br />[[University of Strasbourg]]
| religion = [[Roman Catholicism]]
| education = [[Maynooth College]], [[Catholic University of Leuven (1834–1968)|University of Louvain]]
| school_tradition = [[Neo-Scholasticism|Neoscholasticism]]
| school_tradition = [[Neo-Scholasticism|Neoscholasticism]]
| institutions = [[Maynooth College]]
| institutions = [[Maynooth College]]
}}
}}
'''Peter Coffey''' (9 April 1876 – 7 January 1943) was an Irish Roman Catholic priest and [[Neo-Scholasticism|neo-scholastic]] philosopher.
'''Peter Coffey''' PhD(Louvain) (9 April 1876, Rathrone, Enfield, Ireland – 7 January 1943, Maynooth, Ireland)<ref name="BrownCollinson2012">{{cite book|author1=Stuart Brown|author2=Diane Collinson|author3=Robert Wilkinson|title=Biographical Dictionary of Twentieth-Century Philosophers|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UZQqBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA150|date=10 September 2012|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-134-92796-8|page=150}}</ref> was an Irish Roman Catholic priest and [[Neo-Scholasticism|Neoscholastic]] philosopher. He studied for his doctorate at the [[Catholic University of Leuven (1834–1968)|University of Louvain]].<ref name="Kerr2008">{{cite book|author=Fergus Kerr|title=Work on Oneself: Wittgenstein's Philosophical Psychology|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GVY4UjVfWVQC&pg=PA49|year=2008|publisher=CUA Press|isbn=978-0-9773103-1-9|pages=48–49}}</ref> He was Professor of Logic and Metaphysics at [[Maynooth College]] from 1902 until his death. In his time, Coffey was considered one of the foremost Catholic intellectuals in Ireland.<ref name="Taylor2005">{{cite book|author=G. R. S. Taylor|title=The Guild State: Its Principles and Possibilities|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nXclCQAAQBAJ&pg=PT7|date=1 October 2005|publisher=IHS Press|isbn=978-1-60570-017-5|page=7|quote=Fr. Peter Coffey, onetime Professor at Maynooth in Ireland, and one of the country's "most eminent Catholic intellectuals"...}}</ref> He authored a number of books, including manuals of Thomistic philosophy:

==Life==
Coffey was educated at the Meath Diocesan Seminary in Navan, and [[Maynooth College|St Patrick's College, Maynooth (Maynooth College)]]. He studied for his doctorate at the [[Catholic University of Leuven (1834–1968)|University of Louvain]],<ref name="Kerr2008">{{cite book|author=Fergus Kerr|title=Work on Oneself: Wittgenstein's Philosophical Psychology|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GVY4UjVfWVQC&pg=PA49|year=2008|publisher=CUA Press|isbn=978-0-9773103-1-9|pages=48–49}}</ref> and attended the [[University of Strasbourg]]. He was ordained in 1900.

He was Professor of Logic and Metaphysics at Maynooth College from 1902 until his death. In his time, Coffey was considered one of the foremost Catholic intellectuals in Ireland.<ref name="Taylor2005">{{cite book|author=G. R. S. Taylor|title=The Guild State: Its Principles and Possibilities|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nXclCQAAQBAJ&pg=PT7|date=1 October 2005|publisher=IHS Press|isbn=978-1-60570-017-5|page=7|quote=Fr. Peter Coffey, onetime Professor at Maynooth in Ireland, and one of the country's "most eminent Catholic intellectuals"...}}</ref> He authored a number of books, including manuals of [[Thomistic philosophy]]:
*''The Inductive Sciences, an Inquiry into some of their Methods and Postulates'' (Dublin, 1910)
*''The Inductive Sciences, an Inquiry into some of their Methods and Postulates'' (Dublin, 1910)
*''The Science of Logic'', 2 vols. (London, 1912)
*''The Science of Logic'', 2 vols. (London, 1912)
*''Ontology: The Theory of Being'' (1912)
*''Ontology: The Theory of Being'' (1912)
*''Epistemology'', 2 vols. (London, 1917)
*''Epistemology'', 2 vols. (London, 1917)
His manuals were widely used in the education of Roman Catholic priests and theologians in the English-speaking world,<ref name="Metz2014">{{cite book|author=Rudolf Metz|title=A Hundred Years of British Philosophy|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=erS3AwAAQBAJ&pg=PA819|date=3 June 2014|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-317-85322-0|page=819|orig-year=1938|quote=The most prolific neo-scholastic writer to-day is Peter Coffey, Professor of Logic and Metaphysics in Maynooth College, Ireland (''b''. 1876). We owe to him a system of philosophy based on a Thomistic foundation, broadly planned and fully worked out, which is much used for instruction in Roman Catholic theological seminaries, but has hardly aroused any notice outside their walls...}}</ref> up until roughly the 1960s, but have since been largely ignored.
His manuals were widely used in the education of Roman Catholic priests and theologians in the English-speaking world,<ref name="Metz2014">{{cite book|author=Rudolf Metz|title=A Hundred Years of British Philosophy|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=erS3AwAAQBAJ&pg=PA819|date=3 June 2014|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-317-85322-0|page=819|orig-year=1938|quote=The most prolific neo-scholastic writer to-day is Peter Coffey, Professor of Logic and Metaphysics in Maynooth College, Ireland (''b''. 1876). We owe to him a system of philosophy based on a Thomistic foundation, broadly planned and fully worked out, which is much used for instruction in Roman Catholic theological seminaries, but has hardly aroused any notice outside their walls...}}</ref> up until roughly the 1960s, but have since been largely ignored. He was a contributor of articles on philosophical subjects to the ''Irish Ecclesiastical Record'', and to the ''Catholic Encyclopedia''.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=oZQuAAAAYAAJ&q=W.H.+Grattan+Flood&pg=PA10 "Coffey, Reverend Peter", ''The Catholic Encyclopedia and Its Makers'', New York, the Encyclopedia Press, 1917, p. 32]{{PD-notice}}</ref>


The only book review that [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] ever published, in 1913, was a scathing review of Coffey's ''The Science of Logic''.<ref name="Kerr2008" /><ref name="Descombes2014">{{cite book|author=Vincent Descombes|title=The Institutions of Meaning|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ScruAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA146|date=11 March 2014|publisher=Harvard University Press|isbn=978-0-674-41997-1|page=146}}</ref><ref name="Wittgenstein1913">{{cite journal |title=Review: P. Coffey, The Science of Logic |journal=The Cambridge Review |date=6 March 1913 |last=Wittgenstein |first=Ludwig |authorlink=Ludwig Wittgenstein |volume=34 |issue=853 |page=351 |url=http://fair-use.org/the-cambridge-review/1913/03/06/reviews/the-science-of-logic |accessdate=18 June 2016 }}</ref> By contrast, in 1917, his ''Epistemology'' was favourably reviewed by [[T. S. Eliot]].<ref name="Spurr2010">{{cite book|author=Barry Spurr|title=Anglo-Catholic in Religion: T.S. Eliot and Christianity|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cKEABAAAQBAJ&pg=PA19|date=30 April 2010|publisher=Lutterworth Press|isbn=978-0-7188-4024-2|page=19|quote=By 1917, reviewing Peter Coffey's Thomistic work, ''Epistemology'', Eliot was writing that the Catholic Church was 'the only Church which can even pretend to maintain a philosophy of its own'.}}</ref><ref name="Wilson2010">{{cite journal |title=Style and substance: T. S. Eliot, Jacques Maritain, and Neo-Thomism |journal=Religion & Literature |year=2010 |last=Wilson |first=James Matthew |volume=42 |issue=3 |pages=43–73 |jstor=23049387 }}</ref><ref name="Eliot1917">{{cite journal |title=A Contemporary Thomist |journal=[[New Statesman]] |date=29 December 1917 |last=Eliot |first=T. S. |authorlink=T. S. Eliot |pages=312–313|url=https://muse.jhu.edu/chapter/1211149}}</ref>
The only book review that [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] ever published, in 1913, was a scathing review of Coffey's ''The Science of Logic''.<ref name="Kerr2008" /><ref name="Descombes2014">{{cite book|author=Vincent Descombes|title=The Institutions of Meaning|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ScruAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA146|date=11 March 2014|publisher=Harvard University Press|isbn=978-0-674-41997-1|page=146}}</ref><ref name="Wittgenstein1913">{{cite journal |title=Review: P. Coffey, The Science of Logic |journal=The Cambridge Review |date=6 March 1913 |last=Wittgenstein |first=Ludwig |authorlink=Ludwig Wittgenstein |volume=34 |issue=853 |page=351 |url=http://fair-use.org/the-cambridge-review/1913/03/06/reviews/the-science-of-logic |accessdate=18 June 2016 |archive-date=30 April 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060430185008/http://fair-use.org/the-cambridge-review/1913/03/06/reviews/the-science-of-logic |url-status=dead }}</ref> By contrast, in 1917, his ''Epistemology'' was favourably reviewed by [[T. S. Eliot]].<ref name="Spurr2010">{{cite book|author=Barry Spurr|title=Anglo-Catholic in Religion: T.S. Eliot and Christianity|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cKEABAAAQBAJ&pg=PA19|date=30 April 2010|publisher=Lutterworth Press|isbn=978-0-7188-4024-2|page=19|quote=By 1917, reviewing Peter Coffey's Thomistic work, ''Epistemology'', Eliot was writing that the Catholic Church was 'the only Church which can even pretend to maintain a philosophy of its own'.}}</ref><ref name="Wilson2010">{{cite journal |title=Style and substance: T. S. Eliot, Jacques Maritain, and Neo-Thomism |journal=Religion & Literature |year=2010 |last=Wilson |first=James Matthew |volume=42 |issue=3 |pages=43–73 |jstor=23049387 }}</ref><ref name="Eliot1917">{{cite journal |title=A Contemporary Thomist |journal=[[New Statesman]] |date=29 December 1917 |last=Eliot |first=T. S. |authorlink=T. S. Eliot |pages=312–313|url=https://muse.jhu.edu/chapter/1211149}}</ref>


In his 1903 article ''The Hexahemeron and Science'', Coffey sought to find a middle ground in conflict between natural sciences and the Catholic Church, seeing fault on both sides.<ref name="Privilege2014">{{cite book|author=John Privilege|title=Michael Logue and the Catholic Church in Ireland, 1879–1925|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=q9TJCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA64|date=12 February 2014|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-7190-9132-2|page=64}}</ref>
In his 1903 article ''The Hexahemeron and Science'', Coffey sought to find a middle ground in conflict between natural sciences and the Catholic Church, seeing fault on both sides.<ref name="Privilege2014">{{cite book|author=John Privilege|title=Michael Logue and the Catholic Church in Ireland, 1879–1925|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=q9TJCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA64|date=12 February 2014|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-7190-9132-2|page=64}}</ref>


Coffey advocated for a positive view of [[trade unionism]].<ref name="MacMahon1981">{{cite journal |title=The Catholic Clergy and the Social Question in Ireland, 1891-1916 |journal=Studies: an Irish Quarterly Review |year=1981 |last=MacMahon |first=Joseph A. |volume=70 |issue=280 |pages=263–288 |jstor=30090376 |quote=Father Peter Coffey of Maynooth dealt positively with the powerful influence of trade unionism in bettering the conditions of the workers and in promoting harmony and prosperity among all classes. }}</ref> Some of Coffey's ideas on labour issues, however, incurred the displeasure of his superiors at Maynooth.<ref name="Harris1996">{{cite journal |title=Priestly powerhouse|journal=[[The Tablet]] |date=16 March 1996 |last=Harris |first=Mary |pages=372–373 |url=http://archive.thetablet.co.uk/article/16th-march-1996/20/priestly-powerhouse |accessdate=18 June 2016 |quote=Radical ideas were not welcomed. Peter Coffey, appointed to the chair of philosophy in 1902, was refused permission to publish The Financing of Industry and the Labour Question. }}</ref>
Coffey advocated for a positive view of [[trade unionism]].<ref name="MacMahon1981">{{cite journal |title=The Catholic Clergy and the Social Question in Ireland, 1891–1916 |journal=Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review |year=1981 |last=MacMahon |first=Joseph A. |volume=70 |issue=280 |pages=263–288 |jstor=30090376 |quote=Father Peter Coffey of Maynooth dealt positively with the powerful influence of trade unionism in bettering the conditions of the workers and in promoting harmony and prosperity among all classes. }}</ref> Some of Coffey's ideas on labour issues, however, incurred the displeasure of his superiors at Maynooth.<ref name="Harris1996">{{cite journal|last=Harris|first=Mary|date=16 March 1996|title=Priestly powerhouse|url=http://archive.thetablet.co.uk/article/16th-march-1996/20/priestly-powerhouse|url-status=dead|journal=[[The Tablet]]|pages=372–373|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160814040413/http://archive.thetablet.co.uk/article/16th-march-1996/20/priestly-powerhouse|archive-date=14 August 2016|quote=Radical ideas were not welcomed. Peter Coffey, appointed to the chair of philosophy in 1902, was refused permission to publish The Financing of Industry and the Labour Question.|accessdate=18 June 2016}}</ref>


==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{Reflist}}

==External links==


{{wikisource author}}
{{wikisource author}}

* {{Gutenberg author|id=37857}}
* {{Librivox author |id=15433}}
{{Authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Coffey, Peter}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Coffey, Peter}}
[[Category:1876 births]]
[[Category:1876 births]]
[[Category:1943 deaths]]
[[Category:1943 deaths]]
[[Category:20th-century Roman Catholic priests]]
[[Category:20th-century Irish Roman Catholic priests]]
[[Category:Irish Roman Catholic priests]]
[[Category:Thomists]]
[[Category:Thomist philosophers]]
[[Category:Irish philosophers]]
[[Category:Irish philosophers]]
[[Category:Irish scholars and academics]]
[[Category:Academics of St Patrick's College, Maynooth]]
[[Category:Alumni of St Patrick's College, Maynooth]]
[[Category:Alumni of St Patrick's College, Maynooth]]
[[Category:19th-century Irish philosophers]]
[[Category:19th-century Irish writers]]
[[Category:20th-century Irish philosophers]]
[[Category:20th-century Irish philosophers]]
[[Category:20th-century Irish writers]]
[[Category:20th-century Irish writers]]
[[Category:Contributors to the Catholic Encyclopedia]]

[[Category:University of Strasbourg alumni]]
{{Philosopher-stub}}
[[Category:Burials at Maynooth College Cemetery]]
[[Category:People from Enfield, County Meath]]
[[Category:Christian clergy from County Meath]]

Latest revision as of 15:19, 16 June 2024

Peter Coffey
Born(1876-04-09)9 April 1876
Rathrone,[1] Enfield, Ireland
Died7 January 1943(1943-01-07) (aged 66)
Maynooth, Ireland
EducationMaynooth College
University of Louvain
University of Strasbourg
SchoolNeoscholasticism
InstitutionsMaynooth College

Peter Coffey (9 April 1876 – 7 January 1943) was an Irish Roman Catholic priest and neo-scholastic philosopher.

Life

[edit]

Coffey was educated at the Meath Diocesan Seminary in Navan, and St Patrick's College, Maynooth (Maynooth College). He studied for his doctorate at the University of Louvain,[2] and attended the University of Strasbourg. He was ordained in 1900.

He was Professor of Logic and Metaphysics at Maynooth College from 1902 until his death. In his time, Coffey was considered one of the foremost Catholic intellectuals in Ireland.[3] He authored a number of books, including manuals of Thomistic philosophy:

  • The Inductive Sciences, an Inquiry into some of their Methods and Postulates (Dublin, 1910)
  • The Science of Logic, 2 vols. (London, 1912)
  • Ontology: The Theory of Being (1912)
  • Epistemology, 2 vols. (London, 1917)

His manuals were widely used in the education of Roman Catholic priests and theologians in the English-speaking world,[4] up until roughly the 1960s, but have since been largely ignored. He was a contributor of articles on philosophical subjects to the Irish Ecclesiastical Record, and to the Catholic Encyclopedia.[5]

The only book review that Ludwig Wittgenstein ever published, in 1913, was a scathing review of Coffey's The Science of Logic.[2][6][7] By contrast, in 1917, his Epistemology was favourably reviewed by T. S. Eliot.[8][9][10]

In his 1903 article The Hexahemeron and Science, Coffey sought to find a middle ground in conflict between natural sciences and the Catholic Church, seeing fault on both sides.[11]

Coffey advocated for a positive view of trade unionism.[12] Some of Coffey's ideas on labour issues, however, incurred the displeasure of his superiors at Maynooth.[13]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Stuart Brown; Diane Collinson; Robert Wilkinson (10 September 2012). Biographical Dictionary of Twentieth-Century Philosophers. Routledge. p. 150. ISBN 978-1-134-92796-8.
  2. ^ a b Fergus Kerr (2008). Work on Oneself: Wittgenstein's Philosophical Psychology. CUA Press. pp. 48–49. ISBN 978-0-9773103-1-9.
  3. ^ G. R. S. Taylor (1 October 2005). The Guild State: Its Principles and Possibilities. IHS Press. p. 7. ISBN 978-1-60570-017-5. Fr. Peter Coffey, onetime Professor at Maynooth in Ireland, and one of the country's "most eminent Catholic intellectuals"...
  4. ^ Rudolf Metz (3 June 2014) [1938]. A Hundred Years of British Philosophy. Routledge. p. 819. ISBN 978-1-317-85322-0. The most prolific neo-scholastic writer to-day is Peter Coffey, Professor of Logic and Metaphysics in Maynooth College, Ireland (b. 1876). We owe to him a system of philosophy based on a Thomistic foundation, broadly planned and fully worked out, which is much used for instruction in Roman Catholic theological seminaries, but has hardly aroused any notice outside their walls...
  5. ^ "Coffey, Reverend Peter", The Catholic Encyclopedia and Its Makers, New York, the Encyclopedia Press, 1917, p. 32Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  6. ^ Vincent Descombes (11 March 2014). The Institutions of Meaning. Harvard University Press. p. 146. ISBN 978-0-674-41997-1.
  7. ^ Wittgenstein, Ludwig (6 March 1913). "Review: P. Coffey, The Science of Logic". The Cambridge Review. 34 (853): 351. Archived from the original on 30 April 2006. Retrieved 18 June 2016.
  8. ^ Barry Spurr (30 April 2010). Anglo-Catholic in Religion: T.S. Eliot and Christianity. Lutterworth Press. p. 19. ISBN 978-0-7188-4024-2. By 1917, reviewing Peter Coffey's Thomistic work, Epistemology, Eliot was writing that the Catholic Church was 'the only Church which can even pretend to maintain a philosophy of its own'.
  9. ^ Wilson, James Matthew (2010). "Style and substance: T. S. Eliot, Jacques Maritain, and Neo-Thomism". Religion & Literature. 42 (3): 43–73. JSTOR 23049387.
  10. ^ Eliot, T. S. (29 December 1917). "A Contemporary Thomist". New Statesman: 312–313.
  11. ^ John Privilege (12 February 2014). Michael Logue and the Catholic Church in Ireland, 1879–1925. Oxford University Press. p. 64. ISBN 978-0-7190-9132-2.
  12. ^ MacMahon, Joseph A. (1981). "The Catholic Clergy and the Social Question in Ireland, 1891–1916". Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review. 70 (280): 263–288. JSTOR 30090376. Father Peter Coffey of Maynooth dealt positively with the powerful influence of trade unionism in bettering the conditions of the workers and in promoting harmony and prosperity among all classes.
  13. ^ Harris, Mary (16 March 1996). "Priestly powerhouse". The Tablet: 372–373. Archived from the original on 14 August 2016. Retrieved 18 June 2016. Radical ideas were not welcomed. Peter Coffey, appointed to the chair of philosophy in 1902, was refused permission to publish The Financing of Industry and the Labour Question.
[edit]